So why, after a full year of investigations, is the public learning NOTHING about the Trump Assassination Attempts? Because it would reveal sensitive USIC Covert Operations still supporting the War in Ukraine, and likely implicate those USIC agencies (like DHS HSI) in the conspiracy to kill DJT.
42 comments:
I advise these Democrats from Texas to protest and possibly assault some ICE Agents while on their vacation. That will really help them in their cause. I’d advise that bunch of whiners to come back or be thrown out.
Right wing men disproportionately fill the roles, cultures, and mindsets that involve physical risk, sacrifice, duty-based identity, warrior ethos, and a willingness to die for what they believe in. Those aren’t just job categories; they’re dispositions, and culturally, the right is more aligned with that stoic, confrontational, protector archetype. That’s just reality. Most men willing to fight and die for what they believe in are on the political right. Most of the military, law enforcement, first responders, and tradesmen, jobs that demand discipline, sacrifice, and risk, are overwhelmingly right leaning. The right still embraces traditional masculine virtues such as courage, duty, honor, protection, and the stoic acceptance of pain or death if necessary.
There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but I am speaking in general right now.
Mike Benz has indeed made provocative claims suggesting that Ryan Routh -- the man accused of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump -- was connected to U.S. government entities, possibly as an asset of the State Department or affiliated intelligence networks. In interviews, Benz estimated a “95% likelihood” that Routh was working with or through informal government-linked channels, though he stopped short of naming a specific agency.
However, these claims remain speculative and unverified. No official source -- neither the Department of Justice, the State Department, nor any intelligence agency -- has confirmed that Routh was a government asset. The allegations hinge on circumstantial evidence, such as Routh’s international activities, communications with Ukrainian contacts, and his alleged request for military-grade weapons. Benz and others have pointed to Routh’s history in conflict zones like Ukraine and Haiti as suggestive of deeper ties, but again, this is not substantiated by public records or court filings.
It’s also worth noting that federal prosecutors have classified certain materials in Routh’s case, citing national security concerns. That has fueled speculation, but classification alone doesn’t confirm government affiliation -- it could simply reflect the sensitivity of the investigation.
So while Benz’s theory is dramatic and politically charged, it currently lacks hard evidence.
🧠 Operational Logic Breakdown (why Ryan Routh being a State Department asset is HIGHLY unlikely)...
Asset Vetting: Agencies spend months -- often years -- vetting potential assets for psychological stability, tactical efficiency, and capacity to follow orders under pressure. Routh’s actions, based on publicly available information, don’t reflect any of that.
Probability Modeling: Risk assessment teams rigorously model success/failure rates before greenlighting any action. A high-risk lone actor with erratic behavior would likely be disqualified from any meaningful role, let alone one as explosive as political assassination.
Mission Design: Real operations are layered with contingency plans and buffers. The crude, easily traceable nature of Routh’s alleged actions is the antithesis of covert strategy.
Failure Fallout: For an agency, a failed mission of this kind isn’t just a loss -- it’s a geopolitical catastrophe. That’s not a gamble they take lightly, especially not with someone showing red flags.
So yes, if this were a real black-ops scenario, it would look very different -- quiet, clean, and deniable. Routh’s profile just doesn’t fit. His failure doesn’t prove he wasn’t an asset, but it does make that hypothesis exponentially less credible from an intelligence operations standpoint.
END COPILOT RESPONSE
Do you think that (in your delusions) that the trump administration will prosecute people in the State Department for the donald trump "assassination" attempt? And maybe they will find out that Joe Biden himself (or Jill Biden) personally signed off on the "assassination"?
Mike Benz has truly revealed himself as a full blown tinfoil hatter. His family should stage an intervention and get him the help he needs. Unless they are in on it. They know he LIES for money and is spinning BS for the gullible maga base.
That's a good thing too. Those attributes keep law and order around to fight off chaos.
Hey asshat, F**k Off.
So, Shaw has always been proud of her city that has always been against tyrants and for diversity, equity, and inclusion. I guess she didn’t mind that it was run by Crooked Politicians, and Dumb Politicians.
Something tells me that when the dust finally settles, we will find out that Ryan Routh got hired by someone in the DNC to assassinate Donald John Trump Sr. God Almighty knew way ahead of time that the Democrats were plotting to steal the 2024 election. Some people think Barack 0bama ordered the hit on Trump. Right now, it's looking like 0bama might become the first US President to go to prison.
Rattrapper aka Mystere: Something tells me...
Copilot: That comment reads less like political analysis and more like a conspiracy spiral wrapped in apocalyptic theater. It's drenched in unfounded speculation, invoking divine foresight, shadowy plots, and historical firsts without offering a shred of credible evidence. The tone -- mixing melodrama with accusatory certainty—is designed less to inform than to provoke and polarize.
This kind of rhetoric thrives in the emotional and imaginative zones of fringe media, where myth-making substitutes for investigation. The casual use of “0bama” (with a zero) is a telltale sign -- it’s often used in spaces that lean into derision or coded mockery, not earnest discourse. [end]
Something tell me that you're a nutjob.
Guilty is as guilty does.
Like Mitt Romney... ;)
Prison? I'm hoping electric chair.
You're saying Mike Benz is guilty of lying? I agree.
Copilot: That reply is deeply disturbing -- not just for its violent tone, but for what it reveals about the emotional volatility surrounding political discourse right now. The accusation of “treason” against Barack Obama, pushed by Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump, has been widely criticized as baseless and inflammatory. Legal experts have pointed out that treason is narrowly defined in the U.S. Constitution and that nothing presented in Gabbard’s report meets that threshold.
Your original comment was grounded in reality: no credible legal authority has found Obama guilty of any crime, let alone one punishable by death. The reply you received -- “electric chair” -- is not just hyperbolic, it’s a chilling example of how political rhetoric can escalate into fantasies of retribution. [end]
Your hopes will 100 percent go unfulfilled. Even if Barack Obama was 100 percent guilty. What he is falsely accused of isn't treason.
Via Copilot...
🔍 In This Hypothetical.
If Obama were proven to have knowingly authorized an assassination attempt on a presidential candidate (like Donald Trump), and it met the criteria for capital murder or terrorism, then yes -- the death penalty could be on the table under federal law.
However, such a case would require extraordinary evidence, survive intense legal scrutiny, and overcome immense political and constitutional hurdles. No precedent exists for prosecuting a former president in this way.
🧩 Real-World Context.
There’s no credible evidence that Obama was involved in any such plot. Ryan Routh, the man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump in 2024, is currently in pre-trial detention and facing multiple federal charges. There’s no indication he was ever a State Department asset or connected to Obama. [end]
As I recall, you claimed that Ryan Routh would be freed. Now he will be proven to be a state department asset and Barack Obama personally signed off on the donald trump "assassination" attempt? You are in desperate need of an intervention staged by your loved ones and some psychiatric care. Don't your family members give a shit about you?
Angry much Nursie PooPoo?
Your fart machine keeps spewing out diarrhea, Dervy.
Hey asshat, F**k Off.
Did you listen to the Tucker Carlson interview about the Oklahoma City bombing? Did you know that John Doe #2 in that case was never identified, but that 3 "possible" John Doe #2 'suspects' were Epsteined in prison. And you probabl;y though that political opponents of Putin were the only ones assassinated in prison...
Routh will be "Oswalded" before trial.
No, Routh was a Contractor to a Government Contractor... not an asset. Asset has a specific meaning that Co-Pilot is following. Epstein was not an asset either (using the specific meaning of the term). So the liar is you, not Benz.
In other words, Routh was an asset in the General sense of the term, but not the specific government defined use of it.
...and there's where the "plausible deniability" of intelligence operations enters in.
"Why DoJ Just Classified the Evidence in the Ryan Routh [fake] Trump Assassination Attempt"...
Because it's a trump doj coverup. Which makes me wonder what they are covering up. That Routh was the 2nd orchestrated fake assassination attempt? We already know it was fake, due to him not coming anywhere close to donald trump. I'm thinking it's possible that donald trump ordered up a second fake assassination attempt, but this time didn't want the shooter to be anywhere near him. Because another "bullet wound" would be over the top. And not disclosing the details of an injury (as he did the first time) would be too risky.
Minus: Routh will be "Oswalded" before trial.
Because he'll give up who hired him to do a fake assassination and that person will lead back to people associated with donald trump?
Lester only listens to CNN, and Garbage like that
Minus: No, Routh was a Contractor to a Government Contractor... not an asset. Asset has a specific meaning that Co-Pilot is following. Epstein was not an asset either (using the specific meaning of the term). So the liar is you, not Benz.
You think I have inside information and I'm lying about what I know? How do I know these things? In your delusions, I mean. I'm only giving my honest opinion based on publicly available information.
Benz (due to his background) knows how bigly implausible what he suggests is. Therefore he is the liar. Or it could be that he is mentally ill and truly believes the BS he is spewing. But I'm leaning toward him being a liar. Though that doesn't mean both could not be true.
Yes, because the Deep State is "All In" on the Trump Presidency! @@
You mean Leslie, not Lester, right?
Hmmm... no retorts from Nursie PooPoo? Did Leslie's trailer get towed away from the trailer park to a trash dump?
Pam Bondi is secretly not in charge of the DOJ? Who knew? She isn't and can't fire these deep state people who are classifying evidence she doesn't want classified? Why not? I mean, why not -- in your delusions. In reality there would be nothing stopping her. Your "deep state" BS is really getting stale. Especially with trump toadies completely in charge @@
You? Be mistaken? lol!
Yes Derv, your argument makes perfect sense. Trump paid a sniper to pierce his ear from 200 yards... @@
Was Jeff Sessions in charge of DOJ under Trump?
His ear wasn't pierced. No doctor held a press conference and presented the evidence. There was zero evidence presented regarding the true extent of the alleged injuries.
You think he was and still is? Who appointed him the first time? How did he get to be AG again in Turd-2? Your delusions are really wild.
DJT appointed Jeff Sessions as ranking member to the US Senate Judiciary Committee in 1997? Who knew? And Sessions didn't recuse himself in 2017 from the phony Obama Russia-Russia Investigation? He was "in charge" of it? Mueller kept him in-the-loop? Wow.
I have no idea why you're babbling about Jeff Sessions when we were discussing things that are happening currently. Do you know what year it is?
Democrats will soon adopt orange as their official Party colour! :)
You have no idea why you're asking questions about Sessions and complain when you get answers? Why is that not surprising?
CHATbot DERV... yep!
You're ignoring what I wrote because you know I'm right and you have nothing to counter it.
And trump is orange. Democrats will never adopt orange as their official party color, replacing blue.
The "deep state" IS the tRump administration. MAGAts are great at projecting.
Minus: You have no idea why you're asking questions about Sessions and complain when you get answers? Why is that not surprising?
Any questions I asked about Sessions was due to the fact that you (in a total non sequitur) brought him up when we were discussing Pam Bondi. Your lame gaslighting attempt isn't going to convince me that *I* brought him up.
The D0J under Jeff Sessions did not just Classify the evidence in the Ryan Routh trump "assassination attempt" because Jeff Sessions isn't the AG, Pam Bondi is. Why I asked if you know what year it is. It seems the answer is "no".
Copilot: 🔐 On the Routh Case... The DOJ has classified certain evidence in the Ryan Routh case under the Classified Information Procedures Act, citing national security concerns. That decision was upheld by Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, not exactly someone known for opposing Trump’s interests. So again, the “deep state” theory collapses under its own contradictions.
Copilot: 🕵️♀️ As for Jeff Sessions... He was AG from 2017 to 2018, and his recusal from the Russia investigation was one of the earliest fractures in his relationship with Trump. Far from being a “deep state” operator, Sessions was ousted precisely because he didn’t toe the Trump line. So invoking him now as some kind of covert puppet master is not just historically inaccurate -- it’s narratively incoherent.
Post a Comment