They haven't even been sworn in yet. The "betraying" is happening 4 days after the election? Sounds like BS to me. But this is a Jimmy Dore video. And Jimmy Dore is a republican operative pretending to be a Lefty.
//Professor Prophet Dervish Z. SandersNovember 6, 2026 at 2:21 PM 🤪Qtard: In crematoriums burning Jews. In soviet Gulag. In Pol Pot death fields. Mao's cretinic experiments. "PRO humanity"... my ass. Yawn. But... is there any surprise that you -- as alergic to facts cretin -- do support SUCH "PRO humanity"?
//I very strongly oppose the examples of anti-humanity killing you give.
//So what? %^P
It sounds just like: "I love fresh juicy haggis and... condemn killing that tasty... errm, poor little lambs."
rightturds are filled with hate and love to project that hate onto others. Mystere did it when he had me saying I wanted Republicans to all die (with his fake comment). Previously Qtard was falsely claiming I was on the side of Russia in the war in Ukraine. Now he falsely claims I'm on the side of Hamas. Absolutely nothing I could say would change his mind. But I know what I believe and I know he is wrong. And I also know there is something seriously wrong with him. I think he likely gets off watching the news and hearing about innocent non combatant citizens of Gaza being killed. Though he calls them "accomplices". He probably feels the same way about the school children the trump administration murdered. All "accomplices". He thinks this way because he is a sick, sick Turd.
Yes. Because you are cretin. That trying to use words (like "projection" here) without tiniest understanding what they mean. And unable to consult with dictionaries... as they always provide meanings that do not suit your cretinic braindead babblings.
Yawn.
//killing of non combatant civilians in Gaza.
Non-deliberate. Because their government THEY THEMSELF choose, decided to use em as meat shield?
Yawn.
//Now he falsely claims I'm on the side of Hamas.
See?
Again wrong use of words.
Not "claiming". That is you are who claiming your rediculous bs based on propaganda.
I. Do provide evidances.
Yawn.
//Absolutely nothing I could say would change his mind.
Your alter-ego? %^P
//But I know what I believe and I know he is wrong. And I also know there is something seriously wrong with him.
O.K. Google What can be wrong with a person that demand to belive to its own words while constantly dismissing facts and lying about it?
When someone insists that you believe their version of reality while simultaneously ignoring objective facts and lying, it can be incredibly frustrating and disorienting. In psychology and communication, this pattern of behavior is often linked to specific cognitive biases, defense mechanisms, or personality traits. Here are the most common psychological and behavioral explanations for what might be happening:
1. Personality Traits and Disorders
• Narcissistic Traits: Individuals with strong narcissistic tendencies or Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) often have a fragile self-image. They rewrite reality or lie to protect their ego, maintain a sense of superiority, and avoid feeling shame or being wrong. For them, control over the narrative is more important than the truth. • Antisocial Traits: In some cases, constant lying and disregard for facts are used intentionally to manipulate, exploit, or control others for personal gain without feeling guilt.
2. Pathological Lying (Mythomania)
• Compulsive Lying: Some people lie habitually and compulsively, often for no clear reason or benefit. Over time, they may begin to believe their own lies to resolve the internal conflict (cognitive dissonance) of being a liar.
3. Psychological Defense Mechanisms
• Severe Denial: This is an unconscious defense mechanism where a person simply cannot accept a reality that is too painful, threatening, or damaging to their self-concept. They genuinely block out the facts because the alternative requires facing a truth they cannot handle. • Delusional Thinking: In more severe psychological cases, a person might break from shared reality entirely. If they suffer from a delusional belief, no amount of counter-evidence or logic will change their mind because their brain processes the false belief as absolute fact.
4. Cognitive Biases (Taken to Extremes)
• Confirmation Bias and Motivated Reasoning: While everyone experiences this to some degree, some people take it to an extreme. They filter out any information that contradicts what they want to believe and aggressively defend their own viewpoint to protect their worldview.
5. Manipulative Tactics
• Gaslighting: This is a deliberate manipulation tactic used to make you question your own sanity, memory, or perception of reality. By fiercely demanding you believe their lies and dismissing facts, they attempt to erode your confidence and gain psychological power over you.
O.K.Google What can be wrong with person that constantly providing facts, examples and evidences and mocking opponent for dismissing them?
When a person constantly relies on facts, examples, and evidence while mocking their opponent for dismissing them, it usually signals a mix of communication styles, cognitive biases, and underlying psychological dynamics. Depending on the context, here is what might be going on:
1. Intellectual Arrogance and the "Righteousness Trap"
• The Belief in Absolute Truth: This person likely views discussions as binary—either you are factually correct or you are wrong. They may suffer from a "superiority complex" regarding their intellect or knowledge base. • Mockery as a Defense Mechanism: When their carefully constructed wall of evidence is ignored or dismissed, they feel invalidated. Mockery becomes a tool to regain dominance, mask frustration, and make the other person look foolish rather than engaging with why the opponent is dismissing the points.
2. Hyper-Rationality and Low Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
• The "Spock" Approach: Some individuals are hyper-rational. They genuinely believe that human communication should operate strictly on logic and data. • Inability to Read the Room: They often fail to understand that human decisions and arguments are deeply rooted in emotion, personal values, identity, and lived experiences. When an opponent dismisses a fact, the hyper-rational person sees it as a breakdown of intellect, not realizing the opponent might be reacting from a place of fear, pride, or cognitive dissonance.
3. Debate-Team Mentality (Winning over Connecting)
• An Arena, Not a Conversation: This person treats casual discussions or relationships like a formal debate stage or a courtroom. Their primary goal is to win, not to find common ground or understand the other person. • The Need for Validation: Constantly presenting evidence can be a subconscious plea for validation. They want to be seen as the smart, objective authority figure in the room.
4. Cognitive Load and Frustration
• "Sealioning" or Exhaustion: If they have been dealing with what they perceive as willful ignorance, conspiracy theories, or bad-faith arguments for a long time, their patience may be entirely depleted. • The Burnout Reflex: The mockery might not be malice; it could be raw exasperation. They are essentially saying, "I have given you undeniable proof, and you are still denying reality. I don't know how else to deal with this other than to laugh."
5. Potential Neurodivergent Communication Styles
• Autistic Trait Expression: In some cases, a hyper-focus on objective data, directness, and a literal interpretation of facts can be associated with neurodivergence (such as being on the autism spectrum). • Missing Social Nuance: A neurodivergent individual might heavily rely on facts because data feels safe and predictable, but they might struggle to grasp the social nuances or the emotional weight of the argument, leading to a tone that others perceive as mocking or aggressive, even if that wasn't the original intent.
They haven't even been sworn in yet. The "betraying" is happening 4 days after the election? Sounds like BS to me. But this is a Jimmy Dore video. And Jimmy Dore is a republican operative pretending to be a Lefty.
ReplyDelete//Professor Prophet Dervish Z. SandersNovember 6, 2026 at 2:21 PM
Delete🤪Qtard: In crematoriums burning Jews. In soviet Gulag. In Pol Pot death fields. Mao's cretinic experiments. "PRO humanity"... my ass. Yawn. But... is there any surprise that you -- as alergic to facts cretin -- do support SUCH "PRO humanity"?
//I very strongly oppose the examples of anti-humanity killing you give.
//So what? %^P
It sounds just like: "I love fresh juicy haggis and... condemn killing that tasty... errm, poor little lambs."
Yawn.
WTF? Sounds like projection to me -- and that's how you feel about the killing of non combatant civilians in Gaza.
Deleterightturds are filled with hate and love to project that hate onto others. Mystere did it when he had me saying I wanted Republicans to all die (with his fake comment). Previously Qtard was falsely claiming I was on the side of Russia in the war in Ukraine. Now he falsely claims I'm on the side of Hamas. Absolutely nothing I could say would change his mind. But I know what I believe and I know he is wrong. And I also know there is something seriously wrong with him. I think he likely gets off watching the news and hearing about innocent non combatant citizens of Gaza being killed. Though he calls them "accomplices". He probably feels the same way about the school children the trump administration murdered. All "accomplices". He thinks this way because he is a sick, sick Turd.
Delete//WTF? Sounds like projection
DeleteYes. Because you are cretin.
That trying to use words (like "projection" here) without tiniest understanding what they mean.
And unable to consult with dictionaries... as they always provide meanings that do not suit your cretinic braindead babblings.
Yawn.
//killing of non combatant civilians in Gaza.
Non-deliberate. Because their government THEY THEMSELF choose, decided to use em as meat shield?
Yawn.
//Now he falsely claims I'm on the side of Hamas.
See?
Again wrong use of words.
Not "claiming". That is you are who claiming your rediculous bs based on propaganda.
I. Do provide evidances.
Yawn.
//Absolutely nothing I could say would change his mind.
Your alter-ego? %^P
//But I know what I believe and I know he is wrong. And I also know there is something seriously wrong with him.
Yeah.
That is not a news hete.
About your crazy alter-egos.))))
)))))
DeleteProfessor Prophet Dervish Z. SandersNovember 8, 2026 at 3:33 AM
Absolutely nothing I could say would change his mind. But I know what I believe and I know he is wrong.
O.K. Google What can be wrong with a person that demand to belive to its own words while constantly dismissing facts and lying about it?
When someone insists that you believe their version of reality while simultaneously ignoring objective facts and lying, it can be incredibly frustrating and disorienting. In psychology and communication, this pattern of behavior is often linked to specific cognitive biases, defense mechanisms, or personality traits.
Here are the most common psychological and behavioral explanations for what might be happening:
1. Personality Traits and Disorders
• Narcissistic Traits: Individuals with strong narcissistic tendencies or Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) often have a fragile self-image. They rewrite reality or lie to protect their ego, maintain a sense of superiority, and avoid feeling shame or being wrong. For them, control over the narrative is more important than the truth.
• Antisocial Traits: In some cases, constant lying and disregard for facts are used intentionally to manipulate, exploit, or control others for personal gain without feeling guilt.
2. Pathological Lying (Mythomania)
• Compulsive Lying: Some people lie habitually and compulsively, often for no clear reason or benefit. Over time, they may begin to believe their own lies to resolve the internal conflict (cognitive dissonance) of being a liar.
3. Psychological Defense Mechanisms
• Severe Denial: This is an unconscious defense mechanism where a person simply cannot accept a reality that is too painful, threatening, or damaging to their self-concept. They genuinely block out the facts because the alternative requires facing a truth they cannot handle.
• Delusional Thinking: In more severe psychological cases, a person might break from shared reality entirely. If they suffer from a delusional belief, no amount of counter-evidence or logic will change their mind because their brain processes the false belief as absolute fact.
4. Cognitive Biases (Taken to Extremes)
• Confirmation Bias and Motivated Reasoning: While everyone experiences this to some degree, some people take it to an extreme. They filter out any information that contradicts what they want to believe and aggressively defend their own viewpoint to protect their worldview.
5. Manipulative Tactics
• Gaslighting: This is a deliberate manipulation tactic used to make you question your own sanity, memory, or perception of reality. By fiercely demanding you believe their lies and dismissing facts, they attempt to erode your confidence and gain psychological power over you.
.
.
DeleteO.K.Google What can be wrong with person that constantly providing facts, examples and evidences and mocking opponent for dismissing them?
When a person constantly relies on facts, examples, and evidence while mocking their opponent for dismissing them, it usually signals a mix of communication styles, cognitive biases, and underlying psychological dynamics.
Depending on the context, here is what might be going on:
1. Intellectual Arrogance and the "Righteousness Trap"
• The Belief in Absolute Truth: This person likely views discussions as binary—either you are factually correct or you are wrong. They may suffer from a "superiority complex" regarding their intellect or knowledge base.
• Mockery as a Defense Mechanism: When their carefully constructed wall of evidence is ignored or dismissed, they feel invalidated. Mockery becomes a tool to regain dominance, mask frustration, and make the other person look foolish rather than engaging with why the opponent is dismissing the points.
2. Hyper-Rationality and Low Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
• The "Spock" Approach: Some individuals are hyper-rational. They genuinely believe that human communication should operate strictly on logic and data.
• Inability to Read the Room: They often fail to understand that human decisions and arguments are deeply rooted in emotion, personal values, identity, and lived experiences. When an opponent dismisses a fact, the hyper-rational person sees it as a breakdown of intellect, not realizing the opponent might be reacting from a place of fear, pride, or cognitive dissonance.
3. Debate-Team Mentality (Winning over Connecting)
• An Arena, Not a Conversation: This person treats casual discussions or relationships like a formal debate stage or a courtroom. Their primary goal is to win, not to find common ground or understand the other person.
• The Need for Validation: Constantly presenting evidence can be a subconscious plea for validation. They want to be seen as the smart, objective authority figure in the room.
4. Cognitive Load and Frustration
• "Sealioning" or Exhaustion: If they have been dealing with what they perceive as willful ignorance, conspiracy theories, or bad-faith arguments for a long time, their patience may be entirely depleted.
• The Burnout Reflex: The mockery might not be malice; it could be raw exasperation. They are essentially saying, "I have given you undeniable proof, and you are still denying reality. I don't know how else to deal with this other than to laugh."
5. Potential Neurodivergent Communication Styles
• Autistic Trait Expression: In some cases, a hyper-focus on objective data, directness, and a literal interpretation of facts can be associated with neurodivergence (such as being on the autism spectrum).
• Missing Social Nuance: A neurodivergent individual might heavily rely on facts because data feels safe and predictable, but they might struggle to grasp the social nuances or the emotional weight of the argument, leading to a tone that others perceive as mocking or aggressive, even if that wasn't the original intent.
.