Tucker Doesn't Believe in the Essential American Need to Promote and Affirm Israel! He's for Crazy Sh*t Like "America First" and Letting Israel Fight Their Own Wars! He's the Problem, Not Us! G_d Blesses Those Who Praise Israel!
Anti-Semitism isn't a Universal Principle like Race, Sex, or Religious Non-Essentialism, It's a Very Partisan One that Essentializes and then Privileges One Particular Major Semitic (Abrahamic) Religion (and NOT ALL 3).
So the Progressive Blogger took a large hit as Kamala took a whopping in the Electoral College. Let’s face it she was very lousy candidate, she sounded like an idiot when she spoke. She was just propped up for the gullible like the rest of the democratic loosers. Trump had a very methodical and intelligent campaign. He Beat Her, ass off LOL
ReplyDeleteMinus: Tucker Doesn't Believe in the Essential American Need to Promote and Affirm Israel! He's for Crazy Sh*t Like "America First" and Letting Israel Fight Their Own Wars! He's the Problem, Not Us! G_d Blesses Those Who Praise Israel!
ReplyDeleteAnd the purpose of your post is to strongly disagree with Tucker Carlson? Joe Biden timidly suggested that Israel shouldn't kill so many citizen in Gaza and caught Hell for it. donald trump affirmed that Turd-2 would help Bebe kill Gazan citizens MORE (and you cheered). And Turd-2 has used this issue to deport foreign students who voiced disagreement with the US government helping Israel killing civilians in Gaza. I think you cheered that as well.
I don't know, but I'm thinking that Tucker might have done the same at the time and criticized Joe Biden for not supporting Israel strongly enough. But that was only done to harm Joe Biden and not because he was expressing any thoughts he actually believed in.
Copilot response to my question regarding whether or not Tucker Carlson's position on Israel has been consistent...
🤖No — Tucker Carlson has not held a single, consistent position on U.S. support for Israel across administrations. His stance has shifted over time, and the search results explicitly confirm that his comments changed between 2020 and 2023.🛑
During the Joe Biden presidency: The administration isn't pro-Israel enough! (or at all).
During the donald trump 2nd presidency: The administration is TOO pro-Israel!
I agree with the second statement, but disagree with the first one. Because I'm consistent. Tucker Carlson (and you)? Not so much.
Israel was attacked by Hamas, an Iranian Proxy. If Israel wants to attack Iran in retaliation, I say, "go for it!". But I'll be damned if I'll attack Iran FOR them. Iran didn't attack America.
DeleteTucker, like me, says, "Meden Agan" with support for Israel (not "we must praise and support them to the very end", like Dinesh and Mike).
Deleteking donald ordered that their nuclear sites be bombed. The United States already attacked Iran for them. I don't recall that you were opposed to that.
DeleteNot supporting Israel to the bitter end isn't anti-semitism and most certainly it isn't "supporting Iran" or other semites (Moslems)..
Delete...and nukes can be used against America.
DeleteThis whole US-Iranian talks drama is about nukes, not Israel.
DeleteMinus: ...and nukes can be used against America.
DeleteSo why cancel the JOCPA? And does this mean that Iran would be justified in bombing United States nuclear sites? By saying our nukes could be used against them?
btw, going after universities for "allowing antisemitism" (aka allowing free speech) on campuses and extorting them was wrong and should stop... in your new opinion?
Switzerland was founded upon the principles of America's founders... Neutrality.
DeleteIf people want to call Israeli's names on US campus', have at it. I hope the Israeli's return the favour. Physical violence and harassment is another thing entirely.
DeleteAnd if Iran want to bomb US weapons labs, have at it... but prepared to have your country turned into a sheet of glass!
DeleteIt's a thought that when quartered is 3 parts coward (Shakespeare, "Hamlet")!
DeleteMinus: [be] ...prepared to have your country turned into a sheet of glass!
DeleteIran isn't my country. I was born in the United States and am a US citizen.
But if the the moron king nuked a country and the entire country became a "sheet of glass", I think there would be serious reprecussions. Like nuclear fallout, for example...
Delayed (Global) Fallout: Consists of finer particles that rise higher into the atmosphere, traveling vast distances over days, months, or years.
But donald did suggest nuking a hurricane, so he obviously has no idea what nuclear fallout is.
Similar to how he has no clue how tariffs work. Or DEI. But you don't understand how either of those work either.
lol! btw- The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has already expired. We're going to have to test our new nukes somewhere... and Iran might be a pretty good place, but a hurricane would probably trap a lot of the fallout in water particles and droplets (making it MUCH less dangerous). Jes sayin'!
Delete🤖Via Copilot...
Delete🚫The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has not “expired”.
The person you were talking to said: “The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has expired". That’s incorrect. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) exists. The U.S. has signed it but not ratified it. It has not expired. Most nations follow a voluntary moratorium on testing.
🌀The hurricane argument is scientifically wrong.
The blog author said: “A hurricane would trap fallout in water droplets and make it less dangerous". This is not how nuclear fallout behaves.
A hurricane would: Suck radioactive particles upward. Mix them into the storm. Spread them over a huge radius. Rain contaminated water over land and sea.
It would increase the area of contamination, not reduce it. Meteorologists and nuclear scientists have been extremely clear about this.🛑
Turns out that, like donald trump, you don't understand nuclear fallout either. Which is not a surprise.