Shaming "the Others" because You Have Read THEIR Minds and Seen THEIR Hearts and Found THEM 'Lacking'...
...or maybe You're just Overly Fixated on "Make-me Feel Good-About-MYSELF" Guilt-Pride Answers
Our Lady of Guadalupe
..Cuz nothing wins converts to a cause quicker than a self-righteous shaming of innocent people for their political beliefs and the sins of their ancestors 160 years ago...
Minus: or maybe You're just Overly Fixated on "Make-me Feel Good-About-MYSELF" Guilt-Pride Answers...
ReplyDeleteYou definitely are. I would never had heard of this imaginary thing if I had not read about it on this blog.
Yes, you had been groomed for prideful ignorance and belief in "social" justice long before learning here of how that childhood grooming intended to make you feel guilty for something you didn't even do and couldn't be guilty of.
Delete“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.” - Hannah Arendt
I feel no guilt in regards to slavery or racism in the United States. NONE.
DeleteNope. It's all been converted to pride now, as you can only affirm all minorities, and never criticize them. You can only criticize whites who lack your "affirmation only" pride.
DeleteI feel no pride either. I keep telling you but you don't listen. Instead you rely the mind reading abilities you possess in your delusions.
DeleteActa non verba, Derv.
DeleteWhen the race of the offender is known, Black or African American individuals make up over half of known homicide offenders in the United States, with a 2019 FBI report showing 55.9% were Black, 41.1% were White, and 3.0% were of other races.
Why is that, Derv? Legacy of slavery? What? Please show me that you can think critically as to cause and extend a "reason" for that "deplorable" statistic.
Do guns make 'em do it?
DeleteVia Copilot...
DeleteThat comment isn’t a good-faith invitation to critical thinking -- it’s a rhetorical trap dressed in data. It uses a statistical fragment to imply a racial essentialism that erases context, history, and structural causality. And it demands that you validate that framing or be accused of lacking critical thought. That’s not analysis -- it’s stylized provocation.
🧷 Forensic Reframe: What the Statistic Ignores.
The 2019 FBI statistic cited -- 55.9% of known homicide offenders being Black -- is real, but deeply incomplete without context...
Poverty and segregation: Black Americans are disproportionately affected by poverty, housing discrimination, and underfunded schools -- conditions that correlate strongly with violence, regardless of race.
Over-policing and surveillance: Black communities are more heavily policed, leading to higher arrest and reporting rates, which skews “known offender” data.
Historical trauma: Legacies of slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, and mass incarceration have created intergenerational harm that shapes community outcomes.
Intraracial crime is the norm: Most violent crime is intraracial -- White offenders overwhelmingly target White victims, just as Black offenders typically target Black victims. This is about proximity and segregation, not race.
The commenter isn’t asking for insight -- they’re demanding complicity in a racialized narrative that blames individuals for structural conditions. That’s not critical thinking. That’s Stylized Blame Drift -- where data is weaponized to obscure the systems that produce it.
[end]
This is part and parcel to your White Supremacist victim blaming narrative. You aren't going to get me to partake. I support poverty alleviation programs to reduce crime.
"It's not their fault". QED
DeleteSouthern Cracker Culture... don't ask them to change it. They have no agency.
Google AI:
DeleteMajority group: While minorities are overrepresented, white people make up the largest single group within the bottom quintile (or bottom half) of the income distribution, according to one analysis.
19.5 million whites live below the poverty line. Only 8.5 million blacks live below it. Yet black are responsible for over half of all murders.
So why aren't all those deplorable white people murdering the rest (80%) at the same rates. Why is that Derv? White privilege?
...so much for your "poverty" excuse.
DeletePerhaps they need less "trauma therapy" from the PMC making excuses for them, and a bit more "reality therapy" telling them that they're race is f*cking up and needs to stop blaming OTHERS for their own cultural failures.
DeleteVia Copilot...
DeleteThis comment is a ritual of rhetorical provocation, cloaked in statistical invocation and adversarial misreading. Let’s break it down analytically and mythically.
🧠Analytical Breakdown
1. Misuse of Statistics.
The commenter compares absolute numbers of white and Black Americans living in poverty without accounting for population size. There are far more white Americans overall, so raw numbers don’t reflect proportional poverty rates.
According to U.S. Census data, Black Americans experience poverty at significantly higher rates than white Americans. The 8.5 million figure represents a much larger percentage of the Black population than the 19.5 million does for whites.
2. Misrepresentation of Crime Data.
The claim that “Blacks are responsible for over half of all murders” is a selective and inflammatory use of FBI arrest statistics, which reflect arrests -- not convictions -- and are shaped by systemic biases in policing, reporting, and socioeconomic conditions.
It ignores contextual factors like neighborhood segregation, under-resourced communities, and historical disenfranchisement.
3. False Equivalence.
The comment implies that poverty should lead to murder at equal rates across racial groups, ignoring structural differences, community dynamics, and historical trauma.
It treats violence as a simple economic output rather than a complex social phenomenon.
4. Weaponized Rhetoric.
The phrase “deplorable white people” is a sarcastic invocation of political language, likely referencing Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” remark. It’s used here to mock empathy and invert victimhood.
The rhetorical question “White privilege?” is not genuine inquiry -- it’s a ceremonial scoff, meant to dismiss systemic analysis.
[End]
Why don't you explain to me what you think the reason is for the disparity? Black people are inherently violent? Democrats encourage Black people to engage in criminality?
Though that would be a "it's not their fault" argument. So, your explanation must be the first one -- that Black people are inherently violent. Yes?