The Democratic Party is the Party that believes that RACE is the world's essential social organizing principle. The Republican Party believes that RACE is a non-essential organizing principle. So who are the real racists, Derv? The people who mischaracterize the non-essentialism of race as "white supremacy"? Or those who want to do away with all racial categories?
The anti-white neo-racism of Democrats like yourself is no longer fooling anyone. We'll achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories, not discriminating against the race du jour (yesterday black, today white) of the racial essentialists through social engineering and racial quotas.
So long as the Democratic Party continues to organize around non-essential social categories like race, gender and ethnicity, they'll continue to hemorrhage voters. Because lets face it, their Identity Politics strategy proves that they're no longer a serious political party. They're just a bunch a race and gender shaming PC bullies.
Minus: The Democratic Party is the Party that believes that RACE is the world's essential social organizing principle. The Republican Party believes that RACE is a non-essential organizing principle. So who are the real racists, Derv?
republicans. Because what you wrote is false. Both Democrats and republicans believe that class is the world's essential organizing principal. But Democrats (for the most part) take the side of workers and the non-rich, while republican politicians are on the side of the wealthy. The racist angle was for the base. With donald trump (a very racist man himself) the racism got amped up dramatically. Though he is still for the rich. And that would include rich minorities. Though rich Whites are still superior.
Minus: The anti-white neo-racism of Democrats like yourself is no longer fooling anyone. We'll achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories, not discriminating against the race du jour (yesterday black, today white) of the racial essentialists through social engineering and racial quotas.
I'm not trying to fool anyone, YOU are. I'm not anti-White, I'm anti-racist and pro-equality. And we will not "achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories". We're going in the opposite direction. And Whites are NOT being discriminated against. Here is the proof that you're a racist -- that you're trying to claim that White people are being discriminated against in the United States.
Nobody buys this BS except racist Whites and minorities who are stupid. Or buying in because doing so is financially advantageous to them (Turds like Candance Owens).
Minus: So long as the Democratic Party continues to organize around non-essential social categories like race, gender and ethnicity, they'll continue to hemorrhage voters. Because lets face it, their Identity Politics strategy proves that they're no longer a serious political party.
That's what the republican party organizes around. Your White Identity politics proves that the republicans are no longer a serious political party that represents anyone except rich people. Also fooling poor Whites that they are for them. When republican policies harm poor and middle class Whites along with poor and middle class minorities.
I don't know for how much longer your lies will be effective, but this can't continue on indefinitely. Because the harm republican policies are causing will become very apparent eventually. You're hoping that, before then, democracy will be ended so you won't need voters anymore.
donald trump: "Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians".
What will be "fixed" so that voting is no longer necessary? The only thing I can think of -- the ONE thing that would make voting no longer necessary -- would be to get rid of voting. Or make it "not necessary" because the permanent fix is in. Like in Russia, where Putin got "elected" with almost 90 percent of the votes going to him.
The Old Left believed that "class" was essential. Around 1968, the New Left abandoned that principle and substituted woke SoJus "racial/ ethnic Identity" for class identity. The Black Panthers remained, but the Young Patriots were "cancelled". Dylan went "electric"... "folk went "mainstream pop". In 1992, Bill Clinton furhter betrayed the working class entirely, and made the DNC entirely reliant upon corporate funding. And in 2009, Barrack Obama weaponized SoJus into a new anti-white form of neoracism that seeks to "Young Patriot style", eliminate whiteness entirely..
The influence of Edward SaidPost-Colonial Theory on that shift in the 70s was crucial into establishing multi-cultural ethnicity and "white guilt" as instruments of political power within the Democratic Party University Discourse Power-focused elites.
“Postcolonialism is the invention of rich Indian guys who wanted to make a good career in the west by playing on the guilt of white liberals”
Postcolonialism, as in the postcolonial condition, is to be understood, as Mahmood Mamdani puts it, as a reversal of colonialism but not as superseding it
That blog comment you asked about is a dense mix of historical references, ideological claims, and rhetorical framing. Let’s unpack it analytically and assess its accuracy point by point.
🧠 Breakdown of the Blog Comment.
1. Old Left vs. New Left. ✅ Accurate Core: The Old Left was primarily focused on class struggle, labor rights, and economic justice. The New Left, emerging in the 1960s, shifted toward identity politics, civil rights, anti-war activism, and cultural liberation.
⚠️ Oversimplified: The idea that the New Left “abandoned” class entirely is reductive. Many New Left thinkers saw race, gender, and class as interconnected systems of oppression.
2. Black Panthers vs. Young Patriots.
✅ Historical Basis: The Black Panthers and Young Patriots (a group of poor white Appalachian migrants in Chicago) were part of the original Rainbow Coalition. The Young Patriots did fade from prominence, largely due to lack of funding, internal fragmentation, and FBI suppression.
❌ “Cancelled” Framing: The term “cancelled” is anachronistic and misleading here. Their decline wasn’t due to ideological purging but rather systemic pressures and lack of institutional support.
3. Dylan Going Electric / Folk Going Pop
✅ True Event: Bob Dylan’s switch to electric guitar at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival was controversial and symbolized a cultural shift from protest folk to mainstream rock.
⚠️ Metaphorical Stretch: Using this as a metaphor for political betrayal is poetic but not analytically rigorous.
4. Bill Clinton’s Shift in 1992.
✅ Substantive Critique: Clinton’s embrace of neoliberal policies—NAFTA, welfare reform, financial deregulation—did alienate parts of the working class and labor movement.
✅ Corporate Funding: The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), which Clinton championed, did pivot the party toward corporate donors and centrist policies.
5. Obama and “Weaponized SoJus”.
❌ Inflammatory and Unfounded: The claim that Obama “weaponized social justice into anti-white neoracism” is ideologically charged and lacks empirical support. While Obama did engage with racial justice themes, his rhetoric was consistently inclusive and aimed at bridging divides.
⚠️ Misuse of “SoJus”: The term “SoJus” (social justice warriors) is often used pejoratively and doesn’t reflect the complexity of Obama-era policy or discourse.
🧭 Overall Assessment.
The comment blends valid historical observations with ideological exaggeration and rhetorical distortion. It’s accurate in identifying key shifts—like the New Left’s focus on identity, Clinton’s neoliberal turn, and Dylan’s cultural pivot—but it veers into conspiratorial territory with its framing of Obama and racial politics.
You comments ignores the links between economic and class. By going "electric" Dylan made millions. Ditto for the New Left... abandoning communist social principles, and forming a New Left Professional Managerial Class (PMC) beholding to big Capital for their "surplus salaries" (see Zizek quote) and incorporation/ management of the new "cultural capitalism" identities.
In other words, they "sold out". Dylan was no Kafka-esque Josephine the Singer FOR the Commie Mouse Folk. He was a singer FOR the Capitalist Mouse Pop.
Minus: The claim that Obama “weaponized social justice into anti-white neoracism” is ideologically charged and lacks empirical support.
wtf? You can give a link? I thought she was exposing Russian propaganda and calling it "proof" that Obama and others framed donald for colluding with Russia. I have not heard about any other fake exposing.
Still you continue with your absurd claims that donald trump is a "race non-essentialist"... when ICE is openly espousing White Supremacist rhetoric.
ICE is using similar imagery, artwork, and slogans to put forward the idea that the country is facing a great threat from "the other". Nazi Germany similarly used its propaganda to scare people about such alleged threats from "the other", whether they were Communists, Jews, or anyone else.
The Nazi parallels go even further, though, according to some observers. The painting showing the genocidal expansion westward that the Department of Homeland Security used is from 1872. The caption DHS added, along with the work's title and painter -- "A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending. American Progress, John Gast" -- grabbed the attention of some right-wing watchers.
The caption had exactly 14 words, which prompted Northern University Law Professor Evan Bernick to draw a comparison to the infamous white supremacist “Fourteen Words” slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children". He also pointed to the fact that the “H” in both Heritage and Homeland were intentionally capitalized. H is the eighth letter of the alphabet; another neo-Nazi code is 88, or HH, for "Heil Hitler".
"Brother we could use a man like Adolf Hitler again"... Franco Aragosta, 8/7/2019.
President Obama and his administration actively promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and supported affirmative action policies. This is evident through various initiatives and actions: Executive orders Executive Order 13583: This order, signed in August 2011, established a government-wide initiative to promote diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce. The goals included recruiting, hiring, promoting, and retaining a diverse workforce. Other goals were fostering a culture of collaboration, flexibility, and fairness, as well as removing barriers to equal employment opportunity. Amendments to Executive Order 11246 and Executive Order 11478: In July 2014, these orders were amended to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics for federal contractors and employees, respectively. Executive Order increasing federal employment of individuals with disabilities: Signed in July 2010. Supporting Affirmative Action The Obama administration issued guidance supporting the right of colleges to consider race and ethnicity in admissions as one factor in a holistic review, stating that diversity is an important educational goal. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn affirmative action policies in 2023, President Obama acknowledged the flaws of the policy but reiterated that it "allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged". The administration actively worked to promote DEI and remove barriers to equal employment opportunity within the federal government. Broader Efforts President Obama's administration focused on advancing social progress and equality through measures such as fighting for gender equality and LGBTQI+ rights, expanding protections against discrimination in various sectors, and addressing the crisis of anti-transgender discrimination and violence. The Obama Foundation continues to uphold these values, committing to maintaining an organizational environment where diversity, equity, and inclusion are valued in all aspects of their operations, and promoting these principles with their vendors and partners.
Proof that Black people can support White Supremacy. Candace Owens is one of White Supremacy's bigliest boosters.
ReplyDeleteThe Democratic Party is the Party that believes that RACE is the world's essential social organizing principle. The Republican Party believes that RACE is a non-essential organizing principle. So who are the real racists, Derv? The people who mischaracterize the non-essentialism of race as "white supremacy"? Or those who want to do away with all racial categories?
DeleteThe anti-white neo-racism of Democrats like yourself is no longer fooling anyone. We'll achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories, not discriminating against the race du jour (yesterday black, today white) of the racial essentialists through social engineering and racial quotas.
So long as the Democratic Party continues to organize around non-essential social categories like race, gender and ethnicity, they'll continue to hemorrhage voters. Because lets face it, their Identity Politics strategy proves that they're no longer a serious political party. They're just a bunch a race and gender shaming PC bullies.
LMAO!!! Keep trying. But your " neo-racism" meme is utter bullshit and you, the white supremacist, know it.
ReplyDelete^^Anti-white Neoracist PC Bully^^
DeleteSimple projection.
Delete^^Race Essentialist^^
Delete^^Lying MAGAt^^
Delete^^Supports antiwhite neoracism^^
DeleteMinus: The Democratic Party is the Party that believes that RACE is the world's essential social organizing principle. The Republican Party believes that RACE is a non-essential organizing principle. So who are the real racists, Derv?
ReplyDeleterepublicans. Because what you wrote is false. Both Democrats and republicans believe that class is the world's essential organizing principal. But Democrats (for the most part) take the side of workers and the non-rich, while republican politicians are on the side of the wealthy. The racist angle was for the base. With donald trump (a very racist man himself) the racism got amped up dramatically. Though he is still for the rich. And that would include rich minorities. Though rich Whites are still superior.
Minus: The anti-white neo-racism of Democrats like yourself is no longer fooling anyone. We'll achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories, not discriminating against the race du jour (yesterday black, today white) of the racial essentialists through social engineering and racial quotas.
I'm not trying to fool anyone, YOU are. I'm not anti-White, I'm anti-racist and pro-equality. And we will not "achieve DEI through IGNORING racial categories". We're going in the opposite direction. And Whites are NOT being discriminated against. Here is the proof that you're a racist -- that you're trying to claim that White people are being discriminated against in the United States.
Nobody buys this BS except racist Whites and minorities who are stupid. Or buying in because doing so is financially advantageous to them (Turds like Candance Owens).
Minus: So long as the Democratic Party continues to organize around non-essential social categories like race, gender and ethnicity, they'll continue to hemorrhage voters. Because lets face it, their Identity Politics strategy proves that they're no longer a serious political party.
That's what the republican party organizes around. Your White Identity politics proves that the republicans are no longer a serious political party that represents anyone except rich people. Also fooling poor Whites that they are for them. When republican policies harm poor and middle class Whites along with poor and middle class minorities.
I don't know for how much longer your lies will be effective, but this can't continue on indefinitely. Because the harm republican policies are causing will become very apparent eventually. You're hoping that, before then, democracy will be ended so you won't need voters anymore.
donald trump: "Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians".
What will be "fixed" so that voting is no longer necessary? The only thing I can think of -- the ONE thing that would make voting no longer necessary -- would be to get rid of voting. Or make it "not necessary" because the permanent fix is in. Like in Russia, where Putin got "elected" with almost 90 percent of the votes going to him.
The Old Left believed that "class" was essential. Around 1968, the New Left abandoned that principle and substituted woke SoJus "racial/ ethnic Identity" for class identity. The Black Panthers remained, but the Young Patriots were "cancelled". Dylan went "electric"... "folk went "mainstream pop". In 1992, Bill Clinton furhter betrayed the working class entirely, and made the DNC entirely reliant upon corporate funding. And in 2009, Barrack Obama weaponized SoJus into a new anti-white form of neoracism that seeks to "Young Patriot style", eliminate whiteness entirely..
DeleteThe influence of Edward Said Post-Colonial Theory on that shift in the 70s was crucial into establishing multi-cultural ethnicity and "white guilt" as instruments of political power within the Democratic Party University Discourse Power-focused elites.
Delete“Postcolonialism is the invention of rich Indian guys who wanted to make a good career in the west by playing on the guilt of white liberals”
― Slavoj Žižek
How do YOU spell "Mandami for Mayor"?
DeletePostcolonialism, as in the postcolonial condition, is to be understood, as Mahmood Mamdani puts it, as a reversal of colonialism but not as superseding it
DeleteThe son, however, was not convinced.
Via Copilot...
DeleteThat blog comment you asked about is a dense mix of historical references, ideological claims, and rhetorical framing. Let’s unpack it analytically and assess its accuracy point by point.
🧠 Breakdown of the Blog Comment.
1. Old Left vs. New Left.
✅ Accurate Core: The Old Left was primarily focused on class struggle, labor rights, and economic justice. The New Left, emerging in the 1960s, shifted toward identity politics, civil rights, anti-war activism, and cultural liberation.
⚠️ Oversimplified: The idea that the New Left “abandoned” class entirely is reductive. Many New Left thinkers saw race, gender, and class as interconnected systems of oppression.
2. Black Panthers vs. Young Patriots.
✅ Historical Basis: The Black Panthers and Young Patriots (a group of poor white Appalachian migrants in Chicago) were part of the original Rainbow Coalition. The Young Patriots did fade from prominence, largely due to lack of funding, internal fragmentation, and FBI suppression.
❌ “Cancelled” Framing: The term “cancelled” is anachronistic and misleading here. Their decline wasn’t due to ideological purging but rather systemic pressures and lack of institutional support.
3. Dylan Going Electric / Folk Going Pop
✅ True Event: Bob Dylan’s switch to electric guitar at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival was controversial and symbolized a cultural shift from protest folk to mainstream rock.
⚠️ Metaphorical Stretch: Using this as a metaphor for political betrayal is poetic but not analytically rigorous.
4. Bill Clinton’s Shift in 1992.
✅ Substantive Critique: Clinton’s embrace of neoliberal policies—NAFTA, welfare reform, financial deregulation—did alienate parts of the working class and labor movement.
✅ Corporate Funding: The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), which Clinton championed, did pivot the party toward corporate donors and centrist policies.
5. Obama and “Weaponized SoJus”.
❌ Inflammatory and Unfounded: The claim that Obama “weaponized social justice into anti-white neoracism” is ideologically charged and lacks empirical support. While Obama did engage with racial justice themes, his rhetoric was consistently inclusive and aimed at bridging divides.
⚠️ Misuse of “SoJus”: The term “SoJus” (social justice warriors) is often used pejoratively and doesn’t reflect the complexity of Obama-era policy or discourse.
🧭 Overall Assessment.
The comment blends valid historical observations with ideological exaggeration and rhetorical distortion. It’s accurate in identifying key shifts—like the New Left’s focus on identity, Clinton’s neoliberal turn, and Dylan’s cultural pivot—but it veers into conspiratorial territory with its framing of Obama and racial politics.
You comments ignores the links between economic and class. By going "electric" Dylan made millions. Ditto for the New Left... abandoning communist social principles, and forming a New Left Professional Managerial Class (PMC) beholding to big Capital for their "surplus salaries" (see Zizek quote) and incorporation/ management of the new "cultural capitalism" identities.
DeleteIn other words, they "sold out". Dylan was no Kafka-esque Josephine the Singer FOR the Commie Mouse Folk. He was a singer FOR the Capitalist Mouse Pop.
The claim that Obama “weaponized social justice into anti-white neoracism” is ideologically charged and lacks empirical support.
Deletelol! Tulsi is unveiling the whole plot/ plan now.
He turned Black Affirmative Action into an anti-white DEI post-colonialist coalition.
DeleteMinus: The claim that Obama “weaponized social justice into anti-white neoracism” is ideologically charged and lacks empirical support.
Deletewtf? You can give a link? I thought she was exposing Russian propaganda and calling it "proof" that Obama and others framed donald for colluding with Russia. I have not heard about any other fake exposing.
Meanwhile ICE is recruiting White Supremacist men to kidnap and disappear Hispanic looking people.
Still you continue with your absurd claims that donald trump is a "race non-essentialist"... when ICE is openly espousing White Supremacist rhetoric.
ICE is using similar imagery, artwork, and slogans to put forward the idea that the country is facing a great threat from "the other". Nazi Germany similarly used its propaganda to scare people about such alleged threats from "the other", whether they were Communists, Jews, or anyone else.
The Nazi parallels go even further, though, according to some observers. The painting showing the genocidal expansion westward that the Department of Homeland Security used is from 1872. The caption DHS added, along with the work's title and painter -- "A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending. American Progress, John Gast" -- grabbed the attention of some right-wing watchers.
The caption had exactly 14 words, which prompted Northern University Law Professor Evan Bernick to draw a comparison to the infamous white supremacist “Fourteen Words” slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children". He also pointed to the fact that the “H” in both Heritage and Homeland were intentionally capitalized. H is the eighth letter of the alphabet; another neo-Nazi code is 88, or HH, for "Heil Hitler".
"Brother we could use a man like Adolf Hitler again"... Franco Aragosta, 8/7/2019.
from Google AI
DeletePresident Obama and his administration actively promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and supported affirmative action policies. This is evident through various initiatives and actions:
Executive orders
Executive Order 13583: This order, signed in August 2011, established a government-wide initiative to promote diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce. The goals included recruiting, hiring, promoting, and retaining a diverse workforce. Other goals were fostering a culture of collaboration, flexibility, and fairness, as well as removing barriers to equal employment opportunity.
Amendments to Executive Order 11246 and Executive Order 11478: In July 2014, these orders were amended to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics for federal contractors and employees, respectively.
Executive Order increasing federal employment of individuals with disabilities: Signed in July 2010.
Supporting Affirmative Action
The Obama administration issued guidance supporting the right of colleges to consider race and ethnicity in admissions as one factor in a holistic review, stating that diversity is an important educational goal.
Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn affirmative action policies in 2023, President Obama acknowledged the flaws of the policy but reiterated that it "allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged".
The administration actively worked to promote DEI and remove barriers to equal employment opportunity within the federal government.
Broader Efforts
President Obama's administration focused on advancing social progress and equality through measures such as fighting for gender equality and LGBTQI+ rights, expanding protections against discrimination in various sectors, and addressing the crisis of anti-transgender discrimination and violence.
The Obama Foundation continues to uphold these values, committing to maintaining an organizational environment where diversity, equity, and inclusion are valued in all aspects of their operations, and promoting these principles with their vendors and partners.
^^Political patronage jobs for Democratic Party constituents^^
DeleteAhh, Franco Aragosta, a much brighter but just as confused white supremacist X'tian Nationalist.
ReplyDeleteMay he rest as he lived. An angry disappointed man.
^^Les Carpenter, a silly white guilt-pride addled looney tune^^
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete^^A accomplished expert protectionist of white supremacy^^
ReplyDelete