Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Why Does This Sound Familar?
No Wonder Nick Fuentes and the Groypers are SO ANGRY!
from Google AI:
The last Republican mayor of Chicago was William Hale "Big Bill" Thompson. He served two non-consecutive stints from 1915 to 1923, and again from 1927 to 1931. [1, 2]
Dontcha know? All the racists switched to the Republican Party, and all the non-Racists to the Democrat Party as part of Nixon's "Southern Strategy". The NAZI tattoos didn't switch though. They loyally stayed with the Democratic Party.
wtf? I believe that there are White people who think they are the most advanced race. And these people are referred to as White Supremacists. But the label references what they believe about themselves. I think they are idiots. But this is the commonly accepted definition. It seems you don't understand what the commonly accepted definition is?
Jasmine Crockett is out of her mind.Jasmine is only trying to convince herself that she is one of the most powerful people in this country…” and she is totally unable to stop Americans from disrespecting her! She rates right along there with Al Green and Adam Schiff when it comes to disrespect people! And what a relief it was that she didn't get reelected!
Yes and I totally agree , and furthermore what Mr. Shirt for Bray says and advocated is totally Disgusting , and disgraceful . And is not at all Respectful.
Yes and I totally agree , and furthermore what Mr. Shirt for Brains says and advocated is totally Disgusting , and disgraceful . And is not at all Respectful.
In the years and decades to come in the future. the despicable, annd evil Islamic Republic of Iran could always be found creating chaos and killing those that the regime deemed enemies of their brutal regime. Iran has been instrumental in providing weaponry, training, and funding for evil proxy organizations that were ghoulishly happy to do their bidding. Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis in Yemen have long targeted Israel, most especially civilian targets in Israel who is a tiny nation the size of Rhode Island . Of course, this culminated in the horrific Hamas attack on Israeli civilians on October 7th, 2023 killing over 1200 people including Children and taking 48 hostages, including Americans.
trump, the American embodiment of Fascism and Ignorance always liked ole Adolph. Keeping his manifesto by his bedside so he could learn well the beliefs and tactics of his hero and soul mate.
And so now, through his MAGA propaganda and bullshit he has trained his loyal sheeple to be mini Fascists and worshippers.of deep state and capitalist corruption.
So yes, labeling the malignant narcissist trump a Nazi is fair game.
Hitler was a Democrat. Mein Kampf (My Struggle) documents Germany & his victimhood and provided a Trauma Therapy regime for them... like the kind Oprah and the chicks on The View Proscibe.
Adolf Hitler was not a Democrat. The Democratic Party didn't exist in Germany. Adolf Hitler was 100 percent maga (Make Aryans Great Again). If he was alive today that's something he would definitely come up with.
Copilot Response: Hitler wasn’t a Democrat. He abolished democracy, banned opposition parties, and ruled as a fascist dictator. Mein Kampf isn’t “trauma therapy” — it’s a political manifesto outlining racial supremacy, authoritarian rule, and genocide. Comparing that to Oprah or The View doesn’t make your claim any more accurate; it just replaces history with culture‑war punchlines.
Hitler stole the Democratic Party's Jim Crow laws and applied them whole cloth to Germany in the form of the Nuremberg Race Laws in 1935.
Yes, Nazi legal experts explicitly studied and drew inspiration from the United States’ Jim Crow system when drafting the 1935 Nuremberg Race Laws.
As detailed by Yale legal historian James Q. Whitman in Hitler's American Model, the Third Reich viewed early 20th-century America as the world's leading racist legal jurisdiction. While the Nazis did not copy the U.S. framework identically, American laws served as a foundational blueprint for institutionalized discrimination
Difference between Trump and Biden? Trump celebrates America, Biden blames America. Trump finds ways of getting things done,. Biden made excuses for letting things fall apart. Trump makes you feel good about your country, Biden made you feel bad about it. Trump puts America first, Biden put America last. Trump Clost our Border. Biden allow 10’s of Thousands of Criminals into the Country
"Repressive Tolerance" is a famous, highly controversial essay written by the German-American philosopher and Frankfurt School critical theorist Herbert Marcuse in 1965.
The core thesis of the essay is that in modern "advanced industrial" societies, the seemingly neutral and impartial principle of tolerance—which treats all ideas equally—actually functions to maintain the political, economic, and social status quo. Because this status quo is inherently unequal, capitalist, and oppressive, indiscriminate tolerance of all viewpoints ends up repressing authentic opposition and protecting oppressive systems.
1. The Breakdown of Traditional Tolerance
Historically, the liberal virtue of tolerance was meant to protect the "heretics" and dissenters challenging the established power structure. Marcuse argued this dynamic changed. Advanced democracies have become so consumer-driven, integrated, and technologically dominated that genuine radical critique is either co-opted, commodified, or ignored. In this environment, indiscriminate tolerance—treating aggressive, reactionary, or hateful with the same weight as calls for humanity and liberation—becomes an active tool for maintaining the power of dominant interests.
2. "Abstract" vs. "Liberating" Tolerance
Marcuse divided tolerance into two categories:
Pure/Abstract Tolerance: This is the passive, indiscriminate toleration of all attitudes, even those with objectively damaging effects. Marcuse argued that this refraining from taking sides actually protects the "established machinery of discrimination".
Liberating Tolerance: Marcuse’s proposed alternative, which requires an active intolerance toward regressive or aggressive movements from the Right, and a deliberate tolerance/fostering of progressive movements from the Left.
3. The Call for Intolerance of the Right
Marcuse provocatively argued that a society working toward true liberation, equality, and happiness cannot afford to be impartial. He advocated for the withdrawal of free speech and assembly from groups and movements that:
Promote aggressive, militaristic, or chauvinistic policies.
Discriminate on the grounds of race or religion.
Oppose social security, public services, and medical care.
He believed that suppressing regressive discourse is a logical and necessary prerequisite for strengthening progressive ones.
4. Who Decides What is "Regressive"?
The most heavily criticized aspect of "Repressive Tolerance" is Marcuse's implication that an enlightened vanguard—intellectuals, teachers, and critical theorists—would need to determine which ideas are "progressive" and which are "regressive". Critics, such as liberal philosopher Karl Popper (who proposed a similar "paradox of tolerance"), argued that assigning authorities the right to suppress speech based on its "truth" or "falsity" fundamentally undermines critical discussion and can easily lead to authoritarianism.
Context and Impact
First published in the 1965 book A Critique of Pure Tolerance (co-authored with Robert Paul Wolff and Barrington Moore Jr.), the essay became an ideological cornerstone for the New Left and the student protest movements of the late 1960s. Today, it remains a frequent point of reference in modern debates regarding cancel culture, platforming, algorithmic moderation on social media, and the limits of free speech in polarized political climates.
in other words, the repressive authoritarians on the Left have failed, and the right is taking "tolerance" universal again.
I don't have indiscriminate tolerance of all viewpoints. I'm very intollerante of White Supremacy. BLM has tolerance for ALL viewpoints, excepting those viewpoints that are pro-discrimination. They especially oppose your pro-discrimination White Supremacist ideology. Those days are NOT over. The pendulum will swing back the other way. Decent and empathetic people of all races who are opposed to White Supremacy have been pushed to the brink and aren't going to take much more of your hate and love of oligarchy. I think change is coming, and is coming soon. I could be wrong, but I think the current state of things will not persist. The United States beat back White Supremacy (and later the robber barons) before and can do it again. Hopefully without violence. But, if the resurange of White Supremacy doesn't end with donald trump, violence may be inevitable. I'm not predicting it, only acknowledging the fact that it has happened before and could happen again.
Yes, It seems that we Republicans are ALWAYS Racists except the Guy with the NAZI Tattoo in his chest.
ReplyDeleteDontcha know? All the racists switched to the Republican Party, and all the non-Racists to the Democrat Party as part of Nixon's "Southern Strategy". The NAZI tattoos didn't switch though. They loyally stayed with the Democratic Party.
DeleteBut all the non Nazi White Supremacist tattoos (like Pete Hegseth) has stayed loyal to the Republicans.
DeleteIf Graham Plattner is secretly a Nazi, I think we'll know for sure... If he wins and then switches party affiliation to Republican.
^^Would vote for the Nazi tattoo^^
Delete^^Likely has a White Supremacist tattoo^^
DeleteTattoos can't run for or hold political office, so I could not vote for one. Also, I'm not a Nazi. Nor do I believe in Nazism.
You don't believe in white supremacy either, yet here we are...
Deletewtf? I believe that there are White people who think they are the most advanced race. And these people are referred to as White Supremacists. But the label references what they believe about themselves. I think they are idiots. But this is the commonly accepted definition. It seems you don't understand what the commonly accepted definition is?
DeleteSomething invented by the SPLC? LOL!
DeleteJussie Smolette Racism...
Delete
ReplyDeleteJasmine Crockett is out of her mind.Jasmine is only trying to convince herself that she is one of the most powerful people in this country…” and she is totally unable to stop Americans from disrespecting her! She rates right along there with Al Green and Adam Schiff when it comes to disrespect people!
And what a relief it was that she didn't get reelected!
Yes and I totally agree , and furthermore what Mr. Shirt for Bray says and advocated is totally Disgusting , and disgraceful . And is not at all Respectful.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteYes and I totally agree , and furthermore what Mr. Shirt for Brains says and advocated is totally Disgusting , and disgraceful . And is not at all Respectful.
In the years and decades to come in the future. the despicable, annd evil Islamic Republic of Iran could always be found creating chaos and killing those that the regime deemed enemies of their brutal regime. Iran has been instrumental in providing weaponry, training, and funding for evil proxy organizations that were ghoulishly happy to do their bidding. Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis in Yemen have long targeted Israel, most especially civilian targets in Israel who is a tiny nation the size of Rhode Island . Of course, this culminated in the horrific Hamas attack on Israeli civilians on October 7th, 2023 killing over 1200 people including Children and taking 48 hostages, including Americans.
DeleteIs Hillary planning a 2028 run? It sure looks that way
ReplyDeleteShe’s starting by throwing Joe Biden under the Bus
For 8 Years the stupid Democrats have been calling Donald Trump a NAZI. Now they have one of their own with a NAZI TATTOO ON HIS CHEST!
ReplyDeleteIt's called truth in labelling.
DeleteExactly. Labeling trump a Nazi is truthful.
Deletetrump, the American embodiment of Fascism and Ignorance always liked ole Adolph. Keeping his manifesto by his bedside so he could learn well the beliefs and tactics of his hero and soul mate.
DeleteAnd so now, through his MAGA propaganda and bullshit he has trained his loyal sheeple to be mini Fascists and worshippers.of deep state and capitalist corruption.
So yes, labeling the malignant narcissist trump a Nazi is fair game.
Hitler was a Democrat. Mein Kampf (My Struggle) documents Germany & his victimhood and provided a Trauma Therapy regime for them... like the kind Oprah and the chicks on The View Proscibe.
DeleteAdolf Hitler was not a Democrat. The Democratic Party didn't exist in Germany. Adolf Hitler was 100 percent maga (Make Aryans Great Again). If he was alive today that's something he would definitely come up with.
DeleteCopilot Response: Hitler wasn’t a Democrat. He abolished democracy, banned opposition parties, and ruled as a fascist dictator. Mein Kampf isn’t “trauma therapy” — it’s a political manifesto outlining racial supremacy, authoritarian rule, and genocide. Comparing that to Oprah or The View doesn’t make your claim any more accurate; it just replaces history with culture‑war punchlines.
Hitler stole the Democratic Party's Jim Crow laws and applied them whole cloth to Germany in the form of the Nuremberg Race Laws in 1935.
DeleteYes, Nazi legal experts explicitly studied and drew inspiration from the United States’ Jim Crow system when drafting the 1935 Nuremberg Race Laws.
As detailed by Yale legal historian James Q. Whitman in Hitler's American Model, the Third Reich viewed early 20th-century America as the world's leading racist legal jurisdiction. While the Nazis did not copy the U.S. framework identically, American laws served as a foundational blueprint for institutionalized discrimination
Thanks Democrats!
Difference between Trump and Biden?
ReplyDeleteTrump celebrates America, Biden blames America.
Trump finds ways of getting things done,. Biden made excuses for letting things fall apart.
Trump makes you feel good about your country, Biden made you feel bad about it.
Trump puts America first, Biden put America last.
Trump Clost our Border.
Biden allow 10’s of Thousands of Criminals into the Country
Swimming in the pool of trumpian propaganda and delusion are ya, A pissed off American?
DeleteDon'tcha think it's time to come up for air?
I won’t CONVERSE WITH ASSHOLES LIKE YOU.
DeleteIt's just the TDS induced ranting, Anon.
DeleteHe needs to counteract all the Buddhist meditation with 3-minute hate breaks.
DeleteLes doesn't have TDS, you do. You're the one who is deranged. Les is completely sane.
DeleteGuilt-pride sufferers like you and Les are pathological.
DeleteYou suffer from Marcusian "Repressive tolerance".
Delete"Repressive Tolerance" is a famous, highly controversial essay written by the German-American philosopher and Frankfurt School critical theorist Herbert Marcuse in 1965.
The core thesis of the essay is that in modern "advanced industrial" societies, the seemingly neutral and impartial principle of tolerance—which treats all ideas equally—actually functions to maintain the political, economic, and social status quo. Because this status quo is inherently unequal, capitalist, and oppressive, indiscriminate tolerance of all viewpoints ends up repressing authentic opposition and protecting oppressive systems.
1. The Breakdown of Traditional Tolerance
Historically, the liberal virtue of tolerance was meant to protect the "heretics" and dissenters challenging the established power structure. Marcuse argued this dynamic changed. Advanced democracies have become so consumer-driven, integrated, and technologically dominated that genuine radical critique is either co-opted, commodified, or ignored. In this environment, indiscriminate tolerance—treating aggressive, reactionary, or hateful with the same weight as calls for humanity and liberation—becomes an active tool for maintaining the power of dominant interests.
2. "Abstract" vs. "Liberating" Tolerance
Marcuse divided tolerance into two categories:
Pure/Abstract Tolerance: This is the passive, indiscriminate toleration of all attitudes, even those with objectively damaging effects. Marcuse argued that this refraining from taking sides actually protects the "established machinery of discrimination".
Liberating Tolerance: Marcuse’s proposed alternative, which requires an active intolerance toward regressive or aggressive movements from the Right, and a deliberate tolerance/fostering of progressive movements from the Left.
3. The Call for Intolerance of the Right
Marcuse provocatively argued that a society working toward true liberation, equality, and happiness cannot afford to be impartial. He advocated for the withdrawal of free speech and assembly from groups and movements that:
Promote aggressive, militaristic, or chauvinistic policies.
Discriminate on the grounds of race or religion.
Oppose social security, public services, and medical care.
He believed that suppressing regressive discourse is a logical and necessary prerequisite for strengthening progressive ones.
4. Who Decides What is "Regressive"?
The most heavily criticized aspect of "Repressive Tolerance" is Marcuse's implication that an enlightened vanguard—intellectuals, teachers, and critical theorists—would need to determine which ideas are "progressive" and which are "regressive". Critics, such as liberal philosopher Karl Popper (who proposed a similar "paradox of tolerance"), argued that assigning authorities the right to suppress speech based on its "truth" or "falsity" fundamentally undermines critical discussion and can easily lead to authoritarianism.
Context and Impact
First published in the 1965 book A Critique of Pure Tolerance (co-authored with Robert Paul Wolff and Barrington Moore Jr.), the essay became an ideological cornerstone for the New Left and the student protest movements of the late 1960s. Today, it remains a frequent point of reference in modern debates regarding cancel culture, platforming, algorithmic moderation on social media, and the limits of free speech in polarized political climates.
in other words, the repressive authoritarians on the Left have failed, and the right is taking "tolerance" universal again.
The BLM "tolerance for me but not for thee" days are over.
DeleteI don't have indiscriminate tolerance of all viewpoints. I'm very intollerante of White Supremacy. BLM has tolerance for ALL viewpoints, excepting those viewpoints that are pro-discrimination. They especially oppose your pro-discrimination White Supremacist ideology. Those days are NOT over. The pendulum will swing back the other way. Decent and empathetic people of all races who are opposed to White Supremacy have been pushed to the brink and aren't going to take much more of your hate and love of oligarchy. I think change is coming, and is coming soon. I could be wrong, but I think the current state of things will not persist. The United States beat back White Supremacy (and later the robber barons) before and can do it again. Hopefully without violence. But, if the resurange of White Supremacy doesn't end with donald trump, violence may be inevitable. I'm not predicting it, only acknowledging the fact that it has happened before and could happen again.
Delete