...but hey, Black People can't be Evil or do bad things, right? They have no agency. The Euro-centric view is that only white people have agency. So book your African Vacation today. Blacks are "de-caffeinated" humans. All their harmful ingredients (whiteness) have been artificially and ideologically removed They can't hurt you. Trust me!
ps - DNC unwritten rule, NEVER criticize a minority. Affirm, Include, and move along...
A distraction from the KSoA 's self inflicted and growing problems.
ReplyDeleteBecause we should ignore the ethnic cleansing of Islamic Palestinians in Israel, and Christians in Nigeria...
ReplyDelete...oh that's right. Muslims "good"... Christians "bad". Or in your case, all religions "BAD". @@
...and only white people can be "evil".
ReplyDeleteVia Copilot...
ReplyDeleteWhat you’re seeing there is a rhetorical maneuver—the blogger is collapsing very different conflicts (Israel/Palestine, Nigeria’s farmer‑herder violence, U.S. racial discourse) into a single grievance narrative.
🧠 How the Argument Works.
Stacking crises: He invokes Palestinians and Nigerian Christians as examples of “ignored” suffering.
Binary framing: He reduces complex conflicts into “Muslims good / Christians bad,” which oversimplifies reality.
Victimhood pivot: He then ties it back to his U.S. narrative -- “only White people can be evil” -- suggesting that global tragedies are proof of unfair blame placed on White Americans.
⚖️ Problems with This Framing.
False equivalence: Ethnic cleansing in Israel/Palestine and violence in Nigeria are distinct, with different causes and actors. Treating them as interchangeable erases nuance.
Selective outrage: He highlights Christian suffering but ignores Muslim victims in Nigeria, or Jewish/Christian/Muslim complexities in Israel/Palestine.
Identity politics inversion: By claiming “only White people can be evil,” he reframes systemic critiques of racism as persecution of Whites, which is not supported by evidence.
🪞 Symbolic Reading.
This is a Glyph of Companionship Override in Reverse: instead of softening conflict into togetherness, he hardens disparate conflicts into a single grievance spectacle. It’s a Ceremony of Conflation, where multiple tragedies are collapsed into a rhetorical weapon for domestic identity politics.
In short: The blogger’s post isn’t really about Nigeria or Palestine—it’s about reinforcing his narrative that White men are unfairly demonized. He uses global conflicts as props to dramatize that grievance, which risks misrepresenting the actual situations on the ground.
[end]
I never have seen Les write that Muslims are all good and Christians are all bad. Or that only White people can be evil.
This false. Also, your absurd strawman. My view is that people in general are pretty shitty. All of them, regardless of race or religion. Though it is in the United States that we have a problem with shitty White Christians.
By the way, Copilot also told me that "Armed groups, including jihadist militants like Boko Haram and ISWAP, have killed thousands of civilians, many of them Christians. But not only Christians -- Muslim communities have also been attacked, displaced, and killed".
The underlying cause is "Land and resource disputes between nomadic herders (often Fulani, who are Muslim) and settled farmers (often Christian)".
This conflict is about competition for farmland more so than your White Grievance narrative about Christian persecution.
Meanwhile donald trump is carrying out his agenda of harm against poor Americans who rely on SNAP. Many of them White Christians (his own supporters). But I doubt you care about these people. Instead you might mock them and say they should get jobs so they can afford the food they need without SNAP. Except most of them ARE working.
Via the g00gle AI...
Working-age, non-disabled adults: A recent analysis found that 83% of non-disabled, working-age adults in SNAP households reported earnings in 2021.
Why many don't work: A large portion of SNAP recipients are not expected to work, including children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities. Others may face barriers to work, such as caregiving responsibilities or health conditions.
[end]
Not false equivalence, but simile in multis. Finding common factors/ denominators. There's nothing "false" about it.
DeleteWhat is the simile in multis between you and Les? White guilt-pride (wokeness).
DeleteIt's the point where your core ideological beliefs overlap on a Venn diagram.
DeleteWhite guilt-pride isn't wokeness. "White guilt pride" is imaginary while wokeness is real. Also positive and not negative. It is good to be woke. It means you are alert to social and racial injustice. You (as a White Supremacist) are in denial of this truth. g00gle says it "originated in African-American culture as a call to stay aware of systemic racism".
DeletePride is positive. Guilt is negative. One comes before the other. "I'm not a racist...but my grandfather was one." They can exist simultaneously and both be true.
DeleteThe woke are proud...
What do you think makes gays so "proud" during Pride month? The packed fudge?
Delete...or that packing fudge is no longer "shame-ful"?
DeleteSo, you're woke? You do seem very proud that you see "the truth", while "normies" do not @@
DeleteBeing gay is no longer shameful. This is why "pride" exists. To counter the assertion that they should feel shame. Aren't you proud of being straight? You are clearly believing yourself to be superior for being straight.
g00gle AI overview: Biological explanations for sexual orientation involve a combination of genetics, prenatal hormones, and a maternal immune response, though no single "gay gene" has been identified. Research points to the influence of genetics, prenatal hormone exposure that organizes the brain, and the "fraternal birth order effect" in males, where a mother's immune system may react progressively to male-specific antigens with each male pregnancy.
I thought you said you believed this. Yet you (whenever given the chance) rant about how much you hate gay people. Then deny it when called out. But comments like "packed fudge" clearly shows how much you hate gay people.
Why would the term "packed fudge" upset you? You'd prefer I call it what it really is, packed sh*t? Drop the euphemisms?
DeleteIs it really something to be proud of?
I have 3 children. I'm very proud of them. One is gay. I'm proud of him too, but not because he packs sh*t. We VOTED to approve gay marriage in Maryland, we didn't sneak it through the back door (pun intended) like they did in SCotUS or most other states. I'm actually proud of THAT, too (even though I voted against it). We did it Democratically. The way its' supposed to be done.
DeleteMinus loves strawmen and simple narratives. Despite seemingly being "smart" (he definitely claims to be highly intelligent). Why is this?
ReplyDeleteVia Copilot...
🧠 Why “Smart” People Use Straw Men & Simplifications.
Cognitive shortcuts: Even intelligent people prefer explanations that feel neat and decisive. Complexity is harder to argue with, so reducing it to a simple binary (“Muslims good / Christians bad”) makes the argument easier to wield.
Rhetorical performance: Declaring oneself “smart” and then using straw men can be a way of performing intelligence rather than practicing it -- appearing decisive, quick, and confident, even if the reasoning is shallow.
Identity reinforcement: Simple explanations serve as tribal markers. They reassure the speaker’s in‑group (“we see the truth clearly”) and dismiss the out‑group as overcomplicating things.
Straw men as armor: By misrepresenting the opposing view, he ensures he always “wins” the debate. It’s less about truth, more about dominance.
Narrative coherence: People often prefer a story that fits their worldview over one that reflects messy reality. A “Christian genocide” or “only White people are blamed” narrative is emotionally satisfying, even if factually distorted.
⚖️ The Paradox.
Someone can be verbally agile, quick with references, and confident -- all markers of intelligence -- while still using fragile logic.
It’s not a lack of smarts, but a channeling of intelligence into persuasion and self‑affirmation rather than into careful analysis.
[end]
Mine is the "analyst" (not university, master, or hysteric) discourse. I've done the logical analysis. Convincing others requires utilizing the tool of rhetoric.
DeleteRhetoric doesn't work because you think you already know, and that I'm not the "subject supposed to know" (your therapist (analyst) or university professor). You prefer to get your trauma therapy (feelings of guilt-pride) from Oprah and Whoopie.
Deletebtw - If you have to constantly virtue signal the meaning of events, you can bet that they come from the outside and they're part of the cordycep training algorithm, not your own joy.
Delete^^Long arms continue to pat self on back for conditioned ignorance^^
DeleteYou're right... unconditioned ignorance is soooo much better...
DeleteWant some more candy?
DeleteWoof!
Regarding the 10,0000 Maniacs music video you linked to (information via Copilot)...
Delete⚖️ Political Positioning.
The critique is cultural, not partisan. It’s aimed at the media industry and consumer complicity, not at Democrats or Republicans.
Merchant herself was known for progressive leanings, but the song doesn’t endorse a Left or Right agenda. Instead, it’s a warning about passive consumption and moral laziness.
Both Left and Right audiences can (and do) reinterpret it...
Left‑leaning listeners often see it as a critique of corporate greed and media exploitation.
Right‑leaning listeners sometimes frame it as exposing liberal media manipulation or public ignorance.
[end]
The primary injunction under late capitalism is "enjoyment". So capitalism and their politicians "give em what they want" (with the "harmful" ingredients removed). Coffee w/o caffeine. Coke w/o sugar. Immigrants and multicultuuralism w/o their nasty violent cultures...just their tasty recipes.
Delete...sanitized by "woke".
Delete...Like Bounty with "super picker-uppers"!
Delete...or Charmin toilet paper, so you can "enjoy the go"!
DeleteAnd best of all, the internet gives people "feelings". Hate. Love... Rage clicks... Likes. The things they once got from life and living...
DeleteThanks engagement bots! I almost feel alive.
....something MORE than empty "academic" (university discourse) meaning.
Delete...some Pathos WITH my Logos and fill the void. NOT with enjoyment. But with anger/ rage!
Delete...to hide the dull background hum of "consumption".
DeleteMinus: Immigrants and multiculturalism w/o their nasty violent cultures...
DeleteYou're referring to the White Europeans who originally settled the Americas and slaughtered Native Americans? donald trump does admire Andrew Jackson.
"Indian Removal Act" = expelling undesirables... similar to what is going on under Turd-2 and their "mass deportations"?
Via Copilot...
⚖️ Key Similarities [between the Indian Removal Act and Mass Deportations]...
Displacement as policy: Both involve government‑backed removal of communities.
Targeting marginalized groups: Native Americans in Jackson’s era; undocumented immigrants (often people of color) in Trump’s.
Justification through fear and hierarchy: Jackson invoked “civilization” and land hunger; Trump invokes crime, jobs, and nationalism.
Spectacle of toughness: Both leaders used these policies to project strength and populist defiance.
[end]
Minus: Immigrants and multiculturalism w/o their nasty violent cultures...just their tasty recipes.
Via Copilot...
⚖️ What’s Going On.
Rhetorical bait: By linking to 10,000 Maniacs’ “Give ’Em What They Want,” he’s dressing up his argument in pop‑culture irony.
Consumerism analogy: He’s equating cultural diversity with “products” that can be sanitized for mainstream consumption.
Hostile subtext: The phrase “nasty violent cultures” is a sweeping, derogatory generalization about immigrants. It reduces entire communities to caricatures of violence, while appropriating their food as the only acceptable contribution.
[end]
aka your comment proves you are a White Supremacist... just one of many such racist comments. Yet you continue to deny the obvious.
You dislike the legal doctrine of Terra Nullius. Who cares? We Perserverando'd it, fair and square. :)
Deletebtw - Don't see any criticism of any cultures other than white ones. That qed's your Neoracism. It's just as fashionable today as racism was in Jackson's day.
PS - Has the DNC patent on "White-Out" expired yet?
btw -
Are there any bad or inferior cultures other than white ones? Enquiring minds want to know...
Deletebtw - Are you FOR or Against the "from the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Jew free" Act?
Deletefrom Google AI:
The quote found in the original 1988 Hamas charter regarding the destruction of Israel is: "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it". This quote is part of the preamble of the original covenant and is attributed to the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Imam Hassan al-Banna.
The 1988 charter contained numerous other calls for the destruction of Israel and antisemitic statements, including in Article 7, which cites a Hadith (prophetic tradition) about Muslims fighting and killing Jews at the end of time.
2017 Policy Document
In 2017, Hamas issued a new political document that aimed to soften its image and modify some of the extremist provisions of the 1988 charter. In this newer document:
It declared a willingness to accept an interim Palestinian state along the 1967 borders, but without recognizing Israel's right to exist.
It stated that its struggle is against the "occupying Zionist aggressors" rather than against Jews because of their religion.
It maintained that "armed resistance" against Israel is a legitimate right.
Despite the changes in the 2017 document, many international actors and the Israeli government dismissed it as an attempt to fool the world, pointing to continued rhetoric from Hamas leaders calling for Israel's destruction and the use of violence
The zionists have been deceiving people since 1967, and gullible x'tian nationalists have bought it lock, stock, and barrel.
ReplyDelete...and when they stop believing, they get assassinated ala Charlie Kirk.
Delete1967? Really? Black September was the start? You've got to be kidding.