Colour Blind...

...Don't Fall into the Neo-Racist Trap!

CHAPTERS:

00:00 - Intro 

16:48 - Recent Changes in Race Relations 

26:44 - Colorblindness Concept 

38:00 - Wokeness & Trump Era 

40:40 - Can You Have Pride in Your Identity? 

43:20 - Diversity & Inclusion 

55:03 - Strategies to Reduce Racism 

1:00:10 - Inherited Racial Trauma 

1:05:11 - Spirituality

Excerpt from video above:

The actual data (cops killing blacks) didn't matter. But what mattered was the Narrative and the videos. And once people believed this, that left an opening for ideologies that have been marginal, but kind of percolating in higher academia, like Critical Race Theory. Critical Race Theory sort of had an explanation right? If you see what's going on, all these cops seem to be killing black people uniquely. Critical Race Theory says, "Okay, well I can explain that. Actually America is fundamentally systemically racist. There's no such thing as race neutrality. All of our structures, in fact, are steeped in white supremacy, even if you can't see that easily. And that explains what's going on." So that that took off, and that's what explains the fact that race relations took a nose dive after 2013.

Can you talk about what neo-racism is as you see it?

In the book, I make a distinction between what I call old school racism and neo-racism. Old school racism is exactly what it sounds like. It's, you know, "I don't want a black man marrying my daughter. I don't want my children going to school with black kids." It's self-explanatory. It's a wolf in wolf's clothing. If by now you don't know that old school racism is immoral, then there's really no helping you. I make the distinction between that, and what I call neo-racism. It's essentially the same thing as wokeness with respect to race, or social justice with respect to race. I mean, there's many names for it, but it essentially just reverses the polarity of old school racism. It's the style of racism that says, "white people are inherently evil. Whiteness is evil. Blackness, to be of color, is to be special, is to be morally superior. Is basically to have an innate moral insight into right and wrong that the kind of depraved colonial white mind doesn't have."

So the reason I call this neo-racism is because, you know, I really do think it is as much racism as the old kind of racism. It's just that the targets of the racism are are less sympathetic from the point of view of underdog dynamics, right? Black people are seen to be underdogs in America. Naturally, this provokes sympathy when a black person is a target of racism. White people are not seen to be underdogs in America. And so there's less sympathy, definitely, certainly on the Left of the political spectrum.

But that doesn't make it any less racist to say that, "whiteness is evil, right? And if you complain about anti-white racism, you very quickly can get pigeonholed as some kind of far-right neo-Nazi, cuz like, what you know you really care about, you know, white guys that are getting insulted.

Well I think it actually has an extremely toxic effect on our political culture because, for instance, I remember Sarah Jong at the New York Times. I mean, this story is old now, but five or six years old, but she's has all these tweets just saying the most vile things about white people, right? Like comparing them to like goblins and all this kind of just stuff. Where if it were any other race, that person would just be fired quicker than you can imagine. But they keep her. They keep her and then they say "Well you know, it's okay. She didn't really mean it."

And so what message does this send to the typical white conservative American that maybe does take a certain amount of pride in their group membership, as many human beings do? Well, it says the other side hates people like me. And that's a fantastic way to polarize people. To deliver them into the arms of a dangerous demagogue like Donald Trump. In my view, it's just a rule of human nature. That you can't expect a group of people to cosign insults directed at their identity. Like that you can't expect that of people, of any group of people. So to me, we just have to have a a rock solid understanding that outside of comedy clubs, it's unacceptable to attack somebody for their race. That has to be the norm that we raise our kids with in America. That is the best path towards a Colorblindness Concept cohesive and healthy multi-racial society.

Cenk Tries to Speak Reason to His Tribe... in Vain!

...but again, they are Ideological, not Reasonable/ Rational!  Talking to Democrats is like trying to convince religiously devout Muslims to believe the Pope.  They're incapable of separating the Messenger from the Message without first wrapping it in the Guilt-Pride Ideological Narrative and then Disappearing the Messenger.

It's the Guilt-Pride Ideology Stupid!  They just can't do it!  They cannot escape their own Language Game, for the Rules of their Game are a priori

Scrapin' Away in World Eliteaville...

Thanks Vietnam/ Brazil bots!

from Google AI:

Understanding a sudden surge in blog traffic from Vietnam or Brazil in your Blogger statistics: 

When you see a sudden, significant increase in blog traffic from specific countries like Vietnam or Brazil, especially if it's unusual for your typical audience, it's often a sign of bot traffic or other forms of invalid traffic (IVT). 

Here's why and what it means:

1. Bot Traffic: 

Automated visits: Bots are automated programs designed to visit websites and perform certain actions, like clicking links, scraping content, or filling out forms. 

Skewed metrics: These bots can inflate your pageviews, session duration, and other metrics, giving you a false impression of your blog's popularity. 

Reasons for bot traffic: 

Content scraping: Bots may be scraping your content to repurpose or republish it elsewhere. 

Referral spam: You might be receiving traffic from websites you don't recognize, which is a form of referral spam, where malicious websites send fake traffic to your site to boost their own rankings. 

Fraudulent activities: In some cases, bots are used for fraudulent purposes like click fraud or inflating ad revenue. 

2. Potential reasons for the traffic spike Bot activity: 

It's likely that a large number of bots are visiting your blog. 

Referral spam: The spike could be due to a specific source of referral spam. 

Negative SEO: Although less common, it could be a deliberate attempt to harm your blog's reputation by sending fake traffic. 

Testing or monitoring: Some companies or individuals might be using bots to test or monitor websites, and your blog happened to be included. 

3. Impact on your blog statistics: 

Inflated numbers: Your pageviews, unique visitors, and session duration may appear higher than they actually are. 

Skewed data: The traffic from bots can distort your analytics, making it difficult to understand your real audience and their behavior. 

Misleading reports: You might be misled into thinking your blog is more popular than it is, potentially leading to inaccurate decisions about content strategy or monetization. 

4. What to do:

Analyze your analytics: Use Google Analytics to identify the source of the traffic, the pages they are visiting, and their engagement metrics (bounce rate, session duration). 

Look for patterns: See if the traffic spikes occur at specific times, from certain IP addresses, or through particular referral sources. 

Filter bot traffic: Google Analytics allows you to filter out known bot traffic. 

Consider blocking suspicious IP addresses: If you identify specific IP addresses or ranges associated with the bot traffic, you can consider blocking them.
Don't panic: While bot traffic can be frustrating, it's generally harmless.

In summary, a sudden influx of traffic from Vietnam or Brazil in your Blogger statistics likely indicates bot activity or invalid traffic. While it can skew your data, it's usually not a cause for alarm. By analyzing your analytics and taking appropriate measures, you can better understand and mitigate the impact of such traffic on your blog statistics.

At 100 visits a minute, this is not a direct Domain Name Server (DNS) attack, but may be part of a greater Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack against Blogger. My Farmers Letters blog is getting a lot of Brazil and Vietnam traffic, too, but at only ~1/15th this level (@ 5-10 per minute).  My 3 Thersites blogs are each also getting Brazil/ Vietnam bot traffic at about the 1 visit per minute level

In June 2025, Cloudflare reported blocking the largest Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack ever recorded, according to SC Media. This attack peaked at 7.3 terabits per second (Tbps), and sent over 37.4 TB of data in just 45 seconds. 

Brazil and Vietnam played a significant role as origin points for this attack: 

• Nearly half of the attack traffic originated from Brazil and Vietnam.
• Telefonica Brazil accounted for 10.5% of the total DDoS attack traffic, and Viettel Group (Vietnam) accounted for 9.8%.
• Other significant traffic sources included Taiwan, China, Indonesia, Ukraine, Ecuador, Thailand, the United States, and Saudi Arabia. 

Additional details about the attack:

• It utilized UDP floods as the primary attack vector, according to ZDNET.
• Cloudflare's automated systems and mitigation rules were instrumental in neutralizing the attack.
• The attack originated from over 122,000 source IP addresses across 161 countries. 

In addition to this specific large-scale event, there have been other reports of cyberattacks linked to Vietnam and Brazil:

• In 2025, Anonymous VNLBN conducted a cyber assault on Vietnam.
• A new DDoS Trojan was reported in 2010 attacking sites criticizing the Vietnamese Communist Party.
• Brazil's Supreme Court recently ruled that social media companies can be held liable for user-generated content, aiming to combat hate speech and incitement to violence.
• In 2024, Brazil's state governments were targeted by phishing campaigns, according to Google Cloud.
• In 2024, a ransomware attack on the Brazilian government exposed the "Fog" cyber-gang, revealing confidential data, including bank data and personal identifiers. 

Note: The information above highlights specific instances where Vietnam and Brazil have been linked to cyberattacks. It is important to remember that these are just examples, and the global cyber landscape is constantly evolving

Someone is likely rehearsing another Big Cyberattack... Iran? China?

Update 6:10 pm on 6/28:

The 12 Day War: On the Ground in Tel Aviv

AI Returns Humour to Race Relations...

MAGA: The Rise of the Counter-Elites

The Counter-Elites Are on the Left AND Right (not just MAGA).  The Establishment Elites are the UniParty Neo-liberals (from the Brookings and Hoover Institutes)

New York City is Ground-Zero for Post-WWII Establishment Geriatric  Neoliberalism.  And if Neoliberals can't win there, they'll never win ANYWHERE again.

The Rise of the Neo-Left Counter-Elites

Are the Democrats Going the Way of the Whigs?

Bernie Sanders, "Will the Democrats learn from Zohran Mamdani’s victory?"

Too many Democratic party leaders would rather be the captains on a sinking Titanic than change course

The Democratic party is at a crossroads.

It can continue to push policies that maintain a broken and rigged economic and political system and ignore the pain of the 60% of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck. It can turn its back on the dreams of a younger generation which, if we don’t change that system, will likely be worse off than their parents.

It can continue to depend upon billionaire donors and out-of-touch campaign consultants and spend huge amounts of money on dumb 30-second ads that fewer and fewer people respond to.

It can ignore the tragic reality that tens of millions of Americans are giving up on democracy because they don’t see their government understanding their struggles and the realities of their lives or doing anything about it.

Or it can learn the lesson that the Zohran Mamdani campaign taught us on Tuesday.

And that is:

Have the courage to address the real economic and moral issues that face the majority of our people, take on the greed and power of the oligarchy and fight for an agenda that can improve life for working families.

Some may claim that Mamdani’s victory was just about style and the fact that he is a charismatic candidate. Yes. He is. But you don’t get a Mamdani victory without the extraordinary grassroots movement that rallied around him. And you don’t get that movement and thousands of enthusiastic people knocking on doors without an economic agenda that speaks to the needs of working people. The people of New York and all Americans understand that, in the richest country on earth, they should not have to struggle every day just to put food on the table, pay their rent or pay their medical bills. These are the people the Democratic consultants don’t know exist.

Mamdani has been criticized for his “radical” and “unrealistic” economic policies:

Demanding that, at a time of unprecedented income and wealth inequality, the rich and large corporations start paying their fair share of taxes.

Demanding that, when many New Yorkers are no longer able to find affordable housing, there should be a freeze on rent hikes.

Demanding that, when commuting to a job takes a big toll out of a worker’s paycheck, public transportation should be free.

Demanding that, when many low-income and working people are unable to access good-quality food for themselves and their kids, publicly owned neighborhood grocery stores should be created.

These ideas, and more, are not radical. They may not be what billionaires, wealthy campaign contributors and real estate speculators want, but they are what working people want. And maybe, just maybe, it’s time to listen to them.

Mamdani’s victory was not about “star power”. It was very much about people power, about revitalizing democracy and opening the door for ordinary people to gain control over the decisions that impact their lives.

Importantly, he did not run away from the moral issue that is troubling millions in New York and around the country: the need to end US military support for a rightwing extremist Benjamin Netanyahu government in Israel that is obliterating the people of Gaza and starving their children. Mamdani understands that antisemitism is a disgusting and dangerous ideology, but that it is not antisemitic to be critical of the inhumane policies of the Netanyahu government.

The lesson of Mamdani’s campaign is that it is not good enough just to be critical of Trump and his destructive policies. We have to bring forth a positive vision and an analysis of why things are the way they are. It is not good enough to maintain a status quo that is failing most Americans. At a time when hope is in increasingly short supply, people must have the sense that if we work together, if we have the courage to take on powerful special interests, we can create a better world – a world of economic, social, racial and environmental justice.

Will the current Democratic party leadership learn the lessons of the Mamdani campaign? Probably not. Too many of them would rather be the captains on a sinking Titanic, rather than change course.

Then again, it doesn’t matter what they think. The establishment threw everything they had against Mamdani – millions in Super Pac money, endorsements from “important people”, a hostile media – and they still lost.

The future of the Democratic party will not be determined by its current leadership. It will be decided by the working class of this country. Increasingly, people understand that our political system is corrupt and that billionaires should not be able to buy elections. They understand that we should not have an unprecedented level of income and wealth inequality; that we should not be the only wealthy country not to guarantee healthcare for all; that we should not deny young people the right to a higher education because of their income; that we should not have a major crisis in affordable housing; that we should not have a minimum wage that is a starvation wage; that we should not allow corporations to illegally prevent union organization – and much, much more.

The American people are beginning to stand up and fight back. We have seen that in the many Fighting Oligarchy events that we’ve done around the country that have drawn huge turnouts. We have seen that in the millions of people who came out for the No Kings rallies that took place this month in almost every state. And yesterday, we saw that in the Democratic primary in New York City.

We’re going forward. And no one is going to stop us.

Bernie's problem?  Mamdani's voters were college educated white and minority elites, not working class whites and minorities.   His message is selling to a mass market, not an elite one.  And the working class brand has already been captured by the populist Right.  

The Democratic Party brand is a Luxury Values brand.  EV's, Green Energy, and a mandated less-Productive elite and cheaper wage reducing imported unskilled and non-voting Labour.  THAT is Bernie's market.  The elite market.

The Era of Democratic Party Rule by a 20% Radical Left Minority is Finally Ending

They've raised their presence above the Just Noticeable Differential Threshold and will be eradicated for it by moderate/ centrists Democrats that are no longer intimidated through cancellation by them.  The repercussion is that the old Democratic Party will become an unpopular centrist neoliberal party, and the radical Left will establish a new populist-Left party.

Imposing the Global Open Society Post-WWII Neoliberal Consensus: National Representatives turned Globalist Oppressors

 

Nassim Taleb's "Minority Rule" in Action 

How Establishment "Go Along to Get Along" Politics destroys Representative Government

aka - False Universalism & The Death of Democracy

Trump's Victory Lap

Premature?  Or well earned?

Trump Splits the Democrats on Iran and Proves that only 38% of them aren't members in good standing of the Neoliberal UniParty.

Why Donald Trump is Different from Most Politicians

He Has a Grounding Business Owner Experience in Risk Taking Lacking in Most Modern Politicians and Salaried Business Executives

The Down-Side: Like Taleb, He Outsmarts and Therefore Makes, a LOT of Enemies Out of His Competitors

Moral:  Professional Politicians are White Elephants

...or the End of MAGA?

The Coming of the Trump NWO?...

The Politics of Stupidity - Stampeding the Dwarf Herd

...and unleashing the suicide bombers.

Salvador Dali, "The Great Paranoiac" (1936)

When Myth becomes Confused for Truth

MAGA Turns Out to Not Be the 'Cult' that Democrats Have Always Asserted it was...

...It's FULL of Dissidents!

The American Empire...

...a Bridge too Far!

URGENT EMERGENCIES!

On Dervy's Satyrical Republicans...

...and some actual Democrats:

What's the Democratic Party's Solution to America's Problems?

...Ever More TDS-Level Ad Hominem!

The "Easy Way Out" PsyOp is Played

"Yay, we can always go back to being abducted and tortured by SAVAK, the Shah's American-British trained secret police!"

Khamenei Makes His Case to Iran and the World

This guy reminds me of the Uni-Party Republicans.  Impoliteness invalidates all legitimate opposition.  It invalidates his arguments and complaints because the speaker is a "bad person" and therefore morally "inferior".  It's an ad hominem argument.  And as such a fallacy from "Authority".

No mention of Iran's treachery in using its' proxies to attack Israel for the past 18 months.  No mention of the October 7 "provocation".  Only "Trump's" duplicity in using Israel as proxy.  I guess what goes around, comes around, Ali.

Democrats Go Full Black Nationalism for Juneteenth and Embrace the KKKs Neoracist Allies

 

The Marcus Garvey Flag.

“Marcus Garvey designed the African American [Pan-African] flag, which looked like the Italian flag, except that it is red, black, and green. But it is so abstract, so pure, that the masses were frightened by it.” 

—David Hammons

The Pan-African flag, also known as the UNIA flag or the Marcus Garvey flag, is a tricolor flag consisting of three equal horizontal stripes of red, black, and green. It was designed in 1920 by Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) to represent people of African descent worldwide. The colors symbolize blood (red), the people (black), and the rich land of Africa (green).

On Marcus Garvey:

Marcus Mosiah Garvey Jr. ONH (17 August 1887 – 10 June 1940) was a Jamaican political activist. He was the founder and first President-General of the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League (UNIA-ACL) (commonly known as UNIA), through which he declared himself Provisional President of Africa. Garvey was ideologically a black nationalist and Pan-Africanist. His ideas came to be known as Garveyism.

Garvey was born into a moderately prosperous Afro-Jamaican family in Saint Ann's Bay and was apprenticed into the print trade as a teenager. Working in Kingston, he became involved in trade unionism. He later lived briefly in Costa Rica, Panama, and England. On returning to Jamaica, he founded the UNIA in 1914. In 1916, he moved to the United States and established a UNIA branch in New York City's Harlem district. Emphasising unity between Africans and the African diaspora, he campaigned for an end to European colonial rule in Africa and advocated the political unification of the continent. He envisioned a unified Africa as a one-party state, governed by himself, that would enact laws to ensure black racial purity. Although he never visited the continent, he was committed to the Back-to-Africa movement, arguing that part of the diaspora should migrate there. Garveyist ideas became increasingly popular, and the UNIA grew in membership. His black separatist views—and his relationship with white racists like the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) in the interest of advancing their shared goal of racial separatism—caused a division between Garvey and other prominent African-American civil rights activists such as W. E. B. Du Bois, who promoted racial integration.

Believing that black people needed to be financially independent from white-dominated societies, Garvey launched various businesses in the U.S., including the Negro Factories Corporation and Negro World newspaper. In 1919, he became President of the Black Star Line shipping and passenger company, designed to forge a link between North America and Africa and facilitate African-American migration to Liberia. In 1923 Garvey was convicted of mail fraud for selling the company's stock, and was imprisoned in the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta for nearly two years. Garvey blamed Jews and Catholics, claiming that they were prejudiced against him because of his links to the KKK. His sentence was commuted by U.S. president Calvin Coolidge and he was deported to Jamaica in 1927. Settling in Kingston with his wife Amy Jacques, Garvey established the People's Political Party in 1929, briefly serving as a city councillor. With the UNIA in increasing financial difficulty, he relocated to London in 1935, where his anti-socialist stance distanced him from many of the city's black activists. He died there in 1940, and in 1964 his body was returned to Jamaica for reburial in Kingston's National Heroes Park.

Garvey was a controversial figure. Some in the African diasporic community regarded him as a pretentious demagogue, and were highly critical of his collaboration with white supremacists, his violent rhetoric, and his prejudice against mixed-race people and Jews. He received praise for encouraging a sense of pride and self-worth among Africans and the African diaspora amid widespread poverty, discrimination and colonialism. In Jamaica, he is recognized as a national hero, the first person to be recognized as such.^[1] His ideas exerted a considerable influence on such movements as Rastafari, the Nation of Islam and the Black Power Movement.

Seems the Democrats still embrace the KKK's ideas of racial nationalism.   Segregationists can't help themselves.

Israel Dreams of a Final Solution to its' "Iran Problem"

They, of all people, should reject the dream.

And Americans who support the idea of entering into a war to support it are trapping us into their vicious cycle of racial and religious nationalisms.

If Israel wants to control its' neighbors, let it build its' own Jewish Empire.

America has no Dog in this fight.  And no solution will EVER be "final".

R. R. Reno, "The Moral Logic of Finishing a War"

War seldom ends according to a satisfying script. Unconditional surrender—the banner headline of 1945—is a historical rarity, the exception, not the rule. More often hostilities conclude in the gray zone of ceasefires, armistices, and grudging diplomatic arrangements. Israel stands in that gray zone now. Its defensive campaign against Iran and the Iranian proxy network seems to have primarily met its battlefield objectives. From a military standpoint, Iran appears to be defeated. The harder task is to translate that success into a durable peace—without stumbling into George W. Bush 2.0, the grandiose dream of regime change by force.

Iran is not merely a rival pursuing normal state interests. For decades the Islamic Republic has subordinated economic development, and even internal stability, to a revolutionary ambition: the destruction of the Jewish state. Tehran spent treasure and reputation on uranium enrichment and terror franchises when it could have paved roads or built hospitals. That choice shapes everything that follows.

The savagery of October 7 and its aftermath are proof that détente with a sworn enemy can be fatal self-deception. Iran’s proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, fired their opening salvos to derail Israel’s tentative outreach to Saudi Arabia, and impose a new regional order tilted toward Tehran.

Few expected the Israel Defense Forces to dismantle Hezbollah’s vast arsenal of more than 100,000 rockets, yet in fall of 2024 they did so with shocking speed. Syrian collapse followed, removing another Iranian proxy and opening an aerial corridor to the heartland of the Iranian empire. Precision strikes have now gutted Iran’s military leadership. The war’s kinetic phase is therefore ending on unmistakable terms: Iran’s conventional power is devastated, its proxies are in disarray, and its remaining nuclear facilities lie vulnerable.

At moments like this, political imaginations can run hot, too hot. Some counsel marching on Tehran, imagining that toppled statues would inaugurate a pacified Middle East. That temptation must be resisted. Regime change adventurism—George W. Bush 2.0—is a recipe for exhaustion and backlash, as Americans learned in Iraq and Afghanistan. Israel’s war aims have been defensive: meet a real, not hypothetical, existential threat and prevent Tehran from continuing to fund and arm its proxies that initiated hostilities. The Jewish state is closing in on achieving these defensive goals.

The just war tradition demands prudence at the end of war as well as at the start. As I see it, a settlement, whether by formal treaty or tacit modus vivendi, must impose three conditions:

- No nuclear pathway. Centrifuges disabled, inspections enforced.

- No ballistic missile expansion. Delivery systems are inseparable from warheads.

- No proxy rearmament. Hezbollah and Hamas must remain shells of their former selves.

These conditions are not maximalist fantasies. They are the foundation on which Israeli security—and regional peace—can be built. The peace will not be celebrated widely in the region. It is likely to be grudgingly accepted. But it can be achieved.

Because Iran’s theocrats may spurn any compromise that forecloses their revolutionary aspirations, the “deal” Israel seeks may be no deal at all, but rather something imposed by realities on the ground. Even so, diplomacy must finish the work that airstrikes began: reassure nervous Arab capitals, institutionalize new alignments, and clarify redlines that make further aggression too costly for Iran to contemplate.

Israel’s achievement is real and, in a way, astonishing. Yet the coming victory in this war, if God’s providence permits it, will lay a fresh burden on the consciences of statesmen. Jerusalem will have to model restraint. The present triumph must not decay into hubris. Prudent statecraft requires both justice and limits. Israel has avoided appeasement; may she forsake crusade.

Military successes are only the beginning of the end of conflict. Now is the time for the sober work of securing a peace that prevents the next October 7 while avoiding the folly of endless war.

Although nothing is assured, the quieting of the guns may be coming sooner than we had thought possible. Let the statesmen go to work.

Regime Change Rumours...

??? - or IDF PsyOps

Is the UK's 77th Brigade Generating Support for the War?

Mike Benz on USIC Deep State Info-Compartmentalized Rice Bowl Politics

...muh, "democracy"!

Deep State 101

Happy Father's Day

Only Emperors, No Kings Day!

Blobenomics 101

Blob Regime Change Operations in America Build Momentum... Hoping to Peak on Saturday and Distract DJT from Ukraine and DoGE Reforms

George Washington, "Farewell Address" (1796) - Excerpt:

...The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissention, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual: and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of is own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely ought of sight) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise People to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the Government, and serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in Governments of a monarchical cast, Patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched; it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming it should consume.

It is important likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country, should inspire caution. In those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres. Avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of Government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power; by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern: some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for tho’ this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free Governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield….

...Meanwhile, the Biden Immigration Riots Spread...

Blob Ops Have Now Begun in America... Muh, "Democracy!"

The US Intelligence Community is the World's 2nd Largest Terrorist Organization.

"He who fights with monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."

-Friedrich Nietzsche

Regime Change Operations have come to America... Again.

The City of London Corporation coordinates Blob Soft Power Ops through NGOs, Financial Off-Shore Shell Corporations, Unions, and DNC Officials, much as they coordinated the recent drone strikes in Russia

"Donald J. Trump must GO!"

The Blob's US Military Proxy option has been rendered 'temporarily' Unavailable by DJT,  hence the coordinated attack on the June 14 Military Parade in DC

"See how we can ruin your celebrations, Mr. Trump!"

Tulsi Gabbard, DNI on Hiroshima

The War Hawks Seize Europe and Fly Towards the Rocks of Ruination...

...the Voice of Radical Humanism Responds.

Europe lays between Scylla and Charybdis.  Can it steer a Middle Course?  Who will become its' Odysseus?

Meanwhile, on June 14 America will Celebrate the 250th Anniversary of the American Army in Washington  DC. 

The Brave New Left will Protest everywhere BUT Washington DC on the same day.   

What, no Presence on the Field of Battle?

Organizers (of No Kings Day) expect 1,800 rallies will take place on Saturday for “a nationwide day of defiance” in every state and major city across the country—except Washington, D.C., as to avoid clashes with the Army’s 250th anniversary celebrations, which will be held that day in the nation’s capital.

Why are Democrats protesting against Martin Luther King's holiday?  Atavism?  I wonder?