That's bullplop. I voted for Kamala Harris. All my family members voted for her. Millions of Democrats voted for Kamala Harris. Many Democrats tried to vote for Kamala Harris but they were prevented, or their votes were thrown out. That is how donald trump "won" -- by cheating. Kamala Harris would be president now if not for Republican cheating.
Minus lied: You certainly didn't pick her to run. You didn't even vote on it.
I absolutely did vote for her. I voted for the Biden/Harris ticket multiple times (in primaries and general elections). FYI, all presidential candidates have donors. donald trump lied when he said his campaign would be "self funded". Remember? You defended him lying about this. Now you say having donors negates democracy because it's really the donors choosing the candidates?
btw, I suppose you think that you really voted for donald trump. Your vote for trump was "real", while my vote for Harris wasn't?
I say nobody voted for donald trump. Because he ran as a completely different candidate. One that made promises he had no intention of even trying to fulfill. The "donald trump, 2024 candidate" and the "donald trump, present potus" are very, very different Turds.
Even you, who knew he was lying about much of what he promised (and admired him for that reason), got snookered. He said he would start no new wars and convinced you that meant he definitely wouldn't go to war with Iran.
So, if you voted for candidate donald trump who lies (and you accepted and liked that), that must mean your vote was for a donald trump that would go to war in Iran. Or you didn't vote for the real donald trump, which is one that would go to war with Iran. Meaning you didn't vote for him (the real donald trump).
Minus: Thinks Kamala would deliver on all her promises.
Not AT ALL. I view campaign promises as a wish list. MOST of them won't be fulfilled. But ALL of Kamala's campaign promises were things she would have actually tried to achieve. Or at least like to have seen achieved under ideal circumstances. While donald trump outright lied with his campaign promises. He never had any intention of trying to fulfill most of them. He had no intention of trying to fulfill many of them. Because they weren't a wish thing of things he wanted to achieve for his voters. They were lies designed to fool people into voting for him. MOST of his promises were things he specifically didn't want to work to achieve. In fact, in many instances, he wanted the exact opposite of what he promised. Like going after "the worst of the worst" when it came to illegal immigrants. He always wanted to go after any and all illegal immigrants. And he never had any intention at all to try and lower prices. That promise was a complete lie.
No. Because it's not dependent on what you think. It is dependent on what the candidate means. The campaign promises of Kamala Harris were real. The campaign promises of donald trump were almost all lies. You believing otherwise is only self delusion. Like how you deluded yourself into believing there was no way donald trump would ever attack Iran.
Kamala Really Needs to Stop Drinking! Here is here latest speech. “I really, truly believe this. We we each have have light inside of us. And we need to know that that is what inspires our hope as much as anything external to ourselves. And when we feel that and and and not allow an election or an individual to dampen that light, and instead light, let that light kind of carry us in particular through moments of darkness, that that we not only act on that hope, but we inspire that hope in each other. And in particular, at this moment, it is so important that we not only have hope, but that we understand that that should be a verb."
^^Proves he doesn't know what the definition of "illiterate" is^^
btw, in regards to the Kamala Harris quote, it contains normal normal speech disfluencies that do not indicate Harris was drunk. As per g00gle, "a dysfluency is any break or interruption in the smooth, forward flow of speech. It includes natural hesitations and filler words (e.g., um, uh, like), word repetitions, and self-corrections".
That's just how people talk and is completely normal. Usually, when transcripts are generated, disfluencies are removed to make reading the transcript easier. They are left in to make the speaker look bad, which is the case here.
I acknowledged no such thing. When donald trump speaks... THAT is just how idiots talk. I acknowledge that donald trump is just an idiot who usually doesn't know what he is talking about. And talks in word salads.
What Kamala Harris said is perfectly understandable. She is saying that hope can't just be passive, but requires action. It's a pretty simple message. But perhaps she could have stated it more simply. However, what that's a transcript of is a discussion on a podcast. I really don't give a poop if her words weren't highly polished and she could have stated her thoughts more concisely. The core message is valid and not idiotic.
The way donald trump speaks... that's very frequently idiotic.
A 98-year-old man was brutally attacked by a 27-year-old woman handing out campaign flyers for a Democratic Socialists of America candidate in a Brooklyn apartment building lobby at roughly on Thursday afternoon.
The elderly victim was left with minor head injuries after he was punched, kicked, and struck with a broomstick and a metal chair.
Tashara Abel, 27, was stuffing reelection flyers into mailboxes for Anthony Beckford, a Democratic Socialists of America member and New York State Committee Member running for re-election as a Democratic district leader and who is endorsed by Zohan Mamdavi in the June 23 primary when the elderly man walked in, and the two began arguing over the campaign materials, police and neighbors said, according to a report from the New York Post.
Yes, it only take literally 5 seconds to Google... but you just stick your fingers in your ears and chant..."Nah, Nah, Nah, nah..."
Multiple New York media outlets, including CBS New York and NBC New York, reported on a 98-year-old man assaulted with a broomstick in a Brooklyn building, with surveillance footage showing the incident. The suspect, a woman, was arrested and charged following the attack, as detailed by local reporting. Read the full story at NBC New York
Minus: but you just stick your fingers in your ears and chant..."Nah, Nah, Nah, nah..."
So that means you're confirming that donald trump is directly responsible for every violent act that his supporters commit and they all reflect badly on him?
What's interesting about that is that, when the data is analyzed, it becomes clear that the political right is MUCH more violent than the political left.
PBS News: Based on our own research and a review of related work, we can confidently say that most domestic terrorists in the U.S. are politically on the right, and right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism. ... Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001. Sep 20, 2025.
republicans = responsible for 75 to 80 percent of politically motivated violence.
His work characterizes these groups by ideologies of anti-globalism, racial or ethnic supremacy, nationalism, intense suspicion of federal authority, and the belief that a personal or national way of life is under attack
So Black Panthers and jihadi's are "right wing extremists".. Talk about tautologies. "Right wing extremists are all people who commit extreme acts of violence." @@
Minus: So Black Panthers and jihadi's are "right wing extremists".
wtf? The article does not say that!
Via Copilot...
🤖Research by Jipson and Becker focuses on white racial extremism, hate‑motivated movements, and far‑right social movements. [It does not classify Black Panthers and Muslim jihadists as right wing].
👉The PBS article does not define right‑wing extremism as “any violent person.”
👉Extremism researchers define right‑wing extremism by ideology, not by violence alone.
👉Joe Conservative’s claim is false and unsupported by the article or by academic research.
👉His quote (“His work characterizes…”) is not from the article and cannot be matched to any identifiable source.🛑
For forty-seven years we have had the same answer to the same question “When Will This Terror Reign that is funding and arming Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and Shiite Militias across Iraq and Syria stop their Terror”? Every American administration since 1979 has eventually asked Iran that same question. Will you be a nation, or will you stay a cause? The Islamic Republic has answered every single time with the same word. Allah is our Cause. Yet here we are again, watching White House officials describe a regime built on exporting revolution as though it is one signature away from joining the community of normal nations. It is not a diplomatic strategy. It is a fantasy dressed up as a strategy, and the people selling it know exactly how good it sounds on cable news. Iran is not secretive about what it is. Its constitution explicitly commits the state to spreading Islamic revolution beyond its borders especially to America, and to Israel. We have seen it throughout every American administration. Jimmy Carter discovered this first when the seizure of the U.S. embassy and 444 days of hostages buried any hope of treating the new Iranian government as a rational actor. Every president afterward learned some version of the same lesson on a different stage. Reagan got Iran-Contra and a regime still running terror cells through Lebanon. Clinton chased a reformist president while the real power sat with a Supreme Leader who never blinked. Obama got a nuclear deal that gave Iran cash and a path to keep enriching uranium, and a few years later got Nuclear acceleration and a multi-front war anyway. Biden tried again with the same playbook and he got the same result. This time is different because the financial incentives are much bigger. Hundreds of Billions in investment, access to global markets, and a real economic future is at stake. The new Supreme Leader has talked about putting Americans, and Israeli’s at the bottom of the Persian Gulf, and not about turning over a new leaf. The Reported intel from Pakistan states that Iran DOES have a nuclear weapon and DOES intend to use it if the conflict continues. Is that an outward display of exaggeration. Or not? While Iran may lack an intercontinental missile capability and thus is unable to target the U.S. mainland, other options remain available to effect such a demonstration. This includes targeting Israel, or a U.S. base closer to home. It could even include attacking a fellow Muslim country as Iran has already shown by striking out at Kuwait claiming it was in retaliation for an earlier U.S. attack. I personally don’t think this information is true because five minutes after they acquired a nuke, that information would be on its way to Tel Aviv. If true, then Israel must act because Iran will not even think about using it. If Iran actually has a nuclear weapon, I think they would have used it by now Targeting Israel. At any rate, I think that it’s tme for our military to show the leaders of Iran our TRUE MIGHT. This is all the more reason to eradicate these lunatics, before they have 20 of ‘em.
The terror will stop when the Zionist masters of theft and genocide are defeated, kicked out of Palestine, and it is returned to its rightful owners, the Palestinian people. M
The entire world, except the complicit USA, is turning against the Zionist butchers and thieves.
The greatest evil on the planet right now is the butcher Netanyahu and Zionism. And our government's support of their evil makes this nation guilty of great evil as well.
If Democrats are so good at stealing elections and not getting caught, why is donald trump president?
ReplyDeleteBecause they would have gotten caught. Nobody voted for Kamala.
DeleteThat's bullplop. I voted for Kamala Harris. All my family members voted for her. Millions of Democrats voted for Kamala Harris. Many Democrats tried to vote for Kamala Harris but they were prevented, or their votes were thrown out. That is how donald trump "won" -- by cheating. Kamala Harris would be president now if not for Republican cheating.
DeleteIt Figures that you would lye for that IDIOT
DeleteThe lying predominately comes from the lying trumublican circus of idiots.
DeleteNobody voted for her. The voted for her donors.
DeleteYou didn't vote for her. You voted for whoever her donors picked to run.
DeleteYou certainly didn't pick her to run. You didn't even vote on it.
DeleteMinus lied: You certainly didn't pick her to run. You didn't even vote on it.
DeleteI absolutely did vote for her. I voted for the Biden/Harris ticket multiple times (in primaries and general elections). FYI, all presidential candidates have donors. donald trump lied when he said his campaign would be "self funded". Remember? You defended him lying about this. Now you say having donors negates democracy because it's really the donors choosing the candidates?
btw, I suppose you think that you really voted for donald trump. Your vote for trump was "real", while my vote for Harris wasn't?
DeleteI say nobody voted for donald trump. Because he ran as a completely different candidate. One that made promises he had no intention of even trying to fulfill. The "donald trump, 2024 candidate" and the "donald trump, present potus" are very, very different Turds.
Even you, who knew he was lying about much of what he promised (and admired him for that reason), got snookered. He said he would start no new wars and convinced you that meant he definitely wouldn't go to war with Iran.
So, if you voted for candidate donald trump who lies (and you accepted and liked that), that must mean your vote was for a donald trump that would go to war in Iran. Or you didn't vote for the real donald trump, which is one that would go to war with Iran. Meaning you didn't vote for him (the real donald trump).
^^Thinks Kamala would deliver on all her promises^^
DeleteMinus: Thinks Kamala would deliver on all her promises.
DeleteNot AT ALL. I view campaign promises as a wish list. MOST of them won't be fulfilled. But ALL of Kamala's campaign promises were things she would have actually tried to achieve. Or at least like to have seen achieved under ideal circumstances. While donald trump outright lied with his campaign promises. He never had any intention of trying to fulfill most of them. He had no intention of trying to fulfill many of them. Because they weren't a wish thing of things he wanted to achieve for his voters. They were lies designed to fool people into voting for him. MOST of his promises were things he specifically didn't want to work to achieve. In fact, in many instances, he wanted the exact opposite of what he promised. Like going after "the worst of the worst" when it came to illegal immigrants. He always wanted to go after any and all illegal immigrants. And he never had any intention at all to try and lower prices. That promise was a complete lie.
I view campaign promises as a wish list.
DeleteTrump supporters aren't allowed to do likewise?
No. Because it's not dependent on what you think. It is dependent on what the candidate means. The campaign promises of Kamala Harris were real. The campaign promises of donald trump were almost all lies. You believing otherwise is only self delusion. Like how you deluded yourself into believing there was no way donald trump would ever attack Iran.
DeleteKamala Really Needs to Stop Drinking!
ReplyDeleteHere is here latest speech.
“I really, truly believe this. We we each have have light inside of us. And we need to know that that is what inspires our hope as much as anything external to ourselves. And when we feel that and and and not allow an election or an individual to dampen that light, and instead light, let that light kind of carry us in particular through moments of darkness, that that we not only act on that hope, but we inspire that hope in each other. And in particular, at this moment, it is so important that we not only have hope, but that we understand that that should be a verb."
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteFar more brilliant and truthful than any grunt emanating from the verbal orifice of the malignant narcissist trump.
Delete^^Proves he's illiterate^^
Delete^^Proves he doesn't know what the definition of "illiterate" is^^
Deletebtw, in regards to the Kamala Harris quote, it contains normal normal speech disfluencies that do not indicate Harris was drunk. As per g00gle, "a dysfluency is any break or interruption in the smooth, forward flow of speech. It includes natural hesitations and filler words (e.g., um, uh, like), word repetitions, and self-corrections".
That's just how people talk and is completely normal. Usually, when transcripts are generated, disfluencies are removed to make reading the transcript easier. They are left in to make the speaker look bad, which is the case here.
"That's just how idiots talk!"... acknowledges that Harris wasn't drunk, she was just an idiot.
DeleteI acknowledged no such thing. When donald trump speaks... THAT is just how idiots talk. I acknowledge that donald trump is just an idiot who usually doesn't know what he is talking about. And talks in word salads.
DeleteWhat Kamala Harris said is perfectly understandable. She is saying that hope can't just be passive, but requires action. It's a pretty simple message. But perhaps she could have stated it more simply. However, what that's a transcript of is a discussion on a podcast. I really don't give a poop if her words weren't highly polished and she could have stated her thoughts more concisely. The core message is valid and not idiotic.
The way donald trump speaks... that's very frequently idiotic.
Kamala was perfectly understandable.... to orangatangs and retards.
DeleteYou're referring to trump supporters "understanding" his word salads.
Delete
ReplyDeleteA 98-year-old man was brutally attacked by a 27-year-old woman handing out campaign flyers for a Democratic Socialists of America candidate in a Brooklyn apartment building lobby at roughly on Thursday afternoon.
The elderly victim was left with minor head injuries after he was punched, kicked, and struck with a broomstick and a metal chair.
Tashara Abel, 27, was stuffing reelection flyers into mailboxes for Anthony Beckford, a Democratic Socialists of America member and New York State Committee Member running for re-election as a Democratic district leader and who is endorsed by Zohan Mamdavi in the June 23 primary when the elderly man walked in, and the two began arguing over the campaign materials, police and neighbors said, according to a report from the New York Post.
Credible source name (the New York Post is not) and a hot link is in order on this.
DeleteWhy, because trumpublicans generally make sh*t up out of whole cloth.
Yes, it only take literally 5 seconds to Google... but you just stick your fingers in your ears and chant..."Nah, Nah, Nah, nah..."
DeleteMultiple New York media outlets, including CBS New York and NBC New York, reported on a 98-year-old man assaulted with a broomstick in a Brooklyn building, with surveillance footage showing the incident. The suspect, a woman, was arrested and charged following the attack, as detailed by local reporting. Read the full story at NBC New York
Minus: but you just stick your fingers in your ears and chant..."Nah, Nah, Nah, nah..."
DeleteSo that means you're confirming that donald trump is directly responsible for every violent act that his supporters commit and they all reflect badly on him?
What's interesting about that is that, when the data is analyzed, it becomes clear that the political right is MUCH more violent than the political left.
PBS News: Based on our own research and a review of related work, we can confidently say that most domestic terrorists in the U.S. are politically on the right, and right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism. ... Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001. Sep 20, 2025.
republicans = responsible for 75 to 80 percent of politically motivated violence.
I admit that you're a lazy f*ck that will believe anything posted on a Blue-Check website for immediate 100% confirmation bias
Deleteps - Who defined "right wing" for your study?
DeleteHis work characterizes these groups by ideologies of anti-globalism, racial or ethnic supremacy, nationalism, intense suspicion of federal authority, and the belief that a personal or national way of life is under attack
DeleteSo Black Panthers and jihadi's are "right wing extremists".. Talk about tautologies. "Right wing extremists are all people who commit extreme acts of violence." @@
Minus: So Black Panthers and jihadi's are "right wing extremists".
Deletewtf? The article does not say that!
Via Copilot...
🤖Research by Jipson and Becker focuses on white racial extremism, hate‑motivated movements, and far‑right social movements. [It does not classify Black Panthers and Muslim jihadists as right wing].
👉The PBS article does not define right‑wing extremism as “any violent person.”
👉Extremism researchers define right‑wing extremism by ideology, not by violence alone.
👉Joe Conservative’s claim is false and unsupported by the article or by academic research.
👉His quote (“His work characterizes…”) is not from the article and cannot be matched to any identifiable source.🛑
ReplyDeleteFor forty-seven years we have had the same answer to the same question “When Will This Terror Reign that is funding and arming Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and Shiite Militias across Iraq and Syria stop their Terror”? Every American administration since 1979 has eventually asked Iran that same question. Will you be a nation, or will you stay a cause? The Islamic Republic has answered every single time with the same word. Allah is our Cause. Yet here we are again, watching White House officials describe a regime built on exporting revolution as though it is one signature away from joining the community of normal nations. It is not a diplomatic strategy. It is a fantasy dressed up as a strategy, and the people selling it know exactly how good it sounds on cable news.
Iran is not secretive about what it is. Its constitution explicitly commits the state to spreading Islamic revolution beyond its borders especially to America, and to Israel.
We have seen it throughout every American administration. Jimmy Carter discovered this first when the seizure of the U.S. embassy and 444 days of hostages buried any hope of treating the new Iranian government as a rational actor. Every president afterward learned some version of the same lesson on a different stage. Reagan got Iran-Contra and a regime still running terror cells through Lebanon. Clinton chased a reformist president while the real power sat with a Supreme Leader who never blinked. Obama got a nuclear deal that gave Iran cash and a path to keep enriching uranium, and a few years later got Nuclear acceleration and a multi-front war anyway. Biden tried again with the same playbook and he got the same result.
This time is different because the financial incentives are much bigger. Hundreds of Billions in investment, access to global markets, and a real economic future is at stake.
The new Supreme Leader has talked about putting Americans, and Israeli’s at the bottom of the Persian Gulf, and not about turning over a new leaf.
The Reported intel from Pakistan states that Iran DOES have a nuclear weapon and DOES intend to use it if the conflict continues.
Is that an outward display of exaggeration. Or not? While Iran may lack an intercontinental missile capability and thus is unable to target the U.S. mainland, other options remain available to effect such a demonstration. This includes targeting Israel, or a U.S. base closer to home. It could even include attacking a fellow Muslim country as Iran has already shown by striking out at Kuwait claiming it was in retaliation for an earlier U.S. attack.
I personally don’t think this information is true because five minutes after they acquired a nuke, that information would be on its way to Tel Aviv.
If true, then Israel must act because Iran will not even think about using it.
If Iran actually has a nuclear weapon, I think they would have used it by now Targeting Israel. At any rate, I think that it’s tme for our military to show the leaders of Iran our TRUE MIGHT.
This is all the more reason to eradicate these lunatics, before they have 20 of ‘em.
The terror will stop when the Zionist masters of theft and genocide are defeated, kicked out of Palestine, and it is returned to its rightful owners, the Palestinian people. M
DeleteThe entire world, except the complicit USA, is turning against the Zionist butchers and thieves.
The greatest evil on the planet right now is the butcher Netanyahu and Zionism. And our government's support of their evil makes this nation guilty of great evil as well.
The very BEST 250th birthday present to America would be seeing
ReplyDeleteIlhan Omar and her Cohorts deported.
Spoken like the hateful bigoted asshole that you are.
Delete^^Only hugs anti-semites^^
Delete