Who Needs Joe Biden or the Vetting Process of Primaries? Just Razzle Dazzle 'Em the Chicago Way!
Give 'em the old razzle dazzle
Razzle Dazzle 'em
Give 'em an act with lots of flash in it
And the reaction will be passionate
Give 'em the old hocus pocus
Bead and feather 'em
How can they see with sequins in their eyes?
What if your hinges all are rusting?
What if, in fact, you're just disgusting?
Razzle dazzle 'em
And they;ll never catch wise!
Give 'em the old Razzle Dazzle
Razzle dazzle 'em
Give 'em a show that's so splendiferous
Row after row will crow vociferous
Give 'em the old flim flam flummox
Fool and fracture 'em
How can they hear the truth above the roar?
Throw 'em a fake and a finagle
They'll never know you're just a bagel,
Razzle dazzle 'em
And they'll beg you for more!
Give 'em the old double whammy
Daze and dizzy 'em
Back since the days of old Methuselah
Everyone loves the big bambooz-a-ler
Give 'em the old three ring circus
Stun and stagger 'em
When you're in trouble, go into your dance
Though you are stiffer than a girder
They'll let you get away with murder
Razzle dazzle 'em
And you've got a romance
Give 'em the old
Razzle Dazzle
Give 'em the old Razzle Dazzle
Razzle dazzle 'em
Show 'em the first rate sorceror you are
Long as you keep 'em way off balance
How can they spot you've got no talents
Razzle Dazzle 'em
Razzle Dazzle 'em
Razzle Dazzle 'em
And they'll make you a STAR!
from Rob Marshall's "Chicago" (Razzle Dazzle)
BTW- Can anyone spot the single Republican performer at the rehearsal of events for the coronation of the presidential nominee @ the 2024 Democratic Convention in Chicago (above)? And no, it's not Der Lieder, China Joe. [Hint - it comes @ (0:32)]
You're ALL IN on being wrong, huh?
ReplyDeleteNo, Michelle Obama is not going to replace Joe Biden as a presidential candidate ... [this] is something Republicans should stop immediately. It’s baseless and not grounded in any reality. Advancing such tomfoolery does nothing but make Republicans look mentally irregular. It would be one thing if anyone had any proof, but none exists. As such, anyone spreading this idea that Michelle Obama is running for office, let alone president of the United States, makes the GOP look like a bunch of dysfunctional, tinfoil hat-wearing lunatics. link
ReplyDelete"Political Tea Leaves" to be renamed "Tinfoil Hat Brigade HQ"? All the signs say YES.
President Michelle Obama's campaign day is Adolf Hitler's resurrection day. That's never the case. Nikki Haley Hitler! Nikki Haley Hitler!
ReplyDeleteTotalitarian Thunder and Thrill.
ReplyDeleteYawn.
How I'd know? I observe Totalitarian liliPut, for too long...
And well.
"Bread and entertainment"... is old as this World.
\\It’s baseless and not grounded in any reality.
ReplyDeleteOi! "Insurrection" is not grounded in any reality (apart from dear need of DEMNs to win).
Mystere: President Michelle Obama's campaign day is Adolf Hitler's resurrection day. That's never the case. Nikki Haley Hitler! Nikki Haley Hitler!
ReplyDeleteMystere is babbling about his idol Hitler again.
🔺🔺Oh look!🔺🔺
DeleteDervish blames Mystere, then reposts the message again.😆😆😆😆😆
Nikki Haley Hitler? Dervish babbles about his idol Hitler twice and accuses Mystere? That's a typical lefttard bait and switch trick.
Qtard: Oi! "Insurrection" is not grounded in any reality (apart from dear need of DEMNs to win).
ReplyDeleteApart from the fact that it happened. I've seen the videos. It only didn't happen in the minds of imbecilic reality deniers.
So how many Insurrection charges were filed in Court, Dervy?
ReplyDeleteOh, that's right. 0.
He saw the edited and redacted committee video... Dervy likely watches Big Brother and see's "true love" on "The Bachelor", too.
ReplyDeleteI love Hollywood Productions... they're all just soooo REAL!
ReplyDelete\\Apart from the fact that it happened. I've seen the videos.
ReplyDeleteOf people going by the streets and visiting public places??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\He saw the edited and redacted committee video... Dervy likely watches Big Brother and see's "true
ReplyDeleteNaaaah.
He just propaganda puppet/parrot and just cannot help it -- need to repeat propaganda narrative.
Cause... cretin. ;-P
I wonder if Dervy saw the video's of uniformed Capitol Police officers giving the Qanon Shaiman a private tour of the Capitol, too, escorting him around and unlocking all the doors for him.
ReplyDeleteQtard: Of people going by the streets and visiting public places???
ReplyDeleteThat is proven false narrative. People aren't arrested and convicted for the non crime of going by the streets and visiting public places.
But the imbecile Qtard likely considers this a fact it has the guts and brains to "know".
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
FYI, I am not a reality TV fan. Though the imbecile will likely consider that a "NewSpeak admission" that I am a fan. Maybe I watched the Orange Turd Show (aka The Apprentice) when it originally aired.
Minus: I wonder if Dervy saw the video's...
CLAIM: Footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol shows that Jacob Chansley, who participated in the riot sporting face paint, no shirt and a fur hat with horns, was “led through the Capitol by police the entire time he was in the building.”
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Court documents and video footage from the attack on the Capitol make clear that Chansley, who is widely known as the “QAnon Shaman” and is one of the most recognizable Jan. 6 rioters, entered the Capitol without permission, was repeatedly asked to leave the building and was not accompanied at all times. link
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Of people going by the streets and visiting public places???
\\ That is proven false narrative.
Proven???
By who?
Where?
With WHICH facts/logic???
Naaaah. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
There's no facts/logic. And scream "it proven" it's just the same -- rechanting of propaganda by cretin.
Because cretin that "truth" it's propaganda repeated against obvious facts thousands/millions/billions times. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Because.
Cretin in its cretinism
Naturally UNABLE to grok it -- that "proven" means -- facts provided and logic demonstrated... that "beyond reasonable doubts" reveal it's ACCORDANCE with Reality.
That, and only that... can be called "proven". (well, even that can be found false... as humanum errare est)
\\But the imbecile Qtard likely considers this a fact it has the guts and brains to "know".
Your alter-ego "Qtard"?
Yeah, quite could be. ;-P
\\entered the Capitol without permission,
Ha-ha... they CHANGED it.
So now DEMNs will be 1984-style claim that "it was prohibited" to enter PUBLIC, for the WE THE PEOPLE... building.
That's how Democracy in USA melting... and becoming DEMN-OK-ratsy.
\\was repeatedly asked to leave the building and was not accompanied at all times. link
Why anyone should submit to unlawful demand?
Oh, yeah, DEMN-OK-ratsy. ;-P
Qtard: Proven???
ReplyDeleteYes. Why there have been convictions.
Qtard: By who?
Lawyers.
Qtard: Where?
In court.
Qtard: With WHICH facts/logic???
Application of relevant laws.
Qtard: Why anyone should submit to unlawful demand?
Because it was a lawful demand. Proven by him being arrested, charged and convinced.
Jacob Chansley, who received one of the longest sentences handed down to a U.S. Capitol rioter ... Chansley, 35, was convicted of obstruction of an official proceeding in Nov. 2021 and sentenced to 41 months in prison. link
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Proven???
\\ Yes. Why there have been convictions.
For going by streets??? And ALL of that people??? :-)))))))))))))))))))0
Then I must change my assessment -- USA ALREADY are totalitarian country.
Not a zilch of democracy rule.
But... surely that is what totalitarian cretin wanted to achieve, isn't it, cretin?
\\Qtard: With WHICH facts/logic???
\\Application of relevant laws.
Laws that EXPLICITLY PROHIBIT going by streets and entering public buildings???
\\Qtard: Why anyone should submit to unlawful demand?
\\Because it was a lawful demand. Proven by him being arrested, charged and convinced.
YET ONE totalitarian idea. "Everything that not allowed -- prohibited".
Yawn.
Well... let's wait for a bit... to know how many will be payed to them, for such harm and unlawful convictions.
Yawn.
Qtard: Well... let's wait for a bit... to know how many will be payed to them, for such harm and unlawful convictions.
ReplyDelete$0. There were no "unlawful convictions". The lawbreakers who were convicted were fined. They paid. Criminals are never paid by the government when they are justly convicted.
They aren't? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteMinus: They aren't? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteThere aren't any "unlawful convictions" of J6 rioters and insurrectionists. I didn't say nobody has ever been unjustly convicted. Because they have.
btw, dotard donald has mentioned PARDONS.
...the Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it"...
If you are confessing guilt how can your original conviction be called unlawful or unjust?
Maybe under the 2nd dotard donald administration the convictions will be vacated and the "unlawfully convicted hostages" will be awarded bigly monetary judgments?
Sounds like a rightturd delusion to me. Maybe Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes will end up millionaires?
Qtard: For going by streets??? And ALL of that people???
ReplyDeleteNobody was convicted for "going by streets". The opposite of "ALL of that people". Zero. None.
Though maybe the imbecile thinks fighting with police officers, vandalizing public property, accessing public property by breaking windows and bashing doors -- that's all "going by streets"?
btw, their permit (for the rally) said they had to stay put. So, no "going by streets". It was prohibited. But nobody was charged for "going by streets". Even though they were not supposed to.
\\$0. There were no "unlawful convictions". The lawbreakers who were convicted were fined. They paid. Criminals are never paid by the government when they are justly convicted.
ReplyDeleteWell. I already told it to Joe.
Just watched "The Mauritanian"(and I presume that that movie and book are BANNED by Dems, am I right, Joe?).
About some dude that was suspected being in among 9/11 perpetrators.
Being thrown into GITMO.
Tortured. Till his goody-goody prosecutors told him that they WILL DO THE SAME TORTURES with HIS MOTHER. Then, he "plead guilty"... 100% as totalitarian cretin like it, isn't it???
But then, some courageous and Human Rights Enlightened lawyer (played by Jodie Foster) took him, and pulled him out... after >>>*16*<<< YEARS of detention... for NO crime committed(just that, that he BELIEVED into "USA is a democracy").
And cherry on that American PIE... LAST 7 years he sitted... was because Zero-bama's administration placed an appeal!
And was released in 2016... BEFORE Trump win.(to not give to him that astonishing chance for publicity, aren't that true, Joe?)
Qtard: Just watched "The Mauritanian"(and I presume that that movie and book are BANNED by Dems, am I right...
ReplyDeleteNo.
Qtard: About some dude that was suspected being in among 9/11 perpetrators. Being thrown into GITMO.
By George w Bush.
Qtard: Tortured. Till his goody-goody prosecutors told him that they WILL DO THE SAME TORTURES with HIS MOTHER.
War crimes of the gwb administration.
Qtard: Then, he "plead guilty"... 100% as totalitarian cretin like it, isn't it???
Yeah, you probably love it. I think gwb and others in his administration are war criminals.
Qtard: And cherry on that American PIE... LAST 7 years he sitted... was because Zero-bama's administration placed an appeal! And was released in 2016... BEFORE Trump win.(to not give to him that astonishing chance for publicity...
Yeah, trumpturds would have cheered their orange turd leader releasing a terrorist. Like they cheered when he closed Gitmo.
No, wait... "In January 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to keep the detention camp open indefinitely".
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Just watched "The Mauritanian"(and I presume that that movie and book are BANNED by Dems, am I right...
\\ No.
Of course. Cause they made it official DEMN propaganda. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Interview With "The Last Politician" Author Franklin Foer
CNN.com - Transcripts
https://transcripts.cnn.com › ...
... film "The Mauritanian." Here's a clip from the movie where he tells his lawyer, played by Jodie Foster, that he confessed under duress.
\\By George w Bush.
And NOT released UNDER Zero-bama.
TILL THE VERY END!!!!!
Without ANY reasons.
\\War crimes of the gwb administration.
And WHO was persecuted for that crimes??? Under bama and den????
\\Yeah, you probably love it. I think gwb and others in his administration are war criminals.
That was persecuted by bama and den???
Naaaah. They just PROLONGED persecution of INNOCENT.
\\No, wait... "In January 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to keep the detention camp open indefinitely".
And Holy Bi-den closed it? ;-P
According to Qtard, rightturds get a pass for their misdeeds because Democrats didn't right their misdeeds and punish the offending rightturds.
ReplyDeleteQtard blames Dems for what Dems do, but also for what republicans do. Everything is the fault of Democrats and nothing is the fault of republicans.
And who are IN POWER??? NOW?????!!!!
ReplyDeleteWhose DUTY it is???
Some opposition... which play on a level of mere citizens -- WITHOUT POWER!!!
Some insignificant representatives??? Which have NO. Absolutely NO influence on anything and anyone who constitute ACTUAL POWER: military, law inforsers, secret services, social workers, and etc, and etc, and etc...
Well... whatever.
I deem it useless thing -- to comment babbling of totalitarian cretin any more.
Yawn.
No more babbling from cretin? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
ReplyDeleteQtard: And who are IN POWER??? NOW?????!!!! Whose DUTY it is???
ReplyDeleteHouse Republicans. But the cretin believes a fake plan for victory satisfies that duty. Because it is a cretin.
They are Government of USA????
ReplyDeleteSurely, cretin can think that they are. While same time claiming that they are traitors.
And eetc. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: They are Government of USA???? Surely, cretin can think that they are.
ReplyDeleteThen we are in agreement. If that is what you think. I'd have guessed that the cretin would have no idea that Republican members of the House are part of the government. Due to its imbecility.
Qtard: While same time claiming that they are traitors.
Because they are. You like that they are traitors. Because you a a Totalitarian Putin lover.
\\Republican members of the House are part of the government.
ReplyDeleteYeah.
Totally cretinic idea -- that opposition... is part of government. Somehow. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
And totally Totalitarian one. ;-P
But... I long as know -- that you are not just any, but totalitarian cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
\\Qtard: While same time claiming that they are traitors.
ReplyDelete\\Because they are. You like that they are traitors. Because you a a Totalitarian Putin lover.
YET ONE.
Purely Totalitarian idea.
To blame Political Opposition being "traitors".
But. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Qtard: Purely Totalitarian idea. To blame Political Opposition being "traitors".
ReplyDeleteYes. I agree.
Mystere: Derpish is going to ... eats humble pie and sees his emperor god Farting Poopy Pants JoeJoe Bidet's carcass in a casket after Bidet finds himself getting court martialed in a military tribunal for treason. link
Another Totalitarian idea? Overthrowing democracy -- that is a "human right".
Qtard: Totally cretinic idea -- that opposition... is part of government. Somehow.
ReplyDeleteSomehow? They were elected. But cretin dunno.
Qtard: And totally Totalitarian one.
It is the total opposite. But Totalitarian-loving cretin thinks one party rule -- that's the ideal. Well, it did also claim that overthrowing democracy is a "human right".
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: Purely Totalitarian idea. To blame Political Opposition being "traitors".
\\ Yes. I agree.
Yep.
And IT even agreed with it.
Obviously, why not, as it IS totalitarian. So, it's natural for totalitarian to bear with totalitarian ideals.
\\Overthrowing democracy -- that is a "human right".
Yeah.
It's called "election".
"Overthrowing" democracy each and every time. To keep it clean. Off totalitarian leeches. ;-P
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: Totally cretinic idea -- that opposition... is part of government. Somehow.
\\ Somehow? They were elected. But cretin dunno.
Yeah.
To be legitimate Opposition.
But... how totalitarian DISLIKEs it... :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\But Totalitarian-loving cretin thinks one party rule -- that's the ideal.
Yeah.
You do.
But. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Elections are not overthrowing democracy. Elections ARE democracy. J6 was an attempt to overthrow democracy. Or does the imbecile think J6 was an election? We just had one in which the majority voted for Joe Biden -- but a small number of trumpturds were unhappy with the results -- so they decided to attempt another "election" (insurrection) to keep tRump in power.
ReplyDeleteQtard: \\...Totalitarian-loving cretin thinks one party rule -- that's the ideal\\ Yeah. You do.
Wrote "you" when it meant "I". How do I know? It said so...
"Totally cretinic idea -- that opposition... is part of government. Somehow".
\\Or does the imbecile think J6 was an election?
ReplyDeleteLet your alter-ego Imbecile answer. ;-P
That could be funny.
\\We just had one in which the majority voted for Joe Biden -- but a small number of trumpturds were unhappy with the results -- so they decided to attempt another "election" (insurrection) to keep tRump in power.
That's... just how DEMN propaganda framed it -- people waling by steeets and entering public buildings.
But... was NOT ABLE to prove ANY of such claims in courts.
Which mean... that's just propaganda.
\\Qtard: \\...Totalitarian-loving cretin thinks one party rule -- that's the ideal\\ Yeah. You do.
\\Wrote "you" when it meant "I". How do I know? It said so...
\\"Totally cretinic idea -- that opposition... is part of government. Somehow".
Yeah.
Cretin.
Unable to omit EVERY chance to confirm own cretinism. ;-P
Opposition (The)
UK Parliament
https://www.parliament.uk › ...
The Opposition, formally known as HM Official Opposition, refers to the largest political party in the House of Commons that is not in government.
Opposition (politics)
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki
In politics, the opposition comprises one or more political parties or other organized groups that are opposed, primarily ideologically, to the government ...
Qtard: But... was NOT ABLE to prove ANY of such claims in courts.
ReplyDeleteWERE able. That is why the accused were convicted. If the prosecutors were not able to prove their claims the defendants would have been declared innocent.
Qtard: Which mean... that's just propaganda.
No, it means you are a clueless imbecile.
Qtard: Opposition (The)
UK Parliament
https://www.parliament.uk › ...
The Opposition, formally known as HM Official Opposition, refers to the largest political party in the House of Commons that is not in government. Opposition (politics)
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki
In politics, the opposition comprises one or more political parties or other organized groups that are opposed, primarily ideologically, to the government ...
So, someone elected to serve in government is somehow not a part of that government. IF they are members of the opposing party? Why don't all Republicans just go home then? Qtard thinks they doing jobs they don't have? For no salary? If they aren't in government they certainly should not be collecting one.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
ReplyDelete\\ Qtard: But... was NOT ABLE to prove ANY of such claims in courts.
\\ WERE able.
Well... not a problem.
Provide a link, and make a quote -- where, what judge have did it.
Put people in jail for going by a street... and entering *PUBLIC* building.
\\No, it means you are a clueless imbecile.
Yawn.
Use "you" instead of "I".
Till now it done by IT so often... that I will just assume it as delusion of cretin, and will not be commenting it.
And naaah... you are not imbecile -- to stupid for that. You are Complete Crertin.
\\So, someone elected to serve in government is somehow not a part of that government. IF they are members of the opposing party? Why don't all Republicans just go home then? Qtard thinks they doing jobs they don't have? For no salary? If they aren't in government they certainly should not be collecting one.
Yap.
Totalitarian cretin thinks that "if they payed salary"... they must pander to government. Or... get out.
Qtard: Provide a link, and make a quote -- where, what judge have did it.
ReplyDeleteBecause your delusions tell you they were all declared innocent and set free? No link or quote will convince a crazy person it is wrong. So why should I bother?
Qtard: Put people in jail for going by a street... and entering *PUBLIC* building.
By breaking doors and windows. Vandalizing the building. All ok according to Qtard? It's a public building so they can trash it if they want to? Cause millions of dollars in damages? Enter private areas in that building that are NOT open to the public?
I suppose Qtard thinks if someone goes to the Whitehouse they should be able to lie down in Joe Biden's bed? Try on his clothes? Smash Whitehouse plates and glasses? Because it is a public building?
Also, public buildings are not open 365/24/7. Entering a public building is not permitted if the building is closed. The Capitol was closed on January 6.
Days before the violent insurrection at the US Capitol, the then-US House Sergeant at Arms sent a memo to members of Congress banning tours of buildings on January 6... link
Qtard: \\No, it means you are a clueless imbecile\\ Yawn. Use "you" instead of "I".
No. I used "you" because I meant "you". Dummy don't understand.
Qtard: Till now it done by IT so often...
"So often" being never.
Qtard: Yap.Totalitarian cretin thinks that "if they payed salary"... they must pander to government. Or... get out.
Your words. I didn't write anything like that. But I do think they should do their jobs. Why run for office if you don't want to do the job?
They should be pandering to their constituents. They sent them there to do a job and work on their behalf. Not work on Putin and tRump's behalf.
Like with the border bill. Republicans and Democrats worked together on it. Democrats gave Republicans a lot of what they wanted. But now Republicans aren't going to pass it because donald tRump told them not to. To make Biden look bad.
\\Because your delusions tell you they were all declared innocent and set free? No link or quote will convince a crazy person it is wrong.
ReplyDeleteCongrats, congrats... for admitting being "crazy person" which cannot admit facts AKA cretin. ;-P
\\Qtard: Put people in jail for going by a street... and entering *PUBLIC* building.
\\By breaking doors and windows. Vandalizing the building.
Well.
Then.
It should be easy as pie -- to show fotos of that "Vandalizing the building."
But.
Cretin already ADMITTED. That it is "crazy person".
That do not need any facts... to "believe facts". :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\It's a public building so they can trash it if they want to? Cause millions of dollars in damages? Enter private areas in that building that are NOT open to the public?
Go Google it.
"BLM vandalised images" ;-P
So... it seems... answer is YES!
But... only while that helps DEMNs Propaganda.
\\Also, public buildings are not open 365/24/7. Entering a public building is not permitted if the building is closed. The Capitol was closed on January 6.
Yes.
Totalitarian discretion AKA breaching human and citizen rights... just on a whim.
Yawn.
And when only you'd grow tired CONFIRMING being Totalitarian, ahh??? :-)))))))))))))
\\No. I used "you" because I meant "you". Dummy don't understand.
Yeah.
Dummy -- cretin, dunno do not understand that its miserly NewSpeak lies -- are DEMN too transparent. For a much smarter opponent.
But... how could it know/understand it -- cretins CANNOT. And it is CRETIN. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
YET ONE confirmation (like even needed) of cretinism... of certain one cretin. :-)))))))))))))))000
\\"So often" being never.
Yeah.
NewSpeak talks of a certain cretin.
Yawn.
\\Your words. I didn't write anything like that. But I do think they should do their jobs. Why run for office if you don't want to do the job?
And their "job" is to OPPOSE to unlawful tryes to succumb more power, to skirt rules, to make injust legislation, and etc, and etc, and etc...
That's, because they ARE OPPOSITION. For.
\\Democrats gave Republicans a lot of what they wanted.
It's not about "giving", cretin. ;-P
\\To make Biden look bad.
Naaah.
That's just DEMN Dirty Tricks... being highlighted.
But.
Cretin ALREADY forgot, isn't it?
About Lend-Lease... that pompously was hailed as mean to PREVENT just that "if Reps will be opposing more money to Ukraine... POTUS will be able to send weapon even without their help".
But.
WHERE IS IT????
Where EVEN ONE bullet sent to Ukraine??? Under that Lend-lease????
Naaah.
Because it was pre-planned.
To have Perfect Excuse... to not give help to "Ukrainian nazis"...
Just for the sake of never ending Help of American DEMN puppet of liliPut... to their master.
Just like Zero-bama have had said "after elections... I will have free hands..." to help his master.
Qtard: \\No link or quote will convince a crazy person it is wrong\\ Congrats, congrats... for admitting being "crazy person" which cannot admit facts AKA cretin.
ReplyDeleteIt must be talking to itself. Given that I CLEARLY was referring to IT as a crazy person. Because IT denied any J6 rioter was convicted in court. Right above. While, in another thread, it admitted they were.
This thread... Quote: But... was NOT ABLE to prove ANY of such claims in courts. ... Provide a link, and make a quote -- where, what judge have did it. February 4, 2024 at 8:51 AM.
Another thread... Quote: By calling it "insurrection". And putting people in jail. February 6, 2024 at 2:03 AM.
People are in jail? But IT asked for a link or quote or link to PROVE that happened. Because IT was disputing it. Said that could not possibly be the case.
Then IT admits it happened.
CRAZY PERSON. Proven. Says "no, not in jail". Then says, "yes, they are in jail".
Crazy person (YOU) denies obvious facts. Then, later it admits the same facts. Maybe it will claim "I never said it" or say "my words meant something else"?
Qtard: Put people in jail for going by a street... and entering *PUBLIC* building\\ By breaking doors and windows. Vandalizing the building\\ Well. Then. It should be easy as pie -- to show fotos of that "Vandalizing the building." But. Cretin already ADMITTED. That it is "crazy person".
Yeah, the cretin from far far away (YOU) did admit that.
Qtard: That do not need any facts... to "believe facts".
Obviously. Me, I need facts to be proven to believe them. YOU do not. Like J6 rioters not being in jail. You believe they are not IN SPITE of the FACTS. Well, you admitted it ONCE. But you will likely go back to denying it swiftly.
Qtard: \\It's a public building so they can trash it if they want to? Cause millions of dollars in damages? Enter private areas in that building that are NOT open to the public?\\ Go Google it. "BLM vandalised images"
WHY would I Google BLM when when we were discussing the J6 rioters?
Google "january 6 vandalism and you will see the damage the J6 lawbreakers caused in the Capitol.
Like this image. Also, this one. Here is another. There are many. But Qtard will believe no vandalism occurred? Deflect from the fact that magaturds caused $30 million PLUS in damages to the Capitol by bringing up BLM?
(continued)
ReplyDeleteQuote: The cost of repairing damages from the attack on the U.S. Capitol and related security expenses have already topped $30 million and will keep rising, Architect of the Capitol J. Brett Blanton told lawmakers... "The [inauguration] platform was wrecked. There was broken glass and other debris. Sound systems and photography equipment was damaged beyond repair or stolen. Two historic Olmsted lanterns were ripped from the ground, and the wet blue paint was tracked all over the historic stone balustrades and Capitol building hallways".
In the Capitol building complex, historical statues, murals and furniture were damaged, mainly from pepper spray accretions and residue from chemical irritants and fire extinguishers, requiring expert cleaning and conservation. Work crews covered gaping holes with plywood and cleared "a small mountain of debris left behind on the west and east fronts"...
Qtard: So... it seems... answer is YES!
Yes, the J6 rioters vandalized the Capitol. Lawbreaking that is NOT allowed when a public building is entered.
Qtard: But... only while that helps DEMNs Propaganda.
Qtard (believer in "facts") calls point to reality FACTS "propaganda". No surprise. Qtard does not want to believe it happened. So it doesn't. Screeches, No, it was BLM!
Qtard: \\Also, public buildings are not open 365/24/7. Entering a public building is not permitted if the building is closed. The Capitol was closed on January 6\\ Yes. Totalitarian discretion AKA breaching human and citizen rights... just on a whim.
A public building NEVER being closed is not a "human right". Another "human right" Qtard MADE UP. Like it's MADE UP "human right" that people can overthrow democracy. Because it is up to them to decide.
Qtard: And when only you'd grow tired CONFIRMING being Totalitarian, ahh???
It is asking itself? I say Yes. YOU will never grow tired of confirming being a totalitarian.
Qtard: \\No. I used "you" because I meant "you". Dummy don't understand\\ Yeah. Dummy -- cretin, dunno do not understand that its miserly NewSpeak lies -- are DEMN too transparent. For a much smarter opponent.
Much dumber opponent thinks labeling much smarter opponent's answer as "NewSpeak" is a valid argument. "You meant the opposite of what you said" is NOT an argument.
Qtard: But... how could it know/understand it -- cretins CANNOT. And it is CRETIN.
Yeah, YOU are a cretin. And you (the cretin) obviously cannot understand.
Qtard: YET ONE confirmation (like even needed) of cretinism... of certain one cretin.
Yeah, another confirmation from YOU that YOU are a cretin.
Qtard: \\"So often" being never\\ Yeah. NewSpeak talks of a certain cretin. Yawn.
No. Lie from cretin that factual answer is "NewSpeak".
Qtard: And their "job" is to OPPOSE to unlawful tryes to succumb more power, to skirt rules, to make injust legislation, and etc, and etc, and etc... That's, because they ARE OPPOSITION. For.
"Injust legislation" like the "plan for victory in Ukraine"? That explains why republicans wrote it but won't turn it into legislation and vote on it? Because republicans believe victory in Ukraine is "injust"? Because they believe the victory in Ukraine should be Putin's victory? Gotcha. Thanky for admitting that the repubiturd opposition is "for" -- doing what Putin's puppet dotard donald tells it to do.
Qtard: \\Democrats gave Republicans a lot of what they wanted\\ It's not about "giving", cretin.
Of course it is. It is ALL about giving. republiturds giving Putin's puppet dotard donald what he wants.
Qtard: \\To make Biden look bad\\ Naaah. That's just DEMN Dirty Tricks... being highlighted.
ReplyDeleterepublicans are committing "DEMN dirty tricks"? Yeah, those dirty tricks SHOULD be highlighted. The American people want their representatives to take action on the border -- but republicans are refusing -- because dotard donald told them to.
Qtard: But. Cretin ALREADY forgot, isn't it? About Lend-Lease... that pompously was hailed as mean to PREVENT just that "if Reps will be opposing more money to Ukraine... POTUS will be able to send weapon even without their help".
YOU (the cretin) forgot? Then suddenly remembered?
I didn't forget. The legislation expired. But the Biden administration has found another way to help Ukraine.
A ring-trade is, in essence, a circular swap. One country pays or arms a second country so the second country can arm a third country. ... Biden and Blinken are using the White House's broad non-legislative military-aid authority to arm countries that aren't Ukraine, so they in turn can arm Ukraine. link
Qtard: But. WHERE IS IT????
It expired.
Qtard: Where EVEN ONE bullet sent to Ukraine??? Under that Lend-lease????
The Biden administration didn't use it because they didn't need it at the time.
Qtard: Because it was pre-planned.
Of course. It was planned to send military aid to Ukraine so it could defend itself. Which happened. Bigly aid was sent. It was planned to use Lend-Lease as a backup if republicans blocked aid. Which is happening now. But lend lease expired. So the Biden administration came up with another plan to get aid to Ukraine. Ring-trade.
Qtard: To have Perfect Excuse... to not give help to "Ukrainian nazis"...
You're talking about the republican excuse? NOT pass border legislation (even though it gives republicans most of what they want) so Putin's puppet dotard donald can run on Joe Biden keeping the border "open". Also so Putin gets what he wants -- STOP congressional aid to Ukraine.
Qtard: Just for the sake of never ending Help of American DEMN puppet of liliPut... to their master.
republiturd puppets. dotard donald and his maga faithful in Congress. Your narrative (that it is Democrats who are Putin's puppets) is proven false by the Biden administration's efforts to get more aid to Ukraine via ring-trade.
Qtard: Just like Zero-bama have had said "after elections... I will have free hands..." to help his master.
No. Because Obama DID NOT help his (alleged) "master". He did not give Putin what he wanted...
Quote: Obama was also caught on an open mic in 2012 telling then-Russian President Dimitry Medvedev, that "After my election I have more
flexibility", with regard to the US-led NATO missile defense system in Europe.
[Because of this] Poles and Czechs "very concerned" that the entire missile defense project would be abandoned by [the Obama] administration ... But ... "what they wound up getting with the current system was more robust than they had anticipated".
Means... Obama didn't give Putin what he wanted. Because Putin was never Obama's "master".
\\CRAZY PERSON. Proven. Says "no, not in jail". Then says, "yes, they are in jail".
ReplyDeleteYeah.
DEMN Totalitarin propaganda puppet FAKING context.
As ever.
Why you CUTTED IT OUT of context, ahh, cretin? :-))))))))))
Here it is.
\\\\But violently getting rid of democracy -- that is NOT itself democracy.
\\Yeah.
\\By calling it "insurrection". And putting people in jail.
As easy to see...
that was NOT "admitting" "Crazy person (YOU) denies obvious facts. Then, later it admits the same facts."
That was said about DEMN Propaganda smearing.
Calling people "insurrectionists"... but NOT ABLE TO PROVE any of such claims in court.
SAME.
As calling dRump "rapist"... in result of court where was decision to judge dRumnp for defamation ONLY.
EXACTLY.
As it was depicted in SEMINAL Mark Twain text "How I runned for Governor".
SAME
dirty tricks.
\\WHY would I Google BLM when when we were discussing the J6 rioters?
That was "putting in context".
As it is IMPOSSIBLE to discuss ANY thing... without taking int account SIMILAR cases.
ESPECIALLY if that discussion about USA laws.
Cause USA have
precedent | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu › ...
Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal ...
\\Yes, the J6 rioters vandalized the Capitol. Lawbreaking that is NOT allowed when a public building is entered.
ReplyDeleteAnd because of this... it is I-N-S-U-R-R-E-C-T-I-O-N!!!!!
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
When many people going in packs into tight place... that is SO-O-O-O impossible, and so outlandish... for them to break things, accidentally.
\\Screeches, No, it was BLM!
Naaah.
Just revealing DEMN Propaganda lies... that that was "insurrection".
While that was ordinary rioting.
Rioting... that DEMN Propaganda placated. While it was useful for DEMNs -- to undermine dRump.
But... when rioting that helping dRump happened... they start calling names.
Obvious hypocrisy. ;-P
\\"Injust legislation" like the "plan for victory in Ukraine"? That explains why republicans wrote it but won't turn it into legislation and vote on it?
And DEMN Government WOULD ALLOW that????
DEMN POTUS Bi-den would not vetoed and sign that???
BS I call that.
DEMN showed that they are going FULL TOTALITARIAN mode -- to THWART opposition and then ANY OTHER dissent.
While being supported by such a totalitarian cretins like you. ;-P
\\The American people want their representatives to take action on the border -- but republicans are refusing -- because dotard donald told them to.
Yeah????
"The American people"? Who have such a loud voice.
Or maybe that is DEMN propaganda media... that succumb to itself right to impersonate that "The American people"?
\\Qtard: But. Cretin ALREADY forgot, isn't it? About Lend-Lease... that pompously was hailed as mean to PREVENT just that "if Reps will be opposing more money to Ukraine... POTUS will be able to send weapon even without their help".
\\YOU (the cretin) forgot? Then suddenly remembered?
\\I didn't forget. The legislation expired.
Yeah???
Because Bi-den provided by it SO MUCH weapon... that Ukraine SHOULD be a winner by now??? ;-P
Naaah.
NONE. Not EVEN ONE BULLET was given... by that Lend-Lease.
And its MISSION -- I'll remind to all-forgetting-DEMN-propaganda-parrot -- that MISSION of that Lend-Lease WAS to PREVENT Reps from stalling support...
so, HOW GOOD that Lend-Lease worked???
I'll REMIND to DEMN cretin.
Previous. Historical. Lend-Lease Act.
Continued TO THE VICTORY (and little time beyond, actually).
But THIS one.
PHONY. HYPOCRITICAL. DEMN LYING. Act.
Only helped to puppet-master of DEMNs liliPut!
\\But the Biden administration has found another way to help Ukraine.
ReplyDeleteMore like a way to stall help for Ukraine to win in a war...
and to help their puppet-master. ;-P
And that is FACT!!!
As liliPut burgeoning on months of DELAYing of support. JUST NOW.
\\The Biden administration didn't use it because they didn't need it at the time.
Yeah.
Of course.
Because that would not allow to stall Ukraine's advances... so successfully.
Would not allow to provide dearly needed help to their puppet-master.
See. I agree with you.
They, REALLY, "didn't need it at the time".
SAME.
As they DO NOT need it... or any other plan, or act, or possibility... to help Ukraine.
Because it would stall... their support to their puppet-master.
\\Of course. It was planned to send military aid to Ukraine so it could defend itself. Which happened. Bigly aid was sent.
Ha-ha-ha...
"Bigly aid"... to their puppet-master liliPut.
Which ALLOWED to grab lots of territories of Ukraine. And kill lots of people.
Bigly AID!!!
\\It was planned to use Lend-Lease as a backup if republicans blocked aid.
So???
Now Reps "blocking" aid.
So, where'd Lend-Lease.
Ah. Yes. "It expired."
Can I take it as admission from DEMN cretin that IT know and admit that his DEMNs are... morons. ;-P
\\You're talking about the republican excuse? NOT pass border legislation (even though it gives republicans most of what they want)
And WHO said that???
That "even though it gives republicans most of what they want"?
Republicans?
Naaah. DEMN Propaganda said it. ;-P
Most Truthful Totalitarian Propaganda for all DEMN cretins... of the Whole World??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
\\But ... "what they wound up getting with the current system was more robust than they had anticipated".
And WHO said that???
Ah.
Again.
Most Truthful Totalitarian Propaganda for all DEMN cretins... of the Whole World??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Qtard: \\CRAZY PERSON. Proven. Says "no, not in jail". Then says, "yes, they are in jail"\\ Yeah. DEMN Totalitarin propaganda puppet FAKING context. As ever. Why you CUTTED IT OUT of context, ahh, cretin?
ReplyDeleteYou're accusing yourself of cutting your own words out of context? You are the cretin, so you must be admonishing yourself. Especially given that I did not cut your words out of context. I accurately quoted you.
Qtard: Here it is. \\But violently getting rid of democracy -- that is NOT itself democracy\\ Yeah. By calling it "insurrection". And putting people in jail. As easy to see... that was NOT "admitting" "Crazy person (YOU) denies obvious facts. Then, later it admits the same facts."
It is easy to see that is exactly what happened.
Qtard: That was said about DEMN Propaganda smearing. Calling people "insurrectionists"... but NOT ABLE TO PROVE any of such claims in court.
But, if no claims were proven in court, nobody could possibly be sent to jail.
Qtard: SAME. As calling dRump "rapist"... in result of court where was decision to judge dRumnp for defamation ONLY.
tRump isn't in jail for rape. J6 rioters did go to jail. Because there was evidence given in court that lead to convictions. For crimes, not defamation.
Qtard: EXACTLY. As it was depicted in SEMINAL Mark Twain text "How I runned for Governor".
No. Mark Twain (had that actually happened) should have sued the people lying about him for defamation.
Qtard: SAME. dirty tricks.
Yeah, "dirty tricks" -- that's telling the truth.
Qtard: \\WHY would I Google BLM when when we were discussing the J6 rioters?\\ That was "putting in context". As it is IMPOSSIBLE to discuss ANY thing... without taking int account SIMILAR cases. ESPECIALLY if that discussion about USA laws.
But people who rioted (usually later in the evening) following a peaceful BLM protest were arrested. Rioting and looting isn't protest. Such people should absolutely be arrested, charged and convicted. And many were. SAME as the J6 rioters who vandalized the Capitol building.
Qtard: Cause USA have precedent.
As if you care. You think dotard donald should face no charges only because he is running for political office. That should be his "get out of jail" free card.
Qtard: \\Yes, the J6 rioters vandalized the Capitol. Lawbreaking that is NOT allowed when a public building is entered\\ And because of this... it is I-N-S-U-R-R-E-C-T-I-O-N!!!!!
No. Because they were trying to stop the electoral college vote. So Pence would be taken away by his security detail and Grassley could take over and put the "Green Bay Sweep" plan to steal the election into effect.
Why only a few people were charged with sedition. Most of the rioters there were just useful idiots. Why their charges were far less severe. That does not mean there was no insurrection. Or that they didn't participate in it (even as useful idiots).
Qtard: :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
The imbecile thinks laughing means there was no insurrection. Calling the plan to steal the election (the Green Bay sweep) fiction -- means they didn't try to execute it. Sure.
Qtard: When many people going in packs into tight place... that is SO-O-O-O impossible, and so outlandish... for them to break things, accidentally.
The vandalism wasn't an accident. That's absurd.
Qtard: \\Screeches, No, it was BLM!\\ Naaah. Just revealing DEMN Propaganda lies... that that was "insurrection".
Not "propaganda lies"... what actually happened.
Qtard: While that was ordinary rioting.
No. Nobody participating in "ordinary riots" has ever been charged with Section 1505, which is "obstructing congressional or federal administrative proceedings".
Qtard: Rioting... that DEMN Propaganda placated. While it was useful for DEMNs -- to undermine dRump.
ReplyDeleteLie. Democrats oppose rioting. They support peaceful protesting. As is a citizens first amendment RIGHT. Qtard opposes people exercising their rights. If they are Democrats. And ESPECIALLY if they are Black Democrats. Yes?
If they are White republicans trying to overturn the results of a democratic election -- one where the Democratic POTUS candidate won fair and square -- then Qtard says it is the "human right" of the trumpturds to attempt a coup.
Qtard: But... when rioting that helping dRump happened... they start calling names.
What "calling names"? They said THEMSELVES they were there to "stop the steal". Not "protest the steal". And fighting with Capitol Police (and assaulting them) and vandalizing the Capitol (causing 30 million in damages) isn't peaceful protest. Or "asking questions" of politicians (who ran away because they didn't want to be physically assaulted).
fyi, republican politicians also ran away. Because they knew the rioters were there to assault them. Possibly kill them.
Qtard: Obvious hypocrisy.
No. Consistent holding of lawbreakers accountable.
Qtard: \\"Injust legislation" like the "plan for victory in Ukraine"? That explains why republicans wrote it but won't turn it into legislation and vote on it?\\ And DEMN Government WOULD ALLOW that????
republicans are IN CHARGE in the House. And why would Democrats not allow legislation they agreed with? Democrats voted FOR all previous legislation allocating funds that went to Ukraine aid.
Qtard: DEMN POTUS Bi-den would not vetoed and sign that???
He would sign it.
Qtard: BS I call that.
Because you are an imbecile. Democrats support aid for Ukraine. Proven by all their prior votes. Republicans oppose it. Proven by their prior votes. And their (republicans) current stalling of further aid.
Qtard: DEMN showed that they are going FULL TOTALITARIAN mode -- to THWART opposition and then ANY OTHER dissent.
republicans magaturds have shown that they are going FULL TOTALITARIAN mode -- to THWART opposition and then ANY OTHER dissent.
Qtard: While being supported by such a totalitarian cretins like you.
While being supported by such totalitarian cretins like YOU.
Qtard: \\The American people want their representatives to take action on the border -- but republicans are refusing -- because dotard donald told them to\\ Yeah????
YES.
Qtard: "The American people"? Who have such a loud voice. Or maybe that is DEMN propaganda media... that succumb to itself right to impersonate that "The American people"?
No.
Qtard: But. Cretin ALREADY forgot, isn't it? About Lend-Lease... \\I didn't forget. The legislation expired\\ Yeah??? Because Bi-den provided by it SO MUCH weapon... that Ukraine SHOULD be a winner by now???
No. Because that was the legislation that was negotiated and voted on.
Qtard: Lend-Lease Act ... PHONY. HYPOCRITICAL. DEMN LYING. Act.
So why don't republicans vote for and pass more aid? Because? "Plan for Victory in Ukraine" is phony. Hypocritical. republican lying. Why didn't they say (previously) "that lend lease legislation should not expire until the war is resolved".
Qtard: Only helped to puppet-master of DEMNs liliPut!
Puppet master of republiturds, Putin!!
Qtard: \\But the Biden administration has found another way to help Ukraine\\ More like a way to stall help for Ukraine to win in a war...
Biden administration isn't doing that. House republicans are doing that. But the imbecile is fooled by a fake "plan for victory in Ukraine". It exists (they wrote it down) but they aren't turning it into legislation or voting for it in the House.
Qtard: ...and to help their puppet-master. And that is FACT!!!
Yes. It is a fact that republicans are stalling aid to help their puppet master Putin.
Qtard: As liliPut burgeoning on months of DELAYing of support. JUST NOW.
ReplyDeleteYes. Delayed by republicans.
Qtard: \\The Biden administration didn't use it because they didn't need it at the time\\ Yeah. Of course. Because that would not allow to stall Ukraine's advances... so successfully.
So far "The Joe Biden administration and the U.S. Congress have directed more than $75 billion in assistance to Ukraine, which includes humanitarian, financial, and military support".
The imbecile considers 75 billion to be "stalling".
Qtard: Would not allow to provide dearly needed help to their puppet-master.
How is 75 billion in aid to Ukraine helpful to Putin? He's mad about it. He complained about it to Tucker Carlson. He said he wants it to stop.
Qtard: They, REALLY, "didn't need it at the time". SAME.
Yeah, because 75 billion in aid was flowing.
Qtard: As they DO NOT need it... or any other plan, or act, or possibility... to help Ukraine.
You say. You must be really happy that republicans are blocking further aid.
The Biden administration disagrees. Why they are currently using ring-trade to get more aid to Ukraine.
Qtard: Ha-ha-ha... "Bigly aid"... to their puppet-master liliPut.
Zero dollars in military aid was sent to Putin. 75 billion was sent to Ukraine.
Qtard: Which ALLOWED to grab lots of territories of Ukraine. And kill lots of people.
No. It helped Ukrainians fight back.
Qtard: Bigly AID!!!
Yes.
Qtard: \\It was planned to use Lend-Lease as a backup if republicans blocked aid\\ So???
Now Reps "blocking" aid. So, where'd Lend-Lease.
It expired.
Qtard: Ah. Yes. "It expired."
Correct.
Qtard: Can I take it as admission from DEMN cretin that IT know and admit that his DEMNs are... morons.
No. That is the legislation that was negotiated.
Can I take it as admission from Qtard that IT know and admits that republicans are morons? Those who voted for it. The minority of republicans (Neocons and Never-Trumpers according to Minus FJ) who also want to help Ukraine. Why didn't they demand that the legislation expired later instead of sooner? Democrats would have agreed.
Qtard: \\You're talking about the republican excuse? NOT pass border legislation (even though it gives republicans most of what they want)\\ And WHO said that???
Republicans.
Qtard: That "even though it gives republicans most of what they want"? Republicans?
Yes.
Republican James Lankford: "Are we going to just complain about things, or are we actually going to address and change as many things as we can?" (with the border legislation he negotiated with Democrats).
Qtard: Naaah. DEMN Propaganda said it.
No.
Qtard: \\But ... "what they wound up getting with the current system was more robust than they had anticipated"\\And WHO said that??? The Ah. Again. Most Truthful Totalitarian Propaganda for all DEMN cretins... of the Whole World???
And who said that? Qtard. Yeah, I believe it. NOT. Qtard "knows" all about it? So why don't you tell me exactly how what they received was lacking. Tell me exactly how Obama screwed them on orders from his master, Putin. Can you? Will you? I seriously doubt it. Because that didn't happen.
\\I accurately quoted you.
ReplyDeleteCopy-pasted. Ctrl-Fed.
Yeah.
Cretinic liar lied as ever.
\\"CRAZY PERSON. Proven. Says "no, not in jail". Then says, "yes, they are in jail"."
That "quotes" NOWHERE to be found... except as own cretin's words. And then accuritely cited by me... two times. And now third.
Yawn.
\\But, if no claims were proven in court, nobody could possibly be sent to jail.
Yeah.
And where's Court Judgment??? With word "insurrection" in it? ;-P
\\Yeah, "dirty tricks" -- that's telling the truth.
Yeah. NewSpeak "Truth" -- which is actual Lie.
Yawn.
\\SAME as the J6 rioters who vandalized the Capitol building.
That's it.
Some of them.
Which did actual trespassing. NOT related to any imaginary "insurrection".
Because... if that'll be insurrection -- ALL of them might be persecuted and put in jail.
\\Why only a few people were charged with sedition. Most of the rioters there were just useful idiots. Why their charges were far less severe. That does not mean there was no insurrection. Or that they didn't participate in it (even as useful idiots).
Yeah.
Corrupt Juridical System do decide who are guilty and who need to be persecuted based on political reasons... reasons, defined by executive branch that decided to go full totalitarian (means, control ALL other branches: juridical, press and etc)
Yawn.
\\Not "propaganda lies"... what actually happened.
Yeah.
People going peacefully by a streets. Entering public building.
THEN... corrupt police directed by totalitarian wannabes tried to unleash wrath of Police State on them.
With predictable results -- peaceful protest became "rioting"...
just to make image of it being "insurrection".
Yawn.
\\Lie. Democrats oppose rioting. They support peaceful protesting. As is a citizens first amendment RIGHT.
ReplyDeleteYeah.
But ONLY NOT when it Rep-aligned protest.
That peaceful protests DEMN Propaganda calls only "insurrection". Or "nazis". Or etc.
And trying to deny.
\\Qtard opposes people exercising their rights. If they are Democrats. And ESPECIALLY if they are Black Democrats. Yes?
Your alter-ego "Qtard"??? How *I* should know?
But.
Actually. IT showed being racists... I only dunno which exactly alter-ego, of IT.
\\Yes. Delayed by republicans.
Is there Republican POTUS in White House? ;-P
Cretin thinks that that IS the case??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))00
\\The imbecile considers 75 billion to be "stalling".
FACTs say it ALL.
USA... with that 75 billions... DELIVERED 30 tanks and NO planes.
Poland. Miserly in comparation Poland. GAVE 300 tanks. And DOZENS (practically all they could spare) warplanes!
All truth can be only in COMPARATION.
And most of that 75 billions came BACK to USA... to finance USA army and industry.
\\Zero dollars in military aid was sent to Putin. 75 billion was sent to Ukraine.
And how many billions of $ recieving liliPut for his oil and gas???
To finance his troops. To hold in power. To continue war.
How microchips and all other needed to produce weapon goodies STILL go into RFia without any problems.
Under dRump there'd be sanctions from Hell -- to stop that.
Under Bi-den... there only half-assed efforts. Just to show that they doing something.
Yawn.
Well... same as in all previous history. Reagan(R) delivered finishing blow to USSR. Kennedy(D) was colluding with USSR... even in time of BIGGEST THREAT called Caribbean Crisis.
Demns was sucking for totalitarian all of the time.
Like FDR sucking Stalin's dick.
\\Qtard: Which ALLOWED to grab lots of territories of Ukraine. And kill lots of people.
\\No. It helped Ukrainians fight back.
Where???
ALL territorial gains of Ukrainian army was in 2022. Banishing RFia from around Kiev. From Kherson and Kharkiv.
That was WITH remains of USSR-time weapon and equipment.
In 2023.
WHEN Ukrainian army started FULLY depend on "help to fight back" from USA.
Results are more then slim. And was mostly on sheer courage of Ukrainian soldiers.
NO Abramses. NO F-16s. NO Thunderbolts. NO AH-1 Cobras.
NOTHING!!!
And now EVEN that miserly "help to fight back" effectively stopped. Because of some bureaucratic intrigues of DEMN White House dweller.
\\So, where'd Lend-Lease.
\\It expired.
Yeah.
Because of liliPut's puppet intrigues.
Yawn.
\\Can I take it as admission from Qtard that IT know and admits that republicans are morons? Those who voted for it.
Yeah.
They are morons -- because trusted/believed DEMNs.
Now they know it better -- that that is not good idea to try to make deal with liars.