...as those who were once "socially oppressed" historically reject and oppress their new surgically-minted "trans" wannabe members to prevent them from sharing in their current 'inter-sectionally determined' social privileges?
And perhaps answer the more important question, "Does/Should history confer "rights," social, moral, retributive, or "other"?
"If identity becomes the problem of sexual existence, and if people think... that their own identity has to become the law, the principle, the code of their existence; if the perennial question they ask is "Does this thing conform to my identity?" then, I think, they will turn back to a kind of ethics very close to the old heterosexual virility."
"...the relationships we have to have with ourselves are not ones of identity, rather, they must be relationships of differentiation, of creation, of innovation."
- Michel Foucault
---
"I'm not at ease with "lesbian theories, gay theories," for as I've argued elsewhere, identity categories tend to be instruments of regulatory regimes"- Judith Butler
"Is it not a sign of despair over public politics when identity becomes its own policy, bringing with it those who would "police" it from various sides?"
"And this is not a call to return to silence or invisibility, but, rather, to make use of a category that can be called into question, made to account for what it excludes"
---
"The dangers of identity politics... are that it casts as authentic to the self or group an identity that in fact is defined by its opposition to an Other. Reclaiming such an identity as one's own merely reinforces its dependence on this dominant Other, and further internalizes and reinforces an oppressive hierarchy.
While the charge that identity politics promotes a victim mentality is often a facile pot-shot, Wendy Brown offers a more sophisticated caution against the dangers of ressentiment (the moralizing revenge of the powerless). She argues that identity politics has its own genealogy in liberal capitalism that relentlessly reinforces the "wounded attachments" it claims to sever."
- The Stanford Dictionary of Philosophy
Sounds like a VERY positive conversion to me. I'm all for it.
ReplyDeleteI prefer the guy who converted to "dragon".
ReplyDeleteYou can't convert to dragon.
ReplyDeleteYu can't? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteLet's just hope that they never breed.
ReplyDelete...they're all so BRAVE!
ReplyDeleteBWAH!
No. Dragons aren't even real.
ReplyDeleteThat's just HATE speech...
ReplyDeleteEvangelicals believe gay people aren't real (being gay is a choice). That's hate speech.
ReplyDeleteProof that gayness IS a choice... the "trans".
ReplyDeleteProof that dragons are real? The '+' in LGBT+
ReplyDeleteYou considered turning gay but decided not to?
ReplyDeleteAsexual Dragon wannabe's aren't a plus? Who knew? Sounds "brave" to me... kinda like a 'F You tattoo across one's forehead.
ReplyDeleteThe + stands for: Pansexual, Agender, Gender Queer, Bigender, Gender Variant and Pangender.
ReplyDelete"Dragon" isn't on the list.