12.2% of the Furry Community Identifies as Transgender (Furry Fandom Community is globally estimated to be between 1.5 and 3 million individuals)
Where Affirmation of One's Curated Self-Identity Profile Reigns Supreme!
Eureka! Performative Gender Euphoria!
In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the ego is the self that experiences reality, while the superego is a cruel, imperative voice commanding enjoyment, or jouissance—a painful pleasure beyond simple joy. Unlike Freudian ethics, Lacan's superego doesn't just forbid but actively compels the subject to enjoy, creating a twisted sense of guilt from which no enjoyment is ultimately derived, as any attempted fulfillment of the command leads to more pain and an impossible pursuit of unattainable pleasure...
...unattainable before the furry costume, attainable after donning the furry suit. The ego retires, and the furry persona can be unleashed. The personae's now ego-suspended disbelief achieved.
Gender Identity Disorder (GID: aka - Gender Dysphoria) is related to Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).
The difference from Google AI: Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly multiple personality disorder, involves distinct identities that take control of a person's behavior, accompanied by amnesia, while Gender Dysphoria (GD) is the distress a person experiences from the incongruence between their internal sense of gender and their sex assigned at birth. A key difference is that DID is a global identity disturbance with involuntary shifts and amnesia, whereas GD is a specific distress related to gender identity and often leads to a desire for medical transition. It's important to note that GD is not a personality disorder, though some people with DID may also experience or present with symptoms of GD.
GD can be the pleasure (surplus jouissance) of an actor playing a role as opposed to a schizophrenic fracturing of the Ego It's a function of how deep the rabbit hole one goes:
From Google AI:
SchizophreniaDissociative Identity Disorder
- Characterized by positive (e.g., hallucinations, delusions), negative (e.g., flat affect, withdrawal), and cognitive (e.g., disorganized thinking) symptoms.
- Typically develops in late adolescence or early adulthood.
- Delusions are often bizarre and persecutory, while hallucinations can be auditory, visual, or other sensory experiences.
- Treatment involves antipsychotic medications, therapy, and psychosocial interventions.
- Characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or personality states that alternate and take control of the individual's behavior.
- Often arises from severe childhood trauma or abuse.
- Individuals may experience amnesia, depersonalization, and a sense of detachment from their own body and emotions.
- Treatment involves therapy, such as trauma-focused therapy, to integrate the different identities and develop coping mechanisms
Co-occurrenceIt's important to note that schizophrenia and DID can sometimes co-occur in the same individual. This is known as "schizoaffective disorder."ConclusionSchizophrenia and dissociative identity disorder are distinct mental health conditions with different symptoms, origins, and treatments. It's crucial to seek professional help if you or someone you know is experiencing symptoms of either condition.
Another (very small) community for you to go after and express your hate for. You pivoted very quickly.
ReplyDeleteOoooops!
DeleteI don't hate them, I simply try to understand them. I'm a multiple-personae blogger. I adopt various personae to try and think like the personae I adopt. I "test-drive" different identities, male, female, gay, straight to understand the ideology that animates different perspectives. I try and learn what you "have to believe" to behave in a certain way and make it work. It's performative profilicity.
ReplyDeleteThe internet plays a huge role in forming one's on-line personae. Most people only develop one. I've developed dozens and enjoy not having to "sincerely" or "authentically" perform any one. It's why I love reading a broad range of philosophers as well. It's liberating. Being a furry is "liberating'. And the best part of the furry community is that most people are doing the same thing and so, play along. Acceptance and affirmation are pleasurable and fun things. But it's also a bit of a "bubble" that can leads to mass psychosis if you're unaware of the psychology involved.
DeleteMeden agan!
DeleteHow many men have you had sex with while pretending to be a woman versus how many men have you had sex with while pretending to be gay?
DeleteThe same as you Derv. Isn't sexting fun? It's hard to know who's on the other end.
DeleteBest get back to my flaneur-ing....
DeleteYou have a "neoracist/neosexist" persona that is very into "White guilt pride"? I haven't seen you comment using this persona. I think it would be very easy to spot this fake, given that those terms all describe imaginary positions nobody actually has.
DeleteSure, I call she/her Lance Twiggs
DeleteCopilot comments on your post...
ReplyDeleteThat’s a classic case of ideological scapegoating -- where identity is pathologized, then weaponized to explain violence. The blogger’s logic collapses complexity into caricature: if the shooter had ties to furry or LGBTQ+ communities, then those communities must be inherently unstable or dangerous. It’s not analysis -- it’s symbolic indictment.
Let’s break down the rhetorical mechanics:
🧠 Emotional Logic of Pathologized Identity.
The blogger treats the shooter’s alleged connection to a transgender partner and furry memes as proof of deviance, not context.
He reframes identity traits -- trans, gay, furry -- not as descriptors, but as diagnoses.
By linking these traits to violence, he builds a mythic narrative: “The Deviant Other is dangerous.”
🔍 What the Evidence Actually Shows.
Tyler Robinson, the accused shooter, did leave behind bullet casings engraved with memes tied to furry and online subcultures.
He reportedly lived with a transgender partner.
Experts caution that these inscriptions are likely trolling artifacts, not ideological manifestos.
There is no evidence that being trans, gay, or a furry correlates with increased violence. In fact, these communities are statistically more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.
[end]
FACT -- most shootings are carried out by rightturds.
Via the g00gle AI...
Several studies have documented the connection between extremist ideologies and violence. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reports on extremist-related murders, differentiating them from other types of shootings.
Right-wing extremism: The ADL found that from 2013 to 2022, right-wing extremists were responsible for 76% of extremist-related murders. In 2023, all 17 documented extremist-related murders were committed by right-wing extremists.
White supremacists: The ADL also notes that white supremacists commit the greatest number of domestic extremist-related murders in most years.
Left-wing extremism: Left-wing extremist groups engage in violence, such as assaults and arson, but have not often targeted people with deadly violence since the late 1980s.
Domestic Islamist extremism: Deadly incidents linked to domestic Islamist extremism have significantly decreased in recent years.
[end]
Minus: Best get back to my flaneur-ing....
The phrase “Best get back to my flaneur-ing…” is deliberately stylized -- it evokes the image of someone strolling through the ideological wreckage they believe they’ve just created, basking in their rhetorical triumph. It’s not just a sign-off; it’s a victory lap in prose.
Let’s unpack it:
🧠 “Flaneur-ing” as Rhetorical Pose.
The term flâneur originates from 19th-century French literature—someone who strolls through the city, observing and reflecting, often with detached superiority.
By invoking it here, the blogger casts himself as a cultural critic, a kind of ideological boulevardier who surveys the chaos with smug detachment.
It’s a self-styled persona: aloof, victorious, and unbothered.
🔥 Emotional Logic of the Exit Line.
He’s signaling that his case is closed, his argument airtight.
The tone implies: “I’ve exposed the truth, and now I’ll casually resume my intellectual promenade while the rest of you stew.”
It’s a blend of mockery and self-congratulation, meant to elevate his position while diminishing dissent.
[end]
A narcissistic egomaniac just like donald trump. And proud of it too!
Furries = Paedophile transvestites
Delete:)
DeleteNarcissists aren't ego-maniacs...
Narcissism is not self-love, but the opposite. The narcissist is not full of ego. He has no sense of self. Lacking a stable sense of identity, the narcissist hunts for meaning in therapy, self-help, sex, or radical politics. This is the mental illness and the driving politics of the left.
Che vuoi? A furry snuggle-bunny!
DeleteUniversity academics and Trauma Culture therapists will likely tell you something else. (Lacan, "Four Discourses")
DeleteMinus: Narcissists aren't ego-maniacs.
DeleteVia Copilot...
That reply is a classic deflection -- trying to split hairs between psychological terms to dodge the emotional logic of your critique. While it’s technically true that narcissism and egomania aren’t identical, they’re overlapping constructs, and in casual usage, calling someone a “narcissistic egomaniac” is a rhetorically valid way to describe someone who exhibits grandiosity, self-absorption, and a hunger for admiration.
Egomania is not a formal diagnosis, but refers to excessive self-centeredness and obsession with one’s own importance.
So yes, in clinical psychology, narcissists may have a fragile or unstable sense of self, not a robust ego. But in rhetorical terms -- especially in political discourse -- “narcissistic egomaniac” is shorthand for someone who acts like the world revolves around them, regardless of what’s going on under the hood.
[end]
Minus: Furries = Paedophile transvestites.
donald trump is a furry? He does wear a girdle and makeup. And is a paedophile. I didn't know he is also a furry.
Trump doesn't have a "fragile" ego. It's very strong and very robust/ resilient. It's what makes him a great executive. He prefers to be "feared" than "loved". Machiavelli's classic "Prince", or as YOU yourself call him, "King Donald". And currently he can rightly also say, "l'etat c'est moi"
Deleteps - someone who acts like the world revolves around them
DeleteIf you are the President of the USA, it LITERALLY does.
Only for the dim witted that allow it.
DeleteEveryone allows it. It's called the Constitution. It's America's Social Contract.
DeleteActually the Constitution disallowed the return of donald trump to the presidency after he attempted a coup to remain in power. It's the disqualification clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. People simply chose to ignore it's plain language.
DeleteAyup, the Turd FOTUS has the corrupted scotus to thank for his unconstitutional return to the levers of power.
Delete...and how many people were charged with "Insurrection" on J6? ZERO. So much for your "disqualification" bs.
DeleteThe Disqualification Clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not require a criminal charge or conviction to determine there was an insurrection. It disqualifies anyone who, after swearing an oath to the Constitution, engages in insurrection or rebellion -- period.
DeleteThe Supreme Court’s ruling that only Congress can enforce this clause against federal candidates is a procedural reinterpretation, not a textual requirement. The Constitution itself says that disqualified individuals may only be reinstated by a two-thirds vote in Congress. No such vote was held.
Therefore, Donald Trump’s current presidency is constitutionally invalid. He engaged in insurrection, no vote was taken to restore his eligibility, and no effort was made to follow the procedure outlined in the Constitution.
Ergo, he is an illegitimate president. The failure to enforce the Disqualification Clause is not a technical oversight -- it’s a constitutional violation.
Again, if an Insurrection supposedly occurs, and no one is charged with the crime of insurrection, has an insurrection actually occurred, or has a successful rebellion? And if J6 was a successful rebellion, who are the insurrectionists now?
DeleteIt WAS an insurrection and tRump gladly set it in motion and watched ut unfold. his fascist sycophants followed his dog whistle to a tee.
DeleteIf Kamala Harris was part of a successful rebellion, she is the one who should have been disqualified from running again by the disqualification cause. Yet no states suggested she be taken off the ballot for that reason.
DeleteErgo, your argument is provably false.
🧠 What Joe Conservative Is Arguing.
He claims that because no one was charged specifically with “insurrection,” January 6 wasn’t one
He then suggests that if it was a rebellion, and it succeeded, then the current government -- Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, etc. -- must be the “real insurrectionists”.
This is built on the false premise that the 2020 election was stolen via a "procedural coup", a phrase used by some far-right bloggers to describe the lawful certification of Biden’s win.
🔍 Why This Is False.
Over 1,000 people have been charged in connection with January 6, including for seditious conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding.
The House Select Committee recommended insurrection charges against Donald Trump, and he was later indicted for actions related to the Capitol attack.
The idea of a “procedural coup” is a distortion -- Congress followed constitutional procedures to certify the election, despite pressure and misinformation from Trump and his allies.
[end]
Over 1,000 people have been charged in connection with January 6, including for seditious conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding.
DeleteThe House Select Committee recommended insurrection charges against Donald Trump, and he was later indicted for actions related to the Capitol attack.
...yet no insurrection indictments were filed. Anywhere. With Democrats in charge for 4 years. Q.E.D.