If You're Going to Have a Military Parade, You'll Need a few Tanks...
Tuesday, August 19, 2025
Monday, August 18, 2025
Can the Jews Spiritually Handle Wielding the Power of 'Mastery' over the State of Israel?
...or Will they Lose Their Struggle with their Better Angels to Catastrophe and Re-Enslavement?
A Civilization without Scapegoats. Is it Possible?
w/o Guilt and/ or Shame? Can the Jews Ever Again Take PRIDE in Mastery, ala "Prince" Judah Ben Hur, and as an EQUAL to Rome?
There are no "Final Solutions", merely Katechons for the Eschaton. Persistence, NOT Victory. "The Struggle is Eternal". Israel, such is your name.
Starring Bibi Netanyahu as Col. Kurtz, Scapegoat of the Righteous..
...and Fighting Instrument Against "the Horror"!
...only to Be Judged, once his Usefulness is Over, by a Few 'Good' Men, as "Angels" are in Short Supply.
"Judge not, lest ye be judged."Mathew 7:1
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”
–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
As for me, I'll rely on faith, and let G_d decide. Fortunately I believe that He already did, long, long ago.
Sunday, August 17, 2025
Why Progressives Like Dervy Revel in their Neo-Racist White Guilt-Pride...
Assuming a position of Universal Moral Identity (you can tell I'm not a racist like the "white superiority" conservatives I bash because I'm extremely Euro-critical, yet supportive and not critical of all other minority racial and cultural identities) and therefore "Objective". You're not "objective" Derv, you're just Neo-Racist. And such is the eschatology of "Social Progress" in the minds of not only Dervy, but of all of the Progressive Democratic elites.
And what is the role of a Progressive Social Activist today but to Immanentize the Eschatology... create a future world of multi-cultural harmony by discriminating against one race (white/ European that imagines itself "superior") in favour of all others. Wouldn't that be Progress?
Saturday, August 16, 2025
Noble Lies and the Myth of Progress as Scientific, Technical, and Social Progress
Like Marx's Historicism... an Inevitable and Unstoppable Progression from Feudal -> Capitalist -> Socialist -> Communist Social Systems
Google Ai Continued:
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
The Core Idea of Progress:Critiques and Counterarguments:The Enlightenment-era concept of progress emphasizes continuous improvement and upward movement in various aspects of human life.
It often assumes that humanity is inherently good and that freedom is the ultimate goal, with each generation building upon the achievements of the past.
This view often links progress with technological advancements and economic growth, believing that these will inevitably lead to a better world.
Unsustainability:Many critiques argue that the current model of progress, driven by endless economic expansion and resource depletion, is unsustainable and ultimately harmful.Ignoring Limits:Some critics point to the scientific laws of thermodynamics, limits to growth, and the concept of self-organization, arguing that these natural laws contradict the idea of endless linear progress, according to Tom Wessels in "The Myth of Progress: Toward a Sustainable Future".Unintended Consequences:
Critics also highlight the negative consequences of technological advancements and economic development, such as environmental degradation, social inequality, and the potential for misuse of technology.Moral Ambiguity:The idea of progress as a linear march towards freedom and a better world is challenged by the capacity of humans for both good and evil, and the potential for even well-intentioned advancements to be used for destructive purposes.Loss of Connection:
Some argue that the pursuit of progress has led to a loss of connection with nature and a decline in community and meaningful relationships.Lack of Hope:
In Essence:Some believe that the myth of progress can create a sense of inevitability that discourages action and critical thinking about the challenges facing humanity, according to gwynethjones.coach.
The "myth of progress" represents a powerful and pervasive idea about human history and its trajectory. While it has inspired advancements and positive changes, critiques highlight its limitations, unsustainability, and potential for unintended negative consequences. The debate surrounding the myth of progress raises fundamental questions about the nature of human development, the role of technology, and the path towards a truly sustainable and desirable future.
Time to Immanentize the Eschatology!
e-r-r-r-r-p! Manifest Our Destiny (1872)...???
Have the American Dream Ask Destiny Where the H*ll We're Heading Towards?
The Multi-CultY Paradox of Race and CultURAL Essentialism...
Which Identity/ Affinity Group Should I Hate or Shame This Week?
Which is YOUR god, America? Poseidon or Athena?
In Greek mythology, Cecropia was the original name of Athens, named after its legendary first king, Cecrops. Cecrops was depicted as a man with a serpent's tail, and he is credited with bringing civilization to the region by teaching the people important skills like marriage, writing, and burial practices. The city was later renamed Athens in honor of the goddess Athena, after she won a contest against Poseidon to become the city's patron.
The contest involved each offering a gift to the city. Poseidon struck the ground with his trident, creating a saltwater spring, while Athena planted an olive tree. The Athenians chose Athena's gift, the olive tree, as it provided them with food, oil, and wood, symbolizing peace and prosperity. Consequently, the city was renamed Athens in her honor, and Poseidon, angered by the decision, cursed the city with a water shortage.Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!
Water represents Chaos, the Land, Order... the heroes quest is often to challenge the chaos and create order ...Theseus, however challenged the Minotaur's "ordered" labyrinth whereas Alexander the Great simply "cut" the Gordian knot. One required mind, and knowledge, the other force lacking knowledge. Which was the greater hero?
What Hero Can Weave the Peplos of Diverse Multi-and-Mono Cultures into One Nation? Is it possible or even desirable?
Friday, August 15, 2025
Socialismo Para el Siglo XXI!
Meden Agan Capitalism (Commerce) is the Enemy of the Good (Communism)
ALL Commodification of Land, Labour, Capital, and Information is BAD (and not just BAD, but EVIL)!
No Respites (aka- freedom) from One's Communal Social Duties May be Permitted. Monetized Reciprocity must be made IMPOSSIBLE
Welcome to the Dawn of Technofeudalism!
ps - Don't be a racial essentialist like this AnCap video maker!
What’s gonna happen next? Is Trump gonna federalize the New York City Police Department? What’s after that? Chicago, L.A., Miami, Boston, and on and on? What’s after that? The NFL? The NBA? Is he gonna federalize them to take them over? All he wants to do is deflect from his inadequacy by the bold, insane moves.
The takeover of D.C. police, it’s not what I need. I don’t need this D.C. police to be taken over. I don’t. They need to get the tariffs over with. They need to get the war over with. They need to get the Gaza thing over with.
And after that, we have something else we have to get over with.
No Alec... THAT would be Socialism!
Thursday, August 14, 2025
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
JLP Explores White & Anti-White Race Essentialism and It's Historical Victimology Driven Guilt-Pride Roots
What a 'Whiteness' Cordyceps Infection Looks Like and What Uninfected Black Elite Minds MUST Eradicate!
Big Progressivism vs Radical (small) Progressivism
Aggregate Efficiencies Uber Alles
Tuesday, August 12, 2025
The DNC's Neo-Racism in a Nutshell...
... it's an Elite Project to Eliminate "Whiteness" (@~10:30)
Jonathan Luke Wood[1] (born February 21, 1982), known professionally as J. Luke Wood, is the ninth president of Sacramento State.[2][3] Wood is an American social scientist, author and previously served as the first Black distinguished Professor at San Diego State University .[4][5] Wood is ranked by Education Week as a top 50 scholar.[6] In 2023, Wood was appointed by the state Senate to serve on the California Racial Equity Commission.[7] He is a consistent voice[8][9][10][11] on leadership theory, black male achievement and school suspensions.
Is Jewishness, "Whiteness" too?
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”–Hannah Ardent, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
DEI - Changing a 'Certain' Corporate ("Whiteness") Culture
Real 'Tolerant' Stuff, huh? I sure feel Included!
Monday, August 11, 2025
Hey, Tommy, Tommy!
Proof directly above that you can't criticize English Pakistani's... even gently without being censored. Grooming Gangs? Foggedabowddit!
Sunday, August 10, 2025
Saturday, August 9, 2025
White Guilt Has Died... but White Guilt-Pride Zombies On....
The Neo-Racist Chattering Classes are too Proud of their Guilt to Help Themselves.... it's such a great social luxury status symbol, and unlike a Gold Rolex, can't be faked (or can it?).
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”–Hannah Ardent, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
Where can I get myself a pair of those gold Trump sneakers?
Friday, August 8, 2025
Benz on American Elite's 'Strawman" Boogeymen
1st they Stuffed Al Qaeda, 2nd they Stuffed a Russia Democracy Threat, and 3rd they Stuffed a Domestic White-Nationalist Threat to the Woke.
Time for a New and 'Saner' Non-National Security State Elite to Take the Tiller of State!
Thursday, August 7, 2025
Anti-Racism/ Anti-War Movement Revival Tunes... The Neo-New Left
...only this faux/ woke guilt-pride race war's a little closer to home!
...Just Virtue Signal YOUR Support for Anti-Racism on YOUR Curated Profile TODAY #MelttheICE!
...and when it comes to Anti-WAR ALWAYS chant, "From the River to the Sea, Palestine Must Remain Jew Free!"
"Слава Україні!"
The CCP's Praetorian Guard Moved North of the Rubicon
...rendering Xi Jinping Vulnerable
With the fourth plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) scheduled for October, the annual gathering of CCP leaders at Beidaihe is a prelude of what to expect, from the economy to leadership changes. Lianhe Zaobao China news editor Yang Danxu gives her take.
China’s state media released a 500-word report on 3 August, revealing that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo Standing Committee member Cai Qi visited experts on summer vacation in Beidaihe — indirectly confirming that the top CCP leaders have entered its annual “Beidaihe time”.
Located in Hebei’s Qinhuangdao, about 300 kilometres from Beijing, Beidaihe is a popular summer retreat in northern China. In 1953, the CCP leadership began working collectively from Beidaihe during the summer, formalising a summer office system. This practice was suspended when the Cultural Revolution began in 1966, but resumed in 1984. Several key decisions in the party’s history were made in Beidaihe, including key appointments and political reports ahead of the CCP’s party congress every five years.
This year, the focus of “Beidaihe time” is expected to revolve around the China-US trade war, the Chinese economy, and the upcoming fourth plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the CCP, known as the fourth plenum.
What is ‘Beidaihe time’?
In 2003, during Hu Jintao’s leadership, the summer office system in Beidaihe was abolished, and its political significance diminished. However, the tradition of senior party officials — including some retired leaders — gathering in Beidaihe for a collective retreat from late July to early August has been maintained.
Although no formal meetings are held, top leaders still use the retreat to exchange views on major issues. Before the decline of “gerontocracy” and factionalism, the Beidaihe gathering served as a platform for information sharing, addressing concerns and reaching compromises. In recent years, China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, has established the era of “one position as the highest authority” (定于一尊) and taken full control over key decisions. Nevertheless, discussions during Beidaihe still play a role in coordinating and unifying positions within the party.
This year, the focus of “Beidaihe time” is expected to revolve around the China-US trade war, the Chinese economy, and the upcoming fourth plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the CCP, known as the fourth plenum.
Trade and economy
The third round of China-US trade talks concluded last week in Stockholm, Sweden, with both sides agreeing to extend the “truce” initially reached in Geneva, though the extension still requires final approval from US President Donald Trump.
As the US wraps up tariff negotiations with other countries, which were forced to accept harsh terms, it is clear that Beijing will not agree to a similar outcome. The gap between China and the US on tariff issues remains wide, and the negotiations will only get tougher from here. After using the “rare earth card” to push back against Washington in the earlier phase, China’s leadership now faces key questions before the next round of talks: what can be compromised, what deals should be made, and what should be demanded from Washington in return.
The prospect of the China-US trade war remains a sword of Damocles suspended over the Chinese economy. Despite a 5.3% growth rate in the first half of this year, and domestic consumption contributing over 50% to that growth, China’s economic recovery is far from solid. Official data released last week showed the July manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) at just 49.3 — marking the fourth consecutive month below the boom-bust line.
To put it bluntly, resisting the risks and shocks brought about by the US, whilst addressing the challenges of domestic economic transformation, would be the focus over these five years.
With the uncertainty surrounding tariff negotiations, coupled with overly ramped-up exports in the first half of 2025, it is expected that there would be regression for foreign trade. After the phasing out of the trade-in policy, the revitalisation of domestic demand might not be sustainable. The major age-old obstacle that is the real estate market remains in a state of flux with no sign of rock bottom, while the pulling effect of emerging industries is not sufficient as a replacement — the Chinese leadership would likely not dare to take their eye off the economy.
Before entering “Beidaihe time”, the Politburo — as is customary — met in the last week of July. On top of discussing the state of the economy, it was also decided that the fourth plenum would be convened in Beijing in October, to deliberate on suggestions for the formulation of the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030).
In the words of the officials, the 15th Five-Year Plan period is described as “a crucial phase for consolidating the foundation and making all-round efforts to basically realise socialist modernisation”. Chinese officials also assessed that “China’s development is facing profound and complex changes, as strategic opportunities, risks, and challenges are concurrent and uncertainties and unforeseen factors are rising”.
To put it bluntly, resisting the risks and shocks brought about by the US, whilst addressing the challenges of domestic economic transformation, would be the focus over these five years. How well this is done would determine whether China can realise socialist modernisation by 2035. The direction and blueprint for this endeavour would require total consensus among the top leadership.
The fourth plenum is also expected to address several significant personnel issues, which could be discussed during “Beidaihe time”. There are currently a few unresolved cases among the upper echelons of the CCP.
Leadership issues
The fourth plenum is also expected to address several significant personnel issues, which could be discussed during “Beidaihe time”. There are currently a few unresolved cases among the upper echelons of the CCP.
For instance, the nature of Ma Xingrui’s next appointment, following his stepping down as Xinjiang party secretary over a month ago, has not yet been determined. Similarly, the investigation results and handling of feedback concerning Miao Hua, who fell from grace last November and was removed from his Central Military Commission (CMC) position, have also not been officially announced.
More strikingly, He Weidong, a CMC vice-chairman and Politburo member, has been absent for nearly five months without an official explanation. Authorities might unveil details concerning his situation, along with the Miao case, after the Victory Day parade on 3 September and before the fourth plenum.
If He is indeed in trouble, as external observers speculate, the 20th CMC would be reduced from seven members in October 2022 to four, accounting for the earlier removals of former Defence Minister Li Shangfu and Miao. The 24-member Politburo would also lose a member due to He's alleged downfall.
Whether the authorities will adjust the CMC at the fourth plenum — such as promoting Liu Zhenli or Zhang Shengmin from CMC members to vice-chairmen, or promoting Dong Jun who previously took over as defence minister to a member of the CMC — or whether there would be a rare replacement to the Politburo which is supposedly down a member, these would all be focal points for the fourth plenum.
Historically, over the past two decades, Central Committee plenary sessions have seen more frequent adjustments to the CMC than additions to the Politburo. However, at this critical juncture, with the anti-corruption storm continuing to brew within the People’s Liberation Army and the “pernicious influences” (流毒) yet to be fully eradicated, the leadership is unlikely to rush promotions without complete confidence. This “Beidaihe time” would allow top leaders to briefly set aside daily affairs and carefully deliberate on personnel deployment and selection issues.
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Why Didn't Russia Help Trump Win in 2016?
Why Didn't they Give the Kompromat on Hillary to Don Jr. at the Trump Tower Meeting?
...because it was always a Fusion GPS/ Perkins Coei Set-Up!
One of the founders of the research firm behind the controversial Russian dossier met with a Kremlin-linked lawyer before and after she sat down with President Trump’s son and other campaign officials at the Trump Tower during the 2016 election, Fox News reported on Tuesday.
Glenn Simpson, a former Wall Street Journal reporter and co-founder of Fusion GPS, was with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at a Manhattan federal courtroom just hours before the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Fox News reported, citing a source. He met with her again after the meeting, the report said.Veselnitskaya, promising “dirt” on Hillary Clinton, met with Donald Trump Jr. and other campaign operatives – including Jared Kushner and former campaign manager Paul Manafort. Trump Jr. later said the discussion was about Russian adoptions.
But the meeting took place at a critical time when Fusion GPS was being paid by a Russian oligarch and by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee while it enlisted former British spy Christopher Steele to dig up damaging information about Trump through his contacts in Moscow, Fox News said.
The report said Simpson’s meeting Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS’ being bankrolled by the DNC, the Clinton campaign and Russian interests raises new questions about what role the firm played in the presidential election.
The original plan was to tie Trump and Paul Manafort to Russia, as the Ukrainians had given the Clinton Campaign Kompromat on Manafort (the forged Black-Ledger) that later served as the basis for Manafort's FARA conviction.
On the Persistence of Neo-Racism at Cal State Sacramento
Race Essentialism Refuses to Die in the wake of a Democratic Party Still racked with Civil War and Jim Crow Era Woke Guilt-Pride...
Tuesday, August 5, 2025
On CIA and Now DHS: Plato's Magnesia and America's New Nocturnal Councils
Wisdom's Limits: Virtue's Role of Coordinating Extra-Judicial InJustice Outside the Systems of Law, Law Enforcement, and the Rules-Based International Order
Overcoming Virtue's Enemies: Fear and Animal Instinct
thru Courage:Temperance::Justice:Wisdom
Sorry APS. You lacked the Muscle. :(
Monday, August 4, 2025
Why DoJ Just Classified the Evidence in the Ryan Routh Trump Assassination Attempt
So why, after a full year of investigations, is the public learning NOTHING about the Trump Assassination Attempts? Because it would reveal sensitive USIC Covert Operations still supporting the War in Ukraine, and likely implicate those USIC agencies (like DHS HSI) in the conspiracy to kill DJT.
Sunday, August 3, 2025
Mike Benz on The Durham Annex
et al...
h/t - Shaw Kenawe
Padlock the door and board the windows
Put the people in the street
"It's just my job, " he says "I'm sorry."
And draws a check, goes home to eat
But at night he tells his woman
"I know I hide behind the laws."
She says, "You're only taking orders."
That's how every empire falls
Saturday, August 2, 2025
Friday, August 1, 2025
The 'Critical Infrastructure' Hoax
When Elections get deemed "Critical Infrastructure" by Government Bureaucrats...
...in service of the $$$ and Resource Capture aims of Eurasian and American Oligarch's
Mosca and Pareto's 'Elite Theory" is SPOT ON!
Thursday, July 31, 2025
The Clinton-Obama Russia-Russia Conspiracy Finally Exposed
The Smoking Guns... Revealed.
One question though... why did Shellenberger get the USIC leak? Or was he simply the first to AI Summarize it and take ownership for the work product?
Wednesday, July 30, 2025
Cincinnati's Face of Woke Neo-Racism
The Results of New Left Race Essentialism in Action
"Silentium est Aureum" How the Democrats Sanction Anti-White and Pro-Immigrant Neo-Racism
Black Fragility vs. Superior White Jeans....
The Neo-Racists Pronounce: "Sydney Sweeny's Beauty Should Be Veiled and Hidden! Burka's for White Girls! Beauty Equity Should be Made Mandatory!" How DARE Advertisers market products to the Western Male Gaze and Western Female Ambitions to Capture It! Give us More Phat People Dancing Adverts!
"Enjoy!" - The Capitalist Universalist Injunction;
"Only Female Minorities Must Enjoy! Everyone Else Must Feel Guilty!" - The Intersectional Cultural Capitalist or Neo-Classisist Injunction.
How Language Reflects Social Hierarchy:
Social Status:.
Language can act as a marker of social class, education, and cultural background. For instance, the use of specific dialects, accents, or vocabulary can indicate an individual's perceived social standing.
Prestige and Power:.
Speaking a dominant or prestigious language or dialect can be associated with higher social status and greater access to opportunities, according to Number Analytics.
Social Categorization:.
Language can be used to categorize individuals into social groups and can influence how people are perceived and treated.
Social Mobility:.
Language proficiency in a dominant language can be crucial for social mobility, as it can open doors to education, employment, and social networks.
Examples of Language's Role:
Honorifics:
Many languages have honorifics (e.g., in Japanese, Korean, or Javanese) that are used to address people of higher social status or seniority.
Dialectal Variation:
Differences in pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary can indicate social class or regional identity, which can influence social perceptions.
Code-switching:
The practice of switching between different languages or dialects can reflect social contexts and relationships, highlighting power dynamics.
Formal vs. Informal Language:
The use of formal or informal language can indicate social distance and formality, reflecting hierarchical relationships.
Impact on Social Relations:
Social Categorization and Preferences:
Language can guide social categorization and preferences, particularly in early childhood development when individuals are learning about their social world.
Solidarity and Exclusion:
Language can be used to create a sense of solidarity within a group and to exclude or marginalize those who do not speak the same language or dialect.
Linguistic Discrimination:
Language can be used to discriminate against individuals or groups based on their speech patterns or language variety.
In conclusion, language is a powerful tool for both reflecting and shaping social hierarchies. It influences how we perceive others, how we interact with them, and how we navigate the social landscape.
Tuesday, July 29, 2025
Slaying Dervy's Invisible Dragons...?
....or How the Neo-Racist DNC Grew DJT!
Wes Moore to Democrats: "You're Just Not Neo-Racist Enough!"
Saturday, July 26, 2025
Proof that there is No Intellectual Integrity Left in the Neoliberal Left
...and then Dervy Pretends NOT to be a Neoliberal. @@
Q.E.D.
Friday, July 25, 2025
Thursday, July 24, 2025
Wednesday, July 23, 2025
Epstein, Epstein, Epstein... Peering into the USIC Shadow World
00:00 Introduction02:06 Who Was Jeffrey Epstein?08:58 The CIA Changed How It Operated23:50 What Is Epstein's Level Of Involvement With Intelligence Services?27:30 How Did Epstein Have So Much Influence?30:18 Was Ghislaine Maxwell Involved With Mossad?37:00 Surely This Is CIA Isn't It?49:52 Should We All Become Tax Advisers?52:10 The Indictment01:02:52 The Rumours Of Epstein Being An Intelligence Asset01:07:51 Pam Bondi Could Give Us The Answers Right Now01:10:00 Why Would Trump Interfere In This Information Being Released?01:19:57 Elon Musk Stating That Donald Trump Is In The Epstein Files01:29:15 The Evidence Of Trump's Involvement - Is It Legitimate?01:37:04 You Don't Know Who The Junior Or Senior Partner Is On These Things01:41:36 The Epstein Issue Is Toxic For Trump And MAGA01:48:19 What's The One Thing About All Of This That Nobody Is Talking About?
Brigitte is SLAPPing Everyone Now!
from Google AI:
A SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) lawsuit is a legal action intended to silence critics by burdening them with the cost and stress of a legal defense, rather than a genuine claim. These lawsuits are often filed by powerful individuals or entities against those who are speaking out on public issues, such as environmental concerns, human rights, or government corruption.
Can the Israel Lobby Save the Democratic Party from Itself in 2028?
Liberal & Conservative Jews Battle for the Party's Soul
Shamsi Ali Al-Nuyorki, "Zohran’s Victory, Democratic Party Leaders, And AIPAC"
ZOHRAN Mamdani’s surprising win in the New York City Democratic primary has sparked controversy, particularly among conservative critics and Donald Trump. As a progressive candidate, Mamdani’s platform includes ambitious but well calculated initiatives such as free and faster city buses, rent freezes, and governmental funded groceries, and more. His Victory with 43.51% of the vote over his main political opponent, Andrew Cuomo, and most likely his win in the upcoming New York City mayoral election, will be recorded as a historic milestone in many ways.
It is surprising to many, Mamdani’s triumph marks the largest victory in New York City’s primary election history. He successfully drew in citizens to participate in the election, resulting in the highest voter turnout in the city’s electoral history. This is a remarkable feat in New York City’s politics.
This reality is supposedly be admitted as a source of pride for America, particularly New York City, and serve as a crucial moment to revitalize the country’s political enthusiasm, which has drastically waned since Donald Trump’s re-election. More importantly, for the Democratic Party, especially for those in leadership position, should seize this momentum as an opportunity for resurgence after their defeat in the executive (White House) and legislative branches (senate and congress).
Zohran’s significant victory is truly a good opportunity for Democrats to regain momentum and win the midterm elections this year. For the Democratic Party, winning the Senate and Congressional midterm elections is crucial, given the current political landscape with Donald Trump in the White House and Republican dominance in Congress. The policies implemented by the US government have been unfavorable to ordinary Americans, particularly in immigration and budget allocation, which have long been detrimental to marginalized communities.
Sadly and deeply disappointing, till now some Democratic leaders have not yet to fully support and endorse Zohran Mamdani, despite his official nomination as the party’s candidate for the upcoming mayoral election. Two other candidates, Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams, although known as Democratic cadres, have decided to run as independent candidates against the party’s nominee. Logically, they should be viewed as opponents and party traitors by Democratic politicians and leaders. Unfortunately, some have instead shown support for the opponents of their own party’s candidate (Zohran Mamdani).
What is really the reasons behind the stance of some Democratic Party leaders?
There are many hypotheses regarding their stand. But two primary factors to mention contribute to the party leaders’ reluctance to support and endorse Zohran Mamdani.
First, Mamdani’s Religious Background. Mamdani proudly declared himself the first Muslim mayoral candidate in New York City’s history. His victory sparked Islamophobic attacks, drawing comparisons to post-9/11 anti-Islam sentiments. This is unfortunate, that political identity is still blinded some in time they claim to be upholding universal values; notably equal opportunity and justice for all.
Second, Mamdani’s Pro-Palestinian Stance. Mamdani’s stand on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, particularly regarding genocide and mass killing in Gaza, is rooted in his humanitarian values and his consistency on universal peace and justice. However, he’s been labeled anti-Semitic and anti-Jewish, despite opposing only Zionist Israel’s occupation and inhumane treatment of Palestinians.
Mamdani’s religious affiliation and his stance on Palestine directly contradict the interests of AIPAC, America’s most influential political lobby. Many Democratic politicians and leaders who refuse to support Mamdani have likely been swayed by substantial political donations from Zionist lobby groups in the US. Most politicians have been bought by AIPAC to support Zionist Israeli interests, even when it compromises American interests.
In conclusion, the reluctance of party leaders to support Zohran is due to AIPAC’s funding. However, will this benefit America, especially the Democratic Party? I’m certain that with the significant shift in views on the Palestine-Israel issue among young people and millennials in America, it will ultimately be detrimental. If party leaders continue to prioritize AIPAC’s interests over the interests of New York City’s residents, they’ll regret it and might lose their seats in future elections.
Therefore, I call upon the Democratic leaders to prioritize New York City’s and the party’s interests over Zionist lobby’s interests. Keep aside the ego and narrow interests and endorse Zohran for the larger interest of the party and New Yorkers.
Jamaica Hills, 19 July 2025
What Tulsi Found...
🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration… pic.twitter.com/0sS4Df8yoI
— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 23, 2025
A Marxist Critique of the New Left's Neo-Racist Post-Colonial Project
Excerpt from above video:
Even if Capitalists think they work hard, the economy would not operate without workers. If something is true, it is true regardless of who is saying it. But just as in the natural sciences, the real operations of a thing are not always obvious, and our task as the political Left should actually be debating to determine how things really work. But in universities there is a culture of denunciation instead of debate. There is a vicious culture of condemning attempting to ruin the reputations of people who are deemed to have transgressed in their language, or some cultural element, or to have disagreed with whatever the common sense liberal position on an issue is at the time. And this is not directed towards the Right, the State, let alone the ruling class, but almost always towards people who are against oppression, people on the Left, those who oppose some form of injustice but are deemed morally unworthy to argue about it because of their identity, opinions, or means. And all of this is part and parcel of postcolonialism, and it develops because postcolonialism is not about truth, it's not about struggle, and it's not about solidarity. It's a framework obsessed with the individual, and it's often a vehicle for the personal advancement of individuals through enormous bureaucracies like Academia. And that was the trajectory of people in the Subaltern Studies Collective. Really, people who once talked about Maoism are now just highly paid academics in New York, and Chicago, and so on.
Now, none of this is good enough for those of us seriously wanting to change the world Marxists want to defeat imperialism and all forms of oppression, which means defeating Capitalism. And for that, we need a lot more than deconstructing and altering the fragments of language and discourse. We need to transform the material world get rid of the ruling elite that profits from all varieties of destruction and oppression. We need a revolution that destroys the very definite sites of power in Capitalism and creates a new democratic society run by the working class. And that is the transformation that we need to open up a world of real human freedom, where the majority are able to determine what kind of society they live in, and how they live their lives.
---
“Postcolonialism is the invention of rich Indian guys who wanted to make a good career in the West by playing on the guilt of white liberals”― Slavoj Žižek
from Google AI:
Structuralism is an intellectual movement and theoretical framework that analyzes phenomena by examining their underlying structures and the relationships between their elements. It's a way of understanding things by looking at the systems and patterns that give them meaning, rather than just their individual components or surface-level appearances. Essentially, it emphasizes how interconnectedness and interdependence shape our understanding of the world.Post-structuralism is a philosophical and critical approach that emerged as a response to structuralism, challenging the idea of fixed meanings and universal structures. It emphasizes the instability of meaning, the fluidity of language, and the role of context in interpretation. Key figures include Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Roland Barthes, who explored concepts like deconstruction, discourse analysis, and the "death of the author".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)