More Proof that the Democrats have NO Principles! Former Vice President Kamala Harris will join Michigan Democrat Abdul El-Sayed on the campaign trailas the countdown to November's midterm elections continues. Harris is expected to participate in a roundtable discussion focused on healthcare costs and Black maternal health. The event will feature medical providers and women sharing their experiences on the disparities facing Black mothers during pregnancy and childbirth. Kamala knows that Abdul hates Jews, and her husband is Jewish. That would be awkward if she had a conscience, but she does not have a conscience. The Democrats do not have any real principles other than their greed for power and control. She is in Michigan trying to shore up the Black Democrat votes. Notice that the Democrats don't care about the White Democrat voters in Michigan.
//LIke above where you suggest I want "death fields" in the USA.
Dense cretin you are. But we already was discussing it ubiquotously -- how you cretin unable to phatome concept of what "question" are.
Yawn.
//I want happiness, good health, long life and prosperity for all good people who don't try to harm others for their own benefit. No matter their religion, ethnicity, race, place of birth, or where they currently live.
But... in that definition there's no place for rich people? Because they all bad? Yawn
//The dark fantasies of killing are your fantasies, not mine.
Yeah, cretin. I listed FACTUAL HISTORUCAL events.
But for you that is "daek fantasues".
And you even trying to make big eyes about wht I call you cretin here.))))
But... continue-continue, cretin.
//If I was as terrible as you think I am (an evil moron), you wouldn't laugh.
You are not evil. Just unredeemably stupid. And only then evil. As stupid people tend to behave stupidly. And such behavior tends to be destructive. And destructive usually means evil.
Yawn.
But... you will not understand what I just written.
Isn't it, cretin?
//Personally I find it very troubling that such people exist and in large numbers. And I mean people like you.
Yeah.
That's why people like you hailing for "final solution".
Yawn.
//You support killing by your own admission.
And you can quote it? ;-p )))))
//Just call them "accomplices" and then mow them down, drop bombs on them, starve them to death, or make them live in conditions where they catch diseases.
That is how wars are...
//You probably consider me an "accomplice", given how you keep accusing me of wanting people to be killed. And how the deaths of innocents warms my "cold Nazi heart".
Where is you mourning horribly killed Jews kids??? Where is you supporting justice to their murderers??? Where you condemn Palestinians for NOT giving that scumbags??? And instead if that JUST CIVERING EM AS WELL AS HOSTAGES!!!!!
And in the end, say cretin, that would *NEVER* (you like this word so much) support all-out war IF same would hapoen with Americans?
The bias in favor of the truth that you linked to is true.
Qtard: Dense cretin you are.
Yeah, you're pretty dense. Didn't notice this was a discussion from another thread. And you think I can't identify a loaded question. And I can't see that your answer for me is YES, I want killing fields.
And it's pretty dense to conclude that, when I say (over and over) that Hamas terrorists should be killed, you conclude that I'm on their side.
Naturally I'm concluding you're the cretin. Because your comments prove it.
//Yeah, you're pretty dense. Didn't notice this was a discussion from another thread. And you think I can't identify a loaded question. And I can't see that your answer for me is YES, I want killing fields.
Yeah.
Now I see that you a schizophrenic too.
What "loaded question"???)))) One to which you unable to answer -- because ANY your answer would reveal your previous lies???))))
But, you cretin -- STILL not able to grasp -- that your denial to answer, tryes to derail or outrightly ignore -- REVEAL YOUR LIES even better. ;-p
But... continue-continue, your festival of cretinity, you cretin.)))
//And it's pretty dense to conclude that, when I say (over and over) that Hamas terrorists should be killed, you conclude that I'm on their side.
Of course YOU ARE. On the side of HAMAS terrorists.
Because you DENY to forces if Israel
>>>***ONLY***<<<
possible way of doing that killing. Falsely calling it "genocide".
Or.
You are free to demonstrate your intellect.
And propose to IDF a sure thing working method -- of extracting terrorists and recovering hostages... which are hiden in labirinth of urban territories, "shielded" deliberately with "innocent" people.
Qtard: Of course YOU ARE. On the side of HAMAS terrorists. Because you DENY to forces if Israel >>>***ONLY***<<< possible way of doing that killing. Falsely calling it "genocide". And propose to IDF a sure thing working method -- of extracting terrorists and recovering hostages... which are hiden in labirinth of urban territories, "shielded" deliberately with "innocent" people.
BULL SHIT. I've never said I think Hamas using civilians as shields should protect them. I refer to examples like this one...
UN News: In one instance, a 14-year-old boy was shot by an Israeli military patrol as he was leaving his house, Mr. Sidoti said, explaining that the patrol had been in the area, but at the time there had been no fighting taking place.
“He was shot, badly injured and was lying on the ground,” Mr. Sidoti continued. “He was surrounded by a company of Israeli soldiers who were chatting and probably some of them smoking, over a period of 45 minutes, while this 14-year-old boy bled to death". link.
And there are many more examples from many more sources. Whistleblowers within the Israeli military itself say things like this happen a lot. You don't know about it because you don't want to know about it.
You just lie and say I mean I support the Hamas strategy of using civilians as shields and that should protect them. When I never have. I realize innocent people will be killed due to Hamas using them as shields. I've never called that genocide, a-hole.
This is what I believe: Hamas attacked Israel and killed innocent people. And raped and tortured. They are despicable, the killings were horrific, and Hamas members should be hunted and killed. Also, Hamas using civilians as shields should not give them immunity from being killed.
I only say Israel should take care to minimize civilian deaths. But they aren't doing that. In fact they are doing the opposite. Lots of reports about this are available online. Civilians are being targeted when nobody from Hamas is present. So you can fVck off.
Qtard: Cretins are people with very poor ability to think and come to conclusions. ;-p And you -- demonstrating with your own words here that you too have very poor ability to think and negliguble ability to come to conclusions.
I agree completely. And this is very true about you. Your ability to think and reach accurate conclusions is incredibly poor.
And I don't believe you don't know what a loaded question is. Despite being a moron. You know you asked a loaded question. So (again), you can fVck off.
In recent conflicts, international bodies and human rights organizations have documented that Hamas continues to systematically exploit, militarize, and use children in hostilities, though the nature of their involvement has evolved over the decades. While the direct deployment of children as suicide bombers ("shahids") peaked during the Second Intifada (2000–2005), recent documentations focus on Hamas utilizing minors for support roles in combat zones, intelligence gathering, and operational activities during the current Gaza conflict. The United Nations officially "blacklisted" Hamas in its annual reports on Children and Armed Conflict for grave violations against minors. Recent Patterns & Examples (Current Conflict) Rather than the standard 2000s-era explosive-vest suicide operations, recent documented examples of Hamas utilizing children in combat roles involve using them as couriers, scouts, and auxiliary logistical support: • Ammunition & Explosives Transportation: According to IDF military intelligence reports released during the current war, captured Hamas commanders detailed a combat doctrine where children are given explosives concealed in grocery bags or vegetable bags to deliver to active fighters.
>>>>This relies on the assumption that military forces will avoid targeting children.<<<<
• Combat Intelligence & Damage Assessment: Minors are sent into active combat zones immediately following strikes to assess damage, document military movements, and report back to operatives hiding in tunnels and shelters. • Militarized Summer Camps: Human rights observers highlight that Hamas openly runs summer training camps in Gaza targeting teenagers and children as young as 10. Promotional materials released by Hamas detail training minors in automatic weapon handling, urban combat, and ideological conditioning toward "martyrdom" or self-sacrifice.
Historical Context of Child Suicide Bombers During the Second Intifada, the use of under-18s directly as explosive-carrying suicide bombers was widely reported: • Human Rights Watch Reports: Documented that major factions, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), deployed minors on suicide missions, noting that while leadership publicly claimed policies against it, local commanders circumvented definitions by claiming anyone age 16 or older was an adult. • The 2004 Checkpoint Incidents: Notably, teenagers like 16-year-old Hussam Abdo were intercepted by security forces while wearing explosive vests meant to be detonated at crowded military checkpoints. International bodies emphasize that the active radicalization and logistical integration of minors into militant actions constitute clear violations of international humanitarian law
//And there are many more examples from many more sources. Whistleblowers within the Israeli military itself say things like this happen a lot. You don't know about it because you don't want to know about it.
That is what happen in the war zones. ALL AROUND THE WORLD. IN ALL TIMES.
But... somehow. You do care. And propose to me to ONLY care... while it about Gazans, who inflicted it on their heads THEMSELF.
THEY... I remind you, attacked Israel. In most sinister and atricious way.
AND weaponised such missives with spreading it among gullible idiots like you.
//You just lie and say I mean I support the Hamas strategy of using civilians as shields and that should protect them. When I never have. I realize innocent people will be killed due to Hamas using them as shields. I've never called that genocide, a-hole.
You -- cretin.
You was giving all-out suppirt to other cretin Lessly here.
Though that is exactly what that cretin Lessy did -- called it "genocide". And even proclaimed "final solutiin" for Jews for that whimsical "genocidal crime".
Stop support cretins (like DEMN party), and who knows... maybe people will stop calling you cretin. ;-p
Bur, naaaah.
You will not stop doing cretinic things... because you ARE cretin. ))())
//Qtard: Cretins are people with very poor ability to think and come to conclusions. ;-p And you -- demonstrating with your own words here that you too have very poor ability to think and negliguble ability to come to conclusions.
//I agree completely. And this is very true about you. Your ability to think and reach accurate conclusions is incredibly poor
And you can show it on specific examples (quotes ;-p) and confirm it with comprehensive and conclusive reasoning? ;-p
Naaaaaaaaah.
You -- cretin.
And you will not even get what I just written. ;-p
//And I don't believe you don't know what a loaded question is.
Here.
I even asked AI to make it as simple as possible for such a cretins like you to understand.
But you will not... ;-p
No, a "loaded question" and a "revealing question" (one that uncovers the truth) are not the same thing. They have opposite goals. Here is a simple breakdown to understand the difference easily.
The Short Answer A loaded question is a trap. It tries to force a specific, often unfair answer. A revealing question is a key. It tries to open up the truth by letting the person speak honestly.
Direct Comparison Feature Loaded Question (The Trap) Revealing Question (The Key) Goal To make you look bad or trick you. To find out what actually happened.
Truth It assumes you are already guilty. It searches for the real facts.
Freedom You feel stuck and cannot answer easily. You can answer freely and explain yourself.
Grouped Examples to See the Difference
1. The Loaded Question (The Trap) A loaded question has a hidden accusation inside it. No matter how you answer, you lose. Example: "Have you stopped stealing money from your parents?" If you say Yes, it means you used to steal. If you say No, it means you are still stealing. Result: It does not find the truth; it just makes you look guilty.
2. The Revealing Question (The Truth-Finder) A revealing question is honest. It does not judge you before you speak. It helps the truth come out naturally. Example: "Where did you get the money to buy that new phone?" You can answer honestly (e.g., "I saved up from my job" or "It was a gift"). Result: It reveals the actual truth without trapping you. Summary Think of a loaded question like a lawyer trying to trick a bad guy on TV. Think of a revealing question like a good friend or a scientist trying to learn the real story.
There was no "Russia hoax". donald trump and his campaign eagerly colluded with Russia. The trump administration is colluding with Russia right now. Why a Russian oligarch paid for donald trump junior's wedding reception at great expense. As a thank you.
Obama had several reporters removed with conservative-leaning The Washington Times, New York Post, and Dallas Morning News) from his traveling press plane, citing strict seat limitations. The outlets argued they were targeted because of their Conservative agendas.
This happened during his campaign. This didn't happen when Obama was president.
ABC News: Barack Obama's campaign has booted from its airplane three reporters who work for newspapers that have endorsed John McCain. ... In the final days of a campaign, it is not uncommon for journalists to be shuffled as multiple news agencies rush to get a coveted seat close to the candidate. 10/31/2008.
What "volumes" does it speak? That you're onboard with conflating a campaign allocating a limited number of seats with acts of someone acting as president in an official press briefing (with more seats)?
Think of it this way, the WaPo and NYT are still in the room, ergo "no censorship". If the "pool" then refuses to cover, who's doing the censoring? The news "gatekeepers" controlling the propaganda.
Harris'’s Failed border policies cost the US a hell of a lot more than 150 billion a year. Add the costs to transport, house, feed, clothe, educate, provide medical care, incarcerate and the infrastructure needed to accommodate 20 million of these invaders. Then add in the extra money we need for extra border patrol agents and immigration judges, the extra money we need to support American citizens whose jobs they steal, the money we lose because of the drugs they bring and the crimes they commit, the murders and rapes and the embarrassment of having 300K children trafficked and unaccounted for. Harris' failure on our border is the single biggest failure in the history of the US. MAGA. And she’s still Failing. As she’s failing in every poll.
Again you project. Unable or unwilling to look in the mirror.
Anymouses are generally like that. They push their garbage as they hide behind the anymouse identity of anonymity.
Your fear of being recognized highlights your cowardness. As well as giving you the false feeling of moral strength and superiority. Two things you clearly do not possess.
Projecting is a psychological defense mechanism where a person shifts their own unwanted thoughts, feelings, or traits onto someone else.
What is Projecting? Unconscious denial: The mind hides unacceptable impulses or guilt from itself. Blame shifting: A person who feels angry might accuse everyone else of being hostile. Ego protection: It shields self-esteem by making the external world look like the problem.
Can Someone Saying "You Project" Be Projecting Themselves? Yes, a person who tells you "you are projecting" can indeed be projecting their own behavior onto you. This is a common recursive loop in arguments.The accusation as a mirror: Accusing someone else of defense mechanisms requires a lens tinted by one's own internal state. Defensive deflection: A person guilty of the very thing being discussed may weaponize psychological terms to flip the blame
ReplyDeleteMore Proof that the Democrats have NO Principles!
Former Vice President Kamala Harris will join Michigan Democrat Abdul El-Sayed on the campaign trailas the countdown to November's midterm elections continues. Harris is expected to participate in a roundtable discussion focused on healthcare costs and Black maternal health. The event will feature medical providers and women sharing their experiences on the disparities facing Black mothers during pregnancy and childbirth.
Kamala knows that Abdul hates Jews, and her husband is Jewish.
That would be awkward if she had a conscience, but she does not have a conscience.
The Democrats do not have any real principles other than their greed for power and control.
She is in Michigan trying to shore up the Black Democrat votes.
Notice that the Democrats don't care about the White Democrat voters in Michigan.
trump banned true news because that's what fascists do.
ReplyDeleteMSNOW? What part is true?
Deletelol!
Delete//LIke above where you suggest I want "death fields" in the USA.
DeleteDense cretin you are.
But we already was discussing it ubiquotously -- how you cretin unable to phatome concept of what "question" are.
Yawn.
//I want happiness, good health, long life and prosperity for all good people who don't try to harm others for their own benefit. No matter their religion, ethnicity, race, place of birth, or where they currently live.
But... in that definition there's no place for rich people?
Because they all bad?
Yawn
//The dark fantasies of killing are your fantasies, not mine.
Yeah, cretin. I listed FACTUAL HISTORUCAL events.
But for you that is "daek fantasues".
And you even trying to make big eyes about wht I call you cretin here.))))
But... continue-continue, cretin.
//If I was as terrible as you think I am (an evil moron), you wouldn't laugh.
You are not evil.
Just unredeemably stupid.
And only then evil.
As stupid people tend to behave stupidly. And such behavior tends to be destructive. And destructive usually means evil.
Yawn.
But... you will not understand what I just written.
Isn't it, cretin?
//Personally I find it very troubling that such people exist and in large numbers. And I mean people like you.
Yeah.
That's why people like you hailing for "final solution".
Yawn.
//You support killing by your own admission.
And you can quote it? ;-p
)))))
//Just call them "accomplices" and then mow them down, drop bombs on them, starve them to death, or make them live in conditions where they catch diseases.
That is how wars are...
//You probably consider me an "accomplice", given how you keep accusing me of wanting people to be killed. And how the deaths of innocents warms my "cold Nazi heart".
Where is you mourning horribly killed Jews kids???
Where is you supporting justice to their murderers???
Where you condemn Palestinians for NOT giving that scumbags???
And instead if that JUST CIVERING EM AS WELL AS HOSTAGES!!!!!
And in the end, say cretin, that would *NEVER* (you like this word so much) support all-out war IF same would hapoen with Americans?
Because you are NOT patriot of USA.
Minus: MSNOW? What part is true? lol!
DeleteThe bias in favor of the truth that you linked to is true.
Qtard: Dense cretin you are.
Yeah, you're pretty dense. Didn't notice this was a discussion from another thread. And you think I can't identify a loaded question. And I can't see that your answer for me is YES, I want killing fields.
And it's pretty dense to conclude that, when I say (over and over) that Hamas terrorists should be killed, you conclude that I'm on their side.
Naturally I'm concluding you're the cretin. Because your comments prove it.
//Yeah, you're pretty dense. Didn't notice this was a discussion from another thread. And you think I can't identify a loaded question. And I can't see that your answer for me is YES, I want killing fields.
DeleteYeah.
Now I see that you a schizophrenic too.
What "loaded question"???))))
One to which you unable to answer -- because ANY your answer would reveal your previous lies???))))
But, you cretin -- STILL not able to grasp -- that your denial to answer, tryes to derail or outrightly ignore -- REVEAL YOUR LIES even better. ;-p
But... continue-continue, your festival of cretinity, you cretin.)))
//And it's pretty dense to conclude that, when I say (over and over) that Hamas terrorists should be killed, you conclude that I'm on their side.
Of course YOU ARE. On the side of HAMAS terrorists.
Because you DENY to forces if Israel
>>>***ONLY***<<<
possible way of doing that killing.
Falsely calling it "genocide".
Or.
You are free to demonstrate your intellect.
And propose to IDF a sure thing working method -- of extracting terrorists and recovering hostages... which are hiden in labirinth of urban territories, "shielded" deliberately with "innocent" people.
//Naturally I'm concluding you're the cretin. Because your comments prove it.
DeleteAnd you can build up a logical conclusion? ;-p
How it is so?
Naaaah.
Because you -- cretin.
Cretins are people with very poor ability to think and come to conclusions. ;-p
And you -- demonstrating with your own words here that you too have very poor ability to think and negliguble ability to come to conclusions.
Yet less to prove something. ))))))
But... continue-continue, playing Charlie Gordon here. )))))p
Qtard: Of course YOU ARE. On the side of HAMAS terrorists. Because you DENY to forces if Israel >>>***ONLY***<<< possible way of doing that killing.
DeleteFalsely calling it "genocide". And propose to IDF a sure thing working method -- of extracting terrorists and recovering hostages... which are hiden in labirinth of urban territories, "shielded" deliberately with "innocent" people.
BULL SHIT. I've never said I think Hamas using civilians as shields should protect them. I refer to examples like this one...
UN News: In one instance, a 14-year-old boy was shot by an Israeli military patrol as he was leaving his house, Mr. Sidoti said, explaining that the patrol had been in the area, but at the time there had been no fighting taking place.
“He was shot, badly injured and was lying on the ground,” Mr. Sidoti continued. “He was surrounded by a company of Israeli soldiers who were chatting and probably some of them smoking, over a period of 45 minutes, while this 14-year-old boy bled to death". link.
And there are many more examples from many more sources. Whistleblowers within the Israeli military itself say things like this happen a lot. You don't know about it because you don't want to know about it.
You just lie and say I mean I support the Hamas strategy of using civilians as shields and that should protect them. When I never have. I realize innocent people will be killed due to Hamas using them as shields. I've never called that genocide, a-hole.
This is what I believe: Hamas attacked Israel and killed innocent people. And raped and tortured. They are despicable, the killings were horrific, and Hamas members should be hunted and killed. Also, Hamas using civilians as shields should not give them immunity from being killed.
I only say Israel should take care to minimize civilian deaths. But they aren't doing that. In fact they are doing the opposite. Lots of reports about this are available online. Civilians are being targeted when nobody from Hamas is present. So you can fVck off.
Qtard: Cretins are people with very poor ability to think and come to conclusions. ;-p And you -- demonstrating with your own words here that you too have very poor ability to think and negliguble ability to come to conclusions.
I agree completely. And this is very true about you. Your ability to think and reach accurate conclusions is incredibly poor.
And I don't believe you don't know what a loaded question is. Despite being a moron. You know you asked a loaded question. So (again), you can fVck off.
In recent conflicts, international bodies and human rights organizations have documented that Hamas continues to systematically exploit, militarize, and use children in hostilities, though the nature of their involvement has evolved over the decades.
DeleteWhile the direct deployment of children as suicide bombers ("shahids") peaked during the Second Intifada (2000–2005), recent documentations focus on Hamas utilizing minors for support roles in combat zones, intelligence gathering, and operational activities during the current Gaza conflict.
The United Nations officially "blacklisted" Hamas in its annual reports on Children and Armed Conflict for grave violations against minors.
Recent Patterns & Examples (Current Conflict)
Rather than the standard 2000s-era explosive-vest suicide operations, recent documented examples of Hamas utilizing children in combat roles involve using them as couriers, scouts, and auxiliary logistical support:
• Ammunition & Explosives Transportation: According to IDF military intelligence reports released during the current war, captured Hamas commanders detailed a combat doctrine where children are given explosives concealed in grocery bags or vegetable bags to deliver to active fighters.
>>>>This relies on the assumption that military forces will avoid targeting children.<<<<
• Combat Intelligence & Damage Assessment: Minors are sent into active combat zones immediately following strikes to assess damage, document military movements, and report back to operatives hiding in tunnels and shelters.
• Militarized Summer Camps: Human rights observers highlight that Hamas openly runs summer training camps in Gaza targeting teenagers and children as young as 10. Promotional materials released by Hamas detail training minors in automatic weapon handling, urban combat, and ideological conditioning toward "martyrdom" or self-sacrifice.
Historical Context of Child Suicide Bombers
During the Second Intifada, the use of under-18s directly as explosive-carrying suicide bombers was widely reported:
• Human Rights Watch Reports: Documented that major factions, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), deployed minors on suicide missions, noting that while leadership publicly claimed policies against it, local commanders circumvented definitions by claiming anyone age 16 or older was an adult.
• The 2004 Checkpoint Incidents: Notably, teenagers like 16-year-old Hussam Abdo were intercepted by security forces while wearing explosive vests meant to be detonated at crowded military checkpoints.
International bodies emphasize that the active radicalization and logistical integration of minors into militant actions constitute clear violations of international humanitarian law
//And there are many more examples from many more sources. Whistleblowers within the Israeli military itself say things like this happen a lot. You don't know about it because you don't want to know about it.
DeleteThat is what happen in the war zones. ALL AROUND THE WORLD. IN ALL TIMES.
But... somehow. You do care. And propose to me to ONLY care... while it about Gazans, who inflicted it on their heads THEMSELF.
THEY... I remind you, attacked Israel. In most sinister and atricious way.
AND weaponised such missives with spreading it among gullible idiots like you.
//You just lie and say I mean I support the Hamas strategy of using civilians as shields and that should protect them. When I never have. I realize innocent people will be killed due to Hamas using them as shields. I've never called that genocide, a-hole.
DeleteYou -- cretin.
You was giving all-out suppirt to other cretin Lessly here.
Though that is exactly what that cretin Lessy did -- called it "genocide". And even proclaimed "final solutiin" for Jews for that whimsical "genocidal crime".
Stop support cretins (like DEMN party), and who knows... maybe people will stop calling you cretin. ;-p
Bur, naaaah.
You will not stop doing cretinic things... because you ARE cretin. ))())
//I only say Israel should take care to minimize civilian deaths.
DeleteEven if that "civilians" are trained terrorists footsoldiers who using loopholes in a civilized military laws???
Or you are cretin who completely and utterly brainlessly inapt to understand what I just written?
//Qtard: Cretins are people with very poor ability to think and come to conclusions. ;-p And you -- demonstrating with your own words here that you too have very poor ability to think and negliguble ability to come to conclusions.
Delete//I agree completely. And this is very true about you. Your ability to think and reach accurate conclusions is incredibly poor
And you can show it on specific examples (quotes ;-p) and confirm it with comprehensive and conclusive reasoning? ;-p
Naaaaaaaaah.
You -- cretin.
And you will not even get what I just written. ;-p
//And I don't believe you don't know what a loaded question is.
DeleteHere.
I even asked AI to make it as simple as possible for such a cretins like you to understand.
But you will not... ;-p
No, a "loaded question" and a "revealing question" (one that uncovers the truth) are not the same thing. They have opposite goals.
Here is a simple breakdown to understand the difference easily.
The Short Answer
A loaded question is a trap. It tries to force a specific, often unfair answer.
A revealing question is a key. It tries to open up the truth by letting the person speak honestly.
Direct Comparison
Feature Loaded Question (The Trap) Revealing Question (The Key)
Goal
To make you look bad or trick you.
To find out what actually happened.
Truth
It assumes you are already guilty. It searches for the real facts.
Freedom
You feel stuck and cannot answer easily.
You can answer freely and explain yourself.
Grouped Examples to See the Difference
1. The Loaded Question (The Trap)
A loaded question has a hidden accusation inside it. No matter how you answer, you lose.
Example: "Have you stopped stealing money from your parents?"
If you say Yes, it means you used to steal.
If you say No, it means you are still stealing.
Result: It does not find the truth; it just makes you look guilty.
2. The Revealing Question (The Truth-Finder)
A revealing question is honest. It does not judge you before you speak. It helps the truth come out naturally.
Example: "Where did you get the money to buy that new phone?"
You can answer honestly (e.g., "I saved up from my job" or "It was a gift").
Result: It reveals the actual truth without trapping you.
Summary
Think of a loaded question like a lawyer trying to trick a bad guy on TV. Think of a revealing question like a good friend or a scientist trying to learn the real story.
CNN reported the Russia hoax s facts for 2 years. Telling the Truth is at its lowest level when CNN REPORTS about Trump.
ReplyDeleteThere was no "Russia hoax". donald trump and his campaign eagerly colluded with Russia. The trump administration is colluding with Russia right now. Why a Russian oligarch paid for donald trump junior's wedding reception at great expense. As a thank you.
DeleteDon’t worry Dave Dubya Darling stupid is YOUR Constitutional Right and so is your whining!
ReplyDeleteDon’t worry Dave Dubya Darling being stupid is YOUR Constitutional Right and so is your whining
ReplyDeleteObama had several reporters removed with conservative-leaning The Washington Times, New York Post, and Dallas Morning News) from his traveling press plane, citing strict seat limitations. The outlets argued they were targeted because of their Conservative agendas.
ReplyDeleteProve it. Put up your information supporting your fascist lie. You won't, because you can't
DeleteI remember it. That fact that you can't speaks volumes/
DeleteThis happened during his campaign. This didn't happen when Obama was president.
DeleteABC News: Barack Obama's campaign has booted from its airplane three reporters who work for newspapers that have endorsed John McCain. ... In the final days of a campaign, it is not uncommon for journalists to be shuffled as multiple news agencies rush to get a coveted seat close to the candidate. 10/31/2008.
What "volumes" does it speak? That you're onboard with conflating a campaign allocating a limited number of seats with acts of someone acting as president in an official press briefing (with more seats)?
Think of it this way, the WaPo and NYT are still in the room, ergo "no censorship". If the "pool" then refuses to cover, who's doing the censoring? The news "gatekeepers" controlling the propaganda.
DeleteThe WH Briefing Room only has a limited number of seats...
DeleteHarris'’s Failed border policies cost the US a hell of a lot more than 150 billion a year. Add the costs to transport, house, feed, clothe, educate, provide medical care, incarcerate and the infrastructure needed to accommodate 20 million of these invaders. Then add in the extra money we need for extra border patrol agents and immigration judges, the extra money we need to support American citizens whose jobs they steal, the money we lose because of the drugs they bring and the crimes they commit, the murders and rapes and the embarrassment of having 300K children trafficked and unaccounted for. Harris' failure on our border is the single biggest failure in the history of the US. MAGA. And she’s still Failing. As she’s failing in every poll.
ReplyDeletetrump Cons all seem to all be cretins. Especially Q'tardo.
ReplyDelete)))
DeleteAnd you can elaborate that claim with basing it on facts and reasonable conclusions?
No?
Then why no?
Isn't that because you are just a cretin cawing "cretins, cretins, but they are cretins"? ;-p
Yes, Lessy? ;-)
Just following your lead cretin.
DeleteYou see me as fellow cretin? ;-p
DeleteWell, naturally -- because of being cretin you unable to assess any other level of intelligence. ;-p
Again you project. Unable or unwilling to look in the mirror.
DeleteAnymouses are generally like that. They push their garbage as they hide behind the anymouse identity of anonymity.
Your fear of being recognized highlights your cowardness. As well as giving you the false feeling of moral strength and superiority. Two things you clearly do not possess.
Projecting is a psychological defense mechanism where a person shifts their own unwanted thoughts, feelings, or traits onto someone else.
DeleteWhat is Projecting?
Unconscious denial: The mind hides unacceptable impulses or guilt from itself.
Blame shifting: A person who feels angry might accuse everyone else of being hostile.
Ego protection: It shields self-esteem by making the external world look like the problem.
Can Someone Saying "You Project" Be Projecting Themselves?
Yes, a person who tells you "you are projecting" can indeed be projecting their own behavior onto you. This is a common recursive loop in arguments.The accusation as a mirror:
Accusing someone else of defense mechanisms requires a lens tinted by one's own internal state.
Defensive deflection: A person guilty of the very thing being discussed may weaponize psychological terms to flip the blame
PS Yaaaaawn.
//Unable or unwilling to look in the mirror.
DeleteYou unable to answer to the question on topic you ITSELF started, I remind -- "So, from where you propose to take money to pay 'fair salary'?".
And I call you cretin on that base. Not because I want to call you names -- but on base of that glaring INABILITY to think.
You... trying to call me 'cretin' in response.
But that is clearly just a lame namecalling -- you just want to say something -- while unable to say anything reasonable.
Yawn.
To which I meticuliusly pointing out again.
To which... you trying to answer with calling it 'projection'.
But that is... just yet one confirmation of the poor state of your mind. ;-p
But... continue-continue, cretin.
See? ;-p
DeleteI just showed it to you -- what it mean:
""And you can elaborate that claim with basing it on facts and reasonable conclusions?""
So, you can use it as example, and try to say something about me. ;-p
But.,. you can't. And you wouldn't.
Cause -- you ARE cretin. By definition of that word -- human with poor mind capabilities.))))))