...and somehow the tax code the Democrats completely rewrote in the last two years applied to dotard donald while he was predisent? I guess (if that is true) the Democrats wanted dotard to pay very little (or nothing). The Democrats (now that they have Dotard's taxes for the last 6 years) must be happy that dotard donald benefited from the tax code as they completely rewrote it. Did the republiturds object and propose raising taxes on the wealthy?
Since most Democrats pay no taxes (except their billionaire leaders) the hoi poloi Democrats are always calling for increases but their billionaire sponsors never do.
They got nothing because they don't exist. There are no "pro-war Hillary Democrats". The anti-war pro-Democracy Democrats might have received some MIC donations, but I very seriously doubt it is "billions". Though you've presented no evidence of ANY donations.
\\...in other word's "America's War by Proxy" of "choice" (2014 coup).
Coup? And who became tyrant/dictator in it's result?
Isn't that... Putin himself? Who through that coup snatched non-legal type of power -- from (semi)democratic into warlord? lord-protector? emperor wannabe?
Will it come out of Trump's tax debt?
ReplyDeleteWhat debt would that be? Did you redo his taxes for him?
ReplyDeleteI know you paid more income taxes than he did
ReplyDelete....and so did the single mom scorching coffee down at the Waffle House
ReplyDeleteI didn't write the tax code. That would have been Democrats these past two years.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats rewrote the entire tax code in the last 2 years?
ReplyDelete...and somehow the tax code the Democrats completely rewrote in the last two years applied to dotard donald while he was predisent? I guess (if that is true) the Democrats wanted dotard to pay very little (or nothing). The Democrats (now that they have Dotard's taxes for the last 6 years) must be happy that dotard donald benefited from the tax code as they completely rewrote it. Did the republiturds object and propose raising taxes on the wealthy?
ReplyDeleteDemocrats rewrote the entire tax code in the last 2 years?
ReplyDeleteNope. But they could have and didn't. It was more "important" to investigate January 6.... e-r-r-r-r-p!
\\Did the republiturds object and propose raising taxes on the wealthy?
ReplyDeleteSo? Taxes must only rise? ;-P
Since most Democrats pay no taxes (except their billionaire leaders) the hoi poloi Democrats are always calling for increases but their billionaire sponsors never do.
ReplyDeleteOoops, did I say hoi polloi? I meant hoi kakoi!
ReplyDeleteMinus: Since most Democrats pay no taxes...
ReplyDeleteFalse.
Hah? So, businesses is First Order citizens in USA? And can even vote?
ReplyDeleteThat is ineresting fact to know...
Dervy loves to post 5 year old articles that have long since proven to be false.
ReplyDeleteBetter than voting... business' can donate billions to political campaigns.
ReplyDeleteTime passing doesn't prove facts you dislike to be false.
ReplyDeleteNo, but federal tax changes rendered them "truer". Those blue states used to exempt high state taxes from federal income taxes.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFalser. Now that the state taxes can't be deducted blue staters are paying MORE.
ReplyDelete\\Time passing doesn't prove facts you dislike to be false.
ReplyDeleteEven if something remains true... it can became unimportant. ;-P
But that is too big, too hard to understand for your brains, Derpy.
Yes, now they're paying more, but when the article was written, they were paying less.
ReplyDelete...MUCH less.
ReplyDeleteMinus: ...when the article was written, they were paying less.
ReplyDeleteStill more than red staters.
...becasue Red Staters were paying their State tax bills, which they drew zero benefits from.
ReplyDeleteFalse.
ReplyDeleteYep. Too hard.
ReplyDeleteIt's boring to be right each time. :-)))
lol! Without the Red States, the Blue States would be speaking Chinese.
ReplyDelete?
ReplyDeleteWTF?
ReplyDeleteIs that Mandarin or Cantonese?
ReplyDeletePetrogliph. ;-P From his coprolithic scull.
ReplyDeleteMinus is clearly calling for Lindsey to be assassinated.
ReplyDeleteIs he on my naughty or nice list?
ReplyDeleteKill list.
ReplyDeleteSanta and I have a kill list? You're definitely going on the Naughty List again this year, dervy.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the actual question we should be asking is what kickbacks did the republiturd pro-Putin caucus receive for their NO votes?
ReplyDelete...cuz the Democrat caucus got billions.
ReplyDelete...in your delusions.
ReplyDeleteThe pro-War Hillary Democrats didn't get billions in donations from the military industrial complex for their "Yes" votes? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteThey got nothing because they don't exist. There are no "pro-war Hillary Democrats". The anti-war pro-Democracy Democrats might have received some MIC donations, but I very seriously doubt it is "billions". Though you've presented no evidence of ANY donations.
ReplyDeletelol!
ReplyDeleteHow many anti-war Democrats voted against the Ukraine War funding resolutions again?
The "LOL" is directed at yourself for confusing "millions" for "billions"?
DeleteALL the anti-war Democrats voted to fund Ukraine's self defense.
...in other word's "America's War by Proxy" of "choice" (2014 coup).
ReplyDeleteAnd how many elections did Democrats solicit donations from the MIC for, Dervy? Just one, or every year since 1828?
Billions.
Putin chose to go into Ukraine in February 2022, not 1828.
Delete\\...in other word's "America's War by Proxy" of "choice" (2014 coup).
ReplyDeleteCoup?
And who became tyrant/dictator in it's result?
Isn't that... Putin himself? Who through that coup snatched non-legal type of power -- from (semi)democratic into warlord? lord-protector? emperor wannabe?