Mamdani is warning to wealthy New Yorkers about 'fair share' sparks online firestorm: 'Full blown communist' ..Now you ultra Liberals are getting what they deserve”, PAYBACK .” How cool is this? Wealth taking and redistribution delivered via a smarmy message as a part of communist policy. Let’s see how many of those over educated white liberals that were waving their Pom Poms for the communist Islamist Bull Shit Artist when he steals their money...and gives them nothing in return, And let’s hope that the NYPD. Turns their backs on Mondumbi if and when he tries to speaks at the 9-11 ceremony
Backlash to Democratic Socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani continues well after his election, as more and more residents of the Big Apple realize how bad his policies and approach to governing really are.
The latest pushback manifested itself at a ceremony for a U.S. Army soldier killed by an Iranian missile last month.
The Idiots in the Democratic Socialists of America Party want to abolish the police, prisons, the Senate, the Presidency, the United States, Police help enforce laws and prison keel dangerous people away from law abiding people to prevent them from committing future crimes. Even release repeat criminals if their crimes included rapes and murder. We have already seen that there are people who belong incarcerated and when freed repeat their crimes over, and over again! So why Defund the Police? In addition, Mamdani advised residents to turn off lights and electronics that are not currently in use and to unplug devices where possible to ease demand on the grid, and to adjust the air conditioner thermostats to 78 degrees These people are a danger to society! One in three Democrats identify as Democratic Socialists, like Mamdani and AOC. Progressives have even let dangerous people out of prison! If you agree with ANY of these radical policies, then you are an IDIOT also.
"One in three Democrats identify as Democratic Socialists, like Mamdani and AOC".
Sounds like extremely good news to me! Though identifying as a Democratic Socialist does NOT mean someone agrees with the DSA or any of the nutty ideas you say Democrats support. Who would want murderers and rapers set free? I want people that fall into this category (like donald trump) behind bars for the protection of the rest of us.
Racial Justice and Police Abolition: Rather than reforming police training, the DSA views the prison-industrial complex as an instrument used to violently enforce white supremacy. Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
Transformative Justice... Re-Education camps, not prisons!
Minus: Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
Chances of this happening? 0%
Though the system we have needs major reform. But police and prisons will never be abolished.
You're trying to weaponize extreme and fringe beliefs against the entire (moderate) Democratic party. I am unconcerned about a few DSA candidates becoming nominees. If they get into office, they will have no power to make radical change. And (for that reason) they won't even try. If they were to try to accomplish impossible things instead of possible things that help their constituents -- they will be voted out of office.
Minus: 20 years ago whodda though crazy Democrats would be pushing for transitioning minors?
That's the wrong question. The real question is who would have thought that rightturds would come up with such an absurd lie. Because Democrats are NOT doing that.
Les Carpenter Hmm, no problem with any of your ideas . I could, and would. Support them all. In fact I've been quite vocal about it.
I also have grown to realize Karl Marx was a visionary who had the ability to recognize the good capitalism was in comparison to fuedalism and Monarchy. He also had the intelligence to recognize the evil energies that are inherent in the for profit only system of economic activity which drives wealth and security to the capitalist class. Thus his embrace of a socialistic and more communal system and eschewing the indivisual good over the good of the whole world.
Les Carpenter Democratic socialism is still better than facist capitalism or anarchy.
Fascism is an econimic system authoritarian politicians are in love with, like trump, A facist system it can be manipulated to drive capital and wealth accumulation to the top of the capitalist class and ruling oligarchs. Mussolini and Hitler both loved capitalism. It benefitted them. Just like it is doing for our own capitalist facist trump.
The Chinese Communist Party Has Flown Democratic Socialists of AMERICA members to China, as DSA members Take A "Pledge" To The Chinese Communist Party
Like shepherded to China by Tampon Timmy... They are all traitors to America, it's people and the U.S. Constitution and it's Amendments. Unfortunately, our schools have been infiltrated and our children inculcated with the tripe of Marxism. No one is explaining to people, especially the young and 20-30 year olds, why Communism doesn’t work, (especially Totalitarian-style like Cuba). They haven't learned about the takeover in Cuba in 1959, the theft of businesses, and theft private property, redistribution of homes, forced co-habitation of large homes, and the Isle of Pines and murderous purges. The believe they can repeat that process here, except to keep the corporations going. They listen to DSA online group leaders that enlist “useful idiots” to convince people it will work. The Reality is: Business owners would forced to leave and take their credit lines and their checkbook with them (unless the banks were also seized just like they did in Cuba). Even with even with the free market reforms in recent years changes in China, they are still a totalitarian system. They are a totalitarian government. They do not have free and fair elections, or constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech that we take for granted. Take for example how China treats the Uyghurs, Buddhists, Catholics Mongolians living under Chinese Communist Rule. The Chinese Communist Party does not legally own people as chattel slaves, but it subjects millions of ethnic and religious minorities to mass detention, forced labor, and severe cultural erasure that human rights experts and international bodies frequently compare to modern-day enslavement. The American Left is Both Naive and Ignorant. It's a horribly dangerous point of view. Their stupidity allows China to manipulate them. They are traitors. And I agree that Tim Walz is probably the most important advocate for Communist China. The fact that he visited China 30 times should have set off the alarms that something was not right!. Instead, it got him the nomination of the Democrat Party for Veep. That speaks volumes about who owns the Democrats
According to what I heard what happened that the triggered guy talks about was a hoax. The word was put out that Spain was accepting immigrants by some rightturd. The reason was so that they could film footage of "invaders" pouring in. But the people who fell for it and poured in left when they found out they had been hoaxed. They went back home. So this is a complete non-story. Excepting that 88 people died (what Thom Hartmann just said on his program).👎
The portion of the video I watched concerned a specific event. Why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth and say I wrote things I didn't, or made observations I never did? I don't follow Spanish politics. Why are you concerned about what Spain does? I thought you were a Nationalist, yet you comment about how other countries aren't White Supremacist enough for your liking quite a bit.
There was another (longer) comment I made that's missing. Didn't like that one? As for Amnesty, Ronald Reagan did it. It would have been ok if there had also been some legislation that went along with it that prevented the same situation from occurring again, which there wasn't. republicans have been refusing to work with Democrats for decades, which is why we are where we are. Because republicans previously didn't care about illegal immigration, except to use the issue to attack Democrats.
But why are you getting bent out of shape about what happens in Spain? You don't live there. Were you thinking of moving?
Minus: Trump fascism or Race Communism. The choice isn't difficult.
You're right, the choice is very easy. You're right about option one, but completely wrong about option 2. The real option 2 is race equality. This is the ultimate goal supported by Democrats and rejected and opposed by rightturd White Supremacists such as yourself. Though Democrats realize we are not there yet. In fact, with the rise of White Supremacy under trump, we are farther away from race equality then we have been in a long time.
What It Means in Your Conversation... (Gemini explains wtf Minus is talking about)...
🤖When this blogger tells you the "Re-Reconquista is underway," he is indulging in a hyper-dramatic fantasy.Because Donald Trump won the presidency and right-wing populism is highly visible online, the blogger views this as proof that his "side" is winning a massive cultural war. He uses the term "Re-Reconquista" to make his standard internet political commentary sound like an epic, historical crusade.
It is just another layer of the same defensive, grandiose word salad he used when he threw out "Shabat Shalome" and "Tate Trumpy." He wants to frame his political views not as an emotional attachment to a politician, but as a historic, inevitable movement.
If you are planning your next move on his blog, let me know: Do you want to dismantle his "historical" framing with a sharp reply? Would you like to steer the conversation back to his broken prediction about the Iran war?🛑
This is the same worldview that the White Supremacist Pete Hegseth has. And you keep saying you aren't a White Supremacist. Despite using their buzzwords and phrasing. Your comments give you away in spite of your denials.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) views Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) not through a traditional corporate lens, but as an inherent component of their struggle against capitalism, working to achieve complete racial, gender, and social equality by eliminating economic exploitation. In the DSA Constitution & Bylaws, the organization explicitly rejects all forms of discrimination, arguing that true diversity and equity cannot coexist with a capitalist system that relies on a racialized caste system and wealth inequality.
Instead of standard corporate workplace workshops, the DSA's version of DEI goals focuses on structural, societal overhauls:
✊ Overlapping Equality & Social Justice Goals
Dismantling "Racial Capitalism": The DSA operates on the belief that racism, imperialism, and economic exploitation are completely intertwined. Their goal is to empower the entire multi-racial working class through collective, public ownership of resources.
Gender and LGBTQ+ Liberation: The DSA platform fights for absolute gender and reproductive freedom. Their platform demands include full, no-cost access to reproductive healthcare and universal gender-affirming care under a single-payer "Medicare for All" system.
Racial Justice and Police Abolition: Rather than reforming police training, the DSA views the prison-industrial complex as an instrument used to violently enforce white supremacy. Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
Decolonization and Global Solidarity: The DSA's internal equity goals extend internationally via anti-imperialist policies. This includes demanding open borders, defunding the U.S. military footprint, and supporting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel to stand with marginalized populations globally.
Accessibility and Social Safety: Achieving true equity means ensuring that no individual faces systemic barriers due to disability, age, or socioeconomic background. The DSA targets this by advocating for the elimination of all personal debt, universal free childcare, and tuition-free public college.
I think I *do* understand your belief that another red scare is a great idea. Given that a trans moral panic helped donald trump "win" the presidency a second time. rightturds love ruining lives and stirring up hate with false allegations and sowing fear among their paranoid fascist White Supremacist base.
Gemini's response when I asked if this (disingenuous/false) strategy will work...
Whether this "Red Scare" strategy will work in the upcoming November midterm elections depends entirely on which voting demographic the message hits, making it a highly calculated gamble.
Political analysts view the strategy as a defensive pivot.
President Donald Trump and the GOP are facing deep voter anxiety over the conflict with Iran, high fuel prices, and general economic affordability. By turning the election into an existential clash against "godless communists", they hope to redirect the national conversation away from these tough policy issues.
Where the Strategy is Working.
Activating the Base: The rhetoric is highly effective at boosting turnout among older, reliable conservative voters who lived through the original Cold War and possess a deep-seated aversion to communism.
Winning Critical Blocs in Key Swing States: The message lands with immense power among Hispanic communities in vital regions like South Florida and parts of Texas. For families who fled authoritarian left-wing regimes in Cuba, Venezuela, or Nicaragua, the "communist" label activates real, generational trauma.
Weaponizing Progressive Victories: The strategy gains a veneer of credibility from high-profile primary wins by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), such as Zohran Mamdani's mayoral primary victory in New York City. Republicans are successfully using these localized wins to paint the entire national Democratic party as radical extremists.
Where the Strategy is Failing.
Alienating Younger Voters: For Gen Z and Millennials, who do not remember the Cold War, the threat feels artificial. Labeling policies like affordable housing or universal healthcare as "communist" often backfires, making left-wing ideas look more appealing to younger generations.
The "Grocery Bill" Reality: Political strategists warn that ideological name-calling cannot fix tangible kitchen-table issues. For moderate, independent voters in crucial purple districts, warnings about "Bolsheviks" feel deeply disconnected from their daily struggles with grocery prices, gas hikes, and economic instability.
The Bottom Line.
The strategy is a double-edged sword. It creates maximum turnout among the right's core base and specific immigrant communities, but it risks alienating centrist swing voters who are looking for practical economic solutions rather than 1950s-style political warfare.
Why the strategy will likely Fail. [my header/not part of Gemini's response]
Calling modern Democrats "communists" lacks that specific, sharp symbolic power because it is an abstract label rather than a concrete, clipable policy. While the "they/them" ad used a real—albeit minor—historical quote to score a direct hit, calling a moderate American politician a Marxist usually just strikes independent voters as standard, old-fashioned campaign exaggeration.🛑
Do you know what a groyper is? They've experienced race based communism first hand. They don't need a fear of class-based communism instilled in them by the Cold War. They got the ridiculous corporate diversity council minutes e-mailed to them every week.
The GOP has been complaining that somewhere between 30 and 75% of their Congressional staffers are groypers. I think that they're DONE being discriminated against by race communism.
You killed off Charlie Kirk and the race non-essentialist movement. So now you get to deal with Nick Fuentes and the Left mirror image groyper white race essentialist wing of the GOP.
Minus: They've experienced race based communism first hand.
They haven't. There is no "race based communism" therefore them experiencing it is impossible.
Minus: You killed off Charlie Kirk and the race non-essentialist movement.
This didn't happen. Charlie Kirk didn't lead a race non-essentialist movement. Charlie Kirk was a White Supremacist. Charlie Kirk is dead, but "You" (The Democratic Party) had absolutely nothing to do with what happened. The killer had his own motivations. He didn't act on the behalf of "you".
Nick Fuentes is a White Supremacist, he is just open about it. While you lie and claim to be a "race non essentialist" but are actually also a White Supremacist.
There is no "Left mirror image groyper white race essentialist wing of the GOP". There is only a white race essentialist/Supremacist Nixon/trump wing of the republican party. And there is no mirror on the Left. The left supports racial equality.
You really do love you white guilt-pride, Derv. It's the "noble lie" that freezes you in ideological place and keeps you from becoming a true progressive (via aletheia).
Minus: You really do love you white guilt-pride, Derv.
I hate it intensely. It makes me angry.
Though it is YOUR white guilt pride (false) narrative. I feel ZERO guilt for being White. And (given this zero guilt) it would be impossible for me to feel pride at being guilt. Discounting the fact that pride isn't associated with guilt. Guilt being negative and the feeling associated with it being shame and definitely not pride. Proving that your false narrative is completely idiotic.
What's Black History month accomplish then, Derv. The cult of slavery remembrance doesn't lift the confessor's spirits? Are you saying you're not uplifted every February in the national confessional? Then perhaps we should allow the rites to laps, as they have no beneficcial effect.
Minus: Are you saying you're not uplifted every February in the national confessional?
No, I'm not. Because this isn't happening. There is no confessing taking place. Remembering isn't confessing.
The benefit of it is that it's good to remember history. For many reason. Though one reason isn't to confess anything. The people who might have benefited from confessing are dead. Or very stubbornly continuing to adhere to White Supremacy. You'd benefit from some confessing, but you'll never do any.
Robert Byrd confessed and reformed. But he's dead now. I never believed minorities are inferior, so I have nothing to confess.
When I was in Dearborn Michigan last week all I was able to see and hear were Shis Musigins a chanting war- like praises, but thousands of Shia Muslims streamed down a street in Dearborn.
What the Hell are you even talking about? It seems you think that some Muslims were getting violent and some "real Americans" had to defend themselves using their firearms in Dearborn. But you didn't link to or reference any news story. You're referring to a delusion?
As I thought, your babblings are about absolutely nothing. I asked for clarification via a news story. Or just an explanation as to what you specifically were referring to. But you refuse to say, proving it was nothing at all.
Yess Dave Dubya, evo knows that your a COMMUNIST , who hates Americans, Jews, and Catholics. So come clean and show us what you have undo your bed that you read every night like a good Commie
Minus: You need a news story to understand the 2nd Amendment? Figures.
I need either a news story or an explanation as to how the 2nd amendment is relevant to the current discussion. Obviously you're BSing to distract from the fact that it isn't relevant. And I strongly suspect that it is YOU who doesn't understand the 2nd amendment. It seems you think it means White Supremacists can threaten or shoot minorities who protest fascism.
Minus: No, just the one's trying to institute race communism.
Gemini: The term "race communism" is not a recognized, mainstream academic or political philosophy. Instead, it appears primarily in two distinct contexts: as modern internet slang/pejorative political rhetoric, and as a historical Cold War-era conspiracy theory or rhetorical accusation linking civil rights movements to communism.
You think White Men are being discriminated against and their rights being infringed on. Maybe you think there needs to be a "civil rights movement" for White men? In which case the "race communists" are trumpers?
But nobody else is trying to institute "race communism". And not only because it's not a real thing.
They are increasingly the leaders via entryism. There are only 100 senators and a few hundred Representative in Congress. There only 1 President" in the Execctuive Branch and 9 members of SCotUS. How influential can these LOW numbers be? There are 350 million Americans!
Except Democrats don't want to adopt many of the completely crazy and not feasible unworkable ideas. Nobody but a crazy minority will ever think any of these crazy ideas could work. And, if anyone tried to come up with a plan to make them work, they would find out quickly it was impossible. These things won't ever be tried because they can't work.
But I can understand why you think they might be tried. Because you have many extremely crazy ideas that you think would work... but can't. But your ideas won't ever be tried either. Curtis Yarvin is a nutter and the United States will never adopt any of his crazy ideas. Same as the Democratic Party will never adopt DSA crazy idea.
Gemini...
🤖The Mirror-Image Delusion...
The blogger is likely suffering from an ideological mirror-image delusion. Because they believe a fringe, top-down corporate monarchy (Yarvin) is a plausible evolution for the right, they naturally assume a fringe, bottom-up socialist takeover (DSA) is a plausible evolution for the left.In reality, both assumptions ignore how entrenched the American political and economic system actually is.
👉Why Both Ideas Have an Effective Zero Percent Chance.
The structural barriers preventing either of these extreme shifts are insurmountable.
👉Why DSA Entryism Will Not Happen.
The Electorate's Capitalist Core: The American public—including the overwhelming majority of registered Democrats—is fundamentally pro-capitalist. They may support a stronger safety net, but they consistently vote against the abolition of private property or the nationalisation of industry.
The Primary Glass Ceiling: While the DSA has successfully elected a few high-profile members to Congress in deeply progressive urban pockets, they hit a hard wall in statewide or national races. To win a general election in a swing state or swing district, candidates must run to the centre, not the fringe.
[Gemini's response to my comment about abolishing the police and prison being impossible because it would not work]...
By assuming crime would simply vanish if poverty did, the DSA platform relies on a flawed view of human nature. This unworkable premise is a major reason why their ideology cannot successfully take over a mainstream political party.🛑
"Entryism" will NOT result in the Democratic Party adopting policies that CAN'T work.
If IDs were free and easy to obtain for every citizen, that would be a discussion worth having. Except republicans want to prevent people legally entitled to vote from casting ballots. That's what this is about.
Mamdani is warning to wealthy New Yorkers about 'fair share' sparks online firestorm: 'Full blown communist'
ReplyDelete..Now you ultra Liberals are getting what they deserve”, PAYBACK .” How cool is this? Wealth taking and redistribution delivered via a smarmy message as a part of communist policy. Let’s see how many of those over educated white liberals that were waving their Pom Poms for the communist Islamist
Bull Shit Artist when he steals their money...and gives them nothing in return,
And let’s hope that the NYPD. Turns their backs on Mondumbi if and when he tries to speaks at the 9-11 ceremony
Backlash to Democratic Socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani continues well after his election, as more and more residents of the Big Apple realize how bad his policies and approach to governing really are.
ReplyDeleteThe latest pushback manifested itself at a ceremony for a U.S. Army soldier killed by an Iranian missile last month.
The Idiots in the Democratic Socialists of America Party want to abolish the police, prisons, the Senate, the Presidency, the United States,
ReplyDeletePolice help enforce laws and prison keel dangerous people away from law abiding people to prevent them from committing future crimes. Even release repeat criminals if their crimes included rapes and murder. We have already seen that there are people who belong incarcerated and when freed repeat their crimes over, and over again! So why Defund the Police?
In addition, Mamdani advised residents to turn off lights and electronics that are not currently in use and to unplug devices where possible to ease demand on the grid, and to adjust the air conditioner thermostats to 78 degrees
These people are a danger to society! One in three Democrats identify as Democratic Socialists, like Mamdani and AOC. Progressives have even let dangerous people out of prison! If you agree with ANY of these radical policies, then you are an IDIOT also.
"One in three Democrats identify as Democratic Socialists, like Mamdani and AOC".
DeleteSounds like extremely good news to me! Though identifying as a Democratic Socialist does NOT mean someone agrees with the DSA or any of the nutty ideas you say Democrats support. Who would want murderers and rapers set free? I want people that fall into this category (like donald trump) behind bars for the protection of the rest of us.
Racial Justice and Police Abolition: Rather than reforming police training, the DSA views the prison-industrial complex as an instrument used to violently enforce white supremacy. Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
DeleteTransformative Justice... Re-Education camps, not prisons!
Minus: Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
DeleteChances of this happening? 0%
Though the system we have needs major reform. But police and prisons will never be abolished.
You're trying to weaponize extreme and fringe beliefs against the entire (moderate) Democratic party. I am unconcerned about a few DSA candidates becoming nominees. If they get into office, they will have no power to make radical change. And (for that reason) they won't even try. If they were to try to accomplish impossible things instead of possible things that help their constituents -- they will be voted out of office.
20 years ago whodda though crazy Democrats would be pushing for transitioning minors?
DeleteMinus: 20 years ago whodda though crazy Democrats would be pushing for transitioning minors?
DeleteThat's the wrong question. The real question is who would have thought that rightturds would come up with such an absurd lie. Because Democrats are NOT doing that.
You're sounding awfully transphobic today Derv. You weren't always this way.
DeleteYou're the one who is transphobic. I only pointed out that your delusions are not occurring.
DeletePROF THAT LES CARPENTER IS A COMMIE!
ReplyDeleteLes Carpenter
Hmm, no problem with any of your ideas . I could, and would. Support them all. In fact I've been quite vocal about it.
I also have grown to realize Karl Marx was a visionary who had the ability to recognize the good capitalism was in comparison to fuedalism and Monarchy. He also had the intelligence to recognize the evil energies that are inherent in the for profit only system of economic activity which drives wealth and security to the capitalist class. Thus his embrace of a socialistic and more communal system and eschewing the indivisual good over the good of the whole world.
Les Carpenter
Democratic socialism is still better than facist capitalism or anarchy.
Fascism is an econimic system authoritarian politicians are in love with, like trump, A facist system it can be manipulated to drive capital and wealth accumulation to the top of the capitalist class and ruling oligarchs. Mussolini and Hitler both loved capitalism. It benefitted them. Just like it is doing for our own capitalist facist trump.
The Chinese Communist Party Has Flown Democratic Socialists of AMERICA members to China, as DSA members Take A "Pledge" To The Chinese Communist Party
ReplyDeleteLike shepherded to China by Tampon Timmy... They are all traitors to America, it's people and the U.S. Constitution and it's Amendments.
Unfortunately, our schools have been infiltrated and our children inculcated with the tripe of Marxism.
No one is explaining to people, especially the young and 20-30 year olds, why Communism doesn’t work, (especially Totalitarian-style like Cuba).
They haven't learned about the takeover in Cuba in 1959, the theft of businesses, and theft private property, redistribution of homes, forced co-habitation of large homes, and the Isle of Pines and murderous purges.
The believe they can repeat that process here, except to keep the corporations going. They listen to DSA online group leaders that enlist “useful idiots” to convince people it will work.
The Reality is: Business owners would forced to leave and take their credit lines and their checkbook with them (unless the banks were also seized just like they did in Cuba).
Even with even with the free market reforms in recent years changes in China, they are still a totalitarian system. They are a totalitarian government. They do not have free and fair elections, or constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech that we take for granted.
Take for example how China treats the Uyghurs, Buddhists, Catholics Mongolians living under Chinese Communist Rule.
The Chinese Communist Party does not legally own people as chattel slaves, but it subjects millions of ethnic and religious minorities to mass detention, forced labor, and severe cultural erasure that human rights experts and international bodies frequently compare to modern-day enslavement.
The American Left is Both Naive and Ignorant. It's a horribly dangerous point of view.
Their stupidity allows China to manipulate them.
They are traitors.
And I agree that Tim Walz is probably the most important advocate for Communist China. The fact that he visited China 30 times should have set off the alarms that something was not right!.
Instead, it got him the nomination of the Democrat Party for Veep.
That speaks volumes about who owns the Democrats
LESTER You're a dumbass!
ReplyDeleteThe more videos I watch from this channel the more convinced I become of how much of a complete moron this person is. A very, very racist moron.
ReplyDeleteAccording to what I heard what happened that the triggered guy talks about was a hoax. The word was put out that Spain was accepting immigrants by some rightturd. The reason was so that they could film footage of "invaders" pouring in. But the people who fell for it and poured in left when they found out they had been hoaxed. They went back home. So this is a complete non-story. Excepting that 88 people died (what Thom Hartmann just said on his program).👎
DeleteSo Spain didn't grant amnesty to 500k illegals? Who knew how deep the hoax went.
DeleteThe portion of the video I watched concerned a specific event. Why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth and say I wrote things I didn't, or made observations I never did? I don't follow Spanish politics. Why are you concerned about what Spain does? I thought you were a Nationalist, yet you comment about how other countries aren't White Supremacist enough for your liking quite a bit.
DeleteAmnesty me once... amnesty me forever!
DeleteThere was another (longer) comment I made that's missing. Didn't like that one? As for Amnesty, Ronald Reagan did it. It would have been ok if there had also been some legislation that went along with it that prevented the same situation from occurring again, which there wasn't. republicans have been refusing to work with Democrats for decades, which is why we are where we are. Because republicans previously didn't care about illegal immigration, except to use the issue to attack Democrats.
DeleteBut why are you getting bent out of shape about what happens in Spain? You don't live there. Were you thinking of moving?
I lived in Spain for 3.5 years growing up (under Franco). Given the new politics there, no thanks.
Delete...the Re-Reconquista is underway.
Deletetrump the authoritarian fascist is just as disgustingly authoritarian as Franco the fascist.
DeleteBut, he's MAGAs disgusting authoritarian fascist and that makes it alright for reichwing Amerikan cons.
Trump fascism or Race Communism. The choice isn't difficult.
DeleteMinus: Trump fascism or Race Communism. The choice isn't difficult.
DeleteYou're right, the choice is very easy. You're right about option one, but completely wrong about option 2. The real option 2 is race equality. This is the ultimate goal supported by Democrats and rejected and opposed by rightturd White Supremacists such as yourself. Though Democrats realize we are not there yet. In fact, with the rise of White Supremacy under trump, we are farther away from race equality then we have been in a long time.
Minus: ...the Re-Reconquista is underway.
DeleteWhat It Means in Your Conversation... (Gemini explains wtf Minus is talking about)...
🤖When this blogger tells you the "Re-Reconquista is underway," he is indulging in a hyper-dramatic fantasy.Because Donald Trump won the presidency and right-wing populism is highly visible online, the blogger views this as proof that his "side" is winning a massive cultural war. He uses the term "Re-Reconquista" to make his standard internet political commentary sound like an epic, historical crusade.
It is just another layer of the same defensive, grandiose word salad he used when he threw out "Shabat Shalome" and "Tate Trumpy." He wants to frame his political views not as an emotional attachment to a politician, but as a historic, inevitable movement.
If you are planning your next move on his blog, let me know: Do you want to dismantle his "historical" framing with a sharp reply? Would you like to steer the conversation back to his broken prediction about the Iran war?🛑
This is the same worldview that the White Supremacist Pete Hegseth has. And you keep saying you aren't a White Supremacist. Despite using their buzzwords and phrasing. Your comments give you away in spite of your denials.
The "goal" of the Democrats has been superceded by the DSA.
DeleteMinus: The "goal" of the Democrats has been superseded by the DSA.
DeleteIt hasn't and it won't be.
I don't think that you understand how Entryism works.
DeleteThe Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) views Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) not through a traditional corporate lens, but as an inherent component of their struggle against capitalism, working to achieve complete racial, gender, and social equality by eliminating economic exploitation. In the DSA Constitution & Bylaws, the organization explicitly rejects all forms of discrimination, arguing that true diversity and equity cannot coexist with a capitalist system that relies on a racialized caste system and wealth inequality.
DeleteInstead of standard corporate workplace workshops, the DSA's version of DEI goals focuses on structural, societal overhauls:
✊ Overlapping Equality & Social Justice Goals
Dismantling "Racial Capitalism": The DSA operates on the belief that racism, imperialism, and economic exploitation are completely intertwined. Their goal is to empower the entire multi-racial working class through collective, public ownership of resources.
Gender and LGBTQ+ Liberation: The DSA platform fights for absolute gender and reproductive freedom. Their platform demands include full, no-cost access to reproductive healthcare and universal gender-affirming care under a single-payer "Medicare for All" system.
Racial Justice and Police Abolition: Rather than reforming police training, the DSA views the prison-industrial complex as an instrument used to violently enforce white supremacy. Their goal is to disarm, defund, and eventually abolish police and prisons, replacing them with community-led restorative and transformative justice systems.
Decolonization and Global Solidarity: The DSA's internal equity goals extend internationally via anti-imperialist policies. This includes demanding open borders, defunding the U.S. military footprint, and supporting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel to stand with marginalized populations globally.
Accessibility and Social Safety: Achieving true equity means ensuring that no individual faces systemic barriers due to disability, age, or socioeconomic background. The DSA targets this by advocating for the elimination of all personal debt, universal free childcare, and tuition-free public college.
btw - How do you think that they will "dismantle racial capitalism"? By implementing racial communism, of course!
DeleteI think I *do* understand your belief that another red scare is a great idea. Given that a trans moral panic helped donald trump "win" the presidency a second time. rightturds love ruining lives and stirring up hate with false allegations and sowing fear among their paranoid fascist White Supremacist base.
DeleteGemini's response when I asked if this (disingenuous/false) strategy will work...
Whether this "Red Scare" strategy will work in the upcoming November midterm elections depends entirely on which voting demographic the message hits, making it a highly calculated gamble.
Political analysts view the strategy as a defensive pivot.
President Donald Trump and the GOP are facing deep voter anxiety over the conflict with Iran, high fuel prices, and general economic affordability. By turning the election into an existential clash against "godless communists", they hope to redirect the national conversation away from these tough policy issues.
Where the Strategy is Working.
Activating the Base: The rhetoric is highly effective at boosting turnout among older, reliable conservative voters who lived through the original Cold War and possess a deep-seated aversion to communism.
Winning Critical Blocs in Key Swing States: The message lands with immense power among Hispanic communities in vital regions like South Florida and parts of Texas. For families who fled authoritarian left-wing regimes in Cuba, Venezuela, or Nicaragua, the "communist" label activates real, generational trauma.
Weaponizing Progressive Victories: The strategy gains a veneer of credibility from high-profile primary wins by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), such as Zohran Mamdani's mayoral primary victory in New York City. Republicans are successfully using these localized wins to paint the entire national Democratic party as radical extremists.
Where the Strategy is Failing.
Alienating Younger Voters: For Gen Z and Millennials, who do not remember the Cold War, the threat feels artificial. Labeling policies like affordable housing or universal healthcare as "communist" often backfires, making left-wing ideas look more appealing to younger generations.
The "Grocery Bill" Reality: Political strategists warn that ideological name-calling cannot fix tangible kitchen-table issues. For moderate, independent voters in crucial purple districts, warnings about "Bolsheviks" feel deeply disconnected from their daily struggles with grocery prices, gas hikes, and economic instability.
The Bottom Line.
The strategy is a double-edged sword. It creates maximum turnout among the right's core base and specific immigrant communities, but it risks alienating centrist swing voters who are looking for practical economic solutions rather than 1950s-style political warfare.
Why the strategy will likely Fail. [my header/not part of Gemini's response]
Calling modern Democrats "communists" lacks that specific, sharp symbolic power because it is an abstract label rather than a concrete, clipable policy. While the "they/them" ad used a real—albeit minor—historical quote to score a direct hit, calling a moderate American politician a Marxist usually just strikes independent voters as standard, old-fashioned campaign exaggeration.🛑
Do you know what a groyper is? They've experienced race based communism first hand. They don't need a fear of class-based communism instilled in them by the Cold War. They got the ridiculous corporate diversity council minutes e-mailed to them every week.
DeleteThe GOP has been complaining that somewhere between 30 and 75% of their Congressional staffers are groypers. I think that they're DONE being discriminated against by race communism.
You killed off Charlie Kirk and the race non-essentialist movement. So now you get to deal with Nick Fuentes and the Left mirror image groyper white race essentialist wing of the GOP.
DeleteMinus: They've experienced race based communism first hand.
DeleteThey haven't. There is no "race based communism" therefore them experiencing it is impossible.
Minus: You killed off Charlie Kirk and the race non-essentialist movement.
This didn't happen. Charlie Kirk didn't lead a race non-essentialist movement. Charlie Kirk was a White Supremacist. Charlie Kirk is dead, but "You" (The Democratic Party) had absolutely nothing to do with what happened. The killer had his own motivations. He didn't act on the behalf of "you".
Nick Fuentes is a White Supremacist, he is just open about it. While you lie and claim to be a "race non essentialist" but are actually also a White Supremacist.
There is no "Left mirror image groyper white race essentialist wing of the GOP". There is only a white race essentialist/Supremacist Nixon/trump wing of the republican party. And there is no mirror on the Left. The left supports racial equality.
You really do love you white guilt-pride, Derv. It's the "noble lie" that freezes you in ideological place and keeps you from becoming a true progressive (via aletheia).
DeleteMinus: You really do love you white guilt-pride, Derv.
DeleteI hate it intensely. It makes me angry.
Though it is YOUR white guilt pride (false) narrative. I feel ZERO guilt for being White. And (given this zero guilt) it would be impossible for me to feel pride at being guilt. Discounting the fact that pride isn't associated with guilt. Guilt being negative and the feeling associated with it being shame and definitely not pride. Proving that your false narrative is completely idiotic.
So confession isn't good for the soul. So much for 2,000+ years of Christian dogma...
DeleteWhat's Black History month accomplish then, Derv. The cult of slavery remembrance doesn't lift the confessor's spirits? Are you saying you're not uplifted every February in the national confessional? Then perhaps we should allow the rites to laps, as they have no beneficcial effect.
DeleteMinus: Are you saying you're not uplifted every February in the national confessional?
DeleteNo, I'm not. Because this isn't happening. There is no confessing taking place. Remembering isn't confessing.
The benefit of it is that it's good to remember history. For many reason. Though one reason isn't to confess anything. The people who might have benefited from confessing are dead. Or very stubbornly continuing to adhere to White Supremacy. You'd benefit from some confessing, but you'll never do any.
Robert Byrd confessed and reformed. But he's dead now. I never believed minorities are inferior, so I have nothing to confess.
When I was in Dearborn Michigan last week all I was able to see and hear were Shis Musigins a chanting war- like praises, but thousands of Shia Muslims streamed down a street in Dearborn.
ReplyDeleteYeah? And were they all shouting "death to America"? And did you barely escape with your life?
DeleteThank G_d for the 2nd Amendment!
DeleteWhat the Hell are you even talking about? It seems you think that some Muslims were getting violent and some "real Americans" had to defend themselves using their firearms in Dearborn. But you didn't link to or reference any news story. You're referring to a delusion?
DeleteThe US Constitution certainly is quite a delusion.
DeleteAs I thought, your babblings are about absolutely nothing. I asked for clarification via a news story. Or just an explanation as to what you specifically were referring to. But you refuse to say, proving it was nothing at all.
DeleteYou need a news story to understand the 2nd Amendment? Figures.
DeleteYess Dave Dubya, evo knows that your a COMMUNIST , who hates Americans, Jews, and Catholics. So come clean and show us what you have undo your bed that you read every night like a good Commie
DeleteYour lack of education and ignorance is VERY representative of trump and MAGAs, anon@ 1:56 PM.
DeleteMinus: You need a news story to understand the 2nd Amendment? Figures.
DeleteI need either a news story or an explanation as to how the 2nd amendment is relevant to the current discussion. Obviously you're BSing to distract from the fact that it isn't relevant. And I strongly suspect that it is YOU who doesn't understand the 2nd amendment. It seems you think it means White Supremacists can threaten or shoot minorities who protest fascism.
No, just the one's trying to institute race communism.
DeleteMinus: No, just the one's trying to institute race communism.
DeleteGemini: The term "race communism" is not a recognized, mainstream academic or political philosophy. Instead, it appears primarily in two distinct contexts: as modern internet slang/pejorative political rhetoric, and as a historical Cold War-era conspiracy theory or rhetorical accusation linking civil rights movements to communism.
You think White Men are being discriminated against and their rights being infringed on. Maybe you think there needs to be a "civil rights movement" for White men? In which case the "race communists" are trumpers?
But nobody else is trying to institute "race communism". And not only because it's not a real thing.
Is Race Capitalism a proper term.... I refer you to the DSA goal of abolishing it, above.
DeleteThe Democratic Party and the DSA aren't sympatico. DSA membership is around 120k, while there are tens of millions of Democrats.
DeleteThey are increasingly the leaders via entryism. There are only 100 senators and a few hundred Representative in Congress. There only 1 President" in the Execctuive Branch and 9 members of SCotUS. How influential can these LOW numbers be? There are 350 million Americans!
DeleteExcept Democrats don't want to adopt many of the completely crazy and not feasible unworkable ideas. Nobody but a crazy minority will ever think any of these crazy ideas could work. And, if anyone tried to come up with a plan to make them work, they would find out quickly it was impossible. These things won't ever be tried because they can't work.
DeleteBut I can understand why you think they might be tried. Because you have many extremely crazy ideas that you think would work... but can't. But your ideas won't ever be tried either. Curtis Yarvin is a nutter and the United States will never adopt any of his crazy ideas. Same as the Democratic Party will never adopt DSA crazy idea.
Gemini...
🤖The Mirror-Image Delusion...
The blogger is likely suffering from an ideological mirror-image delusion. Because they believe a fringe, top-down corporate monarchy (Yarvin) is a plausible evolution for the right, they naturally assume a fringe, bottom-up socialist takeover (DSA) is a plausible evolution for the left.In reality, both assumptions ignore how entrenched the American political and economic system actually is.
👉Why Both Ideas Have an Effective Zero Percent Chance.
The structural barriers preventing either of these extreme shifts are insurmountable.
👉Why DSA Entryism Will Not Happen.
The Electorate's Capitalist Core: The American public—including the overwhelming majority of registered Democrats—is fundamentally pro-capitalist. They may support a stronger safety net, but they consistently vote against the abolition of private property or the nationalisation of industry.
The Primary Glass Ceiling: While the DSA has successfully elected a few high-profile members to Congress in deeply progressive urban pockets, they hit a hard wall in statewide or national races. To win a general election in a swing state or swing district, candidates must run to the centre, not the fringe.
[Gemini's response to my comment about abolishing the police and prison being impossible because it would not work]...
By assuming crime would simply vanish if poverty did, the DSA platform relies on a flawed view of human nature. This unworkable premise is a major reason why their ideology cannot successfully take over a mainstream political party.🛑
"Entryism" will NOT result in the Democratic Party adopting policies that CAN'T work.
It never stopped them before, Derv.
DeleteSomething being impossible ALWAYS stops people from doing it.
DeleteNote: In 1996 Chuck Schumer just about DEMANDED that we use Voter ID in our Elections.
ReplyDeleteHypocrisy is his greatest virtue...
DeleteAs you once again define what trump is, and always has been.
DeleteIf IDs were free and easy to obtain for every citizen, that would be a discussion worth having. Except republicans want to prevent people legally entitled to vote from casting ballots. That's what this is about.
Delete