Friday, September 25, 2026

White Supremacy? Or Nativism?

Was Arnold Schwarzeneggar a White Supremacist?
Was he White?

from Google AI:
In 18th-century colonial America, prominent figures like Benjamin Franklin questioned whether Germans were truly white, viewing them as having a "swarthy" complexion that threatened the Anglo-Saxon character of the colonies. However, this rhetoric reflected cultural and political anxiety rather than a legal exclusion from whiteness. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Franklin's Views on German Complexion
  • In his 1751 essay Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc., Benjamin Franklin claimed that most Europeans—including Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians, and Germans—were "swarthy".
  • He asserted that only the English and the Saxons made up the "principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth".
  • Franklin worried that Pennsylvania would become "Germanized" and that German settlers would not adopt English customs or language. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Legal Status and Realities of Whiteness
  • Despite Franklin's cultural xenophobia and complaints about their "complexion," Germans were never legally classified as non-white.
  • They enjoyed the rights of free Europeans, could own property, and were fully eligible for naturalization under early colonial laws and later the Naturalization Act of 1790, which restricted citizenship to "free white persons".
  • The social friction was rooted in language, political power, and cultural assimilation fears rather than a systematic denial of racial privilege. [1, 2, 3, 4]
If you'd like, I can provide more details on:
  • How the Naturalization Act of 1790 defined whiteness for European immigrants
  • Benjamin Franklin's broader economic and political arguments against German settlement
  • How 19th-century nativist movements later targeted other European groups like the Irish or Italians.

 ---

Nativism in American history refers to the political and social movement that prioritized the interests of established, native-born inhabitants over those of new immigrants. While the target groups shifted over time, the underlying anxieties—fear of losing economic, political, and cultural dominance—remained consistent.
The Historical Shifts of American Nativism
  • 1700s (Anti-German/Xenophobic Nativism): Driven by early Anglo-Saxon colonists who feared that large influxes of German and non-English European settlers would refuse to assimilate, dilute the English language, and alter the political landscape.
  • 1830s–1850s (Anti-Catholic Nativism): Fueled by the arrival of millions of Irish and German immigrants. Prominent groups like the Know-Nothing Party feared that Catholic allegiance to the Pope threatened American democratic institutions and took jobs away from American workers.
  • 1870s–1880s (Anti-Asian Nativism): Concentrated in the American West, this movement targeted Chinese workers who built the transcontinental railroads. It led directly to the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the first federal law restricting immigration based entirely on race and nationality.
  • 1890s–1920s (Anti-Southern and Eastern European Nativism): Aimed at Italian, Slavic, and Jewish immigrants. Nativists used pseudo-scientific eugenics to claim these groups were racially inferior to "Nordic" Americans, culminating in the highly restrictive Immigration Act of 1924, which established strict national origin quotas.
Nativist Rhetoric vs. Legal Reality
Like the 18th-century anxieties regarding German immigrants, later nativist movements frequently used racialized language—often describing Irish, Italian, or Slavic immigrants as distinct, inferior "races." However, just like the Germans before them, these European groups retained the fundamental legal status of "white persons" under federal law, granting them paths to citizenship, land ownership, and voting rights that were systematically denied to non-white populations.

16 comments:

  1. //Slavic, and Jewish immigrants. Nativists used pseudo-scientific eugenics to claim these groups were racially inferior to "Nordic" Americans, culminating in the highly restrictive Immigration Act of 1924, which established strict national origin quotas.

    Later adopted by Mussolini and Hitler, as "new shiny ideology".
    Of fascism. ;-p

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, the Nazi's stole Jim Crow laws from the Democrats to apply to Jews

      Delete
    2. Minus: Is the EU Russophobia racism?

      No, because there is no "EU Russophobia". Nobody is afraid or hating Russian people. They are hating Vladimir Putin and his administration. Same as with Israel. People are hating what Ben Netanyahu and his administration are doing and not the Israeli people who are opposed to it.

      If there is Russophobia due to the war in Ukraine, then there is Antisemitism due to what's happening in Gaza and Netanyahu convincing trump to attack Iran. Which would make you an antisemite. Though, that could be why you decided to support the war in Iran? Because disagreeing with anything Netanyahu does makes people antisemites?

      I do know you fully support killing innocents in Gaza, the same as Qtard does. Because Islamophobia is a great phobia to have among rightturds.

      Delete
    3. And you saying it here for the sake of supporting islamists terrorists... oups, "peace-lovers" and Palestinians... which, even do not know about existance of this blog and your valiant efforts in it. ;-p

      Delete
    4. Hamas terrorists should be killed. I have never said otherwise. You lie, scumbag.

      Delete
  2. That is Totally STUPID

    ReplyDelete
  3. Talk about USELESSNESS in a sense of humor!

    Dave DubyaSeptember 25, 2026 at 11:31 PM
    It's no surprise -FJ/JC shares the same sadistic sense of "humor" as the Chinese dictator and a sex offending, child molesting, pedophile protecting, cruel, corrupt, and criminal president.

    The authoritarian personality finds glee in the suffering of those they hate. This is their sense of "humor".

    ReplyDelete


  4. The USA is at its worst point I haven't seen in my lifetime. We have a rising of anti-Semitic Nazism, white nationalism, radical left Socialists and a growing population with poor mental health. The Democratic Party is a total Failure. The number of sane people on the Left seems to be dwindling to an all-time low., and getting lower as we speak .
    We
    Have an incompetent, narcissistic path on the Left that care only about themselves, feeding the powder kegs because it helps them cling to their power. They're walking us down a path to destruction as they have turned to Socialism I really don't know how we get through this.!

    ReplyDelete
  5. "White Suprtemacy? Or Nativism?"

    White Supremacy, not Nativism. Probably not White Suprtemacy. That could be a typo, but I won't just assume it is. Gemini says "Suprtemacy is most likely a typo for supremacy"... so "most likely", but not definitely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah... because you are cretin. Definitely. ))))))

      Delete
    2. ^^More Projection^^ Its speciality.

      Delete
  6. ZOHRAN MANDDANI And KATHY HOCHUL ARE ONE OF A KIND. THEY BOTH ARE COMMUNISTS

    ReplyDelete
  7. Country Leaders that Walk Out of the IN chamber often turn a blind eye to human rights violations or aggression committed by their own close allies, but act aggressively when the same issue involves political enemies.
    The act of leaving the chamber is seen as a failure to engage in mature diplomacy.
    This reflects hypocrisy., and show their Cowardly Nature.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Country Leaders that Walk Out of the IUN chamber often turn a blind eye to human rights violations or aggression committed by their own close allies, but act aggressively when the same issue involves political enemies.
    The act of leaving the chamber is seen as a failure to engage in mature diplomacy.
    This reflects hypocrisy., and show their Cowardly Nature.

    ReplyDelete