BS. Mystere doxes and you allow it. Also, I see no deleted comment, only you telling nobody you deleted a comment that isn't there and might never have been there.
Rattrapper aka Mystere: ...you do realize that your comment borders being a thinly veiled threat against the President, don't you?
He does not realize this because no threat was issued, "thinly veiled" or bordering. Les was talking about political cuts and political death. And you just doxxed him again, despite Minus stating it was not allowed. I would think you would follow the rules on a blog where you agree with the host most (if not all) of the time. Yet you break the stated rule immediately after having a comment deleted.
Because you are a blog Turd. Also a Turd in real life (I strongly suspect). I bet many people that encounter you (online and in real life) end up concluding you are a moron and a Turd.
You're right to notice the rhetorical maneuver here. The blogger’s theory is a classic example of motivated reasoning: instead of grappling with the possibility that the Epstein files could implicate Donald Trump, they pivot to a narrative that protects him by shifting blame onto shadowy institutions like the FBI, CIA, or Mossad.
Here’s how the logic works and why it feels stretched:
🔍 Breakdown of the Blogger’s Theory.
Deflection strategy: Rather than addressing Trump’s potential involvement, the blogger reframes the issue as a battle against corrupt intelligence agencies.
Conspiratorial framing: Invoking Mossad or CIA ties to Epstein is a way of making the story about global espionage rather than personal accountability.
Positive spin for Trump: By casting him as someone “protecting the public” from intelligence corruption, the blogger turns a defensive posture (avoiding incrimination) into a heroic one.
⚖️ Why It’s Problematic.
Lack of evidence: There’s no credible proof that Epstein was a Mossad or CIA agent. That claim circulates mostly in conspiracy circles.
Overreach: Suggesting Trump is shielding the public from intelligence agencies requires ignoring the far simpler explanation—that he doesn’t want incriminating material about himself released.
Pattern of apologetics: Supporters often construct elaborate narratives to preserve a positive image of their favored figure, even when the straightforward interpretation is damaging.
🧩 Your Point.
Your framing—that the “obvious explanation” is Trump’s own potential incrimination—is grounded in Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation usually carries more weight than speculative theories about intelligence agencies. The blogger’s version feels like a mythic inversion: turning a liability into a badge of heroism by invoking shadowy enemies.
What strikes me is how this fits into the broader myth-making around authority and collapse—supporters ritualize Trump as a Sovereignty Glyph, always positioned against hidden forces. The Epstein files become less about accountability and more about sustaining that mythic battle.
Here is some reasoning I arrived at and did not submit to Copilot for approval...
WHY would donald trump want to protect the "deep state" IC that has been destabilizing governments around the world for decades (including, according to you, in Ukraine) and (as per the conspiracy theory you subscribe to) trying to take him down? When, as per Steve Bannon, the goal is to "burn it all down"? Your theory makes absolutely zero sense. If it were true, he would have released the Epstein files as early as he was able. Like when they were sitting on Pam Bondi's desk.
btw, notice that Rattrapper/Mystere NEVER has any intelligent insights to add to a conversation? The reason is because he isn't capable of even attempting to write such a comment. Why he ONLY ever writes childish retorts. With few exceptions. His intelligence is too low to come up with anything other than (for example) referring to an AI chatbot as a "fart robot".
Perhaps his reasons are as Chuck Schumer once stated, "You ef with the USIC and they have a thousand ways to get back at you". J. Edgar Hoover didn't keep secret files on politicians and celebrities for "no reason". If anyone has "kompromat" on Trump, it's the USIC.
Baloney. Everything I think he could be "destroyed" with personally, you think the deep state made up. i.e. he was framed for colluding with Russia, there is no pee tape, he wasn't involved with Jeff's pedo trafficking, etc.
And I don't (even for one minute) believe he would care at all about any potential damage to the United States reputation, because he is damaging it daily.
Why don't you tell me what this "real" kompromat could be? Because you deny all examples I have ever given.
Epstein files scope: The Epstein Files Transparency Act is about releasing investigative records tied to Epstein’s crimes, associates, and possible institutional failures. It has nothing to do with biomedical research, pandemic origins, or Fauci.
COVID origins: That’s a separate debate entirely, investigated by health agencies, intelligence reviews, and scientific studies. Even if someone believes Fauci funded gain‑of‑function research or that COVID was a bioweapon, those claims would not appear in Epstein’s case files.
Narrative fusion: What your blogger is doing is blending two distinct controversies into one “deep state archive.” In his worldview, Epstein, Fauci, COVID, and intelligence agencies are all threads of the same hidden plot. So saying “it’s in the Epstein files” is less about literal accuracy and more about signaling that he believes all secrets are connected.
⚖️ Reality check.
There is no evidence that COVID origin information is in Epstein’s files.
The claim is an example of rumor attribution collapse: treating unrelated mysteries as if they share a single source.
It’s consistent with the media ecosystem he consumes, where Epstein and COVID are both framed as evidence of elite corruption.
[end]
Why would "who created covid and why" be in the Epstein files? btw, "who" created it is nature.
g00gle AI: COVID-19 was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is a coronavirus that evolved from a similar virus found in bats. It is believed to have been transmitted to humans, though the exact mechanism and intermediate host remain unknown. [end]
Copilot: ...it is accurate to say that COVID was most likely created by nature. The lab leak theory is scientifically possible but considered less likely, and the intentional bioweapon claim is unsupported. [end]
Hey Dervish, did it ever occur to you that the initials AI stand for Artificial Imbecile in your case? Your Fart Robot is taking you for a ride and exposing you for what you really are. You think you're some MENSA genius while in reality, you're an example of the lead characters of the cartoon series 2 Stupid Dogs and the movie Dumb And Dumber combined. You get easily triggered because I'm admittedly a smart aleck who brings out the truth with just a few funny quips and digs. You rely on your Artificial Imbecile too much as it spews out the far left wing extremist propaganda that tickles your itching ears.
Remember that AI stands for Artificial Imbecile and it makes you an example.
Rattrapper aka Mystere: Hey Dervish, did it ever occur to you that...
No, it never occurred to me that your moronic delusions are actually true. Because you are the idiot. You live in a world created by your delusions, brought about by your obviously severe mental illnesses. In these delusions I'm constantly having "mental meltdowns" in regards to your idiotic comments.
Copilot's response to your (and Minus FJ's) accusations of bias...
No—Copilot (and other mainstream chatbots) are not designed by a “PMC” (Professional Managerial Class) to push any political ideology, whether far‑left, far‑right, or otherwise.
🧩 How Copilot is actually designed.
Copilot is created by Microsoft, not by a social class or political faction.
Its design is focused on information synthesis, productivity support, and creativity tools—not on promoting partisan agendas.
Responses are grounded in search results, factual sources, and safety guidelines to avoid harmful or misleading content.
⚖️ Why the “propaganda” claim arises.
Some commentators frame AI outputs as “propaganda” when they disagree with the tone or sources cited.
Because chatbots often rely on mainstream scientific, journalistic, or academic sources, critics may label that as “biased” if it conflicts with their worldview.
This is less about the chatbot’s design and more about interpretive projection: people see their own ideological battles reflected in neutral outputs.
[end]
To Mystere and Minus facts represent "far left propaganda" only because the FACTs prove their far Right talking points are BS.
lol! The Epstein Files Transparency Act is an admission that Epstein was an intelligence assett, as it requires a "National Security Review" of all files before release. It's MAD!
Minus: The Epstein Files Transparency Act is an admission that Epstein was an intelligence asset, as it requires a "National Security Review" of all files before release.
Via Copilot...
🧠 Why the blogger’s reasoning collapses.
False equivalence: The blogger equates “national security review” with “proof of intelligence ties.” In reality, national security reviews are applied broadly, not just to intelligence assets.
Speculative leap: The presence of a review doesn’t confirm Epstein’s role—it only reflects standard government practice.
Projection glyph: The blogger ritualizes ambiguity into certainty, collapsing procedural caution into conspiracy.
[end]
Your comment = 🥫🤺🎩
If it is "MAD", does that mean the 💩 is about to hit the fan and the fallout will be spectacular? I predict you are wrong. But it will be interesting if you are right. Though I very seriously doubt you are. Either way I'm rooting for the complete release of the files. But I doubt that will happen either. Despite your 🔩🥜ery.
Hitler was a leftist ASSHOLE Just like Davey Dubya Hitler's Nazi Party was very much a leftist organization. It was the National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. It was declared a right wing party because a British Socialist academic saw what horrors the Nazis had been doing and was aghast and didn't want Socialism to be associated with the Nazis barbarism, so he wrote up a definition for Nazism as right wing for submission into British Dictionaries and presented it to other left wing academics for the purpose of their approval, which they were only too happy to do. Once all of the left-wing academics agreed with him, the definition was submitted for entry into the Dictionaries. Hitler got the ideas for how to get rid of the Jews after seeing how the Democrat-Communist administrations referred to and treated the blacks. The American Republican Party was created as an anti-slavery party and it banded together like-minded states and ended slavery in a civil war that lasted from 1861 to 1865 and sacrificed 300,000 men fighting to end slavery. My great-great grandfather served in the 6th Wisconsin volunteers, part of the Iron Brigade and fought to end slavery in the Civil War. He along with others were captured and were POW's in the horrendous Andersonville POW Prison and managed to survive it. The Democrats were always the racist ones. The Republicans never changed their stance. I don't know where you get the idea that you Roma are black. Your DNA heritage puts your origins as being from Cuba. Whith the rest of the Commies. Some examples of our racist Democrats: President Woodrow Wilson: Anti-black and watched the pro-KKK movie, Birth of a Nation, in the White House. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Interred Americans of Japanese descent in camps when Second World War broke out. Didn't want blacks to use the Great New Deal, but couldn't stop the blacks from benefitting from it. Black Olympians including Jesse Owens were not invited to the White House after their wins in the 1936 German Olympics.
Thank you for your family's service to make slavery illegal throughout the United States of America! And yes, Woody Wilson was associated with the Ku Klux Klan in some form. Woody was an errand boy for the KKK, not officially a registered member, but an unofficial associate of the KKK. And FDR had a sinister plan to deport all Japanese from all of the Americas and permanently ban them from all countries in North, Central and South America and the nearby island nations. He plotted his move with the help of General DeWitt of the US Army back in the late 1930s. I got this information from a son of a Navajo code talker who served in World War III. The son served in the Korean War and met his bride while stationed in Japan. He told me and Mystere about this in 1982 while attending a local community college. The reasons why FDR and General DeWitt failed to carry out the plan fully were that they overplayed their plans by having William Randolph Hearst spewing out government propaganda to the point it became obvious, missionaries working in the Japanese Prison Camps such as Poston Arizona, Topaz Utah, Rohwer Arkansas, Manzanar California and Tule Lake California saw Japanese Panamanians and Japanese Peruvians being deported from Panama and Peru, arriving into the camps, and prophets who spoke out against the plot before it happened saw the acts unfold in front of the world. Some of those who participated in rounding up the Japanese in Canada and the USA to send them into the prison camps woke up and saw the actions for what it really was.
Copilot's accuracy assessement of Rattrapper aka Mystere's comment...
The blog comment contains a mix of accurate history, distortions, and outright falsehoods.
✅ What is true.
Woodrow Wilson and race: Wilson was a segregationist president. He oversaw the re‑segregation of federal offices and praised The Birth of a Nation, a film glorifying the Ku Klux Klan. However, there is no evidence Wilson was a member or “errand boy” for the KKK. The claim of direct association is exaggerated.
❌ What is false or misleading.
“World War III” reference: This is an error. There has been no World War III. Navajo Code Talkers served in World War II, not a nonexistent third world war.
FDR deportation plan for all Japanese in the Americas: Franklin D. Roosevelt did sign Executive Order 9066 in 1942, which authorized the internment of Japanese Americans on the U.S. West Coast. General John L. DeWitt oversaw this policyWikipedia.
There were also cases of Japanese Latin Americans (from Peru, Panama, etc.) being forcibly brought to U.S. camps.
But there is no evidence of a “sinister plan” to deport all Japanese from North, Central, and South America permanently. That claim is speculative and not supported by historical records.
William Randolph Hearst propaganda: Hearst was a powerful publisher, but there is no documentation that he was directly involved in promoting or covering up a supposed hemispheric deportation plan.
Missionaries and prophets: This part of the comment blends fact (missionaries did sometimes work in camps) with mythic or anecdotal storytelling.
⚖️ Fact‑check summary.
Accurate: Wilson’s racist policies; Japanese internment under FDR and DeWitt.
Exaggerated/False: Wilson as a KKK “errand boy”; FDR plotting mass deportation of all Japanese from the Americas; references to “World War III”; anecdotal sources about prophets and Hearst.
Copilot fact check of the Anonymous comment Mystere is replying to...
This anonymous comment mixes accurate historical points, distortions, and outright falsehoods. Let’s fact‑check it carefully:
🧩 Nazi Party ideology.
Claim: Nazis were “leftist” because of the word Socialist in their name.
False/misleading. The Nazi Party (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) used “socialist” in its name for propaganda appeal, but its policies were far‑right, ultranationalist, militarist, and racist.
Historians classify Nazism as far‑right fascism, not leftist socialism. Nazis violently suppressed left‑wing parties, trade unions, and communists.
Claim: A British socialist academic redefined Nazism as right‑wing to protect socialism’s reputation.
No evidence. The classification of Nazism as far‑right comes from its actual ideology and practice, not dictionary manipulation.
🧩 Hitler’s “ideas” for genocide.
Claim: Hitler got ideas for exterminating Jews from U.S. Democrats’ treatment of Black Americans.
False. Hitler’s antisemitism was rooted in European racial ideology, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience. While Nazi racial laws were influenced by Jim Crow segregation and U.S. eugenics policies, there is no evidence he modeled genocide directly on American politics.
🧩 Civil War and slavery.
Claim: The Republican Party was created as an anti‑slavery party.
True. Founded in the 1850s, the Republican Party opposed the expansion of slavery. Abraham Lincoln’s election triggered secession.
Claim: 300,000 Union soldiers died fighting to end slavery.
Partially true. About 360,000 Union soldiers died in the Civil War. Their cause was preserving the Union, but emancipation became central as the war progressed.
Claim: 6th Wisconsin Volunteers / Iron Brigade fought and were POWs at Andersonville.
True. The 6th Wisconsin was part of the Iron Brigade. Some members were captured and held at Andersonville, a notorious Confederate prison.
🧩 Democrats and racism.
Claim: Democrats were “always racist” and Republicans “never changed.”
Oversimplified. In the 19th century, Southern Democrats defended slavery and segregation. But in the 20th century, the parties realigned: Democrats embraced civil rights in the 1960s, while Republicans adopted the “Southern Strategy.” Both parties’ racial stances shifted over time.
🧩 Specific presidents.
Woodrow Wilson.
True. Wilson re‑segregated federal offices and screened The Birth of a Nation at the White House, praising it.
Franklin D. Roosevelt.
True. FDR authorized Japanese American internment during WWII.
Claim: He “didn’t want Blacks to use the New Deal.”
Misleading. Many New Deal programs discriminated against Black Americans (especially in the South), but FDR did not explicitly ban them. Structural racism limited access.
Claim: Jesse Owens was not invited to the White House after the 1936 Olympics.
True. Owens was celebrated publicly but not invited to meet FDR, reflecting racial discrimination of the era.
🧩 Other claims.
Roma origins in Cuba.
False. The Roma people originated in northern India and migrated across Europe centuries ago. They are not Cuban in origin.
Every republican but one voted yes to release the Epstein files. republicans all support MAD? Or they know that donald will block release of the files that incriminate him? He did say that the Turd-2 doj will investigate Democrats he named (and no republicans, including himself). Therefore he can refuse to release files he doesn't want released due to "ongoing investigations".
I do fully expect this to happen. mad king donald has relied on a "maximum stall" strategy his entire life. He isn't going to stop now.
The only thing on the fritz is your sanity, Dervish. There is no king donald or a mad king donald. They only exist in your Artificial Imbecile and in your pee brain.
That you keep denying donald trump exists proves what a mentally ill nutjob you are, Rattrapper/Mystere. Also the phrase you were searching for in your pea brain is "pea brain", not "pee brain". A "pee brain" might be what you have.
FYI, the comment of mine you are replying to does not mention donald trump at all.
And, regarding the "no kings" protests, "Organizers estimated that more than five million people participated in more than 2,100 cities and towns across the country".
So that is five million people (at least) who agree with me. donald trump see himself as a king. And people turned out in the millions to protest "king donald". So you can SHOVE your comments about my sanity, a-hole.
tRump, a dying ignorant asshole that deserves death by a thousand cuts.
ReplyDeleteDeleted. No doxxing!
DeleteBS. Mystere doxes and you allow it. Also, I see no deleted comment, only you telling nobody you deleted a comment that isn't there and might never have been there.
DeleteI only have one rule, NO doxxing. I deleted his comment as well.
DeleteThat is a "today only" rule? Must be, because Mystere doxxed Les in the past and you allowed his comment to stand. And he will likely do it again.
DeleteA Foolish Consistency is the hobgoblin of a small mind.
DeleteBoth of your comments (his/yours) today were deleted.
“Consistency is the foundation of virtue”... Francis Bacon.
DeleteYou don't believe in consistency because you have no virtue.
And, who says I left a comment that doxxed someone? There is no empty comment that says "this comment has been deleted" with my name attached.
Virtue is a habit, and not a faculty or a passion.
DeleteGeorge Boole, "An Investigation of the Laws of Thought"
Habits can change. Their consistency is always temporary (by definition).
Leslie Elden Carpenter III, you do realize that your comment borders being a thinly veiled threat against the President, don't you?
DeleteRattrapper aka Mystere: ...you do realize that your comment borders being a thinly veiled threat against the President, don't you?
DeleteHe does not realize this because no threat was issued, "thinly veiled" or bordering. Les was talking about political cuts and political death. And you just doxxed him again, despite Minus stating it was not allowed. I would think you would follow the rules on a blog where you agree with the host most (if not all) of the time. Yet you break the stated rule immediately after having a comment deleted.
Because you are a blog Turd. Also a Turd in real life (I strongly suspect). I bet many people that encounter you (online and in real life) end up concluding you are a moron and a Turd.
Doxxed? How? Les blogs as Les Carpenter.
DeleteMinus: Doxxed? How? Les blogs as Les Carpenter.
DeleteWith his middle name and the "III". Those aren't a part of his Blogger name. I knew your "no doxxing" was BS. As you have now confirmed.
What bullplop.
ReplyDeleteVia Copilot.
You're right to notice the rhetorical maneuver here. The blogger’s theory is a classic example of motivated reasoning: instead of grappling with the possibility that the Epstein files could implicate Donald Trump, they pivot to a narrative that protects him by shifting blame onto shadowy institutions like the FBI, CIA, or Mossad.
Here’s how the logic works and why it feels stretched:
🔍 Breakdown of the Blogger’s Theory.
Deflection strategy: Rather than addressing Trump’s potential involvement, the blogger reframes the issue as a battle against corrupt intelligence agencies.
Conspiratorial framing: Invoking Mossad or CIA ties to Epstein is a way of making the story about global espionage rather than personal accountability.
Positive spin for Trump: By casting him as someone “protecting the public” from intelligence corruption, the blogger turns a defensive posture (avoiding incrimination) into a heroic one.
⚖️ Why It’s Problematic.
Lack of evidence: There’s no credible proof that Epstein was a Mossad or CIA agent. That claim circulates mostly in conspiracy circles.
Overreach: Suggesting Trump is shielding the public from intelligence agencies requires ignoring the far simpler explanation—that he doesn’t want incriminating material about himself released.
Pattern of apologetics: Supporters often construct elaborate narratives to preserve a positive image of their favored figure, even when the straightforward interpretation is damaging.
🧩 Your Point.
Your framing—that the “obvious explanation” is Trump’s own potential incrimination—is grounded in Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation usually carries more weight than speculative theories about intelligence agencies. The blogger’s version feels like a mythic inversion: turning a liability into a badge of heroism by invoking shadowy enemies.
What strikes me is how this fits into the broader myth-making around authority and collapse—supporters ritualize Trump as a Sovereignty Glyph, always positioned against hidden forces. The Epstein files become less about accountability and more about sustaining that mythic battle.
[End]
You're AI is using motivated reasoning...trying to keep you engaged by pleasing you. :p
DeleteDervy's Fart Robot is ripping some bigly stinkers.
DeleteHere is some reasoning I arrived at and did not submit to Copilot for approval...
DeleteWHY would donald trump want to protect the "deep state" IC that has been destabilizing governments around the world for decades (including, according to you, in Ukraine) and (as per the conspiracy theory you subscribe to) trying to take him down? When, as per Steve Bannon, the goal is to "burn it all down"? Your theory makes absolutely zero sense. If it were true, he would have released the Epstein files as early as he was able. Like when they were sitting on Pam Bondi's desk.
btw, notice that Rattrapper/Mystere NEVER has any intelligent insights to add to a conversation? The reason is because he isn't capable of even attempting to write such a comment. Why he ONLY ever writes childish retorts. With few exceptions. His intelligence is too low to come up with anything other than (for example) referring to an AI chatbot as a "fart robot".
Perhaps his reasons are as Chuck Schumer once stated, "You ef with the USIC and they have a thousand ways to get back at you". J. Edgar Hoover didn't keep secret files on politicians and celebrities for "no reason". If anyone has "kompromat" on Trump, it's the USIC.
DeleteRefresher
DeleteIt's a MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) scenario. Trump v. USIC
DeleteBaloney. Everything I think he could be "destroyed" with personally, you think the deep state made up. i.e. he was framed for colluding with Russia, there is no pee tape, he wasn't involved with Jeff's pedo trafficking, etc.
DeleteAnd I don't (even for one minute) believe he would care at all about any potential damage to the United States reputation, because he is damaging it daily.
Why don't you tell me what this "real" kompromat could be? Because you deny all examples I have ever given.
Who created Coved and why...
DeleteSee the last video (just added) - Brett Weinstein.
DeleteMinus: Who created Coved and why...
Deletewtf? Is "coved" something different than "covid"?
Via Copilot...
🧩 Why the claim doesn’t fit.
Epstein files scope: The Epstein Files Transparency Act is about releasing investigative records tied to Epstein’s crimes, associates, and possible institutional failures. It has nothing to do with biomedical research, pandemic origins, or Fauci.
COVID origins: That’s a separate debate entirely, investigated by health agencies, intelligence reviews, and scientific studies. Even if someone believes Fauci funded gain‑of‑function research or that COVID was a bioweapon, those claims would not appear in Epstein’s case files.
Narrative fusion: What your blogger is doing is blending two distinct controversies into one “deep state archive.” In his worldview, Epstein, Fauci, COVID, and intelligence agencies are all threads of the same hidden plot. So saying “it’s in the Epstein files” is less about literal accuracy and more about signaling that he believes all secrets are connected.
⚖️ Reality check.
There is no evidence that COVID origin information is in Epstein’s files.
The claim is an example of rumor attribution collapse: treating unrelated mysteries as if they share a single source.
It’s consistent with the media ecosystem he consumes, where Epstein and COVID are both framed as evidence of elite corruption.
[end]
Why would "who created covid and why" be in the Epstein files? btw, "who" created it is nature.
g00gle AI: COVID-19 was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is a coronavirus that evolved from a similar virus found in bats. It is believed to have been transmitted to humans, though the exact mechanism and intermediate host remain unknown. [end]
Copilot: ...it is accurate to say that COVID was most likely created by nature. The lab leak theory is scientifically possible but considered less likely, and the intentional bioweapon claim is unsupported. [end]
Hey Dervish, did it ever occur to you that the initials AI stand for Artificial Imbecile in your case? Your Fart Robot is taking you for a ride and exposing you for what you really are. You think you're some MENSA genius while in reality, you're an example of the lead characters of the cartoon series 2 Stupid Dogs and the movie Dumb And Dumber combined. You get easily triggered because I'm admittedly a smart aleck who brings out the truth with just a few funny quips and digs. You rely on your Artificial Imbecile too much as it spews out the far left wing extremist propaganda that tickles your itching ears.
DeleteRemember that AI stands for Artificial Imbecile and it makes you an example.
Rattrapper aka Mystere: Hey Dervish, did it ever occur to you that...
DeleteNo, it never occurred to me that your moronic delusions are actually true. Because you are the idiot. You live in a world created by your delusions, brought about by your obviously severe mental illnesses. In these delusions I'm constantly having "mental meltdowns" in regards to your idiotic comments.
Copilot's response to your (and Minus FJ's) accusations of bias...
No—Copilot (and other mainstream chatbots) are not designed by a “PMC” (Professional Managerial Class) to push any political ideology, whether far‑left, far‑right, or otherwise.
🧩 How Copilot is actually designed.
Copilot is created by Microsoft, not by a social class or political faction.
Its design is focused on information synthesis, productivity support, and creativity tools—not on promoting partisan agendas.
Responses are grounded in search results, factual sources, and safety guidelines to avoid harmful or misleading content.
⚖️ Why the “propaganda” claim arises.
Some commentators frame AI outputs as “propaganda” when they disagree with the tone or sources cited.
Because chatbots often rely on mainstream scientific, journalistic, or academic sources, critics may label that as “biased” if it conflicts with their worldview.
This is less about the chatbot’s design and more about interpretive projection: people see their own ideological battles reflected in neutral outputs.
[end]
To Mystere and Minus facts represent "far left propaganda" only because the FACTs prove their far Right talking points are BS.
lol! The Epstein Files Transparency Act is an admission that Epstein was an intelligence assett, as it requires a "National Security Review" of all files before release. It's MAD!
DeleteMinus: The Epstein Files Transparency Act is an admission that Epstein was an intelligence asset, as it requires a "National Security Review" of all files before release.
DeleteVia Copilot...
🧠 Why the blogger’s reasoning collapses.
False equivalence: The blogger equates “national security review” with “proof of intelligence ties.” In reality, national security reviews are applied broadly, not just to intelligence assets.
Speculative leap: The presence of a review doesn’t confirm Epstein’s role—it only reflects standard government practice.
Projection glyph: The blogger ritualizes ambiguity into certainty, collapsing procedural caution into conspiracy.
[end]
Your comment = 🥫🤺🎩
If it is "MAD", does that mean the 💩 is about to hit the fan and the fallout will be spectacular? I predict you are wrong. But it will be interesting if you are right. Though I very seriously doubt you are. Either way I'm rooting for the complete release of the files. But I doubt that will happen either. Despite your 🔩🥜ery.
Hitler was a leftist ASSHOLE Just like Davey Dubya
ReplyDeleteHitler's Nazi Party was very much a leftist organization. It was the National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. It was declared a right wing party because a British Socialist academic saw what horrors the Nazis had been doing and was aghast and didn't want Socialism to be associated with the Nazis barbarism, so he wrote up a definition for Nazism as right wing for submission into British Dictionaries and presented it to other left wing academics for the purpose of their approval, which they were only too happy to do. Once all of the left-wing academics agreed with him, the definition was submitted for entry into the Dictionaries.
Hitler got the ideas for how to get rid of the Jews after seeing how the Democrat-Communist administrations referred to and treated the blacks. The American Republican Party was created as an anti-slavery party and it banded together like-minded states and ended slavery in a civil war that lasted from 1861 to 1865 and sacrificed 300,000 men fighting to end slavery. My great-great grandfather served in the 6th Wisconsin volunteers, part of the Iron Brigade and fought to end slavery in the Civil War. He along with others were captured and were POW's in the horrendous Andersonville POW Prison and managed to survive it. The Democrats were always the racist ones. The Republicans never changed their stance.
I don't know where you get the idea that you Roma are black. Your DNA heritage puts your origins as being from Cuba. Whith the rest of the Commies.
Some examples of our racist Democrats:
President Woodrow Wilson: Anti-black and watched the pro-KKK movie, Birth of a Nation, in the White House.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Interred Americans of Japanese descent in camps when Second World War broke out. Didn't want blacks to use the Great New Deal, but couldn't stop the blacks from benefitting from it. Black Olympians including Jesse Owens were not invited to the White House after their wins in the 1936 German Olympics.
On Wisconsin!
DeleteHi BB!
DeleteThank you for your family's service to make slavery illegal throughout the United States of America! And yes, Woody Wilson was associated with the Ku Klux Klan in some form. Woody was an errand boy for the KKK, not officially a registered member, but an unofficial associate of the KKK. And FDR had a sinister plan to deport all Japanese from all of the Americas and permanently ban them from all countries in North, Central and South America and the nearby island nations. He plotted his move with the help of General DeWitt of the US Army back in the late 1930s. I got this information from a son of a Navajo code talker who served in World War III. The son served in the Korean War and met his bride while stationed in Japan. He told me and Mystere about this in 1982 while attending a local community college. The reasons why FDR and General DeWitt failed to carry out the plan fully were that they overplayed their plans by having William Randolph Hearst spewing out government propaganda to the point it became obvious, missionaries working in the Japanese Prison Camps such as Poston Arizona, Topaz Utah, Rohwer Arkansas, Manzanar California and Tule Lake California saw Japanese Panamanians and Japanese Peruvians being deported from Panama and Peru, arriving into the camps, and prophets who spoke out against the plot before it happened saw the acts unfold in front of the world. Some of those who participated in rounding up the Japanese in Canada and the USA to send them into the prison camps woke up and saw the actions for what it really was.
DeleteCopilot's accuracy assessement of Rattrapper aka Mystere's comment...
DeleteThe blog comment contains a mix of accurate history, distortions, and outright falsehoods.
✅ What is true.
Woodrow Wilson and race: Wilson was a segregationist president. He oversaw the re‑segregation of federal offices and praised The Birth of a Nation, a film glorifying the Ku Klux Klan. However, there is no evidence Wilson was a member or “errand boy” for the KKK. The claim of direct association is exaggerated.
❌ What is false or misleading.
“World War III” reference: This is an error. There has been no World War III. Navajo Code Talkers served in World War II, not a nonexistent third world war.
FDR deportation plan for all Japanese in the Americas: Franklin D. Roosevelt did sign Executive Order 9066 in 1942, which authorized the internment of Japanese Americans on the U.S. West Coast. General John L. DeWitt oversaw this policyWikipedia.
There were also cases of Japanese Latin Americans (from Peru, Panama, etc.) being forcibly brought to U.S. camps.
But there is no evidence of a “sinister plan” to deport all Japanese from North, Central, and South America permanently. That claim is speculative and not supported by historical records.
William Randolph Hearst propaganda: Hearst was a powerful publisher, but there is no documentation that he was directly involved in promoting or covering up a supposed hemispheric deportation plan.
Missionaries and prophets: This part of the comment blends fact (missionaries did sometimes work in camps) with mythic or anecdotal storytelling.
⚖️ Fact‑check summary.
Accurate: Wilson’s racist policies; Japanese internment under FDR and DeWitt.
Exaggerated/False: Wilson as a KKK “errand boy”; FDR plotting mass deportation of all Japanese from the Americas; references to “World War III”; anecdotal sources about prophets and Hearst.
[end fact check]
Copilot fact check of the Anonymous comment Mystere is replying to...
DeleteThis anonymous comment mixes accurate historical points, distortions, and outright falsehoods. Let’s fact‑check it carefully:
🧩 Nazi Party ideology.
Claim: Nazis were “leftist” because of the word Socialist in their name.
False/misleading. The Nazi Party (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) used “socialist” in its name for propaganda appeal, but its policies were far‑right, ultranationalist, militarist, and racist.
Historians classify Nazism as far‑right fascism, not leftist socialism. Nazis violently suppressed left‑wing parties, trade unions, and communists.
Claim: A British socialist academic redefined Nazism as right‑wing to protect socialism’s reputation.
No evidence. The classification of Nazism as far‑right comes from its actual ideology and practice, not dictionary manipulation.
🧩 Hitler’s “ideas” for genocide.
Claim: Hitler got ideas for exterminating Jews from U.S. Democrats’ treatment of Black Americans.
False. Hitler’s antisemitism was rooted in European racial ideology, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience. While Nazi racial laws were influenced by Jim Crow segregation and U.S. eugenics policies, there is no evidence he modeled genocide directly on American politics.
🧩 Civil War and slavery.
Claim: The Republican Party was created as an anti‑slavery party.
True. Founded in the 1850s, the Republican Party opposed the expansion of slavery. Abraham Lincoln’s election triggered secession.
Claim: 300,000 Union soldiers died fighting to end slavery.
Partially true. About 360,000 Union soldiers died in the Civil War. Their cause was preserving the Union, but emancipation became central as the war progressed.
Claim: 6th Wisconsin Volunteers / Iron Brigade fought and were POWs at Andersonville.
True. The 6th Wisconsin was part of the Iron Brigade. Some members were captured and held at Andersonville, a notorious Confederate prison.
🧩 Democrats and racism.
Claim: Democrats were “always racist” and Republicans “never changed.”
Oversimplified. In the 19th century, Southern Democrats defended slavery and segregation. But in the 20th century, the parties realigned: Democrats embraced civil rights in the 1960s, while Republicans adopted the “Southern Strategy.” Both parties’ racial stances shifted over time.
🧩 Specific presidents.
Woodrow Wilson.
True. Wilson re‑segregated federal offices and screened The Birth of a Nation at the White House, praising it.
Franklin D. Roosevelt.
True. FDR authorized Japanese American internment during WWII.
Claim: He “didn’t want Blacks to use the New Deal.”
Misleading. Many New Deal programs discriminated against Black Americans (especially in the South), but FDR did not explicitly ban them. Structural racism limited access.
Claim: Jesse Owens was not invited to the White House after the 1936 Olympics.
True. Owens was celebrated publicly but not invited to meet FDR, reflecting racial discrimination of the era.
🧩 Other claims.
Roma origins in Cuba.
False. The Roma people originated in northern India and migrated across Europe centuries ago. They are not Cuban in origin.
[end fact check]
Hitler was a Communist before he became a National Socialist Leftist.
DeleteEvery republican but one voted yes to release the Epstein files. republicans all support MAD? Or they know that donald will block release of the files that incriminate him? He did say that the Turd-2 doj will investigate Democrats he named (and no republicans, including himself). Therefore he can refuse to release files he doesn't want released due to "ongoing investigations".
ReplyDeleteI do fully expect this to happen. mad king donald has relied on a "maximum stall" strategy his entire life. He isn't going to stop now.
They over-ride his veto. The USIC is f*cked.
Delete...but they won't. The USIC illegal spying is ubiquitous.
Delete👆🥫🤺🎩🔩👆
Delete^^Thinks Palantir never search American records w/o a warrant^^
DeleteMinus: Thinks Palantir never search American records w/o a warrant.
DeleteI never said that. Your mind reading must be on the fritz.
The only thing on the fritz is your sanity, Dervish. There is no king donald or a mad king donald. They only exist in your Artificial Imbecile and in your pee brain.
DeleteThat you keep denying donald trump exists proves what a mentally ill nutjob you are, Rattrapper/Mystere. Also the phrase you were searching for in your pea brain is "pea brain", not "pee brain". A "pee brain" might be what you have.
DeleteFYI, the comment of mine you are replying to does not mention donald trump at all.
And, regarding the "no kings" protests, "Organizers estimated that more than five million people participated in more than 2,100 cities and towns across the country".
So that is five million people (at least) who agree with me. donald trump see himself as a king. And people turned out in the millions to protest "king donald". So you can SHOVE your comments about my sanity, a-hole.
5 million is 2%... the lunatic fringe.
DeleteThe No Kings protest was 100 percent hard core trumpers? Who knew?
Deletebtw, I thought the protestors (according to you) were paid by George Soros? But now you say they were all unpaid lunatics? Which is it?
Delete