Thursday, January 30, 2020

Rudy Crushes Biden on Ukraine and Corruption

Isn't it great to NOT have the media squishing the news into fake social justice "grand narratives" for a change?

35 comments:

  1. So when is the Dotard Justice Department under Toady Barr going to be filing charges? As per YOU, no charges means no crime. Rudy is going to be charged before Biden ever is. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...they'll file as soon as President Zelinsky sends Trump the evidence that Rudy still doesn't have.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He's going to send Dotard Russian fabricated "evidence"? Why would he do that, given that they're fighting Russia (not friendly with them so why would Zelensky help Putin), the aid was approved, an election is coming up (and the next Democratic administration won't be happy if he does this)?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zelinsky doesn't need to "fabricate" anything... and Trump will be around for 5 more years.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Of course Zelensky won't fabricate the "evidence". He'll pass along Russian-fabricated evidence. If he decides he has to play Dotard's game. But Dotard is already being impeached for his bribery attempts. When the Senate acquits him and Russia rigs our elections so that Dotard "wins" again, you're saying the extortion will be back on?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why would he do that? Ukraine is at WAR with Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Exactly. Why would he. Perhaps because he determines he has no choice. The "evidence" will likely be passed through an intermediary, however. As opposed to being delivered direct from Putin. That's how Rudy is getting it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Zelinsky is Putin's mole, too? I'm sure glad that all our Democrat X-Men mindreaders are tracking him....

    ReplyDelete
  9. I doubt it. Are you telling me he is? I don't know how mind reading figures in. Other than it being a delusion you refer to often.

    ReplyDelete
  10. btw, your "breaking news" is a douche bag in a stocking cap on YouTube. LOL. Where are the charges? "they'll file as soon as President Zelinsky sends Trump the evidence that Rudy still doesn't have"... LOL!

    That must explain why Democrats have been so successful in their "corruption". republics control all of government (aside from the House), yet the only way the "truth" can get out is via YouTube and podcasts. LOL. And the only way Dotard can get the "evidence" is to send his private lawyer (who he isn't paying) on errands (then deny he sent him) -- when REAL investigations go through official channels.

    ReplyDelete
  11. They don't call it "The Deep State" for nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If there were a "deep state" (as you believe) Dotard would not now be president. The "deep state" (if it is "never trumpers" and Democrats working together) would have stopped him. That fact alone points to your conspiracy theory being total bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  13. They can't stop the people from voting (unless they're Bernie voters in the DNC).

    ReplyDelete
  14. ps How do you like the DNC clearing the debate platform for billionaires?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Gee, it turns out that John Bolton got $115,000 for speeches from a Ukrainian oligarch... so he's got no motive tp prevent a Ukrainian corruption investigation from openning...

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1. That is the biggest component of the republican strategy for "winning" (ask Kris Kobach). Before Dotard added collusion with foreign powers as a strategy.

    2. They didn't. They changed the rules for a specific former republican billionaire. And no, I don't like it. But, according to you, being a billionaire is a positive. Even though you got a fake one.

    3. Dotard approved aid multiple times previously because Ukraine was meeting the benchmarks for dealing with corruption. What changed was that Joe Biden announced he was running for president. Only then did Dotard become concerned with "corruption" in Ukraine. Previously he was only concerned with his own corruption (perpetrating it). Dotard should have Barr's DOJ investigate Rudy if he wants to find real corruption involving Ukraine.

    Quote: ...federal prosecutors charged... that Lev Parnas... was wired $1 million from a Russian bank account weeks before his arrest. ...the source of the funds was Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch who has close ties to Vladimir Putin. ... Rudy has worked as Trump's lawyer for "free", but Parnas paid him half a million dollars for his work. [end quote].

    ReplyDelete
  17. So if Putin is the puppet master, why is he paying Lev Parnas to undermine Rudy and the President?

    ReplyDelete
  18. He isn't. Putin paid Lev to help Rudy get his fake dirt on Joe Biden. This is what Lev was doing when he was arrested. After that Dotard lied about knowing him, so Lev decided to tell the truth.

    Whatever your side is busted doing you accuse the other side of. Dotard colluded with Russia. Hillary and the DNC did not collude with Ukraine. Dotard is corrupt, not Hillary or Joe Biden. Rudy was paid by Putin to deliver fake dirt to the Dotard administration. Lev was the intermediary who is telling the truth now. Not because he is being paid, but because he thought highly of Dotard but Dotard quickly threw him under the bus when he was caught.

    People don't like being betrayed. But that is Dotard's SOP. Michael Cohen also flipped because Dotard betrayed him. Flipping is the smart thing for ex Dotard associates to do after he throws them under the bus.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Re: "Gee, it turns out that John Bolton got $115,000 for speeches from a Ukrainian oligarch... so he's got no motive to prevent a Ukrainian corruption investigation from opening".

    When I read this comment previously, I wasn't aware -- but apparently Dotard wants revenge on Bolton. He may possibly have him arrested, I've heard. Obviously that explains why Bolton is now "corrupt". LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Avoidance. Let's try again. Alexandra Chalupa.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Avoidance. Let's try again. You had an explanation as for why Dotard hired Bolton. Now Bolton is "turning" on Dotard (because he knows what the predisent did was illegal). But doesn't Bolton "betraying" Dotard mean he never was a "best person"? Why does Dotard keep selecting people who are obviously NOT the "best"?

    Apparently he forgets to ask "are you willing to repeatedly break laws for me and/or ignore my lawbreaking" during the interview.

    ReplyDelete
  22. As for Chalupa, she is another truth-teller who tried to warn us, so she must be part of a VAST anti-Dotard conspiracy. Bwahhh!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why'd the DNC pay her over $400k, then?

    BWAH!

    ReplyDelete
  24. According to Chalupa, "I was a part time consultant for the DNC running an ethnic engagement program. I was not an opposition researcher for the DNC, and the DNC never asked me to go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information".

    Ukrainians (and Ukrainian Americans like Chalupa) were concerned about Manafort working for the Dotard campaign because Dotard indicated that he thought Crimea should be a part of Russia (and they knew Manafort is a Putin stooge). It wasn't a conspiracy, they didn't want Crimea taken over by Russia. OF COURSE they didn't want Dotard to be president.

    As per the article you link to... "Russia's effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin ... There's little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine".

    ReplyDelete
  25. Part-timers for the DNC get $412k paydays? How can I work for the DNC?

    ReplyDelete
  26. What ethnic community would you provide outreach to? Pro-Dotard/Putin collusion Russians? I doubt the DNC is interested in reaching out to them. You should apply to the RNC (if you aren't already employed by them).

    ReplyDelete
  27. BTW, contract work often includes salary plus costs. So the 412K would include money she spent doing the work she was contracted to do (including hiring other people to assist her). I don't know if that is what happened, but it certainly would explain the high dollar figure (if 412K is accurate). You give me a link that says it all went into her bank account if what I say is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  28. You are right about one thing. The DNC doesn't want to do outreach to any American voters...

    ...and she probably did have to pay a lot of Ukrainians for that dirt-book on Manafort.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ethnically Ukrainian people living in the US who have the right to vote are US citizens, xenophobe. Also, the suggestion that Manafort was framed is bullshit.

    Quote: CNN fact-checkers found that House minority members' claims that Chalupa "worked with Ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the Trump Campaign" are entirely baseless [and that] Manafort's involvement in questionable activities in Ukraine was exposed as part of a broader effort by Ukrainians to combat corruption in their own country. [end quote].

    ReplyDelete
  30. Chalupa was the "inventor" or the entire Russia-Russia hoax. She's the one who helped plant the "black ledger" in the abandoned Ukrainian oligarch's bank vault in order to bring down the Trump Campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  31. PS - Mueller KNEW that the ledger was a fake. But those FBI contractors who had worked for Director Mueller and were abusing the NSA databases needed a cover story/protection. Russia-Russia was born.

    ReplyDelete