Tuesday, November 28, 2023

Subversive Anti-Democracy

67 comments:

  1. So now opposing White Supremacy is antidemocratic? Someone said you can't vote? Or is it the other way around -- the White Supremacists want to stop those who disagree with them from voting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please don't FEED into those Creeps at the Progressive Blog.
    You are doing exactly what they are trying to get you to do.
    IGNORE THE BASTARDS!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are the Democrats killing the United States of America?
    Well let me count the ways!
    The population of SF declined 6% last year and 8% the year earlier.
    Chicago's decline was the 2nd worst in the nation last year.
    Portland & Seattle saw population declines over the last two years.
    LA County, San Diego County & Orange County saw a decline of up to 5% last year.
    The population of NY declined 5.3% last year. The cops are leaving in the thousands. The City is becoming another San Fransisco with these Illegal Immigrants, sleeping all over the streets, and Looting our stores, and selling Drugs to our Children, all this while our Tax payers are paying for their pleasures. And all because of the Democratic-Liberal Mayor, Governor, and YES the Democratic Senators.
    California's population declined for the first time in 2021, and has declined "progressively" since. The State has the highest tax yet the most crime and homeless. Those tax dollars are going to waste.
    Keep in mind these are "sanctuary cities". Not only are their existing TAX-PAYING CITIZENS leaving in droves, but they're being displaced by illegals and replacement cultures. Shit half can barely speak English, no wonder the Democrats attract them.
    And then there's the USA, where the Democrats took control of both houses and POTUS thanks to COVID and snowflakes. Since then the cost at the pump and grocery store have doubled, the cost of services has doubled in places, and our tax obligations have doubled or more by some measures.
    Meanwhile the Democrats proved to be wrong about just about EVERYTHING that they put their hands on. Especially the Democratic President!
    Reply

    ReplyDelete
  4. So now opposing White Supremacy is antidemocratic?

    It can't be? When such opposition means excluding them from participation? You have no conception as to what democracy means.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You found it surprising??? Still?????!!!! :-)))

    While that how DEMNs LOVE censure... DEMN self-revealing. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  6. Minus: You have no conception as to what democracy means.

    Now Minus is talking to himself?

    Minus: Dervy loves a DINO. Democracy in Name Only.

    Isn't that what you want? I don't want that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dervish Sanders November 29, 2023 at 9:29 AM: "oh-hoho! oh-hoho! oh-hoho! oh-hoho! Minus is talking to himself?

      Minus: Dervy loves a DINO. Democracy in Name Only.

      Isn't that what you want? I don't want that. oh-hoho! oh-hoho! oh-hoho! oh-hoho!"


      Derpish wants the CCP and HAMASS to usurp the USA.

      Delete
  7. I certainly have a more "meden agan" conception of a democracy. It's why America was founded as a Republic, and NOT a democracy. And now, it's closer than ever to being neither. As the "democracy system" (elections) is completely broken. It only offers Hobsonian choices, hence Hobsonian results.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The brokenness has to do with too many legitimate voters being disenfranchised. Usually Democrats. That's why you think it's "broken". You want to stop more people from voting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Illegals aren't disenfranchised voters. Neither are double voters and serial ballot stuffers.

    ReplyDelete
  10. \\ It only offers Hobsonian choices, hence Hobsonian results.

    Again.

    Mark Twain.

    How I tried to became Governor.

    Yawn.



    \\Blogger Joe Conservative said...

    \\ Illegals aren't disenfranchised voters. Neither are double voters and serial ballot stuffers.


    ONLY if and when they vote for that nasty-nasty-wrong dRump. :-))))))))

    If they vote DEMNs... that is DEMN-OK-ratsy. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  11. Qtard: Again. Mark Twain. How I tried to became Governor.

    Mark Twain never ran for any political office. Qtard does not know the difference between reality and fiction. Gets them confused.

    Qtard: \\Blogger Joe Conservative said... Illegals aren't disenfranchised voters. Neither are double voters and serial ballot stuffers.

    Illegal immigrants don't vote. "Serial ballot stuffers" are imaginary. "Double voters" get caught. Many are Republicans.

    Qtard: ONLY if and when they vote for that nasty-nasty-wrong dRump. If they vote DEMNs... that is DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    No.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If more Republicans are prosecuted for double voting it's only because more Democrats aren't being prosecuted for it. But hey, that about sums up DoJ today. Democrat only Justice...

    ReplyDelete
  13. \\Mark Twain never ran for any political office. Qtard does not know the difference between reality and fiction. Gets them confused.

    :-))))))))))))

    Always need to show itself an idiot, yes, cretin Derpy? :-))))))



    \\Qtard: ONLY if and when they vote for that nasty-nasty-wrong dRump. If they vote DEMNs... that is DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    \\No.

    Thanky-thanky for NewSpeak "Yes" here. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  14. No, dummy. My "no" was not a "NewSpeak Yes".

    ReplyDelete
  15. Everything Qtard says?

    I don't use NewSpeak. Never have.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Look.

    You ALSO claimed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN WORDS. Just said even. IN SEQUENTIAL sentences.

    That showing YOU as relentless liar.

    So???

    HOW??? Anybody who are not idiot. And have intact memory SHOULD believe to your mere lying claim that it "NEVER" did something... what it doing ALL OF THE TIME??? ;-P


    Your problem Derpy is... that you NOT ABLE to get -- that ALL your lies are saved here... for eternity (well, while Google data-centers are on-line).

    You still trying to pretend that that is mere talking -- where your words not saved anyhow... and you can pretend NOT SAYING something, at your please.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Am I not a saint??? ;-P

    Explaining to lying scum such a trivia. :-)))))))

    ReplyDelete
  18. Qtard: You ALSO claimed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN WORDS. Just said even. IN SEQUENTIAL sentences.

    Talking to your alter ego? I know I have never done this.

    Qtard: That showing YOU as relentless liar.

    This shows you as a relentless liar. That you keep telling this absurd lie. Over and over.

    Qtard: So??? HOW??? Anybody who are not idiot. And have intact memory SHOULD believe to your mere lying claim that it "NEVER" did something... what it doing ALL OF THE TIME???

    Yeah. I agree with this observation you have made about yourself. You keep lying. ALL THE TIME.

    Qtard: Your problem Derpy is... that you NOT ABLE to get -- that ALL your lies are saved here... for eternity (well, while Google data-centers are on-line).

    Impossible. Given that I told no lies. Your lies are the lies that are saved here.

    Qtard: You still trying to pretend that that is mere talking -- where your words not saved anyhow...

    No. My words are saved. And they prove you are a liar.

    Qtard: ...and you can pretend NOT SAYING something, at your please.

    You are the one who is pretending.

    Qtard: Am I not a saint??? Explaining to lying scum such a trivia.

    Explaining to yourself. But you clearly do not understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking the language of your daddy, Dervish? Your daddy Satan must be very proud of you, Dervish.

      Delete
  19. \\Talking to your alter ego? I know I have never done this.

    Yawn.

    And that stubbornness only PROVE that you are I-D-I-O-T. :-))))))))))

    While all your previous lies fixed and open for anybody to observe.



    \\This shows you as a relentless liar. That you keep telling this absurd lie. Over and over.

    Tsk-tsk-tsk.

    But... *I* ABLE to confirm my words with PERFECT QUOTES.

    While you are not. ;-P

    And well, that you continuing doing such counter-factual claims -- only CONFIRM MY claim -- that you are relentless liar, and I-D-I-O-T.



    \\Yeah. I agree with this observation you have made about yourself. You keep lying. ALL THE TIME.

    Yet one relentless lie... Derpy cannot prove with ANY facts/quotes.

    Yawn.



    \\Impossible. Given that I told no lies. Your lies are the lies that are saved here.

    YET ONE scream of relentless liar and idiot.

    Yawn.



    \\No. My words are saved. And they prove you are a liar.

    AS ALWAYS.

    You are FREE to GIVE QUOTES... of that YOUR words that you think "they prove you are a liar".

    But... you will not do that. Because, even though you are such idiotic liar -- still you know as a fact -- that there is NO such words/facts/quotes that proves YOUR claims. ;-P



    \\You are the one who is pretending.

    And??? QUOTES??? ;-P



    \\Explaining to yourself. But you clearly do not understand.

    Yep.

    I really do not understand -- how damaged brain of relentless counter-factual liar and idiot mind works.

    That's why I'm still here.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Qtard: While all your previous lies fixed and open for anybody to observe.

    Talking to yourself? I haven't lied, so it's impossible for anyone to observe them.

    Qtard: But... *I* ABLE to confirm my words with PERFECT QUOTES.

    So why don't you?

    Qtard: While you are not. And well, that you continuing doing such counter-factual claims...

    Quote one.

    Qtard: ...only CONFIRM MY claim -- that you are relentless liar, and I-D-I-O-T.

    Talking about "counter-factual claims" I never made confirm you are a liar and idiot.

    Qtard: \\You keep lying. ALL THE TIME\\ Yet one relentless lie... Derpy cannot prove with ANY facts/quotes.

    That I am illiterate. That is provably false. I wouldn't be able to read and reply to your idiocy if that was the case.

    Qtard: \\Impossible. Given that I told no lies. Your lies are the lies that are saved here\\ YET ONE scream of relentless liar and idiot.

    Another lie. I didn't write in all caps. There was no screaming. While you screamed "yet one". Even though there were no screams -- except yours.

    Qtard: \\No. My words are saved. And they prove you are a liar\\ AS ALWAYS. You are FREE to GIVE QUOTES... of that YOUR words that you think "they prove you are a liar". But... you will not do that.

    Why should I when you gave no quotes? Just lied about them being saved here for people to see. When they aren't.

    Qtard: Because, even though you are such idiotic liar -- still you know as a fact -- that there is NO such words/facts/quotes that proves YOUR claims.

    I do not "know" that. Because you lie.

    Qtard: \\You are the one who is pretending\\ And??? QUOTES???

    "I never said it" in regards to things just said -- that never happened.

    Qtard: I really do not understand -- how damaged brain of relentless counter-factual liar and idiot mind works.

    Me neither. You need a psychiatrist. I can't tell you anything to help with your serious mental illnesses.

    Qtard: That's why I'm still here.

    Instead of at a psychiatrist office? Doesn't the asylum where you reside provide one?

    ReplyDelete
  21. \\Talking to yourself? I haven't lied, so it's impossible for anyone to observe them.

    :-))))))))))

    So... you are solipsist, maybe?

    One thinking that whole World is inside your head??!!! :-)))



    \\So why don't you?

    You answered to it yourself -- because you claim not seeing it.

    Hysterical blindness. ;-P



    \\Quote one.

    "I NEVER said it"(tm) ;-P



    \\Talking about "counter-factual claims" I never made confirm you are a liar and idiot.

    Thanky-thanky for confirming being relentless liar and idiot. ;-P



    \\Qtard: \\You keep lying. ALL THE TIME\\ Yet one relentless lie... Derpy cannot prove with ANY facts/quotes.

    \\That I am illiterate. That is provably false. I wouldn't be able to read and reply to your idiocy if that was the case.

    Whatever.

    This you comment DO NOT contain any fact or refer to any quote. ;-P

    Which only confirms my claim.



    \\Qtard: \\Impossible. Given that I told no lies. Your lies are the lies that are saved here\\ YET ONE scream of relentless liar and idiot.

    \\Another lie. I didn't write in all caps. There was no screaming. While you screamed "yet one". Even though there were no screams -- except yours.

    Emphasises in text are "screams"??? :-))))

    Illiterate idiot and liar. You are.

    YET ONE confirmation given by you... but you will scream "I NEVER said it". AGAIN! :-))))



    \\Why should I when you gave no quotes? Just lied about them being saved here for people to see. When they aren't.

    I-D-I-O-T Derr Punn just confirmed being idiot -- which unable to learn how to search by this blog. ;-P



    \\Qtard: Because, even though you are such idiotic liar -- still you know as a fact -- that there is NO such words/facts/quotes that proves YOUR claims.

    \\I do not "know" that. Because you lie.

    Idiot Derr Punn just admitted being even more stoopid... to the level being imbecile -- unable to know. :-)))))



    \\Qtard: \\You are the one who is pretending\\ And??? QUOTES???

    \\"I never said it" in regards to things just said -- that never happened.

    "Never happened"... but can be found in dozens in comments made by certain someone under nickname/account Derr Punn. :-)))))))))

    And that Derr Punn will even try to cry "it... is not a liar, you are", :-))))



    \\Me neither. You need a psychiatrist. I can't tell you anything to help with your serious mental illnesses.

    Using "you" instead "I"? AGAIN???!!! :-)))))


    \\Instead of at a psychiatrist office? Doesn't the asylum where you reside provide one?

    And what is the name of that asylum you recide? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  22. Qtard: So... you are solipsist, maybe?

    No. Not NewSpeak "yes".

    Qtard: One thinking that whole World is inside your head??!!!

    No. Not NewSpeak "yes".

    Qtard: \\So why don't you?\\You answered to it yourself -- because you claim not seeing it. Hysterical blindness.

    I can't see your delusions. That has nothing to do with "Hysterical Blindness". You keep using the term, but you clearly dunno what it means.

    Qtard: \\Quote one. "I NEVER said it"(tm) ;-P

    I see you trademarked that phrase. Or think you have. Because you keep using it, yes? A lot more than I ever have.

    Qtard: Thanky-thanky for confirming being relentless liar and idiot. ;-P

    Thanking yourself.

    Qtard: \\You keep lying. ALL THE TIME\\ Yet one relentless lie... Derpy cannot prove with ANY facts/quotes\\ That I am illiterate. That is provably false. I wouldn't be able to read and reply to your idiocy if that was the case\\ Whatever.

    Thanky for admitting you lied.

    Qtard: This you comment DO NOT contain any fact or refer to any quote. Which only confirms my claim.

    Right. You gave no quotes of my alleged "lies". Confirming you lied about me lying.

    Qtard: Emphasises in text are "screams"???

    Writing in caps is screaming. I don't do that often. Yet you keep imaging screams.

    Qtard: YET ONE confirmation given by you... but you will scream "I NEVER said it". AGAIN! :-))))

    Qtard's delusions are telling it I confirmed something? What? I dunno what you're talking about. Something you "heard" me saying in your delusions probably. So, yes, I never said it.

    Qtard: \\Why should I when you gave no quotes? Just lied about them being saved here for people to see. When they aren't\\ I-D-I-O-T Derr Punn just confirmed being idiot -- which unable to learn how to search by this blog.

    "Derr Punn"? This is another of your alter egos, yes?

    Qtard: Because, even though you are such idiotic liar -- still you know as a fact -- that there is NO such words/facts/quotes that proves YOUR claims\\ I do not "know" that. Because you lie\\ Idiot Derr Punn just admitted being even more stoopid... to the level being imbecile -- unable to know.

    Thanky for admitting this about yourself. Even though you did blame another alter ego, "Derr Punn".

    Qtard: \\You are the one who is pretending\\ And??? QUOTES???\\"I never said it" in regards to things just said -- that never happened\\ "Never happened"... but can be found in dozens in comments made by certain someone under nickname/account Derr Punn.

    Only in your delusions. In reality "Derr Punn" has never commented.

    Qtard: And that Derr Punn will even try to cry "it... is not a liar, you are".

    I doubt it. "Derr Punn" is imaginary. But maybe you hear it's voice whispering to you? Calling you a liar? Saying it isn't?

    Qtard: Using "you" instead "I"? AGAIN???!!!

    Impossible. I can't do something "again" that I have never done. Not even once.

    Qtard: \\Instead of at a psychiatrist office? Doesn't the asylum where you reside provide one?\\ And what is the name of that asylum you recide?

    Using "you" instead of "I"? AGAIN???!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. \\No. Not NewSpeak "yes".

    Ya. Ya, NewSpeak "ya".

    I translated for you. No thanks needed. ;-P



    \\I can't see your delusions. That has nothing to do with "Hysterical Blindness". You keep using the term, but you clearly dunno what it means.

    It's when to see something becomes so unbearable, that subconscious mind make to conscious counterpart think that it do not see it.

    From where I know it?

    There is such sci-fi novel "Martians. Go home!" where it depicted most vividly. ;-P

    But of course Derr Punn know much more about it. :-)))))))



    \\I see you trademarked that phrase. Or think you have. Because you keep using it, yes? A lot more than I ever have.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: Thanky-thanky for confirming being relentless liar and idiot. ;-P

    \\Thanking yourself.

    Oh. How kind of you. That I need to thanked for revealing such an apparent idiot and relentless liar as Derr Punn too. :-))))))

    At least you know what generosity is. ;-P

    Or that just that hidden alter-ego of yours. Trying to mark its presence.



    \\Whatever.

    \\Thanky for admitting you lied.

    Oh.

    Yet one evidances of imbecilic moronity of Derr Punn showed itself -- it sees confirmation in anything. :-)))))))

    Or... as ever... it is free to EXPLAIN -- how it possible.

    But... it never used that chance for good.

    Only for confirming own imbecility. :-))))))))))

    Well, Derr Punn is imbecile not for nothing. :-))))))))



    \\Qtard: This you comment DO NOT contain any fact or refer to any quote. Which only confirms my claim.

    \\Right. You gave no quotes of my alleged "lies". Confirming you lied about me lying.

    Because you tried to subvert my reference to your recurring "I NEVER said it" as...

    how again you tryed to LIE about that OPEN and OBVIOUS FACTS???? :-))))

    "A lot more than I ever have." -- imbecile, you ADMITTED that you said it!!! :-)))))

    But... you'll try to SUBVERT it TOO, isn't it?

    By claiming that "I NEVER said "I NEVER said it""?????!!!! :-))))))))))))))))))))

    LOL!!!

    But you'd never be able to understand, why I'm laughing.

    You... "pulling Charlie Gordon" imbecile. :-))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete

  24. \\Writing in caps is screaming. I don't do that often. Yet you keep imaging screams.

    Pft!

    And you maybe can recite or refer for such a grammar rule? ;-P

    Naaah. Cause you -- imbecile. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))




    \\Qtard: YET ONE confirmation given by you... but you will scream "I NEVER said it". AGAIN! :-))))

    \\Qtard's delusions are telling it I confirmed something? What? I dunno what you're talking about. Something you "heard" me saying in your delusions probably. So, yes, I never said it.

    Imbecile Derr Punn responded "I never said it" -- even though it was predicted that such words will be -- CONFIRMATION of it's imbecility. :-))))))

    Well, imbecile Derr Punn is imbecile not for nothing -- cannot help it, must be "pulling Charlie Gordon". :-))))))))))




    \\Thanky for admitting this about yourself. Even though you did blame another alter ego, "Derr Punn".

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    And again.

    Imbecile Derr Punn DO NOT get it why I'm laughing.

    Still "pulling Charlie Gordon" and thinking that it successfully repelled my words... without understanding that it only CONFIRMED being imbecile -- unable to learn, unable to understand. :-))))



    \\Only in your delusions. In reality "Derr Punn" has never commented.

    Yep.

    Derr Pu... uh, I mean Derpy Sadners NEED to pull Charlie Gordon -- to show how dense it is.

    Trying burgeoning on his inability to get indirect and/or figural references... even if damn apparent. :-))))))))))

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    It... just DUNNO how silly it looking like. And while I laughing. So much.

    But. O.K., I'll try to explain.

    So... silly Derr Punn... who cannot pose a threat to a much smarter opponent... but still trying to pretend that it can...

    basing its rebuff tactics on PRETENDING being EVEN MORE STUPID... NOT ABLE to understand that Derr Punn, De-Ru-Pun, Derpy... or any other DELIBERATE HUMOROUS mangling of its silly name/nickname/moniker.

    Isn't it DEMN hilarious.

    But... Derr Punn cannot get it. Too stooopid. :-))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  25. \\I doubt it. "Derr Punn" is imaginary. But maybe you hear it's voice whispering to you? Calling you a liar? Saying it isn't?

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Silly. Pretending that it was said NOT about you. :-))))))))))))))

    While NOBODY here will believe to it. :-))))))))))))))))))))

    What a self-duping idiot, Derr Punn. But well, it's the idiot... not for nothing. :-)))))))



    \\Qtard: Using "you" instead "I"? AGAIN???!!!

    \\Impossible. I can't do something "again" that I have never done. Not even once.

    Yeah.

    Like words "I NEVER said it"... that you never said...

    but then, CONFIRMED with YOUR OWN WORDS, remember? ""A lot more than I ever have.""

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))


    But... Derr Punn... will continue "pulling Charlie Gordon", and will try to subvert it...

    either with "I NEVER said it". Or with "give QUOTES". Or with silly-silly-bonker "somebody else DID it". :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  26. "pulled a Charlie Gordon" to explain a stupid mistake, and everyone laughs, including Charlie...

    Where did I make a stupid mistake, then laugh when you pointed it out? You don't even know what "pulling a Charlie Gordon" means.

    Qtard: Silly. Pretending that it was said NOT about you.

    Like you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?

    But you keep using different names. Think I'm supposed to respond to any name you use as if you're talking about me? I have no obligation to do that.

    Qtard: Like words "I NEVER said it"... that you never said...

    Lie. I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it".

    Qtard: but then, CONFIRMED with YOUR OWN WORDS, remember? ""A lot more than I ever have.""

    I never said I never wrote that I never said it. I say it often. Because you keep lying. You keep insisting I said things I never have. Like "I do deny em their rights". When I defend people having their rights. Even the J6 insurrectionists.

    I only denied they have an imaginary right you made up. Lied about the right you made up being a "human right".

    Qtard: But... Derr Punn... will continue "pulling Charlie Gordon", and will try to subvert it... either with "I NEVER said it". Or with "give QUOTES". Or with silly-silly-bonker "somebody else DID it".

    No, asshole. That's your LIE. That I have ever wrote "I never said it" in regards to things I have actually said. Because you are a relentless henious liar.

    ReplyDelete
  27. \\Where did I make a stupid mistake, then laugh when you pointed it out? You don't even know what "pulling a Charlie Gordon" means.

    With this YOUR words. ;-P

    Or what... you'll retort with "I NEVER said it"??? AGAIN! :-))))))



    \\Like you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?

    Well... it not supported by any logic. Not based on any facts.

    Just your sheer idiotic pretense -- that is you'd repeat after much smarter opponent his smart words... it would impress... anybody.

    So... in my case that is not pretense -- just a try to make rational conclusion on the base of idiotic behavior of a complete moron... pretending being imbecile. :-))))))



    \\But you keep using different names. Think I'm supposed to respond to any name you use as if you're talking about me? I have no obligation to do that.

    Why you whine about "you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?" then??? ;-P

    You wish for me to be an idiot. Like you. Or even bigger (if that us possible :-)))).

    And fall for such miserable tricks. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    For the very least -- if you want from opponent to do something, to behave somehow up to your expectation -- you must show that behavior... itself. :-))))))

    Double standards -- do not work. ;-P



    \\Lie. I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it".

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Like I need your words to be exactly like that to make such conclusion.

    But well... your showing Moronity... that is just spectacular. :-))))))))



    \\Qtard: but then, CONFIRMED with YOUR OWN WORDS, remember? ""A lot more than I ever have.""

    \\I never said I never wrote that I never said it. I say it often. Because you keep lying. You keep insisting I said things I never have. Like "I do deny em their rights".

    Yeah.

    You, who tried to repel my claim higher on that idiotic base Moronic Literality that "I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it"."

    Itself using lame subvertion of my words by pretending that I EVER have said/written here ""I do deny em their rights"" EXACTLY.

    Though it obvious lie. And you will not only will not be able to give QUOTE.

    But also... you, itself... repeated MANY times, how indecently I did, with short-cutting your moronic retorts as ""I *DO* deny..." em their rights". ;-P

    And now... this Utterly Moronic Try... :-)))))))))

    But you are mpron not for nothing. :-)))))))))))))))))))))

    Please, continue-continue like that... pulling Charlie Gordon. :-))))


    ReplyDelete
  28. \\When I defend people having their rights. Even the J6 insurrectionists.

    Yep.

    Like whining that dRump is guilty. Though it his right as mere human -- to be protected by Presumption of Innocence. ;-P

    THAT MUCH you are "defender" of "people having their rights". :-)))))

    Yup.

    Defender.

    But not of their Unseverable Human Rights... but their "right" to be "protected from violation".

    Like with censure of information they would receive.

    Yawn.



    \\I only denied they have an imaginary right you made up. Lied about the right you made up being a "human right".

    Yap.

    Totalitarian (wannabe?) Derr Punn YET ONE time CONFIRMED his desmissiveness toward Unseverable Human Rights.

    But it will deny it further too... with "I NEVER said it" or any other way.

    Yawn.



    \\No, asshole. That's your LIE. That I have ever wrote "I never said it" in regards to things I have actually said. Because you are a relentless henious liar.

    And I must believe to such a stooopid lie? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))

    You did it just in that comment I just commented.

    A dozen or more lies.

    But. Somehow. I must fall to your level. And start believing into your lies not being lies????

    What an Utter Moronity. You showing here. Derr Punn. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))





    .

    ReplyDelete
  29. Qtard: With this YOUR words. ;-P

    What words? I dunno what words you are talking about. Quote them.

    Qtard: Or what... you'll retort with "I NEVER said it"??? AGAIN! :-))))))

    How could I know if I said it or not when you gave no quote of words allegedly said?

    Qtard: \\Like you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?\\Well... it not supported by any logic. Not based on any facts.

    Lie. Based on you calling yourself "Q". Are you denying you did?

    Qtard: Just your sheer idiotic pretense -- that is you'd repeat after much smarter opponent his smart words... it would impress... anybody.

    LOL! Qtard called itself a "much smarter opponent".

    LOL! Qtard said it's dumb words are "smart".

    Qtard: So... in my case that is not pretense -- just a try to make rational conclusion on the base of idiotic behavior of a complete moron... pretending being imbecile.

    There is no such basis. Not in regards to me. In regards to you? Yes.

    Means... My conclusion that you are a complete moron pretending to be smart... Is completely rational. Also likely 100 percent accurate.

    Qtard: \\But you keep using different names. Think I'm supposed to respond to any name you use as if you're talking about me? I have no obligation to do that\\ Why you whine about "you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?" then??? ;-P

    Non sequitur. I brought up the fact that I have consistently referred to you as "Qtard". While you continue to use different "nicknames".

    Qtard: You wish for me to be an idiot. Like you.

    If you were an idiot "like me" you'd be smart. But you aren't. You've proven yourself to be an idiot. Over and over.

    Qtard: Or even bigger (if that us possible.

    It's very possible. You prove it every time you comment.

    Qtard: And fall for such miserable tricks.

    I dunno what you are even talking about. Idiot considers being truthful a "trick"?

    Qtard: For the very least -- if you want from opponent to do something, to behave somehow up to your expectation -- you must show that behavior... itself.

    If that is what I have been doing -- it isn't working. I'm debating honestly and you're lying. Not trying to be an honest debater like me. At all.

    Qtard: Double standards -- do not work.

    Well, you could stop it with all the idiotic lies. Now that you've admitted they aren't working. But you won't.

    \Lie. I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it"\\ Like I need your words to be exactly like that to make such conclusion.

    Sounds like an admission that you're a liar. You will tell me "what Derpy really mean" in regards to my own words.

    Qtard: But well... your showing Moronity... that is just spectacular.

    Wrote "your" when you meant "me", yes?

    Qtard: You, who tried to repel my claim higher on that idiotic base Moronic Literality that "I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it"."

    wtf? I responded to what you wrote. You are admitting your own words are moronity? I agree.

    Qtard: Itself using lame subvertion of my words by pretending that I EVER have said/written here ""I do deny em their rights"" EXACTLY.

    You did. Who gives a shit about "exactly". That is what you said I meant.

    Qtard: Though it obvious lie.

    Truth.

    Qtard: And you will not only will not be able to give QUOTE.

    I will be able to quote.

    You repeated your lie right HERE...

    "I *DO* deny..." em their rights". ;-P

    It's right there! You just repeated your lie! Immediately after denying it!

    Qtard: And now... this Utterly Moronic Try... :-)))))))))

    I agree. Your denial is utterly moronic.

    Qtard: But you are mpron not for nothing. :-))))))))))))))))))))

    Wrote "you" instead of "I".

    Qtard: Please, continue-continue like that... pulling Charlie Gordon. :-))))

    Impossible. I can't "continue" doing something I have never done. Not even once.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Qtard: like whining that dRump is guilty. Though it his right as mere human -- to be protected by Presumption of Innocence.

    He has it. In court. Rules governoring courts and trials do not apply to individuals and their opinions. But you are too stupid to understand this.

    Qtard: THAT MUCH you are "defender" of "people having their rights".

    I am. You are not. Want to take away from me my right to have my own opinions.

    Qtard: But not of their Unseverable Human Rights...

    Lie.

    Qtard: ...but their "right" to be "protected from violation".

    I don't know why you put quote marks around "protected from violation". As if you are quoting me. When did I write that? Give a link or admit you are a liar.

    Qtard: Like with censure of information they would receive.

    What information? Censored by who? I dunno what you're talking about. Demanding again that intelligence agencies reveal sources and methods? So the enemies of the US can take countermeasures? Kill undercover agents?

    Qtard: Totalitarian (wannabe?)

    No. Totalitarian opposer.

    Qtard: Derr Punn YET ONE time CONFIRMED his desmissiveness toward Unseverable Human Rights.

    I have confirmed my unwavering support for human rights over and over.

    Qtard: But it will deny it further too... with "I NEVER said it" or any other way. Yawn.

    Why would I not deny it by saying YOU LIE? I very strongly demand human rights for all.

    Qtard: And I must believe to such a stooopid lie? You did it just in that comment I just commented.

    Did not.

    Qtard: A dozen or more lies.

    No. Not NewSeak "yes". Not "just what a liar would say".

    Qtard: But. Somehow. I must fall to your level. And start believing into your lies not being lies????

    You'd need to rise to my level. Stop falsely claiming my true comments are lies.

    Qtard's What an Utter Moronity. You showing here. Derr Punn.

    Telling your alter ego Derr Punn? What about De-Ru-Pi and De-Ru-Pun? Why not tell them too?

    ReplyDelete
  31. \\What words? I dunno what words you are talking about. Quote them.

    THIS words ^^^^^

    With which you admitted being idiot, which trying to play card being imbecile. :-))))))))))))

    What a moron. :-))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\How could I know if I said it or not when you gave no quote of words allegedly said?

    Doubling-down on being imbecile, yes Derr Punn? :-)))))))

    Very Last Trick in your Sleave. :-))))))))))))))))))))))

    Play being dumber then dumb, to make opponent so disgusted with its denseness, that it will flee.

    But... too bad. I'm such opponent which such miserly tricks only ENTERTAIN.

    So, continue-continue... pulling Charlie Gordon. :-)))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: \\Like you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?\\Well... it not supported by any logic. Not based on any facts.

    \\Lie. Based on you calling yourself "Q". Are you denying you did?

    Tsk-tsk-tsk. ;-P

    Based on occurrence of same letter "Q"... but that is not causation, only correlation.

    There is LOTS of different words that have same letters.

    Like Shit and Sweep.

    Do you like to have former instead of later in your tea... on the "base" of such shity idiotic conclusion? ;-P

    Surely you do. Cause you are... I-D-I-O-T. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\LOL! Qtard called itself a "much smarter opponent".

    \\LOL! Qtard said it's dumb words are "smart".

    Yawn.

    It's natural for idiots -- to not understand what smartness and smart words are. To try to dismiss em too.

    That was predictable.

    And just YET ONE evidence that you are I-D-I-O-T. ;-P

    Nothing more.



    \\There is no such basis. Not in regards to me. In regards to you? Yes.

    If you'd only knew what you are trying to ask... :-))))))))))))))))))))

    But how could you... you are the idiot.

    Who trying to say that there is NO facts... because it "believing in facts"...



    \\Means... My conclusion that you are a complete moron pretending to be smart... Is completely rational. Also likely 100 percent accurate.

    Oh, no, Wisest of the Wise revealed my stoopidity!!! Now I am completely defeated, with its Wisdom!!!

    Naaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    It just made YET ONE blunder of a complete moron. Utter Idiot mentioned word "rational".

    Ok, Google... what "rational meaning"

    adjective: rational

    1.
    based on or in accordance with reason or logic.
    "I'm sure there's a perfectly rational explanation"


    So... dumb dupe dummy Derr Punn... WHERE is Reason??? WHERE is Logic??? In any of your words??? ;-P




    .

    ReplyDelete
  32. Qtard: \\What words? I dunno what words you are talking about. Quote them\\THIS words ^^^^^

    Pointers to words just said? That isn't a quote of words previously written. Moronic games again. Like when you refused to quote words written 3 times and you gave timestamps instead. Obviously there are none.

    Qtard: Based on occurrence of same letter "Q"... but that is not causation, only correlation.

    Q Plus "tard" because you are a proven moron.

    Qtard: So... dumb dupe dummy Derr Punn... WHERE is Reason??? WHERE is Logic??? In any of your words???

    Asking your alter ego Derr Punn? But when you ask one of them -- they never answer. Not in writing, at least. Maybe Derr Punn whispered the answer to you?

    ReplyDelete
  33. \\Pointers to words just said? That isn't a quote of words previously written. Moronic games again. Like when you refused to quote words written 3 times and you gave timestamps instead. Obviously there are none.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Are you imbecile... or just an idiot pretending being imbecile?

    You must be thinking that you found my weakness? With that "written 3 times".

    And now you trying to use it as a "cunning" trick.

    Please, continue-continue.

    That is SO-O-O hilarious. :-)))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Q Plus "tard" because you are a proven moron.

    So what???

    That's just an explanation of how it emerged in your dumb head. Being DUMB simple. And that way easy to come up with, for DUMB person.

    But that is not a fact I need to take into account.

    Especially as I already know that you are idiot -- such idiotic ideas emerging in your mind add nothing to that conclusion.

    Yawn.


    \\Qtard: So... dumb dupe dummy Derr Punn... WHERE is Reason??? WHERE is Logic??? In any of your words???

    \\Asking your alter ego Derr Punn? But when you ask one of them -- they never answer. Not in writing, at least. Maybe Derr Punn whispered the answer to you?

    Derpy-Derr Punn just ADMITTED that it have NEITHER Reason NOR Logic to support its moronic claims...

    Congrats Derr Punn, congrats -- you did it YET AGAIN -- pulled Charlie Gordon. ;-P



    \\Qtard: \\But you keep using different names. Think I'm supposed to respond to any name you use as if you're talking about me? I have no obligation to do that\\ Why you whine about "you pretend I don't mean YOU when I refer to "Qtard"?" then??? ;-P

    \\Non sequitur. I brought up the fact that I have consistently referred to you as "Qtard". While you continue to use different "nicknames".

    Yeah?

    And you can provide LOGICAL explanation? How it CAN BE "Non sequitur."?

    Because your "consistency" proves only that you are consistently dumb. ;-P



    \\If you were an idiot "like me" you'd be smart. But you aren't. You've proven yourself to be an idiot. Over and over.

    Yeah? Really?

    But such a "smart" as you... NOT ABLE to provide NEITHER facts, NOR logical or just any EXPLANATION.

    That is just self-revealing of what flavor of "smart" you are -- self proclaimed "smart"... dumb asses. :-))))))))))))))))))

    Is there something which could prevent dumb ass to call itself "smart"? No, there is not such thing. All words or more or less equal. And easy to utter for anyone.

    Even Poppy the parrot can say it. "I'm smart. I'm smart. I'm the f*g genius" -- does that mean that we need to award it with a Noble Prize??? :-))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  34. \\It's very possible. You prove it every time you comment.

    Yep.

    I'm glad that you admitted that with every my comment I proving you being dumb. And even dumber. ;-P


    \\Idiot considers being truthful a "trick"?

    I'm glad that you know at least that about... itself. :-)))))))))))))

    Like claiming "I believe in facts". And calling facts and quotes "nasty tricks". :-)))))



    \\If that is what I have been doing -- it isn't working. I'm debating honestly and you're lying. Not trying to be an honest debater like me. At all.

    Cause... I do not know NewSpeak. That much.

    I only started learning it from you. ;-P

    Blame it on itself. As you are stupid in all things, you are stupid as teacher too. :-)))))))



    \\Qtard: Double standards -- do not work.

    \\Well, you could stop it with all the idiotic lies. Now that you've admitted they aren't working. But you won't.

    Not my problem.

    My standards are adamant usage of evident facts and stone cold logic.

    But, Derpy the Idiot unable to grok it. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\\Lie. I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it"\\ Like I need your words to be exactly like that to make such conclusion.

    \\Sounds like an admission that you're a liar. You will tell me "what Derpy really mean" in regards to my own words.

    Same as just above.

    You just confirmed, Derr Punn, that you are moron wannabe imbecile, that unable to grok my explanations. Based on facts and logic. Because it declared that facts do not exist... because it need to believe in em, while he don't like, don't able to. :-))))))

    Yawn.



    \\Qtard: But well... your showing Moronity... that is just spectacular.

    \\Wrote "your" when you meant "me", yes?

    Dunno.

    You cutted it out of context.

    Try to make CORRECT quotes...

    but wait, you CAN'T, because you are moron. :-))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: You, who tried to repel my claim higher on that idiotic base Moronic Literality that "I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it"."

    \\wtf? I responded to what you wrote. You are admitting your own words are moronity? I agree.

    :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Moron Derpy CANNOT even recall (refresh it's loony memories with re-reading) what it said. :-)))))))

    But it ready to agree it was Moronity to say it that way. Because it was unable to respond to a smart comment.

    Now, as ever, it trying to pull lazy and oversimplistic trick "no, you are fool". :-))))))))

    While obviously thinking that it would not be seen by much more smarter opponent.

    Yes, Derr Punn, that is what your thought was, here? ;-P



    ReplyDelete
  35. \\Qtard: Itself using lame subvertion of my words by pretending that I EVER have said/written here ""I do deny em their rights"" EXACTLY.

    \\You did. Who gives a shit about "exactly".

    Who???

    It was YOU. Just ABOVE!

    When tryed to claim that... copy-pasting "Lie. I never said "I never said it" in regards to "I never said it".

    So... sometime it need to be EXACTLY -- mostly when *I* saying/writing it. Though I *ALREADY* doing 100% copy-pasted QUOTES of your words.

    While same time... when it YOUR moronic babbling -- it DO NOT need to be EXACT.

    Oh, yeah. I GOT it, Liar Derr Punn. For a YEAR and some more time. ALREADY. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    That you are *liar*. And that's why ANY *exactness* is like a garlic and holy water to a vampire... makes you hiss. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\That is what you said I meant.

    Yeah??? And you can confirm it? With CORRECT QUOTES???

    Or that is just "what I (heinous liar and hypocrite) mean that you (my much smarter and truthful opponent) meant" idiotic idea of Derr Punn The Idiot AKA Dervish Sadners MEANS. ;-P



    \\Qtard: Though it obvious lie.

    \\Truth.

    Yap.

    In NewSpeak!

    Congrats for admitting. It. ;-P



    \\"I *DO* deny..." em their rights". ;-P

    \\It's right there! You just repeated your lie! Immediately after denying it!

    Yeah???

    And you "never ever" written something like in that excerpt "I *DO* deny..." -- word-to-word.

    What an miserly idiotic lie.

    YOU are one who CONFIRMED several times -- that YOU know and remember PERFECTLY WELL... to which of your words that excerpt refers. And that that is YOUR OWN WORDS -- YOUR EMPHASIS -- to write it like "I *DO*". ;-P

    What a miserly NewSpeak talker you are. :-))))))))))))))))))



    \\Impossible. I can't "continue" doing something I have never done. Not even once.

    Yeah.

    While you... itself ADMITTED that "some times I do"... but other then that -- "I never done".

    What a moronic liar. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Derr Punn are.

    That is... some childish lies. Children tend to lie in such a silly unsophisticated way.

    Maybe Derr Punn is a child? Naaah.

    His brain is just impared, so it behave like a kid. :-))))))))

    Like his holy Bi-den. ;-P






    ReplyDelete
  36. \\ Dervish Sanders said...

    \\ Qtard: like whining that dRump is guilty. Though it his right as mere human -- to be protected by Presumption of Innocence.

    \\ He has it. In court. Rules governoring courts and trials do not apply to individuals and their opinions. But you are too stupid to understand this.

    Aha!

    So... ONLY judge and prosecutor must (hypocritically) pretend that defendant not guilty.

    And only while in court.

    And all other time. Outside of the court. In media and press. Among general public... it ALLOWED to call innocent people CRIMINALS??? and ostracize and impair their human rights?

    YES???

    And that can be called "democratic"??? Though -- that is EXACTLY how it is in Totalitarian countries. Where coming into court means 99.9% being judged. Even if you are completely innocent.

    Yes? Totalitarian Derr Punn.

    THAT IS your "standards of democracy".



    \\Qtard: THAT MUCH you are "defender" of "people having their rights".

    \\I am. You are not. Want to take away from me my right to have my own opinions.

    YAP!

    That SAME raving as of Totalitarian Manslaghter liliPut.

    That ALSO whining about his "right for opinion" -- that Ukrainians are Nazis, and he must kill em all -- was "taken away".

    Ough... but Derr Punn have THE SAME "opinion" too.

    If it walk as totalitarian, if it quack as totalitarian -- it IS totalitarian.

    Yawn.



    \\I don't know why you put quote marks around "protected from violation". As if you are quoting me. When did I write that? Give a link or admit you are a liar.

    Go learn to use Google. ;-P

    Or... just CONFIRM yet one time that you are moron. :-)))))))))))))))))))) Nearly an imbecile.

    Dunno how to use Google. :-))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: Totalitarian (wannabe?)

    \\No. Totalitarian opposer.

    Yeah.

    NewSpeak.



    \\I have confirmed my unwavering support for human rights over and over.

    Yeah?

    Same as when you written "I *DO* deny..." and even when you EXPLAINED what your mean -- that you ONLY "denied em HAVING such rights"??? Though that is Unseveralbe Human Rights -- Immanent, MEANS -- CANNOT be denied! :-))))))))

    If one is not totalitarian. But Derr Punn ARE totalitarian. Same as his sock-master liliPut. ;-P



    \\Why would I not deny it by saying YOU LIE? I very strongly demand human rights for all.

    Except for... nasty-nasty-J6insurrectionists... or nasty-nasty-dRump.

    Like JUST ABOVE... you denied dRump Presumption of Innocence protection. ;-P

    Means... that's all just a NewSpeak lying hypocrisy. :-))))))))))))))))0



    \\Qtard: And I must believe to such a stooopid lie? You did it just in that comment I just commented.

    \\Did not.

    Just so obvious lie. But you are relentlessly hypocritical liar not for nothing. Derr Punn. :-))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: A dozen or more lies.

    \\No. Not NewSeak "yes". Not "just what a liar would say".

    Why not?

    FACTS say it is.

    And FACTS are Obvious and Absolute Truth. ;-P

    Undeniable.

    Except, if by idiotic NewSpeak talkers like Derr Punn -- and that is ALSO is a FACT... by now.

    You are liar. And liar... is YOU. :-))))))))))))))))))))

    One to one correspondence.

    Like... there is one who lying non-stop in this blog comments. And there is one who use nickname/account Dervish Sadners.

    Liar and hypocrite, and Dervish Sadners coming into a bar... and then IT ask a drink for ITself. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))









    ReplyDelete
  37. You're a liar and an idiot. Imaginary rights are NOT unseveralbe or immanent. Imaginary rights CAN be denied. There is no sore loser "right" to attempt to violently overturn the results of a free and fair democratic election losers are sad about losing. Even if they feel (despite there being no evidence) the election was "stolen". You calling this a "human right" only proves your moronity.

    Qtard: Like JUST ABOVE... you denied dRump Presumption of Innocence protection.

    Lie. Anyone who read my comment can see you lied. Because you are a liar.

    ReplyDelete
  38. \\Imaginary rights CAN be denied.

    Yap.

    And you are Nazi and Totalitarian.

    Who DARE to call Immanent Human Rights -- "imaginary". ;-P


    \\Lie. Anyone who read my comment can see you lied. Because you are a liar.

    Yap.

    Anybody of your pack of DEMN liars and totalitarians wannabe.

    But is this surprising anyhow???

    There is ONE and a HALF billion of China Commies who are in one boat with you.

    So... that is pretty damn obvious and natural.

    Though Utterly SAD, too.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Dervish Sanders, Human Rights DefenderDecember 10, 2023 at 9:13 AM

    Qtard: Who DARE to call Immanent Human Rights -- "imaginary".

    No. You lie. I called the "right" you made up imaginary. Real Human Rights are real and DEMANDED by me. Demanded and strongly defended. Including by rejecting totalitarian lovers like you adding fake ones. Fake "rights" designed to undermine the real ones. Or destroy them. Which is what Putin fans like you want -- to see democracy in America destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  40. \\No. You lie. I called the "right" you made up imaginary.

    Yap.

    Rights mentioned in Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Which are on a display in museum. And reprinted many-many times. Became base for LAWS of United Nation whole world countries gethering.

    But... for Derpy Totalitarian it is just "imaginary".

    Because it only "believes in facts"... of its own choosing.



    \\Real Human Rights are real and DEMANDED by me.

    You are free to CITE The Source of what you call "Real Human Rights".

    Is it Right to censor Free Speach? Or that is "protection from violation".

    Or Right to forbid people to go by public streets and go into public buildings? Or that is "insurrection".

    Or Right to call people Nazis? Or that is "holy truthes" of DEMN propaganda. ;-P




    \\Including by rejecting totalitarian lovers like you adding fake ones.

    Yeah...

    like cited from Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Which... by opinion of Derr Punn totalitarian sock-puppet are "fake" one.



    \\Fake "rights" designed to undermine the real ones. Or destroy them. Which is what Putin fans like you want -- to see democracy in America destroyed.

    Yes, yes, yes.

    Nazis of the Future will be calling itself Anti-Nazi.

    Totalitarians of the Future will be calling itself Protectors of democracy... oups, they do it ALL of the time, in ALL ages.

    Calling their totalitarian rule -- Most Definite and True DEMN-OK-ratsy.

    Like just today -- pope of Russian Church called its country "most free"... an par with only handfull of other... pity that it not voclised FULL LIST.

    Of that "most free"... shitholes.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Qtard: Rights mentioned in Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Lie. The "right" you are talking about is NOT in the Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Qtard: \\Putin fans like you want -- to see democracy in America destroyed.\\Yes, yes, yes.

    That is a very enthusiastic confirmation. Thanky for admitting your hatred for democracy.

    ReplyDelete
  42. \\Lie. The "right" you are talking about is NOT in the Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Yawn.

    Even though I posted excerpt directly from it...

    Or you just decided to moniker your lies before saying em??? :-))))))

    Like "Now it will be LIE..."? :-)))



    \\That is a very enthusiastic confirmation. Thanky for admitting your hatred for democracy.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    And not to BEGINNING of that your SELF-REVEALING blurt: "\\Fake "rights" designed to undermine the real ones."??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Where you ADMITTED being fake... well, REAL one liliPut-like and liking totalitarian.

    Who trying to proclaim being "protector of deocracy".

    Thought it do not need protection. Especially from likes of you. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  43. Qtard: Even though I posted excerpt directly from it...

    Lie. That would be impossible. Given that you made it up.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Well, you did post an excerpt from the DOI, but the excerpt did not say it is an unalienable right for sore losers to violently overthrow a democratically elected leader.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...

    Joe Biden won the election, thus Joe Biden has the consent of the governed.

    Qtard: Where you ADMITTED being fake... well, REAL one liliPut-like and liking totalitarian.

    You admitted your Putin-like hatred for democracy with your dismissal of the consent of the governed. Majority rule is democracy. You argue for minority rule. Say rights of the majority is "tyranny". That is your NewSpeak definition.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I didn't vote for donald tRump in 2016. So... He was a despot ruling by force during his first term? donald tRump will be a despot ruling by force if he gets back in the White House in 2024? Maybe Joe Biden should order him arrested and sent to Gitmo as an enemy of the United States?

    ReplyDelete
  46. \\Lie. That would be impossible. Given that you made it up.

    :-)))))))))))))))))))

    Yep.

    I traveled in time and made up all that thing -- American Revolution, War for independence and Declaration of Independence signing. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Just because it too unbearable to a DEMN totalitarian hypocrite being revealed being Anti-Human Rights critter and totalitarian propaganda chanter. :-))))))))))))))



    Yep.

    Here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>VVVVVV

    \\deriving their >>>just<<< powers from the consent of the governed...

    Means that when people going to public places to ASK "those who know better", those... who are IN POWER, and NEED to ANSWER to such question...

    they do not put in jail for that -- because, that is what totalitarians do...



    \\Joe Biden won the election, thus Joe Biden has the consent of the governed.

    All of em?

    Well... King of England was put on the throne in all accordance with customs and laws of that time... and under consent of governed.

    But... some, from distant colonies, decided to revolt against him, anyway.



    \\You admitted your Putin-like hatred for democracy with your dismissal of the consent of the governed.

    Pft! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))

    Anti-Human Rights Totalitarians. That got his lying guts to utter "I *DO* deny..." to the people he don't like HAVING ANY human rights. Could accuse me here, with something like that. :-)))))))

    That's like if man-eater Dr.Hannibal Lecter would try to accuse me being cannibal... for nibbling my own cracked nail. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Majority rule is democracy.

    BS.

    That would be just Despoty of Majority. As it was in almost everywhere from primordial times.

    Rule of Fist. Laws of Jungle. Might makes Right. And Etc...

    Derpy the Idiot just YET ONE time conmfirmed that it dunno what mean words it trying to use to sound smart. :-))))))))))))))))))))



    \\You argue for minority rule. Say rights of the majority is "tyranny". That is your NewSpeak definition.

    Yap.

    United Nation Declaration of Human Rights definition.

    "Truth speaking" NewSpeak type of heinous totalitarian LIAR tryes to dismiss and subvert.

    Following orders of its sock-master liliPut...

    ReplyDelete
  47. Qtard: I traveled in time and made up all that thing -- American Revolution, War for independence and Declaration of Independence signing.

    Lie. "Right" you're claiming exists has NOTHING to do with any of that.

    I didn't say any of that was made up. Certainly not by you. What you made up was a "right" to violently overturn the results of a free and fair democratic election. That isn't what the Founders did.

    Qtard: ...utter "I *DO* deny..." to the people he don't like HAVING ANY human rights.

    Lie. Fake quote.

    Qtard: Following orders of its sock-master liliPut...

    Lie. I never even heard of the band Liliput until you brought them up.

    You follow the orders of your master, Putin. Repeating him almost word for word.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Qtard: United Nation Declaration of Human Rights definition.

    Lie. The UN never came out in favor of the J6 insurrectionists. The UN never said the human rights of the J6 insurrectionists is being violated.

    Qtard: \\Joe Biden won the election, thus Joe Biden has the consent of the governed\\ All of em?

    donald tRump got 100 percent of the vote in 2016? Qtard confirmed it doesn't even know what "consent of the governed" means.

    ReplyDelete
  49. \\Lie. "Right" you're claiming exists has NOTHING to do with any of that.

    Yawn.

    You are free to demonstrate with facts and logic -- why my words not true.

    But.

    You are just a miserly I-D-I-O-T... that's why you only cry out your false "lie", "no", "never" and etc fitting moserly idiot miserly babbling. :-))))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: ...utter "I *DO* deny..." to the people he don't like HAVING ANY human rights.

    \\Lie. Fake quote.

    Yeah.

    Fake.

    Like all that time that you itself confirmed that you recognize that quote, and showed definitely that you know that YOU said it... that "I *DO* deny..." -- exactly with that emphasis, exactly in that context, exactly with that totalitarian meaning behind it.

    And now... in absolutely same totalitarian way -- trying to call it "fake". "Lie". Etc.

    Like it described in famous "1984" text, which described such a totalitarian way of thinking with all clear and transparent details -- do lie, then go say that you NEVER lied, and persuade people around to admit that your lies are truth, and truth is lies...

    Yawn.



    ReplyDelete
  50. Qtard: You are free to demonstrate with facts and logic -- why my words not true.

    I need to disprove that you are a time travelling moron? That you traveled back to the time of the "fathers founders" and helped them revolt? The USA exists separate from the UK thanks to you?

    Qtard: You are just a miserly I-D-I-O-T... that's why you only cry out your false "lie", "no", "never" and etc fitting moserly idiot miserly babbling.

    Like I need to write any more to refute the lies of a babbling moron.

    Qtard: ...utter "I *DO* deny..." to the people he don't like HAVING ANY human rights.\\Lie. Fake quote. Yeah. Fake.

    Yes. FAKE.

    Qtard: Like all that time that you itself confirmed that you recognize that quote...

    I recognize a partial quote. One you added lies to.

    Qtard: ...showed definitely that you know that YOU said it... that "I *DO* deny..." -- exactly with that emphasis, exactly in that context, exactly with that totalitarian meaning behind it.

    Lie. I definitely know I did not say that with that totalitarian meaning behind it.

    Qtard: And now... in absolutely same totalitarian way -- trying to call it "fake". "Lie". Etc.

    It is fake. Calling out lies isn't "totalitarian".

    Qtard: Like it described in famous "1984" text...

    Another lie.

    Qtard: ...do lie, then go say that you NEVER lied, and persuade people around to admit that your lies are truth, and truth is lies...

    What you do.

    ReplyDelete
  51. \\What you do.

    Yeah?

    And you can demonstrate where and how? With basing it on facts and logic?

    Naaaah. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    That's why it's so funny.

    Continue-continue.

    My personal totalitarian clown. :-))))))))))))))))))




    \\Qtard: Like it described in famous "1984" text...

    \\Another lie.

    Like you can show... where and how it is anyhow can be any lie. :-))))))))))))))))))

    But... naaah, you can only continue your counter-factual self-revealing yammering. :-))))))))))))))

    Which is... DEMN amusing.

    Continue-continue.

    Yawn.



    \\It is fake. Calling out lies isn't "totalitarian".

    Yeah?

    When Stalin was calling innocent people "enemies of a state", when Hitler was calling Jews "vermin", when Mao and Poi Pot was instigating poor and uneducated people at those who know some stuff -- that all was NOT totalitarian lies???

    Well... of course, from totalitarian wannabe point of view, that think that Despoty of Majority it's Trut Demn-OK-ratsy. :-)))))))))))))))))))))



    \\Lie. I definitely know I did not say that with that totalitarian meaning behind it.

    Nobody CARE about what you "know" or "don't know".

    Only FACTS matter.

    And facts is -- YOU have had said "I *DO* deny..." -- with that emphasis exactly and with that totalitarian meaning exactly.

    And... you trying to embellish that erroneous totalitarian overview... with SAME totalitarian methods of deceptive lies and twisting meaning and outright denial of FACTUAL TRUTH.


    \\I recognize a partial quote. One you added lies to.

    What lies???

    That you... itself, DOUBLED-DOWN on "I only denied em HAViNG such rights"???

    Which you REPEAT every time.

    Means... one-to-one correspondence with ANY OTHER totalitarian liars out there. That lie about their crimes. While trying to re-name their crimes.

    Like... most obvious -- Hitler was killing Jews, but forced everyone under his power to BELIEVE, or just say that one believe... that that was "freeing Germany from filth of vermins".

    It's not bad to eradicate people... if one would make people to call em vermins.

    SAME... as you re-named people that was just going by public streets and into public buildings to ask legitimate question... insurrectionists.

    "Insurrectionists"... they are not people that deserve having any rights, isn't it?



    \\Qtard: You are just a miserly I-D-I-O-T... that's why you only cry out your false "lie", "no", "never" and etc fitting moserly idiot miserly babbling.

    \\Like I need to write any more to refute the lies of a babbling moron.

    Dunno.

    Why you need to refute its own lies...

    Cause you are moron? Probably.

    Pulling Charlie Gordon. :-))))))))))))))))



    \\Qtard: You are free to demonstrate with facts and logic -- why my words not true.

    \\I need to disprove that you are a time travelling moron? That you traveled back to the time of the "fathers founders" and helped them revolt? The USA exists separate from the UK thanks to you?

    Yup.

    That was YOUR claim.

    That *I*.

    Somehow.

    Forged that Declaration of Independence of USA.

    Dunno how.

    But you was SO-O-O-O adamant about it. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    But now you claim that that is impossible? ;-P

    What WISE thing to do... Charlie Gordon.

    To show... ITSELF, how idiotic your other claim are.

    Just to make it with YET ONE bullshit claim.

    And that... ad nausiem. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    But... that is where all fun are. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    To look into what MOAR infinitely nauseous idiocy it can extort... out of its deficient brain. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0000


    ReplyDelete
  52. Derr Punn silently agreeing here too... it seems. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  53. No. There is no f*cking way I would ever agree with any of the idiocy you wrote above.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Perfect Cringing!

    Of a totalitarian I-D-I-O-T. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  55. Imaginary cringing the mentally ill Qtard sees in it's delusions.

    ReplyDelete
  56. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    Continue-continue your cringing. Derr Punn. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    I know you can do it ad nausiem -- confirming being utter moron that unable to help it -- to continue-continue to cringe... more, MORE, MOAAAAR :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    ReplyDelete
  57. Imaginary cringing the mentally ill Qtard sees in it's delusions.

    ReplyDelete
  58. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

    ReplyDelete
  59. No more cringing? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  60. No imbecilic backbites here? :-))))))

    ReplyDelete