Factcheck.org: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. [end fact check]
Dixon Diaz is a liar. A homophobic/transphobic liar. Barack Obama is a faithful family man. The kind of person the Right says they like. But he's Black and a Democrat. Thus the sick lies. btw, you like these lies because you're a homophobic/transphobic racist too.
Dotard decided to punish Edward Snowden (by not giving him a pardon) for being too patriotic? Who knew? As a public service long-haired blonde guy tells you what products not to buy. How nice of him.
ps - So if Barack Obama ever did regain his law license, he couldn't in future be charged with lying on his original BAR application and then forced to surrender it? Who knew that surrendering it before trial would negate the consequences, unlike impeaching (removing from office) ex-presidents (people no longer occupying the offices for which they are being impeached).
Maybe the Illinois bar should have continued to prosecute the case against Obama and thereby prevented his ever attempting to regain his law license in the future. But then that wouldn't have been allowed because it makes no sense, unlike the impeachment of a FORMER president. :)
A January 15 Congressional Research Service report notes that while the Constitution "does not directly address" the issue, most scholars have concluded that Congress does have the authority to impeach and convict a former President :P
btw, who says Barack Obama wants to practice law again? He's making bank pursuing other endeavors such as his Netflix deal and writing bestselling books.
Impeachment can't impose criminal penalties... it can only remove from office.
Trump isn't in office. Who says the Donald Trump wants to be president again? He's making bank pursuing other endeavors such as the Trump Corporation and starting a new political party. :)
Impeachment can bar a convicted individual from running for political office again. Who says Dotard wants to be president again? He has. Not that I believe the liar. But I do think he wants to pretend to run again (and raise money from his magamoron dupes).
People not voting for them will stop Dotard Junior and Ivana Junior from attaining political office. There are also crimes each could be prosecuted for and convicted of. Which would prevent them from running. Dotard's entire family is corrupt. Although Tiffany may just be stupid and Barron is too young to have started criming yet.
Dotard's new political party should be called the "White Supremacist party". If he were to chose an honest name. Instead he'll use a euphemism for White Supremacy like the "patriot party" or the "maga party".
trump organization = bankruptcy. DeutschBank will be foreclosing on his properties soon. And the IRS will be sending him a enormous bill for back taxes he defrauded them out of. As well as interest and penalties. LOL.
I don't have the authority to arrest anyone. And the "stop the steal" stupidity got a permit. Because the right to protest peacefully is protected. They didn't have a permit to violently enter the capitol. If you commit crimes while protesting you should be arrested. Unless you're a Dotard cultist protesting imaginary election theft. Hypocrite.
Factcheck.org: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges? No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. [end fact check]
ReplyDeleteDixon Diaz is a liar. A homophobic/transphobic liar. Barack Obama is a faithful family man. The kind of person the Right says they like. But he's Black and a Democrat. Thus the sick lies. btw, you like these lies because you're a homophobic/transphobic racist too.
Dotard decided to punish Edward Snowden (by not giving him a pardon) for being too patriotic? Who knew? As a public service long-haired blonde guy tells you what products not to buy. How nice of him.
ReplyDeleteIs it true that Barack Obama got sucked into supporting homosexual marriage? LOL!
ReplyDeleteps - So if Barack Obama ever did regain his law license, he couldn't in future be charged with lying on his original BAR application and then forced to surrender it? Who knew that surrendering it before trial would negate the consequences, unlike impeaching (removing from office) ex-presidents (people no longer occupying the offices for which they are being impeached).
ReplyDeleteMaybe the Illinois bar should have continued to prosecute the case against Obama and thereby prevented his ever attempting to regain his law license in the future. But then that wouldn't have been allowed because it makes no sense, unlike the impeachment of a FORMER president. :)
ReplyDeleteNixon should have run again in '76.
ReplyDeleteA January 15 Congressional Research Service report notes that while the Constitution "does not directly address" the issue, most scholars have concluded that Congress does have the authority to impeach and convict a former President :P
ReplyDeletebtw, who says Barack Obama wants to practice law again? He's making bank pursuing other endeavors such as his Netflix deal and writing bestselling books.
Impeachment can't impose criminal penalties... it can only remove from office.
ReplyDeleteTrump isn't in office. Who says the Donald Trump wants to be president again? He's making bank pursuing other endeavors such as the Trump Corporation and starting a new political party. :)
...and impeachment won't stop Don Jr from becoming President in 2024 or Ivanka from becoming a Florida Senator in 2022.
ReplyDeleteImpeachment can bar a convicted individual from running for political office again. Who says Dotard wants to be president again? He has. Not that I believe the liar. But I do think he wants to pretend to run again (and raise money from his magamoron dupes).
ReplyDeletePeople not voting for them will stop Dotard Junior and Ivana Junior from attaining political office. There are also crimes each could be prosecuted for and convicted of. Which would prevent them from running. Dotard's entire family is corrupt. Although Tiffany may just be stupid and Barron is too young to have started criming yet.
Dotard's new political party should be called the "White Supremacist party". If he were to chose an honest name. Instead he'll use a euphemism for White Supremacy like the "patriot party" or the "maga party".
ReplyDeletetrump organization = bankruptcy. DeutschBank will be foreclosing on his properties soon. And the IRS will be sending him a enormous bill for back taxes he defrauded them out of. As well as interest and penalties. LOL.
So why aren't you impeaching the Trump kids instead of pursuing criminal charges...
ReplyDeleteOh, that's right... because it's all just a political stunt.
Insurrection isn't a "stunt". Dotard and Dotard junior should be charged. Among others.
ReplyDeleteThen arrest the nightly protestors in Portland and occupyers in Seattle.
ReplyDeleteHypocrite.
I don't have the authority to arrest anyone. And the "stop the steal" stupidity got a permit. Because the right to protest peacefully is protected. They didn't have a permit to violently enter the capitol. If you commit crimes while protesting you should be arrested. Unless you're a Dotard cultist protesting imaginary election theft. Hypocrite.
ReplyDeleteSure you do.
ReplyDeleteNo Democrats ever violated their "assembly" permits? And when they do, they should "only then" be subject to arrest? Who knew?
Democrats protest real injustices, not imaginary ones.
ReplyDeleteThe black death toll from cops is a "real injustice" but the thousands of black on black murders in Chicago aren't? Who knew?
ReplyDeleteI was referring to BLM versus "stop the steal". Your "who knew" = strawman.
ReplyDelete